Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: Add fsd spi compatible

From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Lee Jones' <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, pankaj.dubey@samsung.com,
	andi@etezian.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsd@tesla.com,
	'Adithya K V' <adithya.kv@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: Add fsd spi compatible
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:01:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yidv5aGB3CljCEWg@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <010901d832fb$212124f0$63636ed0$@samsung.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 830 bytes --]

On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:15:15PM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:

> >There were changes adding the FSD SoC as well as DT stuff IIRC.

> FSD SoC DT changes are already in -next.
> I think this can go with MFD tree because of immutable
> branch between MFD, SPI and DT due for the v5.18 merge windows.
> I am not sure if there are better ways to handle this.

I need the changes that are hard dependencies to actually be in my tree
so my tree is not broken, -next isn't good enough here.  If there are
dependencies for things you're posting you should explicitly say what
they are when you post (not just vauge statements that there are
dependencies), and when you post things that will be dependencies for
other trees it's good to mention this so that people can think about
putting them on a separate branch for easier cross merging.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]