All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
Cc: daniel@ffwll.ch, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dma-buf: cleanup dma_fence_unwrap selftest v2
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 15:16:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yo4sHQUP8IHdt4Kq@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220506141009.18047-1-christian.koenig@amd.com>

On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 04:10:05PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> The selftests, fix the error handling, remove unused functions and stop
> leaking memory in failed tests.
> 
> v2: fix the memory leak correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

I'm still a bit lost on all this (maybe add an explainer why you want to
drop dma_fence_signal() - it's just not necessary for test functionality).

But I think it's at least correct now.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

I've seen you've resent it to get intel-gfx-ci to look at it, so assuming
that's all fine I think it's now all reviewed and ready for merging.
-Daniel
> ---
>  drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c | 48 +++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c
> index 039f016b57be..e20c5a7dcfe4 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c
> @@ -4,27 +4,19 @@
>   * Copyright (C) 2022 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/dma-fence.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-fence-array.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-fence-chain.h>
>  #include <linux/dma-fence-unwrap.h>
> -#if 0
> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> -#include <linux/kthread.h>
> -#include <linux/mm.h>
> -#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
> -#include <linux/slab.h>
> -#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> -#include <linux/random.h>
> -#endif
>  
>  #include "selftest.h"
>  
>  #define CHAIN_SZ (4 << 10)
>  
> -static inline struct mock_fence {
> +struct mock_fence {
>  	struct dma_fence base;
>  	spinlock_t lock;
> -} *to_mock_fence(struct dma_fence *f) {
> -	return container_of(f, struct mock_fence, base);
> -}
> +};
>  
>  static const char *mock_name(struct dma_fence *f)
>  {
> @@ -45,7 +37,8 @@ static struct dma_fence *mock_fence(void)
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&f->lock);
> -	dma_fence_init(&f->base, &mock_ops, &f->lock, 0, 0);
> +	dma_fence_init(&f->base, &mock_ops, &f->lock,
> +		       dma_fence_context_alloc(1), 1);
>  
>  	return &f->base;
>  }
> @@ -59,7 +52,7 @@ static struct dma_fence *mock_array(unsigned int num_fences, ...)
>  
>  	fences = kcalloc(num_fences, sizeof(*fences), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!fences)
> -		return NULL;
> +		goto error_put;
>  
>  	va_start(valist, num_fences);
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_fences; ++i)
> @@ -70,13 +63,17 @@ static struct dma_fence *mock_array(unsigned int num_fences, ...)
>  				       dma_fence_context_alloc(1),
>  				       1, false);
>  	if (!array)
> -		goto cleanup;
> +		goto error_free;
>  	return &array->base;
>  
> -cleanup:
> -	for (i = 0; i < num_fences; ++i)
> -		dma_fence_put(fences[i]);
> +error_free:
>  	kfree(fences);
> +
> +error_put:
> +	va_start(valist, num_fences);
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_fences; ++i)
> +		dma_fence_put(va_arg(valist, typeof(*fences)));
> +	va_end(valist);
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> @@ -113,7 +110,6 @@ static int sanitycheck(void *arg)
>  	if (!chain)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	dma_fence_signal(f);
>  	dma_fence_put(chain);
>  	return err;
>  }
> @@ -154,10 +150,8 @@ static int unwrap_array(void *arg)
>  		err = -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	dma_fence_signal(f1);
> -	dma_fence_signal(f2);
>  	dma_fence_put(array);
> -	return 0;
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  static int unwrap_chain(void *arg)
> @@ -196,10 +190,8 @@ static int unwrap_chain(void *arg)
>  		err = -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	dma_fence_signal(f1);
> -	dma_fence_signal(f2);
>  	dma_fence_put(chain);
> -	return 0;
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  static int unwrap_chain_array(void *arg)
> @@ -242,10 +234,8 @@ static int unwrap_chain_array(void *arg)
>  		err = -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	dma_fence_signal(f1);
> -	dma_fence_signal(f2);
>  	dma_fence_put(chain);
> -	return 0;
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  int dma_fence_unwrap(void)
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dma-buf: cleanup dma_fence_unwrap selftest v2
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 15:16:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yo4sHQUP8IHdt4Kq@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220506141009.18047-1-christian.koenig@amd.com>

On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 04:10:05PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> The selftests, fix the error handling, remove unused functions and stop
> leaking memory in failed tests.
> 
> v2: fix the memory leak correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

I'm still a bit lost on all this (maybe add an explainer why you want to
drop dma_fence_signal() - it's just not necessary for test functionality).

But I think it's at least correct now.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

I've seen you've resent it to get intel-gfx-ci to look at it, so assuming
that's all fine I think it's now all reviewed and ready for merging.
-Daniel
> ---
>  drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c | 48 +++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c
> index 039f016b57be..e20c5a7dcfe4 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c
> @@ -4,27 +4,19 @@
>   * Copyright (C) 2022 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/dma-fence.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-fence-array.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-fence-chain.h>
>  #include <linux/dma-fence-unwrap.h>
> -#if 0
> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> -#include <linux/kthread.h>
> -#include <linux/mm.h>
> -#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
> -#include <linux/slab.h>
> -#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> -#include <linux/random.h>
> -#endif
>  
>  #include "selftest.h"
>  
>  #define CHAIN_SZ (4 << 10)
>  
> -static inline struct mock_fence {
> +struct mock_fence {
>  	struct dma_fence base;
>  	spinlock_t lock;
> -} *to_mock_fence(struct dma_fence *f) {
> -	return container_of(f, struct mock_fence, base);
> -}
> +};
>  
>  static const char *mock_name(struct dma_fence *f)
>  {
> @@ -45,7 +37,8 @@ static struct dma_fence *mock_fence(void)
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&f->lock);
> -	dma_fence_init(&f->base, &mock_ops, &f->lock, 0, 0);
> +	dma_fence_init(&f->base, &mock_ops, &f->lock,
> +		       dma_fence_context_alloc(1), 1);
>  
>  	return &f->base;
>  }
> @@ -59,7 +52,7 @@ static struct dma_fence *mock_array(unsigned int num_fences, ...)
>  
>  	fences = kcalloc(num_fences, sizeof(*fences), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!fences)
> -		return NULL;
> +		goto error_put;
>  
>  	va_start(valist, num_fences);
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_fences; ++i)
> @@ -70,13 +63,17 @@ static struct dma_fence *mock_array(unsigned int num_fences, ...)
>  				       dma_fence_context_alloc(1),
>  				       1, false);
>  	if (!array)
> -		goto cleanup;
> +		goto error_free;
>  	return &array->base;
>  
> -cleanup:
> -	for (i = 0; i < num_fences; ++i)
> -		dma_fence_put(fences[i]);
> +error_free:
>  	kfree(fences);
> +
> +error_put:
> +	va_start(valist, num_fences);
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_fences; ++i)
> +		dma_fence_put(va_arg(valist, typeof(*fences)));
> +	va_end(valist);
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> @@ -113,7 +110,6 @@ static int sanitycheck(void *arg)
>  	if (!chain)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	dma_fence_signal(f);
>  	dma_fence_put(chain);
>  	return err;
>  }
> @@ -154,10 +150,8 @@ static int unwrap_array(void *arg)
>  		err = -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	dma_fence_signal(f1);
> -	dma_fence_signal(f2);
>  	dma_fence_put(array);
> -	return 0;
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  static int unwrap_chain(void *arg)
> @@ -196,10 +190,8 @@ static int unwrap_chain(void *arg)
>  		err = -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	dma_fence_signal(f1);
> -	dma_fence_signal(f2);
>  	dma_fence_put(chain);
> -	return 0;
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  static int unwrap_chain_array(void *arg)
> @@ -242,10 +234,8 @@ static int unwrap_chain_array(void *arg)
>  		err = -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	dma_fence_signal(f1);
> -	dma_fence_signal(f2);
>  	dma_fence_put(chain);
> -	return 0;
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  int dma_fence_unwrap(void)
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-25 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-06 14:10 [PATCH 1/5] dma-buf: cleanup dma_fence_unwrap selftest v2 Christian König
2022-05-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] dma-buf: cleanup dma_fence_unwrap implementation Christian König
2022-05-06 14:10   ` Christian König
2022-05-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] dma-buf: return only unsignaled fences in dma_fence_unwrap_for_each v3 Christian König
2022-05-25 13:13   ` Daniel Vetter
2022-05-25 13:13     ` Daniel Vetter
2022-07-11  9:44   ` Karolina Drobnik
2022-07-11  9:44     ` Karolina Drobnik
2022-07-11  9:57     ` Christian König
2022-07-11  9:57       ` Christian König
2022-07-11 12:17       ` Karolina Drobnik
2022-07-11 12:17         ` Karolina Drobnik
2022-07-11 12:25         ` Christian König
2022-07-11 12:25           ` Christian König
2022-07-11 12:41           ` Karolina Drobnik
2022-07-11 12:41             ` Karolina Drobnik
2022-05-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] dma-buf: generalize dma_fence unwrap & merging v2 Christian König
2022-05-06 14:10   ` Christian König
2022-05-12 14:56   ` [dma] a9290ca07a: BUG:KASAN:slab-out-of-bounds_in__dma_fence_unwrap_merge kernel test robot
2022-05-12 14:56     ` kernel test robot
2022-05-12 14:56     ` kernel test robot
2022-05-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm: use dma_fence_unwrap_merge() in drm_syncobj Christian König
2022-05-06 14:10   ` Christian König
2022-05-06 14:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] dma-buf: cleanup dma_fence_unwrap selftest v2 Christian König
2022-05-12 11:34   ` Christian König
2022-05-25 13:16 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2022-05-25 13:16   ` Daniel Vetter
     [not found] <20220518135844.3338-1-christian.koenig@amd.com>
2022-05-18 13:58 ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yo4sHQUP8IHdt4Kq@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.