All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/ssd130x: Only define a SPI device ID table when built as a module
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 08:10:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YpYv8islaEySOEtg@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220530140246.742469-1-javierm@redhat.com>

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 04:02:46PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The kernel test robot reports a compile warning due the ssd130x_spi_table
> variable being defined but not used. This happen when ssd130x-spi driver
> is built-in instead of being built as a module, i.e:
> 
>   CC      drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x-spi.o
>   AR      drivers/base/firmware_loader/built-in.a
>   AR      drivers/base/built-in.a
>   CC      kernel/trace/trace.o
> drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x-spi.c:155:35: warning: ‘ssd130x_spi_table’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>   155 | static const struct spi_device_id ssd130x_spi_table[] = {
>       |                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> The driver shouldn't need a SPI device ID table and only have an OF device
> ID table, but the former is needed to workaround an issue in the SPI core.
> This always reports a MODALIAS of the form "spi:<device>" even for devices
> registered through Device Trees.
> 
> But the table is only needed when the driver built as a module to populate
> the .ko alias info. It's not needed when the driver is built-in the kernel.
> 
> Fixes: 74373977d2ca ("drm/solomon: Add SSD130x OLED displays SPI support")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>

> ---
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x-spi.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x-spi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x-spi.c
> index 43722adab1f8..07802907e39a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x-spi.c
> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ssd130x_of_match[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ssd130x_of_match);
>  
> +#if IS_MODULE(CONFIG_DRM_SSD130X_SPI)
>  /*
>   * The SPI core always reports a MODALIAS uevent of the form "spi:<dev>", even
>   * if the device was registered via OF. This means that the module will not be
> @@ -160,6 +161,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id ssd130x_spi_table[] = {
>  	{ /* sentinel */ }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, ssd130x_spi_table);
> +#endif
>  
>  static struct spi_driver ssd130x_spi_driver = {
>  	.driver = {
> -- 
> 2.36.1
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/ssd130x: Only define a SPI device ID table when built as a module
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 08:10:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YpYv8islaEySOEtg@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220530140246.742469-1-javierm@redhat.com>

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 04:02:46PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The kernel test robot reports a compile warning due the ssd130x_spi_table
> variable being defined but not used. This happen when ssd130x-spi driver
> is built-in instead of being built as a module, i.e:
> 
>   CC      drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x-spi.o
>   AR      drivers/base/firmware_loader/built-in.a
>   AR      drivers/base/built-in.a
>   CC      kernel/trace/trace.o
> drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x-spi.c:155:35: warning: ‘ssd130x_spi_table’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>   155 | static const struct spi_device_id ssd130x_spi_table[] = {
>       |                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> The driver shouldn't need a SPI device ID table and only have an OF device
> ID table, but the former is needed to workaround an issue in the SPI core.
> This always reports a MODALIAS of the form "spi:<device>" even for devices
> registered through Device Trees.
> 
> But the table is only needed when the driver built as a module to populate
> the .ko alias info. It's not needed when the driver is built-in the kernel.
> 
> Fixes: 74373977d2ca ("drm/solomon: Add SSD130x OLED displays SPI support")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>

> ---
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x-spi.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x-spi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x-spi.c
> index 43722adab1f8..07802907e39a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x-spi.c
> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ssd130x_of_match[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ssd130x_of_match);
>  
> +#if IS_MODULE(CONFIG_DRM_SSD130X_SPI)
>  /*
>   * The SPI core always reports a MODALIAS uevent of the form "spi:<dev>", even
>   * if the device was registered via OF. This means that the module will not be
> @@ -160,6 +161,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id ssd130x_spi_table[] = {
>  	{ /* sentinel */ }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, ssd130x_spi_table);
> +#endif
>  
>  static struct spi_driver ssd130x_spi_driver = {
>  	.driver = {
> -- 
> 2.36.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-31 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-30 14:02 [PATCH] drm/ssd130x: Only define a SPI device ID table when built as a module Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-30 14:02 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-31 15:10 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2022-05-31 15:10   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-06-01 22:38   ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YpYv8islaEySOEtg@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.