From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble memory as ROX
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 13:52:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHja0HOUabUxD5YS@moria.home.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601103050.GT4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:30:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 01:12:56PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> > +static void __init_or_module do_text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len)
> > +{
> > + if (system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> > + text_poke_early(addr, opcode, len);
> > + } else {
> > + mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
> > + text_poke(addr, opcode, len);
> > + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> So I don't much like do_text_poke(); why?
Could you share why?
I think the impementation sucks but conceptually it's the right idea -
create a new temporary mapping to avoid the need for RWX mappings.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble memory as ROX
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 13:52:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHja0HOUabUxD5YS@moria.home.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601103050.GT4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:30:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 01:12:56PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> > +static void __init_or_module do_text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len)
> > +{
> > + if (system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> > + text_poke_early(addr, opcode, len);
> > + } else {
> > + mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
> > + text_poke(addr, opcode, len);
> > + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> So I don't much like do_text_poke(); why?
Could you share why?
I think the impementation sucks but conceptually it's the right idea -
create a new temporary mapping to avoid the need for RWX mappings.
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble memory as ROX
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 13:52:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHja0HOUabUxD5YS@moria.home.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601103050.GT4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:30:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 01:12:56PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> > +static void __init_or_module do_text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len)
> > +{
> > + if (system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> > + text_poke_early(addr, opcode, len);
> > + } else {
> > + mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
> > + text_poke(addr, opcode, len);
> > + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> So I don't much like do_text_poke(); why?
Could you share why?
I think the impementation sucks but conceptually it's the right idea -
create a new temporary mapping to avoid the need for RWX mappings.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble memory as ROX
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 13:52:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHja0HOUabUxD5YS@moria.home.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601103050.GT4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:30:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 01:12:56PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> > +static void __init_or_module do_text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len)
> > +{
> > + if (system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> > + text_poke_early(addr, opcode, len);
> > + } else {
> > + mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
> > + text_poke(addr, opcode, len);
> > + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> So I don't much like do_text_poke(); why?
Could you share why?
I think the impementation sucks but conceptually it's the right idea -
create a new temporary mapping to avoid the need for RWX mappings.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 220+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-01 10:12 [PATCH 00/13] mm: jit/text allocator Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 01/13] nios2: define virtual address space for modules Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-13 22:16 ` Dinh Nguyen
2023-06-13 22:16 ` Dinh Nguyen
2023-06-13 22:16 ` Dinh Nguyen
2023-06-13 22:16 ` Dinh Nguyen
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 02/13] mm: introduce jit_text_alloc() and use it instead of module_alloc() Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 03/13] mm/jitalloc, arch: convert simple overrides of module_alloc to jitalloc Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 04/13] mm/jitalloc, arch: convert remaining " Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 22:35 ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 22:35 ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 22:35 ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 22:35 ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 05/13] module, jitalloc: drop module_alloc Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 06/13] mm/jitalloc: introduce jit_data_alloc() Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86/ftrace: enable dynamic ftrace without CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 08/13] arch: make jitalloc setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 09/13] kprobes: remove dependcy on CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 10/13] modules, jitalloc: prepare to allocate executable memory as ROX Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 11/13] ftrace: Add swap_func to ftrace_process_locs() Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble memory as ROX Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 11:07 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 11:07 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 11:07 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 11:07 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-02 0:02 ` Song Liu
2023-06-02 0:02 ` Song Liu
2023-06-02 0:02 ` Song Liu
2023-06-02 0:02 ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 17:52 ` Kent Overstreet [this message]
2023-06-01 17:52 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 17:52 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 17:52 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 16:54 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 16:54 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 16:54 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 16:54 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 18:00 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:00 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:00 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:00 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:13 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 18:13 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 18:13 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 18:13 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 18:38 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:38 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:38 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:38 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 20:50 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 20:50 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 20:50 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 20:50 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 23:54 ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-01 23:54 ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-01 23:54 ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-01 23:54 ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-05 2:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-06-05 2:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-06-05 2:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-06-05 2:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-06-05 8:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 8:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 8:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 8:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 16:10 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 16:10 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 16:10 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 16:10 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 20:42 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 20:42 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 20:42 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 20:42 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 21:01 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 21:01 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 21:01 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 21:01 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 21:11 ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-05 21:11 ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-05 21:11 ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-05 21:11 ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-04 21:47 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 21:47 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 21:47 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 21:47 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 22:49 ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 22:49 ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 22:49 ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 22:49 ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/jitalloc: make memory allocated for code ROX Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 16:12 ` [PATCH 00/13] mm: jit/text allocator Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 16:12 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 16:12 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 16:12 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 18:14 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:14 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:14 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:14 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-02 9:35 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-02 9:35 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-02 9:35 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-02 9:35 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-02 18:20 ` Song Liu
2023-06-02 18:20 ` Song Liu
2023-06-02 18:20 ` Song Liu
2023-06-02 18:20 ` Song Liu
2023-06-03 21:11 ` Puranjay Mohan
2023-06-03 21:11 ` Puranjay Mohan
2023-06-03 21:11 ` Puranjay Mohan
2023-06-03 21:11 ` Puranjay Mohan
2023-06-04 18:02 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 18:02 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 18:02 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 18:02 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 21:22 ` Song Liu
2023-06-04 21:22 ` Song Liu
2023-06-04 21:22 ` Song Liu
2023-06-04 21:22 ` Song Liu
2023-06-04 21:40 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 21:40 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 21:40 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 21:40 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-05 4:05 ` Song Liu
2023-06-05 4:05 ` Song Liu
2023-06-05 4:05 ` Song Liu
2023-06-05 4:05 ` Song Liu
2023-06-05 9:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 9:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 9:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 9:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 10:09 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-05 10:09 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-05 10:09 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-05 10:09 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-06 10:16 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-06 10:16 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-06 10:16 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-06 10:16 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-06 18:21 ` Song Liu
2023-06-06 18:21 ` Song Liu
2023-06-06 18:21 ` Song Liu
2023-06-06 18:21 ` Song Liu
2023-06-08 18:41 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-08 18:41 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-08 18:41 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-08 18:41 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-09 17:02 ` Song Liu
2023-06-09 17:02 ` Song Liu
2023-06-09 17:02 ` Song Liu
2023-06-09 17:02 ` Song Liu
2023-06-12 21:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-12 21:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-12 21:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-12 21:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-13 18:56 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-13 18:56 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-13 18:56 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-13 18:56 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-13 21:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-13 21:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-13 21:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-13 21:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-20 8:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-20 8:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-20 8:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-20 8:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 21:13 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-05 21:13 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-05 21:13 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-05 21:13 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-02 0:36 ` Song Liu
2023-06-02 0:36 ` Song Liu
2023-06-02 0:36 ` Song Liu
2023-06-02 0:36 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZHja0HOUabUxD5YS@moria.home.lan \
--to=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.