All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] lib/vsprintf: Sort headers alphabetically
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 16:31:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNEASXq6SNS5oIu1@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230805175027.50029-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

On Sat 2023-08-05 20:50:25, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Sorting headers alphabetically helps locating duplicates, and
> make it easier to figure out where to insert new headers.

I agree that includes become a mess after some time. But I am
not persuaded that sorting them alphabetically in random source
files help anything.

Is this part of some grand plan for the entire kernel, please?
Is this outcome from some particular discussion?
Will this become a well know rule checked by checkpatch.pl?

I am personally not going to reject patches because of wrongly
sorted headers unless there is some real plan behind it.

I agree that it might look better. An inverse Christmas' tree
also looks better. But it does not mean that it makes the life
easier. The important things are still hidden in the details
(every single line).

From my POV, this patch would just create a mess in the git
history and complicate backporting.

I am sorry but I will not accept this patch unless there
is a wide consensus that this makes sense.

Best Regards,
Petr

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-07 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-05 17:50 [PATCH v2 0/3] lib/vsprintf: Rework header inclusions Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-05 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] lib/vsprintf: Sort headers alphabetically Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-07 14:31   ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2023-08-07 14:53     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2023-08-07 15:00       ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-07 14:58     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-07 19:47       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2023-08-14 15:33         ` Petr Mladek
2023-08-05 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] lib/vsprintf: Split out sprintf() and friends Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-05 18:43   ` Andrew Morton
2023-08-05 21:31     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-08 12:55     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-07 15:03   ` Petr Mladek
2023-08-07 15:09     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-07 15:11       ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-07 15:13         ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-08  6:41           ` Petr Mladek
2023-08-08 12:47             ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-10  8:15               ` Petr Mladek
2023-08-10  9:09                 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2023-08-10 13:17                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-10 14:17                     ` Rasmus Villemoes
2023-08-11 19:28                       ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-14 11:16                         ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-14 15:16                   ` Petr Mladek
2023-08-15  9:58                   ` David Laight
2023-08-09  8:48             ` David Laight
2023-08-10 13:13               ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-14  8:12                 ` David Laight
2023-08-14 12:28                   ` 'Andy Shevchenko'
2023-08-08  2:24       ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-08 12:49         ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-07 19:31     ` Rasmus Villemoes
2023-08-08 11:17       ` David Laight
2023-08-05 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] lib/vsprintf: Declare no_hash_pointers in sprintf.h Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-07  6:00   ` Marco Elver
2023-08-07 15:06   ` Petr Mladek
2023-08-07 15:27     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-14 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] lib/vsprintf: Rework header inclusions Petr Mladek
2023-08-14 16:11   ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZNEASXq6SNS5oIu1@alley \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.