Re: [PATCH net-next 10/10] net: fill in MODULE_DESCRIPTION()s for PCS Layer

From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>,
	Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"open list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/10] net: fill in MODULE_DESCRIPTION()s for PCS Layer
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 03:48:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZ6D+AylYTNDW9F9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf825e28-cceb-49e1-9880-7971cc955b2c@lunn.ch>

On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 08:21:03PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 10:16:10AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > W=1 builds now warn if module is built without a MODULE_DESCRIPTION().
> > Add descriptions to the LynxI PCS MediaTek's SoC.
> 
> Does pcs-lynx.c also have this issue? It can be built at a module.

Absolutely. I can see the warning in pcs-lynx and pcs-pts.

WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/net/pcs/pcs_xpcs.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/net/pcs/pcs-lynx.o