From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Don't defer TLB invalidation when zapping table entries Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:14:33 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ZgL0ae7AffPUw4CS@linux.dev> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20240326161000.GA9723@willie-the-truck> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 04:10:01PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > @@ -1163,7 +1168,7 @@ static int stage2_unmap_walker(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx, > > kvm_granule_size(ctx->level)); > > > > if (childp) > > - mm_ops->put_page(childp); > > + mm_ops->free_unlinked_table(childp, ctx->level); > > Hmm, but doesn't the deferred TLBI still happen after the RCU critical > section? Right... We'd need to change that too :) Although I suppose table invalidations are relatively infrequent when compared to leaf invalidations. > I also think I found another bug, so I'll send a v2 with an extra patch... And I'm sure there's plenty more to be found too, heh. -- Thanks, Oliver
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Don't defer TLB invalidation when zapping table entries Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:14:33 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ZgL0ae7AffPUw4CS@linux.dev> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20240326161000.GA9723@willie-the-truck> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 04:10:01PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > @@ -1163,7 +1168,7 @@ static int stage2_unmap_walker(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx, > > kvm_granule_size(ctx->level)); > > > > if (childp) > > - mm_ops->put_page(childp); > > + mm_ops->free_unlinked_table(childp, ctx->level); > > Hmm, but doesn't the deferred TLBI still happen after the RCU critical > section? Right... We'd need to change that too :) Although I suppose table invalidations are relatively infrequent when compared to leaf invalidations. > I also think I found another bug, so I'll send a v2 with an extra patch... And I'm sure there's plenty more to be found too, heh. -- Thanks, Oliver _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-26 16:14 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-03-25 18:51 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: arm64: TLBI fixes for the pgtable code Will Deacon 2024-03-25 18:51 ` Will Deacon 2024-03-25 18:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Don't defer TLB invalidation when zapping table entries Will Deacon 2024-03-25 18:51 ` Will Deacon 2024-03-26 8:34 ` Oliver Upton 2024-03-26 8:34 ` Oliver Upton 2024-03-26 14:31 ` Oliver Upton 2024-03-26 14:31 ` Oliver Upton 2024-03-26 16:10 ` Will Deacon 2024-03-26 16:10 ` Will Deacon 2024-03-26 16:14 ` Oliver Upton [this message] 2024-03-26 16:14 ` Oliver Upton 2024-03-25 18:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Don't pass a TLBI level hint " Will Deacon 2024-03-25 18:51 ` Will Deacon 2024-03-26 8:37 ` Oliver Upton 2024-03-26 8:37 ` Oliver Upton 2024-03-26 9:34 ` Will Deacon 2024-03-26 9:34 ` Will Deacon 2024-03-26 13:12 ` Oliver Upton 2024-03-26 13:12 ` Oliver Upton 2024-03-25 18:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: Use TLBI_TTL_UNKNOWN in __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range() Will Deacon 2024-03-25 18:51 ` Will Deacon 2024-03-26 13:48 ` Ryan Roberts 2024-03-26 13:48 ` Ryan Roberts 2024-03-27 12:45 ` Will Deacon 2024-03-27 12:45 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ZgL0ae7AffPUw4CS@linux.dev \ --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=gshan@redhat.com \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=qperret@google.com \ --cc=rananta@google.com \ --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \ --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \ --cc=smostafa@google.com \ --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.