From: "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>,
Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>,
Salil Akerkar <Salil.Akerkar@arm.com>,
Basant Kumar Dwivedi <Basant.KumarDwivedi@arm.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH v1 19/38] arm64/sme: Implement vector length configuration prctl()s
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:32:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a033745b-c5d0-d56a-bf0a-95b93f7f4bab@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211001124014.GB5080@sirena.org.uk>
On 10/1/2021 8:40 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 01:20:12PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
>> config: arc-randconfig-r043-20210930 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
>
> I suspect you're reporting architectures in alphabetical order - can I
> suggest making a priority list of widely used architectures? I know I
> tend to zone out issues which look like they only occur on less actively
> maintained architectures as some of them have odd architecture specific
> issues that really need to be fixed at the architecture level.
>
>
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your advice, we run the tests on different architectures
randomly for now, and we'll consider a priority list of widely used
architectures.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>,
Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>,
Salil Akerkar <Salil.Akerkar@arm.com>,
Basant Kumar Dwivedi <Basant.KumarDwivedi@arm.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH v1 19/38] arm64/sme: Implement vector length configuration prctl()s
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:32:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a033745b-c5d0-d56a-bf0a-95b93f7f4bab@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211001124014.GB5080@sirena.org.uk>
On 10/1/2021 8:40 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 01:20:12PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
>> config: arc-randconfig-r043-20210930 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
>
> I suspect you're reporting architectures in alphabetical order - can I
> suggest making a priority list of widely used architectures? I know I
> tend to zone out issues which look like they only occur on less actively
> maintained architectures as some of them have odd architecture specific
> issues that really need to be fixed at the architecture level.
>
>
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your advice, we run the tests on different architectures
randomly for now, and we'll consider a priority list of widely used
architectures.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chen, Rong A <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 19/38] arm64/sme: Implement vector length configuration prctl()s
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 09:32:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a033745b-c5d0-d56a-bf0a-95b93f7f4bab@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211001124014.GB5080@sirena.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 800 bytes --]
On 10/1/2021 8:40 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 01:20:12PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
>> config: arc-randconfig-r043-20210930 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
>
> I suspect you're reporting architectures in alphabetical order - can I
> suggest making a priority list of widely used architectures? I know I
> tend to zone out issues which look like they only occur on less actively
> maintained architectures as some of them have odd architecture specific
> issues that really need to be fixed at the architecture level.
>
>
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your advice, we run the tests on different architectures
randomly for now, and we'll consider a priority list of widely used
architectures.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-08 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 143+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-30 18:11 [PATCH v1 00/38] arm64/sme: Initial support for the Scalable Matrix Extension Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 01/38] arm64/fp: Reindent fpsimd_save() Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 9:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-11 9:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-11 13:02 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 13:02 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 02/38] arm64/sve: Remove sve_load_from_fpsimd_state() Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 03/38] arm64/sve: Make access to FFR optional Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 04/38] arm64/sve: Rename find_supported_vector_length() Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 05/38] arm64/sve: Use accessor functions for vector lengths in thread_struct Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 06/38] arm64/sve: Put system wide vector length information into structs Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-01 3:13 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-01 3:13 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-01 3:13 ` kernel test robot
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 07/38] arm64/sve: Explicitly load vector length when restoring SVE state Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 08/38] arm64/sve: Track vector lengths for tasks in an array Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 10:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-11 10:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-11 13:14 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 13:14 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 13:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-11 13:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 09/38] arm64/sve: Make sysctl interface for SVE reusable by SME Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 10/38] arm64/sve: Generalise vector length configuration prctl() for SME Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 10:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-11 10:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-11 13:18 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 13:18 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 11/38] selftests: arm64: Parameterise ptrace vector length information Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 12/38] arm64/sme: Provide ABI documentation for SME Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-08 14:11 ` Alan Hayward
2021-10-08 14:11 ` Alan Hayward
2021-10-08 15:28 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-08 15:28 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-08 16:45 ` Alan Hayward
2021-10-08 16:45 ` Alan Hayward
2021-10-08 17:04 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-08 17:04 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 11:15 ` Alan Hayward
2021-10-11 11:15 ` Alan Hayward
2021-10-11 11:48 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 11:48 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 11:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-11 11:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-11 13:20 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 13:20 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 13:17 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-11 13:17 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-11 13:23 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 13:23 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 14:19 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-11 14:19 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-11 20:10 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 20:10 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-12 8:23 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-12 8:23 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-13 18:37 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-13 18:37 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-14 9:57 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-14 9:57 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 13/38] arm64/sme: System register and exception syndrome definitions Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 14/38] arm64/sme: Define macros for manually encoding SME instructions Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 15/38] arm64/sme: Early CPU setup for SME Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 16/38] arm64/sme: Basic enumeration support Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 17/38] arm64/sme: Identify supported SME vector lengths at boot Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 18/38] arm64/sme: Implement sysctl to set the default vector length Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 19/38] arm64/sme: Implement vector length configuration prctl()s Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-01 5:20 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-01 5:20 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-01 5:20 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-01 12:40 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-01 12:40 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-01 12:40 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-08 1:32 ` Chen, Rong A [this message]
2021-10-08 1:32 ` Chen, Rong A
2021-10-08 1:32 ` [kbuild-all] " Chen, Rong A
2021-10-01 16:38 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-01 16:38 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-01 16:38 ` kernel test robot
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 20/38] arm64/sme: Implement support for TPIDR2 Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 21/38] arm64/sme: Implement SVCR context switching Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 12:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-11 12:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 22/38] arm64/sme: Implement streaming SVE " Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 23/38] arm64/sme: Implement ZA " Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 12:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-11 12:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 24/38] arm64/sme: Implement traps and syscall handling for SME Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-11 12:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-11 12:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 25/38] arm64/sme: Implement streaming SVE signal handling Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 26/38] arm64/sme: Implement ZA " Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 27/38] arm64/sme: Implement ptrace support for streaming mode SVE registers Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 28/38] arm64/sme: Add ptrace support for ZA Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 29/38] arm64/sme: Disable streaming mode and ZA when flushing CPU state Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 30/38] arm64/sme: Save and restore streaming mode over EFI runtime calls Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 31/38] arm64/sme: Provide Kconfig for SME Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 32/38] kselftest/arm64: Add tests for TPIDR2 Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 33/38] kselftest/arm64: Extend vector configuration API tests to cover SME Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 34/38] kselftest/arm64: sme: Provide streaming mode SVE stress test Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 35/38] kselftest/arm64: Add stress test for SME ZA context switching Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 36/38] kselftest/arm64: signal: Add SME signal handling tests Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 37/38] selftests: arm64: Add streaming SVE to SVE ptrace tests Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v1 38/38] selftests: arm64: Add coverage for the ZA ptrace interface Mark Brown
2021-09-30 18:11 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a033745b-c5d0-d56a-bf0a-95b93f7f4bab@intel.com \
--to=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=Basant.KumarDwivedi@arm.com \
--cc=Salil.Akerkar@arm.com \
--cc=alan.hayward@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.