All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	peterz@infradead.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	joao.m.martins@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/23] device-dax: Kill dax_kmem_res
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:06:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3ad70a2-77a8-d50e-f372-731a8e27c03b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159643100485.4062302.976628339798536960.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>

On 03.08.20 07:03, Dan Williams wrote:
> Several related issues around this unneeded attribute:
> 
> - The dax_kmem_res property allows the kmem driver to stash the adjusted
>   resource range that was used for the hotplug operation, but that can be
>   recalculated from the original base range.
> 
> - kmem is using an open coded release_resource() + kfree() when an
>   idiomatic release_mem_region() is sufficient.
> 
> - The driver managed resource need only manage the busy flag. Other flags
>   are of no concern to the kmem driver. In fact if kmem inherits some
>   memory range that add_memory_driver_managed() rejects that is a
>   memory-hotplug-core policy that the driver is in no position to
>   override.
> 
> - The implementation trusts that failed remove_memory() results in the
>   entire resource range remaining pinned busy. The driver need not make
>   that layering violation assumption and just maintain the busy state in
>   its local resource.
> 
> - The "Hot-remove not yet implemented." comment is stale since hotremove
>   support is now included.

I think some of these changes could have been nicely split out to
simplify reviewing. E.g., comment update, release_mem_region(),  &=
~IORESOURCE_BUSY ...

[...]

> +
>  int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct dev_dax *dev_dax = to_dev_dax(dev);
> -	struct range *range = &dev_dax->range;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_start;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_size;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_end;
> -	struct resource *new_res;
> -	const char *new_res_name;
> -	int numa_node;
> +	struct range range = dax_kmem_range(dev_dax);
> +	int numa_node = dev_dax->target_node;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	char *res_name;
>  	int rc;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -37,109 +45,94 @@ int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct device *dev)
>  	 * could be mixed in a node with faster memory, causing
>  	 * unavoidable performance issues.
>  	 */
> -	numa_node = dev_dax->target_node;
>  	if (numa_node < 0) {
>  		dev_warn(dev, "rejecting DAX region with invalid node: %d\n",
>  				numa_node);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Hotplug starting at the beginning of the next block: */
> -	kmem_start = ALIGN(range->start, memory_block_size_bytes());
> -
> -	kmem_size = range_len(range);
> -	/* Adjust the size down to compensate for moving up kmem_start: */
> -	kmem_size -= kmem_start - range->start;
> -	/* Align the size down to cover only complete blocks: */
> -	kmem_size &= ~(memory_block_size_bytes() - 1);
> -	kmem_end = kmem_start + kmem_size;
> -
> -	new_res_name = kstrdup(dev_name(dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!new_res_name)
> +	res_name = kstrdup(dev_name(dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!res_name)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	/* Region is permanently reserved if hotremove fails. */
> -	new_res = request_mem_region(kmem_start, kmem_size, new_res_name);
> -	if (!new_res) {
> -		dev_warn(dev, "could not reserve region [%pa-%pa]\n",
> -			 &kmem_start, &kmem_end);
> -		kfree(new_res_name);
> +	res = request_mem_region(range.start, range_len(&range), res_name);

I think our range could be empty after aligning. I assume
request_mem_region() would check that, but maybe we could report a
better error/warning in that case.

> +	if (!res) {
> +		dev_warn(dev, "could not reserve region [%#llx-%#llx]\n",
> +				range.start, range.end);
> +		kfree(res_name);
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Set flags appropriate for System RAM.  Leave ..._BUSY clear
> -	 * so that add_memory() can add a child resource.  Do not
> -	 * inherit flags from the parent since it may set new flags
> -	 * unknown to us that will break add_memory() below.
> +	 * Temporarily clear busy to allow add_memory_driver_managed()
> +	 * to claim it.
>  	 */
> -	new_res->flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM;
> +	res->flags &= ~IORESOURCE_BUSY;

Right, same approach is taken by virtio-mem.

>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Ensure that future kexec'd kernels will not treat this as RAM
>  	 * automatically.
>  	 */
> -	rc = add_memory_driver_managed(numa_node, new_res->start,
> -				       resource_size(new_res), kmem_name);
> +	rc = add_memory_driver_managed(numa_node, res->start,
> +				       resource_size(res), kmem_name);
> +
> +	res->flags |= IORESOURCE_BUSY;

Hm, I don't think that's correct. Any specific reason why to mark the
not-added, unaligned parts BUSY? E.g., walk_system_ram_range() could
suddenly stumble over it - and e.g., similarly kexec code when trying to
find memory for placing kexec images. I think we should leave this
!BUSY, just as it is right now.

>  	if (rc) {
> -		release_resource(new_res);
> -		kfree(new_res);
> -		kfree(new_res_name);
> +		release_mem_region(range.start, range_len(&range));
> +		kfree(res_name);
>  		return rc;
>  	}
> -	dev_dax->dax_kmem_res = new_res;
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(dev, res_name);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> -static int dev_dax_kmem_remove(struct device *dev)
> +static void dax_kmem_release(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
>  {
> -	struct dev_dax *dev_dax = to_dev_dax(dev);
> -	struct resource *res = dev_dax->dax_kmem_res;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_start = res->start;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_size = resource_size(res);
> -	const char *res_name = res->name;
>  	int rc;
> +	struct device *dev = &dev_dax->dev;
> +	const char *res_name = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct range range = dax_kmem_range(dev_dax);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We have one shot for removing memory, if some memory blocks were not
>  	 * offline prior to calling this function remove_memory() will fail, and
>  	 * there is no way to hotremove this memory until reboot because device
> -	 * unbind will succeed even if we return failure.
> +	 * unbind will proceed regardless of the remove_memory result.
>  	 */
> -	rc = remove_memory(dev_dax->target_node, kmem_start, kmem_size);
> -	if (rc) {
> -		any_hotremove_failed = true;
> -		dev_err(dev,
> -			"DAX region %pR cannot be hotremoved until the next reboot\n",
> -			res);
> -		return rc;
> +	rc = remove_memory(dev_dax->target_node, range.start, range_len(&range));
> +	if (rc == 0) {

if (!rc) ?

> +		release_mem_region(range.start, range_len(&range));

remove_memory() does a release_mem_region_adjustable(). Don't you
actually want to release the *unaligned* region you requested?

> +		dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
> +		kfree(res_name);
> +		return;
>  	}

Not sure if inverting the error handling improved the code / review here.
>  
> -	/* Release and free dax resources */
> -	release_resource(res);
> -	kfree(res);
> -	kfree(res_name);
> -	dev_dax->dax_kmem_res = NULL;
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	any_hotremove_failed = true;
> +	dev_err(dev, "%#llx-%#llx cannot be hotremoved until the next reboot\n",
> +			range.start, range.end);
>  }
>  #else
> -static int dev_dax_kmem_remove(struct device *dev)
> +static void dax_kmem_release(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
>  {
>  	/*
> -	 * Without hotremove purposely leak the request_mem_region() for the
> -	 * device-dax range and return '0' to ->remove() attempts. The removal
> -	 * of the device from the driver always succeeds, but the region is
> -	 * permanently pinned as reserved by the unreleased
> -	 * request_mem_region().
> +	 * Without hotremove purposely leak the request_mem_region() for
> +	 * the device-dax range attempts. The removal of the device from
> +	 * the driver always succeeds, but the region is permanently
> +	 * pinned as reserved by the unreleased request_mem_region().
>  	 */
>  	any_hotremove_failed = true;
> -	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
>  
> +static int dev_dax_kmem_remove(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	dax_kmem_release(to_dev_dax(dev));
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static struct dax_device_driver device_dax_kmem_driver = {
>  	.drv = {
>  		.probe = dev_dax_kmem_probe,
> 

Maybe split some of these changes out. Would at least help me to review ;)

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	peterz@infradead.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	joao.m.martins@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/23] device-dax: Kill dax_kmem_res
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:06:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3ad70a2-77a8-d50e-f372-731a8e27c03b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159643100485.4062302.976628339798536960.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>

On 03.08.20 07:03, Dan Williams wrote:
> Several related issues around this unneeded attribute:
> 
> - The dax_kmem_res property allows the kmem driver to stash the adjusted
>   resource range that was used for the hotplug operation, but that can be
>   recalculated from the original base range.
> 
> - kmem is using an open coded release_resource() + kfree() when an
>   idiomatic release_mem_region() is sufficient.
> 
> - The driver managed resource need only manage the busy flag. Other flags
>   are of no concern to the kmem driver. In fact if kmem inherits some
>   memory range that add_memory_driver_managed() rejects that is a
>   memory-hotplug-core policy that the driver is in no position to
>   override.
> 
> - The implementation trusts that failed remove_memory() results in the
>   entire resource range remaining pinned busy. The driver need not make
>   that layering violation assumption and just maintain the busy state in
>   its local resource.
> 
> - The "Hot-remove not yet implemented." comment is stale since hotremove
>   support is now included.

I think some of these changes could have been nicely split out to
simplify reviewing. E.g., comment update, release_mem_region(),  &=
~IORESOURCE_BUSY ...

[...]

> +
>  int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct dev_dax *dev_dax = to_dev_dax(dev);
> -	struct range *range = &dev_dax->range;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_start;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_size;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_end;
> -	struct resource *new_res;
> -	const char *new_res_name;
> -	int numa_node;
> +	struct range range = dax_kmem_range(dev_dax);
> +	int numa_node = dev_dax->target_node;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	char *res_name;
>  	int rc;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -37,109 +45,94 @@ int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct device *dev)
>  	 * could be mixed in a node with faster memory, causing
>  	 * unavoidable performance issues.
>  	 */
> -	numa_node = dev_dax->target_node;
>  	if (numa_node < 0) {
>  		dev_warn(dev, "rejecting DAX region with invalid node: %d\n",
>  				numa_node);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Hotplug starting at the beginning of the next block: */
> -	kmem_start = ALIGN(range->start, memory_block_size_bytes());
> -
> -	kmem_size = range_len(range);
> -	/* Adjust the size down to compensate for moving up kmem_start: */
> -	kmem_size -= kmem_start - range->start;
> -	/* Align the size down to cover only complete blocks: */
> -	kmem_size &= ~(memory_block_size_bytes() - 1);
> -	kmem_end = kmem_start + kmem_size;
> -
> -	new_res_name = kstrdup(dev_name(dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!new_res_name)
> +	res_name = kstrdup(dev_name(dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!res_name)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	/* Region is permanently reserved if hotremove fails. */
> -	new_res = request_mem_region(kmem_start, kmem_size, new_res_name);
> -	if (!new_res) {
> -		dev_warn(dev, "could not reserve region [%pa-%pa]\n",
> -			 &kmem_start, &kmem_end);
> -		kfree(new_res_name);
> +	res = request_mem_region(range.start, range_len(&range), res_name);

I think our range could be empty after aligning. I assume
request_mem_region() would check that, but maybe we could report a
better error/warning in that case.

> +	if (!res) {
> +		dev_warn(dev, "could not reserve region [%#llx-%#llx]\n",
> +				range.start, range.end);
> +		kfree(res_name);
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Set flags appropriate for System RAM.  Leave ..._BUSY clear
> -	 * so that add_memory() can add a child resource.  Do not
> -	 * inherit flags from the parent since it may set new flags
> -	 * unknown to us that will break add_memory() below.
> +	 * Temporarily clear busy to allow add_memory_driver_managed()
> +	 * to claim it.
>  	 */
> -	new_res->flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM;
> +	res->flags &= ~IORESOURCE_BUSY;

Right, same approach is taken by virtio-mem.

>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Ensure that future kexec'd kernels will not treat this as RAM
>  	 * automatically.
>  	 */
> -	rc = add_memory_driver_managed(numa_node, new_res->start,
> -				       resource_size(new_res), kmem_name);
> +	rc = add_memory_driver_managed(numa_node, res->start,
> +				       resource_size(res), kmem_name);
> +
> +	res->flags |= IORESOURCE_BUSY;

Hm, I don't think that's correct. Any specific reason why to mark the
not-added, unaligned parts BUSY? E.g., walk_system_ram_range() could
suddenly stumble over it - and e.g., similarly kexec code when trying to
find memory for placing kexec images. I think we should leave this
!BUSY, just as it is right now.

>  	if (rc) {
> -		release_resource(new_res);
> -		kfree(new_res);
> -		kfree(new_res_name);
> +		release_mem_region(range.start, range_len(&range));
> +		kfree(res_name);
>  		return rc;
>  	}
> -	dev_dax->dax_kmem_res = new_res;
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(dev, res_name);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> -static int dev_dax_kmem_remove(struct device *dev)
> +static void dax_kmem_release(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
>  {
> -	struct dev_dax *dev_dax = to_dev_dax(dev);
> -	struct resource *res = dev_dax->dax_kmem_res;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_start = res->start;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_size = resource_size(res);
> -	const char *res_name = res->name;
>  	int rc;
> +	struct device *dev = &dev_dax->dev;
> +	const char *res_name = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct range range = dax_kmem_range(dev_dax);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We have one shot for removing memory, if some memory blocks were not
>  	 * offline prior to calling this function remove_memory() will fail, and
>  	 * there is no way to hotremove this memory until reboot because device
> -	 * unbind will succeed even if we return failure.
> +	 * unbind will proceed regardless of the remove_memory result.
>  	 */
> -	rc = remove_memory(dev_dax->target_node, kmem_start, kmem_size);
> -	if (rc) {
> -		any_hotremove_failed = true;
> -		dev_err(dev,
> -			"DAX region %pR cannot be hotremoved until the next reboot\n",
> -			res);
> -		return rc;
> +	rc = remove_memory(dev_dax->target_node, range.start, range_len(&range));
> +	if (rc == 0) {

if (!rc) ?

> +		release_mem_region(range.start, range_len(&range));

remove_memory() does a release_mem_region_adjustable(). Don't you
actually want to release the *unaligned* region you requested?

> +		dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
> +		kfree(res_name);
> +		return;
>  	}

Not sure if inverting the error handling improved the code / review here.
>  
> -	/* Release and free dax resources */
> -	release_resource(res);
> -	kfree(res);
> -	kfree(res_name);
> -	dev_dax->dax_kmem_res = NULL;
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	any_hotremove_failed = true;
> +	dev_err(dev, "%#llx-%#llx cannot be hotremoved until the next reboot\n",
> +			range.start, range.end);
>  }
>  #else
> -static int dev_dax_kmem_remove(struct device *dev)
> +static void dax_kmem_release(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
>  {
>  	/*
> -	 * Without hotremove purposely leak the request_mem_region() for the
> -	 * device-dax range and return '0' to ->remove() attempts. The removal
> -	 * of the device from the driver always succeeds, but the region is
> -	 * permanently pinned as reserved by the unreleased
> -	 * request_mem_region().
> +	 * Without hotremove purposely leak the request_mem_region() for
> +	 * the device-dax range attempts. The removal of the device from
> +	 * the driver always succeeds, but the region is permanently
> +	 * pinned as reserved by the unreleased request_mem_region().
>  	 */
>  	any_hotremove_failed = true;
> -	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
>  
> +static int dev_dax_kmem_remove(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	dax_kmem_release(to_dev_dax(dev));
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static struct dax_device_driver device_dax_kmem_driver = {
>  	.drv = {
>  		.probe = dev_dax_kmem_probe,
> 

Maybe split some of these changes out. Would at least help me to review ;)

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/23] device-dax: Kill dax_kmem_res
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:06:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3ad70a2-77a8-d50e-f372-731a8e27c03b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159643100485.4062302.976628339798536960.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>

On 03.08.20 07:03, Dan Williams wrote:
> Several related issues around this unneeded attribute:
> 
> - The dax_kmem_res property allows the kmem driver to stash the adjusted
>   resource range that was used for the hotplug operation, but that can be
>   recalculated from the original base range.
> 
> - kmem is using an open coded release_resource() + kfree() when an
>   idiomatic release_mem_region() is sufficient.
> 
> - The driver managed resource need only manage the busy flag. Other flags
>   are of no concern to the kmem driver. In fact if kmem inherits some
>   memory range that add_memory_driver_managed() rejects that is a
>   memory-hotplug-core policy that the driver is in no position to
>   override.
> 
> - The implementation trusts that failed remove_memory() results in the
>   entire resource range remaining pinned busy. The driver need not make
>   that layering violation assumption and just maintain the busy state in
>   its local resource.
> 
> - The "Hot-remove not yet implemented." comment is stale since hotremove
>   support is now included.

I think some of these changes could have been nicely split out to
simplify reviewing. E.g., comment update, release_mem_region(),  &=
~IORESOURCE_BUSY ...

[...]

> +
>  int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct dev_dax *dev_dax = to_dev_dax(dev);
> -	struct range *range = &dev_dax->range;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_start;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_size;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_end;
> -	struct resource *new_res;
> -	const char *new_res_name;
> -	int numa_node;
> +	struct range range = dax_kmem_range(dev_dax);
> +	int numa_node = dev_dax->target_node;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	char *res_name;
>  	int rc;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -37,109 +45,94 @@ int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct device *dev)
>  	 * could be mixed in a node with faster memory, causing
>  	 * unavoidable performance issues.
>  	 */
> -	numa_node = dev_dax->target_node;
>  	if (numa_node < 0) {
>  		dev_warn(dev, "rejecting DAX region with invalid node: %d\n",
>  				numa_node);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Hotplug starting at the beginning of the next block: */
> -	kmem_start = ALIGN(range->start, memory_block_size_bytes());
> -
> -	kmem_size = range_len(range);
> -	/* Adjust the size down to compensate for moving up kmem_start: */
> -	kmem_size -= kmem_start - range->start;
> -	/* Align the size down to cover only complete blocks: */
> -	kmem_size &= ~(memory_block_size_bytes() - 1);
> -	kmem_end = kmem_start + kmem_size;
> -
> -	new_res_name = kstrdup(dev_name(dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!new_res_name)
> +	res_name = kstrdup(dev_name(dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!res_name)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	/* Region is permanently reserved if hotremove fails. */
> -	new_res = request_mem_region(kmem_start, kmem_size, new_res_name);
> -	if (!new_res) {
> -		dev_warn(dev, "could not reserve region [%pa-%pa]\n",
> -			 &kmem_start, &kmem_end);
> -		kfree(new_res_name);
> +	res = request_mem_region(range.start, range_len(&range), res_name);

I think our range could be empty after aligning. I assume
request_mem_region() would check that, but maybe we could report a
better error/warning in that case.

> +	if (!res) {
> +		dev_warn(dev, "could not reserve region [%#llx-%#llx]\n",
> +				range.start, range.end);
> +		kfree(res_name);
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Set flags appropriate for System RAM.  Leave ..._BUSY clear
> -	 * so that add_memory() can add a child resource.  Do not
> -	 * inherit flags from the parent since it may set new flags
> -	 * unknown to us that will break add_memory() below.
> +	 * Temporarily clear busy to allow add_memory_driver_managed()
> +	 * to claim it.
>  	 */
> -	new_res->flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM;
> +	res->flags &= ~IORESOURCE_BUSY;

Right, same approach is taken by virtio-mem.

>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Ensure that future kexec'd kernels will not treat this as RAM
>  	 * automatically.
>  	 */
> -	rc = add_memory_driver_managed(numa_node, new_res->start,
> -				       resource_size(new_res), kmem_name);
> +	rc = add_memory_driver_managed(numa_node, res->start,
> +				       resource_size(res), kmem_name);
> +
> +	res->flags |= IORESOURCE_BUSY;

Hm, I don't think that's correct. Any specific reason why to mark the
not-added, unaligned parts BUSY? E.g., walk_system_ram_range() could
suddenly stumble over it - and e.g., similarly kexec code when trying to
find memory for placing kexec images. I think we should leave this
!BUSY, just as it is right now.

>  	if (rc) {
> -		release_resource(new_res);
> -		kfree(new_res);
> -		kfree(new_res_name);
> +		release_mem_region(range.start, range_len(&range));
> +		kfree(res_name);
>  		return rc;
>  	}
> -	dev_dax->dax_kmem_res = new_res;
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(dev, res_name);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> -static int dev_dax_kmem_remove(struct device *dev)
> +static void dax_kmem_release(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
>  {
> -	struct dev_dax *dev_dax = to_dev_dax(dev);
> -	struct resource *res = dev_dax->dax_kmem_res;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_start = res->start;
> -	resource_size_t kmem_size = resource_size(res);
> -	const char *res_name = res->name;
>  	int rc;
> +	struct device *dev = &dev_dax->dev;
> +	const char *res_name = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct range range = dax_kmem_range(dev_dax);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We have one shot for removing memory, if some memory blocks were not
>  	 * offline prior to calling this function remove_memory() will fail, and
>  	 * there is no way to hotremove this memory until reboot because device
> -	 * unbind will succeed even if we return failure.
> +	 * unbind will proceed regardless of the remove_memory result.
>  	 */
> -	rc = remove_memory(dev_dax->target_node, kmem_start, kmem_size);
> -	if (rc) {
> -		any_hotremove_failed = true;
> -		dev_err(dev,
> -			"DAX region %pR cannot be hotremoved until the next reboot\n",
> -			res);
> -		return rc;
> +	rc = remove_memory(dev_dax->target_node, range.start, range_len(&range));
> +	if (rc == 0) {

if (!rc) ?

> +		release_mem_region(range.start, range_len(&range));

remove_memory() does a release_mem_region_adjustable(). Don't you
actually want to release the *unaligned* region you requested?

> +		dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
> +		kfree(res_name);
> +		return;
>  	}

Not sure if inverting the error handling improved the code / review here.
>  
> -	/* Release and free dax resources */
> -	release_resource(res);
> -	kfree(res);
> -	kfree(res_name);
> -	dev_dax->dax_kmem_res = NULL;
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	any_hotremove_failed = true;
> +	dev_err(dev, "%#llx-%#llx cannot be hotremoved until the next reboot\n",
> +			range.start, range.end);
>  }
>  #else
> -static int dev_dax_kmem_remove(struct device *dev)
> +static void dax_kmem_release(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
>  {
>  	/*
> -	 * Without hotremove purposely leak the request_mem_region() for the
> -	 * device-dax range and return '0' to ->remove() attempts. The removal
> -	 * of the device from the driver always succeeds, but the region is
> -	 * permanently pinned as reserved by the unreleased
> -	 * request_mem_region().
> +	 * Without hotremove purposely leak the request_mem_region() for
> +	 * the device-dax range attempts. The removal of the device from
> +	 * the driver always succeeds, but the region is permanently
> +	 * pinned as reserved by the unreleased request_mem_region().
>  	 */
>  	any_hotremove_failed = true;
> -	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
>  
> +static int dev_dax_kmem_remove(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	dax_kmem_release(to_dev_dax(dev));
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static struct dax_device_driver device_dax_kmem_driver = {
>  	.drv = {
>  		.probe = dev_dax_kmem_probe,
> 

Maybe split some of these changes out. Would at least help me to review ;)

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-21 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 174+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-03  5:02 [PATCH v4 00/23] device-dax: Support sub-dividing soft-reserved ranges Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02 ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02 ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] x86/numa: Cleanup configuration dependent command-line options Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] x86/numa: Add 'nohmat' option Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] efi/fake_mem: Arrange for a resource entry per efi_fake_mem instance Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] ACPI: HMAT: Refactor hmat_register_target_device to hmem_register_device Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] resource: Report parent to walk_iomem_res_desc() callback Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] mm/memory_hotplug: Introduce default phys_to_target_node() implementation Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:02   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] ACPI: HMAT: Attach a device for each soft-reserved range Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] device-dax: Drop the dax_region.pfn_flags attribute Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] device-dax: Move instance creation parameters to 'struct dev_dax_data' Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] device-dax: Make pgmap optional for instance creation Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] device-dax: Kill dax_kmem_res Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-21 10:06   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-08-21 10:06     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 10:06     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-08 15:33     ` Joao Martins
2020-09-08 15:33       ` Joao Martins
2020-09-08 15:33       ` Joao Martins
2020-09-08 18:03       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-08 18:03         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-08 18:03         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-23  8:04       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-23  8:04         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-23  8:04         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-23 21:41         ` Dan Williams
2020-09-23 21:41           ` Dan Williams
2020-09-23 21:41           ` Dan Williams
2020-09-23 21:41           ` Dan Williams
2020-09-24  7:25           ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-24  7:25             ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-24  7:25             ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-24  7:25             ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-24 13:54             ` Dan Williams
2020-09-24 13:54               ` Dan Williams
2020-09-24 13:54               ` Dan Williams
2020-09-24 13:54               ` Dan Williams
2020-09-24 18:12               ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-24 18:12                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-24 18:12                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-24 18:12                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-24 21:26                 ` Dan Williams
2020-09-24 21:26                   ` Dan Williams
2020-09-24 21:26                   ` Dan Williams
2020-09-24 21:26                   ` Dan Williams
2020-09-24 21:41                   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-24 21:41                     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-24 21:41                     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-24 21:41                     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-24 21:50                     ` Dan Williams
2020-09-24 21:50                       ` Dan Williams
2020-09-24 21:50                       ` Dan Williams
2020-09-24 21:50                       ` Dan Williams
2020-09-25  8:54                       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-25  8:54                         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-25  8:54                         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-25  8:54                         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-03  5:03 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] device-dax: Add an allocation interface for device-dax instances Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] device-dax: Introduce 'seed' devices Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] drivers/base: Make device_find_child_by_name() compatible with sysfs inputs Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] device-dax: Add resize support Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-21 22:56   ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-21 22:56     ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-21 22:56     ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-03  5:03 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] mm/memremap_pages: Convert to 'struct range' Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] mm/memremap_pages: Support multiple ranges per invocation Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:03   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] device-dax: Add dis-contiguous resource support Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] device-dax: Introduce 'mapping' devices Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] device-dax: Make align a per-device property Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] device-dax: Add an 'align' attribute Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] dax/hmem: Introduce dax_hmem.region_idle parameter Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] device-dax: Add a range mapping allocation attribute Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  5:04   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-03  7:47 ` [PATCH v4 00/23] device-dax: Support sub-dividing soft-reserved ranges David Hildenbrand
2020-08-03  7:47   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-03  7:47   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-20  1:53   ` Dan Williams
2020-08-20  1:53     ` Dan Williams
2020-08-20  1:53     ` Dan Williams
2020-08-20  1:53     ` Dan Williams
2020-08-21 10:15     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 10:15       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 10:15       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 10:15       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 18:27       ` Dan Williams
2020-08-21 18:27         ` Dan Williams
2020-08-21 18:27         ` Dan Williams
2020-08-21 18:27         ` Dan Williams
2020-08-21 18:30         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 18:30           ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 18:30           ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 18:30           ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:17           ` Dan Williams
2020-08-21 21:17             ` Dan Williams
2020-08-21 21:17             ` Dan Williams
2020-08-21 21:17             ` Dan Williams
2020-08-21 21:33             ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:33               ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:33               ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:33               ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:42               ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:42                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:42                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:42                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:43               ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:43                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:43                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:43                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:46               ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:46                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:46                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 21:46                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-21 23:21     ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-21 23:21       ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-21 23:21       ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-21 23:21       ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-22  2:32       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2020-08-22  2:32         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2020-08-22  2:32         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2020-08-22  2:32         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2020-09-08 10:45       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-08 10:45         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-08 10:45         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-08 10:45         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-23  0:43         ` Dan Williams
2020-09-23  0:43           ` Dan Williams
2020-09-23  0:43           ` Dan Williams
2020-09-23  0:43           ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a3ad70a2-77a8-d50e-f372-731a8e27c03b@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.