Re: [Autotest] [AUTOTEST] [PATCH 1/2] Add latest LTP test in autotest

From: sudhir kumar <smalikphy@gmail.com>
To: dlaor@redhat.com
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>,
	Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>,
	Autotest mailing list <autotest@test.kernel.org>,
	Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <mrodrigu@redhat.com>,
	Uri Lublin <uril@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Autotest] [AUTOTEST] [PATCH 1/2] Add latest LTP test in autotest
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:00:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a50cf5ab0907080230m759ef168qafa4090d0dc320b4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A54660C.6090509@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Dor Laor<dlaor@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/08/2009 07:40 AM, Martin Bligh wrote:
>>>
>>> ATM I will suggest to merge the patches in and let get tested so that
>>> we can collect failures/breakages if any.
>>
>> I am not keen on causing regressions, which we've risked doing every
>> time we change LTP. I think we at least need to get a run on a
>> non-virtualized
>> machine with some recent kernel, and exclude the tests that fail every
>> time.
>
> We can use the reported results (impressive) as a base.
> When more regressions are introduced, we can chop more tests

Sure, soon will send the revised patch. Thanks everyone for your thoughts!!
>


-- 
Sudhir Kumar