All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	avri.altman@wdc.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
	beanhuo@micron.com, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com,
	peter.wang@mediatek.com, chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com,
	andy.teng@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: add required delay after gating reference clock
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:35:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8cd5beee0a1e12a40da752c6cd9b5de@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56c1fc80919491d058d904fcc7301835@codeaurora.org>

Hi Stanely,

On 2020-02-17 21:42, Can Guo wrote:
> On 2020-02-17 21:34, Stanley Chu wrote:
>> Hi Can,
>> 
>> On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 21:22 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
>>> On 2020-02-17 21:12, Stanley Chu wrote:
>>> > Hi Can,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> >  			} else if (!on && clki->enabled) {
>>> >> >  				clk_disable_unprepare(clki->clk);
>>> >> > +				wait_us = hba->dev_info.clk_gating_wait_us;
>>> >> > +				if (ref_clk && wait_us)
>>> >> > +					usleep_range(wait_us, wait_us + 10);
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi St,anley,
>>> >>
>>> >> If wait_us is 1us, it would be inappropriate to use usleep_range()
>>> >> here.
>>> >> You have checks of the delay in patch #2, but why it is not needed
>>> >> here?
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Can Guo.
>>> >
>>> > You are right. I could make that delay checking as common function so
>>> > it
>>> > can be used here as well to cover all possible values.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for suggestion.
>>> > Stanley
>>> 
>>> Hi Stanley,
>>> 
>>> One more thing, as in patch #2, you have already added delays in your
>>> ufshcd_vops_setup_clocks(OFF, PRE_CHANGE) path, plus this delay here,
>>> don't you delay for 2*bRefClkGatingWaitTime in ufshcd_setup_clocks()?
>>> As the delay added in your vops also delays the actions of turning
>>> off all the other clocks in ufshcd_setup_clocks(), you don't need the
>>> delay here again, do you agree?
>> 
>> MediaTek driver is not using reference clocks named as "ref_clk" 
>> defined
>> in device tree, thus the delay specific for "ref_clk" in
>> ufshcd_setup_clocks() will not be applied in MediaTek platform.
>> 
>> This patch is aimed to add delay for this kind of "ref_clk" used by 
>> any
>> future vendors.
>> 
>> Anyway thanks for the reminding : )
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Can Guo.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Stanley
> 
> Hi Stanley,
> 
> Then we are unluckily hit by this change. We have ref_clk in DT, thus
> this change would add unwanted delays to our platforms. but still we
> disable device's ref_clk in vops. :)
> 
> Could you please hold on patch #1 first? I need sometime to have a
> dicussion with my colleagues on this.
> 
> Thanks.
> Can Guo.

Since we all need this delay here, how about put the delay in the
entrence of ufshcd_setup_clocks(), before vops_setup_clocks()?
If so, we can remove all the delays we added in our vops since the
delay anyways delays everything inside ufshcd_setup_clocks().

Meanwhile, if you want to modify the delay
(hba->dev_info.clk_gating_wait_us) for some reasons, say for specific
UFS devices, you still can do it in vops_apply_dev_quirks().

What do you say?

Thanks,
Can Guo.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	andy.teng@mediatek.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
	chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avri.altman@wdc.com,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, peter.wang@mediatek.com,
	alim.akhtar@samsung.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	asutoshd@codeaurora.org, bvanassche@acm.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, beanhuo@micron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: add required delay after gating reference clock
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:35:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8cd5beee0a1e12a40da752c6cd9b5de@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56c1fc80919491d058d904fcc7301835@codeaurora.org>

Hi Stanely,

On 2020-02-17 21:42, Can Guo wrote:
> On 2020-02-17 21:34, Stanley Chu wrote:
>> Hi Can,
>> 
>> On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 21:22 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
>>> On 2020-02-17 21:12, Stanley Chu wrote:
>>> > Hi Can,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> >  			} else if (!on && clki->enabled) {
>>> >> >  				clk_disable_unprepare(clki->clk);
>>> >> > +				wait_us = hba->dev_info.clk_gating_wait_us;
>>> >> > +				if (ref_clk && wait_us)
>>> >> > +					usleep_range(wait_us, wait_us + 10);
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi St,anley,
>>> >>
>>> >> If wait_us is 1us, it would be inappropriate to use usleep_range()
>>> >> here.
>>> >> You have checks of the delay in patch #2, but why it is not needed
>>> >> here?
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Can Guo.
>>> >
>>> > You are right. I could make that delay checking as common function so
>>> > it
>>> > can be used here as well to cover all possible values.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for suggestion.
>>> > Stanley
>>> 
>>> Hi Stanley,
>>> 
>>> One more thing, as in patch #2, you have already added delays in your
>>> ufshcd_vops_setup_clocks(OFF, PRE_CHANGE) path, plus this delay here,
>>> don't you delay for 2*bRefClkGatingWaitTime in ufshcd_setup_clocks()?
>>> As the delay added in your vops also delays the actions of turning
>>> off all the other clocks in ufshcd_setup_clocks(), you don't need the
>>> delay here again, do you agree?
>> 
>> MediaTek driver is not using reference clocks named as "ref_clk" 
>> defined
>> in device tree, thus the delay specific for "ref_clk" in
>> ufshcd_setup_clocks() will not be applied in MediaTek platform.
>> 
>> This patch is aimed to add delay for this kind of "ref_clk" used by 
>> any
>> future vendors.
>> 
>> Anyway thanks for the reminding : )
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Can Guo.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Stanley
> 
> Hi Stanley,
> 
> Then we are unluckily hit by this change. We have ref_clk in DT, thus
> this change would add unwanted delays to our platforms. but still we
> disable device's ref_clk in vops. :)
> 
> Could you please hold on patch #1 first? I need sometime to have a
> dicussion with my colleagues on this.
> 
> Thanks.
> Can Guo.

Since we all need this delay here, how about put the delay in the
entrence of ufshcd_setup_clocks(), before vops_setup_clocks()?
If so, we can remove all the delays we added in our vops since the
delay anyways delays everything inside ufshcd_setup_clocks().

Meanwhile, if you want to modify the delay
(hba->dev_info.clk_gating_wait_us) for some reasons, say for specific
UFS devices, you still can do it in vops_apply_dev_quirks().

What do you say?

Thanks,
Can Guo.

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	andy.teng@mediatek.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
	chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avri.altman@wdc.com,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, peter.wang@mediatek.com,
	alim.akhtar@samsung.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	asutoshd@codeaurora.org, bvanassche@acm.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, beanhuo@micron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: add required delay after gating reference clock
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:35:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8cd5beee0a1e12a40da752c6cd9b5de@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56c1fc80919491d058d904fcc7301835@codeaurora.org>

Hi Stanely,

On 2020-02-17 21:42, Can Guo wrote:
> On 2020-02-17 21:34, Stanley Chu wrote:
>> Hi Can,
>> 
>> On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 21:22 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
>>> On 2020-02-17 21:12, Stanley Chu wrote:
>>> > Hi Can,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> >  			} else if (!on && clki->enabled) {
>>> >> >  				clk_disable_unprepare(clki->clk);
>>> >> > +				wait_us = hba->dev_info.clk_gating_wait_us;
>>> >> > +				if (ref_clk && wait_us)
>>> >> > +					usleep_range(wait_us, wait_us + 10);
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi St,anley,
>>> >>
>>> >> If wait_us is 1us, it would be inappropriate to use usleep_range()
>>> >> here.
>>> >> You have checks of the delay in patch #2, but why it is not needed
>>> >> here?
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Can Guo.
>>> >
>>> > You are right. I could make that delay checking as common function so
>>> > it
>>> > can be used here as well to cover all possible values.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for suggestion.
>>> > Stanley
>>> 
>>> Hi Stanley,
>>> 
>>> One more thing, as in patch #2, you have already added delays in your
>>> ufshcd_vops_setup_clocks(OFF, PRE_CHANGE) path, plus this delay here,
>>> don't you delay for 2*bRefClkGatingWaitTime in ufshcd_setup_clocks()?
>>> As the delay added in your vops also delays the actions of turning
>>> off all the other clocks in ufshcd_setup_clocks(), you don't need the
>>> delay here again, do you agree?
>> 
>> MediaTek driver is not using reference clocks named as "ref_clk" 
>> defined
>> in device tree, thus the delay specific for "ref_clk" in
>> ufshcd_setup_clocks() will not be applied in MediaTek platform.
>> 
>> This patch is aimed to add delay for this kind of "ref_clk" used by 
>> any
>> future vendors.
>> 
>> Anyway thanks for the reminding : )
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Can Guo.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Stanley
> 
> Hi Stanley,
> 
> Then we are unluckily hit by this change. We have ref_clk in DT, thus
> this change would add unwanted delays to our platforms. but still we
> disable device's ref_clk in vops. :)
> 
> Could you please hold on patch #1 first? I need sometime to have a
> dicussion with my colleagues on this.
> 
> Thanks.
> Can Guo.

Since we all need this delay here, how about put the delay in the
entrence of ufshcd_setup_clocks(), before vops_setup_clocks()?
If so, we can remove all the delays we added in our vops since the
delay anyways delays everything inside ufshcd_setup_clocks().

Meanwhile, if you want to modify the delay
(hba->dev_info.clk_gating_wait_us) for some reasons, say for specific
UFS devices, you still can do it in vops_apply_dev_quirks().

What do you say?

Thanks,
Can Guo.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-19  2:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-17  9:35 [PATCH v1 0/2] scsi: ufs: fix waiting time for reference clock Stanley Chu
2020-02-17  9:35 ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-17  9:35 ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-17  9:35 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: add required delay after gating " Stanley Chu
2020-02-17  9:35   ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-17  9:35   ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-17 12:58   ` Can Guo
2020-02-17 12:58     ` Can Guo
2020-02-17 12:58     ` Can Guo
2020-02-17 13:12     ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-17 13:12       ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-17 13:12       ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-17 13:22       ` Can Guo
2020-02-17 13:22         ` Can Guo
2020-02-17 13:22         ` Can Guo
2020-02-17 13:34         ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-17 13:34           ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-17 13:34           ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-17 13:42           ` Can Guo
2020-02-17 13:42             ` Can Guo
2020-02-17 13:42             ` Can Guo
2020-02-19  2:35             ` Can Guo [this message]
2020-02-19  2:35               ` Can Guo
2020-02-19  2:35               ` Can Guo
2020-02-19  9:11               ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-19  9:11                 ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-19  9:11                 ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-19 10:33                 ` Can Guo
2020-02-19 10:33                   ` Can Guo
2020-02-19 10:33                   ` Can Guo
2020-02-20 13:30                   ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-20 13:30                     ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-20 13:30                     ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-17 16:17   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-02-17 16:17     ` Bart Van Assche
2020-02-17 16:17     ` Bart Van Assche
2020-02-18  0:50     ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-18  0:50       ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-18  0:50       ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-17  9:35 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: add waiting time for " Stanley Chu
2020-02-17  9:35   ` Stanley Chu
2020-02-17  9:35   ` Stanley Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a8cd5beee0a1e12a40da752c6cd9b5de@codeaurora.org \
    --to=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=andy.teng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuohong.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.