acpica-devel.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI: NUMA: Remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA Kconfig
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI: NUMA: Remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA Kconfig Haibo Xu
@ 2024-03-07  8:44   ` Arnd Bergmann
  2024-03-07  9:19     ` Haibo Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2024-03-07  8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Haibo Xu
  Cc: Alison Schofield, Jisheng Zhang, Rafael J . Wysocki, Dave Hansen,
	Björn Töpel, Conor.Dooley, guoren, Zong Li,
	James Morse, linux-riscv, Ard Biesheuvel, Baoquan He,
	acpica-devel, Robert Moore, linux-acpi, Sami Tolvanen,
	Greentime Hu, Dan Williams, Len Brown, Albert Ou,
	Alexandre Ghiti, Charlie Jenkins, Chen Jiahao, Yuntao Wang,
	Paul Walmsley, Clément Léger, Haibo Xu, Anup Patel,
	Tony Luck, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel, Samuel Holland,
	Evan Green, Palmer Dabbelt, Andrew Jones

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 09:47, Haibo Xu wrote:
> x86/arm64/loongarch would select ACPI_NUMA by default and riscv
> would do the same thing, so the dependency is no longer needed
> since these are the four architectures that support ACPI.
>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Suggested-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> index 849c2bd820b9..2bf47ad1ec9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
>  config ACPI_NUMA
>  	bool "NUMA support"
>  	depends on NUMA
> -	depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH)
>  	default y if ARM64

Can we remove the prompt as well and make this a
hidden option? I think this is now always selected
when it can be used anyway.

If we make it

      def_bool NUMA && !X86

then the select statements except for the X86_64_ACPI_NUMA
can also go away.

      Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 0/6] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V
@ 2024-03-07  8:47 Haibo Xu
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ACPICA: SRAT: Add RISC-V RINTC affinity structure Haibo Xu
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Haibo Xu @ 2024-03-07  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: xiaobo55x, ajones, sunilvl, Haibo Xu, Paul Walmsley,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown,
	Robert Moore, Conor Dooley, Guo Ren, Björn Töpel,
	Alexandre Ghiti, Greentime Hu, Baoquan He, Evan Green, Zong Li,
	Sami Tolvanen, Jisheng Zhang, Clément Léger,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chen Jiahao, Arnd Bergmann, James Morse,
	Samuel Holland, Anup Patel, Ard Biesheuvel, Tony Luck,
	Yuntao Wang, Dan Williams, Dave Hansen, Alison Schofield,
	linux-riscv, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, acpica-devel

This patch series enable RISC-V ACPI NUMA support which was based on
the recently approved ACPI ECR[1].

Patch 1/6 is generated from the acpica PR[2] and should be merged through
the acpica project. Due to this dependency, other 5 patches can only be
merged after the corresponding ACPICA patch was pulled into linux.

Patch 2/6 add RISC-V specific acpi_numa.c file to parse NUMA information
from SRAT and SLIT ACPI tables.
Patch 3/6 add the common SRAT RINTC affinity structure handler.
Patch 4/6 remove the '#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH)' condition to make some NUMA
related parse functions common for all current architectures that support
ACPI_NUMA
Patch 5/6 remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA Kconfig which was no
longer needed since all the current architectures that support ACPI would
select ACPI_NUMA by default.
Patch 6/6 add corresponding ACPI_NUMA config for RISC-V Kconfig.

Based-on: https://github.com/linux-riscv/linux-riscv/tree/for-next

[1] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YTdDx2IPm5IeZjAW932EYU-tUtgS08tX/view?usp=sharing
[2] https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/926

Testing:
Since the ACPI AIA/PLIC support patch set is still under upstream review,
hence it is tested using the poll based HVC SBI console and RAM disk.
1) Build latest Qemu with the following patch backported
   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240129094200.3581037-1-haibo1.xu@intel.com/
   https://github.com/vlsunil/qemu/commit/42bd4eeefd5d4410a68f02d54fee406d8a1269b0

2) Build latest EDK-II
   https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt/README.md

3) Build Linux with the following configs enabled
   CONFIG_RISCV_SBI_V01=y
   CONFIG_SERIAL_EARLYCON_RISCV_SBI=y
   CONFIG_HVC_RISCV_SBI=y
   CONFIG_NUMA=y
   CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA=y

4) Build buildroot rootfs.cpio

5) Launch the Qemu machine
   qemu-system-riscv64 -nographic \
   -machine virt,pflash0=pflash0,pflash1=pflash1 -smp 4 -m 8G \
   -blockdev node-name=pflash0,driver=file,read-only=on,filename=RISCV_VIRT_CODE.fd \
   -blockdev node-name=pflash1,driver=file,filename=RISCV_VIRT_VARS.fd \
   -object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m0 \
   -object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m1 \
   -numa node,memdev=m0,cpus=0-1,nodeid=0 \
   -numa node,memdev=m1,cpus=2-3,nodeid=1 \
   -numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=30 \
   -kernel linux/arch/riscv/boot/Image \
   -initrd buildroot/output/images/rootfs.cpio \
   -append "root=/dev/ram ro console=hvc0 earlycon=sbi"

[    0.000000] ACPI: SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x80000000-0x17fffffff]
[    0.000000] ACPI: SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x180000000-0x27fffffff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x17fe3bc40-0x17fe3cfff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x27fff4c40-0x27fff5fff]
...
[    0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 0 -> HARTID 0x0 -> Node 0
[    0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 0 -> HARTID 0x1 -> Node 0
[    0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 1 -> HARTID 0x2 -> Node 1
[    0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 1 -> HARTID 0x3 -> Node 1

---
Changes since v1
  - Switch the order of patch 2/4 and 3/4 - Per Sunil's suggestion
  - Add a new patch 4/6 to make some NUMA related parse functions common
    for all the architectures that support ACPI NUMA - Per Sunil's suggestion
  - Add a new patch 5/6 to remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA
    Kconfig since all the current architectures that support ACPI
    would select ACPI_NUMA by default - Per Arnd and Sunil's suggestion
  - Other minor fix for code format - Per Sunil's comments

Haibo Xu (6):
  ACPICA: SRAT: Add RISC-V RINTC affinity structure
  ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
  ACPI: NUMA: Add handler for SRAT RINTC affinity structure
  ACPI: NUMA: Make some NUMA related parse functions common
  ACPI: NUMA: Remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA Kconfig
  ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA

 arch/riscv/Kconfig            |   1 +
 arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h |  15 +++-
 arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile    |   1 +
 arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c      |   5 --
 arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c     |   4 +-
 arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c   |   2 -
 drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig     |   1 -
 drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c      |  40 ++++++++---
 include/acpi/actbl3.h         |  18 ++++-
 include/linux/acpi.h          |   6 ++
 11 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c

-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/6] ACPICA: SRAT: Add RISC-V RINTC affinity structure
  2024-03-07  8:47 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V Haibo Xu
@ 2024-03-07  8:47 ` Haibo Xu
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT Haibo Xu
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Haibo Xu @ 2024-03-07  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: xiaobo55x, ajones, sunilvl, Haibo Xu, Paul Walmsley,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown,
	Robert Moore, Conor Dooley, Guo Ren, Anup Patel, Greentime Hu,
	Alexandre Ghiti, Sami Tolvanen, Zong Li, Jisheng Zhang,
	Baoquan He, Clément Léger, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	Chen Jiahao, Arnd Bergmann, James Morse, Evan Green,
	Samuel Holland, Marc Zyngier, Ard Biesheuvel, Tony Luck,
	Yuntao Wang, Dan Williams, Alison Schofield, Dave Hansen,
	linux-riscv, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, acpica-devel

ACPICA commit 93caddbf2f620769052c59ec471f018281dc3a24

Add definition of RISC-V Interrupt Controller(RINTC)
affinity structure which was approved by UEFI forum
and will be part of next ACPI spec version(6.6).

Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/93caddbf
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
---
 include/acpi/actbl3.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/acpi/actbl3.h b/include/acpi/actbl3.h
index c080d579a546..5202e3fc9b41 100644
--- a/include/acpi/actbl3.h
+++ b/include/acpi/actbl3.h
@@ -192,7 +192,8 @@ enum acpi_srat_type {
 	ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GIC_ITS_AFFINITY = 4,	/* ACPI 6.2 */
 	ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GENERIC_AFFINITY = 5,	/* ACPI 6.3 */
 	ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GENERIC_PORT_AFFINITY = 6,	/* ACPI 6.4 */
-	ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_RESERVED = 7	/* 7 and greater are reserved */
+	ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_RINTC_AFFINITY = 7,	/* ACPI 6.6 */
+	ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_RESERVED = 8	/* 8 and greater are reserved */
 };
 
 /*
@@ -296,6 +297,21 @@ struct acpi_srat_generic_affinity {
 #define ACPI_SRAT_GENERIC_AFFINITY_ENABLED     (1)	/* 00: Use affinity structure */
 #define ACPI_SRAT_ARCHITECTURAL_TRANSACTIONS   (1<<1)	/* ACPI 6.4 */
 
+/* 7: RINTC Affinity (ACPI 6.6) */
+
+struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity {
+	struct acpi_subtable_header header;
+	u16 reserved;           /* Reserved, must be zero */
+	u32 proximity_domain;
+	u32 acpi_processor_uid;
+	u32 flags;
+	u32 clock_domain;
+};
+
+/* Flags for struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity */
+
+#define ACPI_SRAT_RINTC_ENABLED     (1)	/* 00: Use affinity structure */
+
 /*******************************************************************************
  *
  * STAO - Status Override Table (_STA override) - ACPI 6.0
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
  2024-03-07  8:47 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V Haibo Xu
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ACPICA: SRAT: Add RISC-V RINTC affinity structure Haibo Xu
@ 2024-03-07  8:47 ` Haibo Xu
  2024-04-01  7:06   ` Sunil V L
  2024-04-02  9:31   ` Alexandre Ghiti
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] ACPI: NUMA: Add handler for SRAT RINTC affinity structure Haibo Xu
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 2 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Haibo Xu @ 2024-03-07  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: xiaobo55x, ajones, sunilvl, Haibo Xu, Paul Walmsley,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown,
	Robert Moore, Conor Dooley, Guo Ren, Alexandre Ghiti,
	Greentime Hu, Jisheng Zhang, Baoquan He, Sami Tolvanen, Zong Li,
	Clément Léger, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chen Jiahao,
	Arnd Bergmann, James Morse, Russell King (Oracle),
	Evan Green, Samuel Holland, Marc Zyngier, Anup Patel,
	Ard Biesheuvel, Tony Luck, Yuntao Wang, Dave Hansen,
	Alison Schofield, Dan Williams, linux-riscv, linux-kernel,
	linux-acpi, acpica-devel

Add acpi_numa.c file to enable parse NUMA information from
ACPI SRAT and SLIT tables. SRAT table provide CPUs(Hart) and
memory nodes to proximity domain mapping, while SLIT table
provide the distance metrics between proximity domains.

Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h |  15 +++-
 arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile    |   1 +
 arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c      |   5 --
 arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c     |   4 +-
 arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c   |   2 -
 include/linux/acpi.h          |   6 ++
 7 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
index 7dad0cf9d701..e0a1f84404f3 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -61,11 +61,14 @@ static inline void arch_fix_phys_package_id(int num, u32 slot) { }
 
 void acpi_init_rintc_map(void);
 struct acpi_madt_rintc *acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(int cpu);
-u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu);
+static inline u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+	return acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(cpu)->uid;
+}
+
 int acpi_get_riscv_isa(struct acpi_table_header *table,
 		       unsigned int cpu, const char **isa);
 
-static inline int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; }
 void acpi_get_cbo_block_size(struct acpi_table_header *table, u32 *cbom_size,
 			     u32 *cboz_size, u32 *cbop_size);
 #else
@@ -87,4 +90,12 @@ static inline void acpi_get_cbo_block_size(struct acpi_table_header *table,
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
+int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu);
+void acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void);
+#else
+static inline int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; }
+static inline void acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void) { }
+#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
+
 #endif /*_ASM_ACPI_H*/
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
index f71910718053..5d3e9cf89b76 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
@@ -105,3 +105,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)		+= compat_vdso/
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_64BIT)		+= pi/
 obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)		+= acpi.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA)	+= acpi_numa.o
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
index e619edc8b0cc..040bdbfea2b4 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
@@ -191,11 +191,6 @@ struct acpi_madt_rintc *acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(int cpu)
 	return &cpu_madt_rintc[cpu];
 }
 
-u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu)
-{
-	return acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(cpu)->uid;
-}
-
 /*
  * __acpi_map_table() will be called before paging_init(), so early_ioremap()
  * or early_memremap() should be called here to for ACPI table mapping.
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0231482d6946
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * ACPI 6.6 based NUMA setup for RISCV
+ * Lots of code was borrowed from arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
+ *
+ * Copyright 2004 Andi Kleen, SuSE Labs.
+ * Copyright (C) 2013-2016, Linaro Ltd.
+ *		Author: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Intel Corporation.
+ *
+ * Reads the ACPI SRAT table to figure out what memory belongs to which CPUs.
+ *
+ * Called from acpi_numa_init while reading the SRAT and SLIT tables.
+ * Assumes all memory regions belonging to a single proximity domain
+ * are in one chunk. Holes between them will be included in the node.
+ */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: NUMA: " fmt
+
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/bitmap.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/memblock.h>
+#include <linux/mmzone.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/topology.h>
+
+#include <asm/numa.h>
+
+static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
+
+int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	return acpi_early_node_map[cpu];
+}
+
+static inline int get_cpu_for_acpi_id(u32 uid)
+{
+	int cpu;
+
+	for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++)
+		if (uid == get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu))
+			return cpu;
+
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static int __init acpi_parse_rintc_pxm(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
+				       const unsigned long end)
+{
+	struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa;
+	int cpu, pxm, node;
+
+	if (srat_disabled())
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	pa = (struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *)header;
+	if (!pa)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_RINTC_ENABLED))
+		return 0;
+
+	pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
+	node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
+
+	/*
+	 * If we can't map the UID to a logical cpu this
+	 * means that the UID is not part of possible cpus
+	 * so we do not need a NUMA mapping for it, skip
+	 * the SRAT entry and keep parsing.
+	 */
+	cpu = get_cpu_for_acpi_id(pa->acpi_processor_uid);
+	if (cpu < 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	acpi_early_node_map[cpu] = node;
+	pr_info("SRAT: PXM %d -> HARTID 0x%lx -> Node %d\n", pxm,
+		cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpu), node);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void __init acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	/*
+	 * In ACPI, SMP and CPU NUMA information is provided in separate
+	 * static tables, namely the MADT and the SRAT.
+	 *
+	 * Thus, it is simpler to first create the cpu logical map through
+	 * an MADT walk and then map the logical cpus to their node ids
+	 * as separate steps.
+	 */
+	acpi_table_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, sizeof(struct acpi_table_srat),
+				 ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_RINTC_AFFINITY, acpi_parse_rintc_pxm, 0);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++)
+		early_map_cpu_to_node(i, acpi_numa_get_nid(i));
+}
+
+/* Callback for Proximity Domain -> logical node ID mapping */
+void __init acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa)
+{
+	int pxm, node;
+
+	if (srat_disabled())
+		return;
+
+	if (pa->header.length < sizeof(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity)) {
+		pr_err("SRAT: Invalid SRAT header length: %d\n", pa->header.length);
+		bad_srat();
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_RINTC_ENABLED))
+		return;
+
+	pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
+	node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
+
+	if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
+		pr_err("SRAT: Too many proximity domains %d\n", pxm);
+		bad_srat();
+		return;
+	}
+
+	node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
+}
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index 4f73c0ae44b2..a2cde65b69e9 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -281,8 +281,10 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	setup_smp();
 #endif
 
-	if (!acpi_disabled)
+	if (!acpi_disabled) {
 		acpi_init_rintc_map();
+		acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes();
+	}
 
 	riscv_init_cbo_blocksizes();
 	riscv_fill_hwcap();
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
index cfbe4b840d42..81a2aa77680c 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const un
 	if (hart == cpuid_to_hartid_map(0)) {
 		BUG_ON(found_boot_cpu);
 		found_boot_cpu = true;
-		early_map_cpu_to_node(0, acpi_numa_get_nid(cpu_count));
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -110,7 +109,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const un
 	}
 
 	cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpu_count) = hart;
-	early_map_cpu_to_node(cpu_count, acpi_numa_get_nid(cpu_count));
 	cpu_count++;
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index b7165e52b3c6..f74c62956e07 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -269,6 +269,12 @@ acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa) { }
 
 int acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV
+void acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa);
+#else
+static inline void acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa) { }
+#endif
+
 #ifndef PHYS_CPUID_INVALID
 typedef u32 phys_cpuid_t;
 #define PHYS_CPUID_INVALID (phys_cpuid_t)(-1)
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 3/6] ACPI: NUMA: Add handler for SRAT RINTC affinity structure
  2024-03-07  8:47 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V Haibo Xu
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ACPICA: SRAT: Add RISC-V RINTC affinity structure Haibo Xu
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT Haibo Xu
@ 2024-03-07  8:47 ` Haibo Xu
  2024-04-01  6:56   ` Sunil V L
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] ACPI: NUMA: Make some NUMA related parse functions common Haibo Xu
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Haibo Xu @ 2024-03-07  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: xiaobo55x, ajones, sunilvl, Haibo Xu, Paul Walmsley,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown,
	Robert Moore, Conor Dooley, Guo Ren, Björn Töpel,
	Alexandre Ghiti, Greentime Hu, Charlie Jenkins, Sia Jee Heng,
	Sami Tolvanen, Zong Li, Jisheng Zhang, Clément Léger,
	Baoquan He, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chen Jiahao, James Morse,
	Arnd Bergmann, Russell King (Oracle),
	Evan Green, Samuel Holland, Anup Patel, Ard Biesheuvel,
	Tony Luck, Yuntao Wang, Alison Schofield, Dave Hansen,
	Dan Williams, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, linux-acpi,
	acpica-devel

Add RINTC affinity structure handler during parsing SRAT table.

Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
index 0214518fc582..1946431c0eef 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
@@ -165,6 +165,19 @@ acpi_table_print_srat_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
 		}
 	}
 	break;
+
+	case ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_RINTC_AFFINITY:
+		{
+			struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *p =
+			    (struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *)header;
+			pr_debug("SRAT Processor (acpi id[0x%04x]) in proximity domain %d %s\n",
+				 p->acpi_processor_uid,
+				 p->proximity_domain,
+				 (p->flags & ACPI_SRAT_RINTC_ENABLED) ?
+				 "enabled" : "disabled");
+		}
+		break;
+
 	default:
 		pr_warn("Found unsupported SRAT entry (type = 0x%x)\n",
 			header->type);
@@ -448,6 +461,21 @@ acpi_parse_gi_affinity(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
 }
 #endif /* defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined (CONFIG_ARM64) */
 
+static int __init
+acpi_parse_rintc_affinity(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
+			  const unsigned long end)
+{
+	struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *rintc_affinity;
+
+	rintc_affinity = (struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *)header;
+	acpi_table_print_srat_entry(&header->common);
+
+	/* let architecture-dependent part to do it */
+	acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(rintc_affinity);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __initdata parsed_numa_memblks;
 
 static int __init
@@ -501,7 +529,7 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
 
 	/* SRAT: System Resource Affinity Table */
 	if (!acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, acpi_parse_srat)) {
-		struct acpi_subtable_proc srat_proc[4];
+		struct acpi_subtable_proc srat_proc[5];
 
 		memset(srat_proc, 0, sizeof(srat_proc));
 		srat_proc[0].id = ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_CPU_AFFINITY;
@@ -512,6 +540,8 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
 		srat_proc[2].handler = acpi_parse_gicc_affinity;
 		srat_proc[3].id = ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GENERIC_AFFINITY;
 		srat_proc[3].handler = acpi_parse_gi_affinity;
+		srat_proc[4].id = ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_RINTC_AFFINITY;
+		srat_proc[4].handler = acpi_parse_rintc_affinity;
 
 		acpi_table_parse_entries_array(ACPI_SIG_SRAT,
 					sizeof(struct acpi_table_srat),
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 4/6] ACPI: NUMA: Make some NUMA related parse functions common
  2024-03-07  8:47 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V Haibo Xu
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] ACPI: NUMA: Add handler for SRAT RINTC affinity structure Haibo Xu
@ 2024-03-07  8:47 ` Haibo Xu
  2024-04-01  7:00   ` Sunil V L
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI: NUMA: Remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA Kconfig Haibo Xu
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Haibo Xu @ 2024-03-07  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: xiaobo55x, ajones, sunilvl, Haibo Xu, Paul Walmsley,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown,
	Robert Moore, Conor Dooley, Guo Ren, Alexandre Ghiti,
	Greentime Hu, Anup Patel, Zong Li, Sami Tolvanen, Jisheng Zhang,
	Baoquan He, Clément Léger, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	Chen Jiahao, Arnd Bergmann, James Morse, Evan Green,
	Samuel Holland, Tony Luck, Ard Biesheuvel, Yuntao Wang,
	Dan Williams, Alison Schofield, Dave Hansen, linux-riscv,
	linux-kernel, linux-acpi, acpica-devel

The acpi_numa_slit_init(), acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init()
and acpi_parse_cfmws() functions are common enough to be used
on platforms that support ACPI_NUMA(x86/arm64/loongarch).
Remove the condition to avoid long defined(CONFIG_ARCH) check
when new platform(riscv) support was enabled.

Suggested-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
index 1946431c0eef..938c4adb7ec4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
@@ -219,7 +219,6 @@ int __init srat_disabled(void)
 	return acpi_numa < 0;
 }
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH)
 /*
  * Callback for SLIT parsing.  pxm_to_node() returns NUMA_NO_NODE for
  * I/O localities since SRAT does not list them.  I/O localities are
@@ -351,13 +350,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
 	(*fake_pxm)++;
 	return 0;
 }
-#else
-static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
-				   void *arg, const unsigned long table_end)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-#endif /* defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined (CONFIG_ARM64) */
 
 static int __init acpi_parse_slit(struct acpi_table_header *table)
 {
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI: NUMA: Remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA Kconfig
  2024-03-07  8:47 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V Haibo Xu
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] ACPI: NUMA: Make some NUMA related parse functions common Haibo Xu
@ 2024-03-07  8:47 ` Haibo Xu
  2024-03-07  8:44   ` Arnd Bergmann
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA Haibo Xu
  2024-03-27 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V Haibo Xu
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Haibo Xu @ 2024-03-07  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: xiaobo55x, ajones, sunilvl, Haibo Xu, Arnd Bergmann,
	Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	Len Brown, Robert Moore, Conor Dooley, Guo Ren,
	Björn Töpel, Alexandre Ghiti, Greentime Hu,
	Charlie Jenkins, Baoquan He, Sami Tolvanen, Zong Li,
	Jisheng Zhang, Clément Léger, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	Chen Jiahao, James Morse, Evan Green, Samuel Holland, Anup Patel,
	Ard Biesheuvel, Tony Luck, Yuntao Wang, Dave Hansen,
	Dan Williams, Alison Schofield, linux-riscv, linux-kernel,
	linux-acpi, acpica-devel

x86/arm64/loongarch would select ACPI_NUMA by default and riscv
would do the same thing, so the dependency is no longer needed
since these are the four architectures that support ACPI.

Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Suggested-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
index 849c2bd820b9..2bf47ad1ec9b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
 config ACPI_NUMA
 	bool "NUMA support"
 	depends on NUMA
-	depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH)
 	default y if ARM64
 
 config ACPI_HMAT
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA
  2024-03-07  8:47 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V Haibo Xu
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI: NUMA: Remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA Kconfig Haibo Xu
@ 2024-03-07  8:47 ` Haibo Xu
  2024-04-01  7:18   ` Sunil V L
  2024-03-27 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V Haibo Xu
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Haibo Xu @ 2024-03-07  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: xiaobo55x, ajones, sunilvl, Haibo Xu, Paul Walmsley,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown,
	Robert Moore, Conor Dooley, Guo Ren, Alexandre Ghiti,
	Greentime Hu, Charlie Jenkins, Sami Tolvanen, Zong Li,
	Jisheng Zhang, Baoquan He, Clément Léger,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chen Jiahao, Arnd Bergmann, James Morse,
	Russell King (Oracle),
	Evan Green, Samuel Holland, Marc Zyngier, Anup Patel, Tony Luck,
	Ard Biesheuvel, Yuntao Wang, Alison Schofield, Dave Hansen,
	Dan Williams, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, linux-acpi,
	acpica-devel

Enable ACPI based NUMA for RISCV in Kconfig.

Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
---
 arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index 0bfcfec67ed5..0fb55f166701 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ config NUMA
 	select HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
 	select NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
 	select NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
+	select ACPI_NUMA if ACPI
 	select OF_NUMA
 	select USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
 	help
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI: NUMA: Remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA Kconfig
  2024-03-07  8:44   ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2024-03-07  9:19     ` Haibo Xu
  2024-03-07  9:22       ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Haibo Xu @ 2024-03-07  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Haibo Xu, Alison Schofield, Jisheng Zhang, Rafael J . Wysocki,
	Dave Hansen, Björn Töpel, Conor.Dooley, guoren,
	Zong Li, James Morse, linux-riscv, Ard Biesheuvel, Baoquan He,
	acpica-devel, Robert Moore, linux-acpi, Sami Tolvanen,
	Greentime Hu, Dan Williams, Len Brown, Albert Ou,
	Alexandre Ghiti, Charlie Jenkins, Chen Jiahao, Yuntao Wang,
	Paul Walmsley, Clément Léger, Anup Patel, Tony Luck,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel, Samuel Holland, Evan Green,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Andrew Jones

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 4:44 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 09:47, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > x86/arm64/loongarch would select ACPI_NUMA by default and riscv
> > would do the same thing, so the dependency is no longer needed
> > since these are the four architectures that support ACPI.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Suggested-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> > index 849c2bd820b9..2bf47ad1ec9b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig
> > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> >  config ACPI_NUMA
> >       bool "NUMA support"
> >       depends on NUMA
> > -     depends on (X86 || ARM64 || LOONGARCH)
> >       default y if ARM64
>
> Can we remove the prompt as well and make this a
> hidden option? I think this is now always selected
> when it can be used anyway.
>
> If we make it
>
>       def_bool NUMA && !X86
>
> then the select statements except for the X86_64_ACPI_NUMA
> can also go away.
>

Good idea!
Shall we include the ACPI in the def_bool definition?

>       Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI: NUMA: Remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA Kconfig
  2024-03-07  9:19     ` Haibo Xu
@ 2024-03-07  9:22       ` Arnd Bergmann
  2024-03-07  9:28         ` Haibo Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2024-03-07  9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Haibo Xu
  Cc: Haibo Xu, Alison Schofield, Jisheng Zhang, Rafael J . Wysocki,
	Dave Hansen, Björn Töpel, Conor.Dooley, guoren,
	Zong Li, James Morse, linux-riscv, Ard Biesheuvel, Baoquan He,
	acpica-devel, Robert Moore, linux-acpi, Sami Tolvanen,
	Greentime Hu, Dan Williams, Len Brown, Albert Ou,
	Alexandre Ghiti, Charlie Jenkins, Chen Jiahao, Yuntao Wang,
	Paul Walmsley, Clément Léger, Anup Patel, Tony Luck,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel, Samuel Holland, Evan Green,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Andrew Jones

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 10:19, Haibo Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 4:44 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 09:47, Haibo Xu wrote:

>> If we make it
>>
>>       def_bool NUMA && !X86
>>
>> then the select statements except for the X86_64_ACPI_NUMA
>> can also go away.
>>
>
> Good idea!
> Shall we include the ACPI in the def_bool definition?
>

No need, because this is inside of an 'if ACPI' block.

       Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI: NUMA: Remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA Kconfig
  2024-03-07  9:22       ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2024-03-07  9:28         ` Haibo Xu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Haibo Xu @ 2024-03-07  9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Haibo Xu, Alison Schofield, Jisheng Zhang, Rafael J . Wysocki,
	Dave Hansen, Björn Töpel, Conor.Dooley, guoren,
	Zong Li, James Morse, linux-riscv, Ard Biesheuvel, Baoquan He,
	acpica-devel, Robert Moore, linux-acpi, Sami Tolvanen,
	Greentime Hu, Dan Williams, Len Brown, Albert Ou,
	Alexandre Ghiti, Charlie Jenkins, Yuntao Wang, Paul Walmsley,
	Clément Léger, Anup Patel, Tony Luck,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel, Samuel Holland, Evan Green,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Andrew Jones

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:23 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 10:19, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 4:44 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 09:47, Haibo Xu wrote:
>
> >> If we make it
> >>
> >>       def_bool NUMA && !X86
> >>
> >> then the select statements except for the X86_64_ACPI_NUMA
> >> can also go away.
> >>
> >
> > Good idea!
> > Shall we include the ACPI in the def_bool definition?
> >
>
> No need, because this is inside of an 'if ACPI' block.
>

Cool! Let me have a try.

Thanks,
Haibo
>        Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V
  2024-03-07  8:47 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V Haibo Xu
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA Haibo Xu
@ 2024-03-27 12:37 ` Haibo Xu
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Haibo Xu @ 2024-03-27 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Haibo Xu
  Cc: ajones, sunilvl, Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Robert Moore, Conor Dooley,
	Guo Ren, Björn Töpel, Alexandre Ghiti, Greentime Hu,
	Baoquan He, Evan Green, Zong Li, Sami Tolvanen, Jisheng Zhang,
	Clément Léger, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chen Jiahao,
	Arnd Bergmann, James Morse, Samuel Holland, Anup Patel,
	Ard Biesheuvel, Tony Luck, Yuntao Wang, Dan Williams,
	Dave Hansen, Alison Schofield, linux-riscv, linux-kernel,
	linux-acpi, acpica-devel

Hi @Sunil V L,

Could you please have a review on this patch set?

Thanks,
Haibo

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 4:34 PM Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> This patch series enable RISC-V ACPI NUMA support which was based on
> the recently approved ACPI ECR[1].
>
> Patch 1/6 is generated from the acpica PR[2] and should be merged through
> the acpica project. Due to this dependency, other 5 patches can only be
> merged after the corresponding ACPICA patch was pulled into linux.
>
> Patch 2/6 add RISC-V specific acpi_numa.c file to parse NUMA information
> from SRAT and SLIT ACPI tables.
> Patch 3/6 add the common SRAT RINTC affinity structure handler.
> Patch 4/6 remove the '#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH)' condition to make some NUMA
> related parse functions common for all current architectures that support
> ACPI_NUMA
> Patch 5/6 remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA Kconfig which was no
> longer needed since all the current architectures that support ACPI would
> select ACPI_NUMA by default.
> Patch 6/6 add corresponding ACPI_NUMA config for RISC-V Kconfig.
>
> Based-on: https://github.com/linux-riscv/linux-riscv/tree/for-next
>
> [1] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YTdDx2IPm5IeZjAW932EYU-tUtgS08tX/view?usp=sharing
> [2] https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/926
>
> Testing:
> Since the ACPI AIA/PLIC support patch set is still under upstream review,
> hence it is tested using the poll based HVC SBI console and RAM disk.
> 1) Build latest Qemu with the following patch backported
>    https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240129094200.3581037-1-haibo1.xu@intel.com/
>    https://github.com/vlsunil/qemu/commit/42bd4eeefd5d4410a68f02d54fee406d8a1269b0
>
> 2) Build latest EDK-II
>    https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/OvmfPkg/RiscVVirt/README.md
>
> 3) Build Linux with the following configs enabled
>    CONFIG_RISCV_SBI_V01=y
>    CONFIG_SERIAL_EARLYCON_RISCV_SBI=y
>    CONFIG_HVC_RISCV_SBI=y
>    CONFIG_NUMA=y
>    CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA=y
>
> 4) Build buildroot rootfs.cpio
>
> 5) Launch the Qemu machine
>    qemu-system-riscv64 -nographic \
>    -machine virt,pflash0=pflash0,pflash1=pflash1 -smp 4 -m 8G \
>    -blockdev node-name=pflash0,driver=file,read-only=on,filename=RISCV_VIRT_CODE.fd \
>    -blockdev node-name=pflash1,driver=file,filename=RISCV_VIRT_VARS.fd \
>    -object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m0 \
>    -object memory-backend-ram,size=4G,id=m1 \
>    -numa node,memdev=m0,cpus=0-1,nodeid=0 \
>    -numa node,memdev=m1,cpus=2-3,nodeid=1 \
>    -numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=30 \
>    -kernel linux/arch/riscv/boot/Image \
>    -initrd buildroot/output/images/rootfs.cpio \
>    -append "root=/dev/ram ro console=hvc0 earlycon=sbi"
>
> [    0.000000] ACPI: SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x80000000-0x17fffffff]
> [    0.000000] ACPI: SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x180000000-0x27fffffff]
> [    0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x17fe3bc40-0x17fe3cfff]
> [    0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x27fff4c40-0x27fff5fff]
> ...
> [    0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 0 -> HARTID 0x0 -> Node 0
> [    0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 0 -> HARTID 0x1 -> Node 0
> [    0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 1 -> HARTID 0x2 -> Node 1
> [    0.000000] ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM 1 -> HARTID 0x3 -> Node 1
>
> ---
> Changes since v1
>   - Switch the order of patch 2/4 and 3/4 - Per Sunil's suggestion
>   - Add a new patch 4/6 to make some NUMA related parse functions common
>     for all the architectures that support ACPI NUMA - Per Sunil's suggestion
>   - Add a new patch 5/6 to remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA
>     Kconfig since all the current architectures that support ACPI
>     would select ACPI_NUMA by default - Per Arnd and Sunil's suggestion
>   - Other minor fix for code format - Per Sunil's comments
>
> Haibo Xu (6):
>   ACPICA: SRAT: Add RISC-V RINTC affinity structure
>   ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
>   ACPI: NUMA: Add handler for SRAT RINTC affinity structure
>   ACPI: NUMA: Make some NUMA related parse functions common
>   ACPI: NUMA: Remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA Kconfig
>   ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA
>
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig            |   1 +
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h |  15 +++-
>  arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile    |   1 +
>  arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c      |   5 --
>  arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c     |   4 +-
>  arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c   |   2 -
>  drivers/acpi/numa/Kconfig     |   1 -
>  drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c      |  40 ++++++++---
>  include/acpi/actbl3.h         |  18 ++++-
>  include/linux/acpi.h          |   6 ++
>  11 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] ACPI: NUMA: Add handler for SRAT RINTC affinity structure
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] ACPI: NUMA: Add handler for SRAT RINTC affinity structure Haibo Xu
@ 2024-04-01  6:56   ` Sunil V L
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Sunil V L @ 2024-04-01  6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Haibo Xu
  Cc: xiaobo55x, ajones, Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Robert Moore, Conor Dooley,
	Guo Ren, Björn Töpel, Alexandre Ghiti, Greentime Hu,
	Charlie Jenkins, Sia Jee Heng, Sami Tolvanen, Zong Li,
	Jisheng Zhang, Clément Léger, Baoquan He,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chen Jiahao, James Morse, Arnd Bergmann,
	Russell King (Oracle),
	Evan Green, Samuel Holland, Anup Patel, Ard Biesheuvel,
	Tony Luck, Yuntao Wang, Alison Schofield, Dave Hansen,
	Dan Williams, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, linux-acpi,
	acpica-devel

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 04:47:55PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Add RINTC affinity structure handler during parsing SRAT table.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> index 0214518fc582..1946431c0eef 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> @@ -165,6 +165,19 @@ acpi_table_print_srat_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
>  		}
>  	}
>  	break;
> +
> +	case ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_RINTC_AFFINITY:
> +		{
> +			struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *p =
> +			    (struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *)header;
> +			pr_debug("SRAT Processor (acpi id[0x%04x]) in proximity domain %d %s\n",
> +				 p->acpi_processor_uid,
> +				 p->proximity_domain,
> +				 (p->flags & ACPI_SRAT_RINTC_ENABLED) ?
> +				 "enabled" : "disabled");
> +		}
> +		break;
> +
>  	default:
>  		pr_warn("Found unsupported SRAT entry (type = 0x%x)\n",
>  			header->type);
> @@ -448,6 +461,21 @@ acpi_parse_gi_affinity(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
>  }
>  #endif /* defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined (CONFIG_ARM64) */
>  
> +static int __init
> +acpi_parse_rintc_affinity(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> +			  const unsigned long end)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *rintc_affinity;
> +
> +	rintc_affinity = (struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *)header;
> +	acpi_table_print_srat_entry(&header->common);
> +
> +	/* let architecture-dependent part to do it */
> +	acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(rintc_affinity);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int __initdata parsed_numa_memblks;
>  
>  static int __init
> @@ -501,7 +529,7 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
>  
>  	/* SRAT: System Resource Affinity Table */
>  	if (!acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, acpi_parse_srat)) {
> -		struct acpi_subtable_proc srat_proc[4];
> +		struct acpi_subtable_proc srat_proc[5];
>  
>  		memset(srat_proc, 0, sizeof(srat_proc));
>  		srat_proc[0].id = ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_CPU_AFFINITY;
> @@ -512,6 +540,8 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
>  		srat_proc[2].handler = acpi_parse_gicc_affinity;
>  		srat_proc[3].id = ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GENERIC_AFFINITY;
>  		srat_proc[3].handler = acpi_parse_gi_affinity;
> +		srat_proc[4].id = ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_RINTC_AFFINITY;
> +		srat_proc[4].handler = acpi_parse_rintc_affinity;
>  
>  		acpi_table_parse_entries_array(ACPI_SIG_SRAT,
>  					sizeof(struct acpi_table_srat),
LGTM. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] ACPI: NUMA: Make some NUMA related parse functions common
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] ACPI: NUMA: Make some NUMA related parse functions common Haibo Xu
@ 2024-04-01  7:00   ` Sunil V L
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Sunil V L @ 2024-04-01  7:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Haibo Xu
  Cc: xiaobo55x, ajones, Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Robert Moore, Conor Dooley,
	Guo Ren, Alexandre Ghiti, Greentime Hu, Anup Patel, Zong Li,
	Sami Tolvanen, Jisheng Zhang, Baoquan He,
	Clément Léger, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chen Jiahao,
	Arnd Bergmann, James Morse, Evan Green, Samuel Holland,
	Tony Luck, Ard Biesheuvel, Yuntao Wang, Dan Williams,
	Alison Schofield, Dave Hansen, linux-riscv, linux-kernel,
	linux-acpi, acpica-devel

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 04:47:56PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> The acpi_numa_slit_init(), acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init()
> and acpi_parse_cfmws() functions are common enough to be used
> on platforms that support ACPI_NUMA(x86/arm64/loongarch).
> Remove the condition to avoid long defined(CONFIG_ARCH) check
> when new platform(riscv) support was enabled.
> 
> Suggested-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 8 --------
>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> index 1946431c0eef..938c4adb7ec4 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,6 @@ int __init srat_disabled(void)
>  	return acpi_numa < 0;
>  }
>  
> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH)
>  /*
>   * Callback for SLIT parsing.  pxm_to_node() returns NUMA_NO_NODE for
>   * I/O localities since SRAT does not list them.  I/O localities are
> @@ -351,13 +350,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
>  	(*fake_pxm)++;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -#else
> -static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> -				   void *arg, const unsigned long table_end)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -#endif /* defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined (CONFIG_ARM64) */
>  
>  static int __init acpi_parse_slit(struct acpi_table_header *table)
>  {
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT Haibo Xu
@ 2024-04-01  7:06   ` Sunil V L
  2024-04-01  7:41     ` Haibo Xu
  2024-04-02  9:31   ` Alexandre Ghiti
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Sunil V L @ 2024-04-01  7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Haibo Xu
  Cc: xiaobo55x, ajones, Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Robert Moore, Conor Dooley,
	Guo Ren, Alexandre Ghiti, Greentime Hu, Jisheng Zhang,
	Baoquan He, Sami Tolvanen, Zong Li, Clément Léger,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chen Jiahao, Arnd Bergmann, James Morse,
	Russell King (Oracle),
	Evan Green, Samuel Holland, Marc Zyngier, Anup Patel,
	Ard Biesheuvel, Tony Luck, Yuntao Wang, Dave Hansen,
	Alison Schofield, Dan Williams, linux-riscv, linux-kernel,
	linux-acpi, acpica-devel

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 04:47:54PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Add acpi_numa.c file to enable parse NUMA information from
> ACPI SRAT and SLIT tables. SRAT table provide CPUs(Hart) and
> memory nodes to proximity domain mapping, while SLIT table
> provide the distance metrics between proximity domains.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h |  15 +++-
>  arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile    |   1 +
>  arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c      |   5 --
>  arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c     |   4 +-
>  arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c   |   2 -
>  include/linux/acpi.h          |   6 ++
>  7 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> index 7dad0cf9d701..e0a1f84404f3 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -61,11 +61,14 @@ static inline void arch_fix_phys_package_id(int num, u32 slot) { }
>  
>  void acpi_init_rintc_map(void);
>  struct acpi_madt_rintc *acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(int cpu);
> -u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu);
> +static inline u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu)
> +{
> +	return acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(cpu)->uid;
> +}
> +
>  int acpi_get_riscv_isa(struct acpi_table_header *table,
>  		       unsigned int cpu, const char **isa);
>  
> -static inline int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; }
>  void acpi_get_cbo_block_size(struct acpi_table_header *table, u32 *cbom_size,
>  			     u32 *cboz_size, u32 *cbop_size);
>  #else
> @@ -87,4 +90,12 @@ static inline void acpi_get_cbo_block_size(struct acpi_table_header *table,
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> +int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu);
> +void acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void);
> +#else
> +static inline int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; }
> +static inline void acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void) { }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
> +
>  #endif /*_ASM_ACPI_H*/
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> index f71910718053..5d3e9cf89b76 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -105,3 +105,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)		+= compat_vdso/
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_64BIT)		+= pi/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)		+= acpi.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA)	+= acpi_numa.o
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> index e619edc8b0cc..040bdbfea2b4 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -191,11 +191,6 @@ struct acpi_madt_rintc *acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(int cpu)
>  	return &cpu_madt_rintc[cpu];
>  }
>  
> -u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu)
> -{
> -	return acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(cpu)->uid;
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * __acpi_map_table() will be called before paging_init(), so early_ioremap()
>   * or early_memremap() should be called here to for ACPI table mapping.
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0231482d6946
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * ACPI 6.6 based NUMA setup for RISCV
> + * Lots of code was borrowed from arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> + *
> + * Copyright 2004 Andi Kleen, SuSE Labs.
> + * Copyright (C) 2013-2016, Linaro Ltd.
> + *		Author: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Intel Corporation.
> + *
> + * Reads the ACPI SRAT table to figure out what memory belongs to which CPUs.
> + *
> + * Called from acpi_numa_init while reading the SRAT and SLIT tables.
> + * Assumes all memory regions belonging to a single proximity domain
> + * are in one chunk. Holes between them will be included in the node.
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: NUMA: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/memblock.h>
> +#include <linux/mmzone.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/topology.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/numa.h>
> +
> +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
> +
> +int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	return acpi_early_node_map[cpu];
> +}
> +
> +static inline int get_cpu_for_acpi_id(u32 uid)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++)
> +		if (uid == get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu))
> +			return cpu;
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init acpi_parse_rintc_pxm(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> +				       const unsigned long end)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa;
> +	int cpu, pxm, node;
> +
> +	if (srat_disabled())
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	pa = (struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *)header;
> +	if (!pa)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_RINTC_ENABLED))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
> +	node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If we can't map the UID to a logical cpu this
> +	 * means that the UID is not part of possible cpus
> +	 * so we do not need a NUMA mapping for it, skip
> +	 * the SRAT entry and keep parsing.
> +	 */
> +	cpu = get_cpu_for_acpi_id(pa->acpi_processor_uid);
> +	if (cpu < 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	acpi_early_node_map[cpu] = node;
> +	pr_info("SRAT: PXM %d -> HARTID 0x%lx -> Node %d\n", pxm,
> +		cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpu), node);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void __init acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * In ACPI, SMP and CPU NUMA information is provided in separate
> +	 * static tables, namely the MADT and the SRAT.
> +	 *
> +	 * Thus, it is simpler to first create the cpu logical map through
> +	 * an MADT walk and then map the logical cpus to their node ids
> +	 * as separate steps.
> +	 */
> +	acpi_table_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, sizeof(struct acpi_table_srat),
> +				 ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_RINTC_AFFINITY, acpi_parse_rintc_pxm, 0);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++)
> +		early_map_cpu_to_node(i, acpi_numa_get_nid(i));
> +}
> +
> +/* Callback for Proximity Domain -> logical node ID mapping */
> +void __init acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa)
> +{
> +	int pxm, node;
> +
> +	if (srat_disabled())
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (pa->header.length < sizeof(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity)) {
> +		pr_err("SRAT: Invalid SRAT header length: %d\n", pa->header.length);
> +		bad_srat();
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_RINTC_ENABLED))
> +		return;
> +
> +	pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
> +	node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
> +
> +	if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> +		pr_err("SRAT: Too many proximity domains %d\n", pxm);
> +		bad_srat();
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 4f73c0ae44b2..a2cde65b69e9 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -281,8 +281,10 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>  	setup_smp();
>  #endif
>  
> -	if (!acpi_disabled)
> +	if (!acpi_disabled) {
>  		acpi_init_rintc_map();
> +		acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes();
> +	}
>  
>  	riscv_init_cbo_blocksizes();
>  	riscv_fill_hwcap();
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> index cfbe4b840d42..81a2aa77680c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const un
>  	if (hart == cpuid_to_hartid_map(0)) {
>  		BUG_ON(found_boot_cpu);
>  		found_boot_cpu = true;
> -		early_map_cpu_to_node(0, acpi_numa_get_nid(cpu_count));
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -110,7 +109,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const un
>  	}
>  
>  	cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpu_count) = hart;
> -	early_map_cpu_to_node(cpu_count, acpi_numa_get_nid(cpu_count));
>  	cpu_count++;
>  
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index b7165e52b3c6..f74c62956e07 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -269,6 +269,12 @@ acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa) { }
>  
>  int acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV
> +void acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa);
> +#else
> +static inline void acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa) { }
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifndef PHYS_CPUID_INVALID
>  typedef u32 phys_cpuid_t;
>  #define PHYS_CPUID_INVALID (phys_cpuid_t)(-1)
> -- 
This is a large patch spanning across multiple files. Can we split this
into multiple smaller patches? Changes look fine to me though.

Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA Haibo Xu
@ 2024-04-01  7:18   ` Sunil V L
  2024-04-01  8:04     ` Haibo Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Sunil V L @ 2024-04-01  7:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Haibo Xu
  Cc: xiaobo55x, ajones, Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Robert Moore, Conor Dooley,
	Guo Ren, Alexandre Ghiti, Greentime Hu, Charlie Jenkins,
	Sami Tolvanen, Zong Li, Jisheng Zhang, Baoquan He,
	Clément Léger, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chen Jiahao,
	Arnd Bergmann, James Morse, Russell King (Oracle),
	Evan Green, Samuel Holland, Marc Zyngier, Anup Patel, Tony Luck,
	Ard Biesheuvel, Yuntao Wang, Alison Schofield, Dave Hansen,
	Dan Williams, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, linux-acpi,
	acpica-devel

Hi Haibo,

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 04:47:58PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Enable ACPI based NUMA for RISCV in Kconfig.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 0bfcfec67ed5..0fb55f166701 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ config NUMA
>  	select HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
>  	select NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
>  	select NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
> +	select ACPI_NUMA if ACPI

If the firmware didn't provide the SRAT/SLIT on ACPI based systems, then
there will be a message "Failed to initialise from firmware" from
arch_acpi_numa_init(). This is not specific to RISC-V. But I am
wondering why should it be pr_info instead of pr_debug.

Thanks,
Sunil
>  	select OF_NUMA
>  	select USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
>  	help
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
  2024-04-01  7:06   ` Sunil V L
@ 2024-04-01  7:41     ` Haibo Xu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Haibo Xu @ 2024-04-01  7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sunil V L
  Cc: Haibo Xu, ajones, Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Robert Moore, Conor Dooley,
	Guo Ren, Alexandre Ghiti, Greentime Hu, Jisheng Zhang,
	Baoquan He, Sami Tolvanen, Zong Li, Clément Léger,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chen Jiahao, Arnd Bergmann, James Morse,
	Russell King (Oracle),
	Evan Green, Samuel Holland, Marc Zyngier, Anup Patel,
	Ard Biesheuvel, Tony Luck, Yuntao Wang, Dave Hansen,
	Alison Schofield, Dan Williams, linux-riscv, linux-kernel,
	linux-acpi, acpica-devel

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 3:06 PM Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 04:47:54PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > Add acpi_numa.c file to enable parse NUMA information from
> > ACPI SRAT and SLIT tables. SRAT table provide CPUs(Hart) and
> > memory nodes to proximity domain mapping, while SLIT table
> > provide the distance metrics between proximity domains.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h |  15 +++-
> >  arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile    |   1 +
> >  arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c      |   5 --
> >  arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c     |   4 +-
> >  arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c   |   2 -
> >  include/linux/acpi.h          |   6 ++
> >  7 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

> >  #ifndef PHYS_CPUID_INVALID
> >  typedef u32 phys_cpuid_t;
> >  #define PHYS_CPUID_INVALID (phys_cpuid_t)(-1)
> > --
> This is a large patch spanning across multiple files. Can we split this
> into multiple smaller patches? Changes look fine to me though.
>

Thanks for the review!
I will try to break them in v3.

> Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA
  2024-04-01  7:18   ` Sunil V L
@ 2024-04-01  8:04     ` Haibo Xu
  2024-04-01 16:57       ` Luck, Tony
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Haibo Xu @ 2024-04-01  8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sunil V L
  Cc: Haibo Xu, ajones, Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Robert Moore, Conor Dooley,
	Guo Ren, Alexandre Ghiti, Greentime Hu, Charlie Jenkins,
	Sami Tolvanen, Zong Li, Jisheng Zhang, Baoquan He,
	Clément Léger, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chen Jiahao,
	Arnd Bergmann, James Morse, Russell King (Oracle),
	Evan Green, Samuel Holland, Marc Zyngier, Anup Patel, Tony Luck,
	Ard Biesheuvel, Yuntao Wang, Alison Schofield, Dave Hansen,
	Dan Williams, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, linux-acpi,
	acpica-devel

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 3:18 PM Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Haibo,
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 04:47:58PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > Enable ACPI based NUMA for RISCV in Kconfig.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index 0bfcfec67ed5..0fb55f166701 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ config NUMA
> >       select HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
> >       select NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
> >       select NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
> > +     select ACPI_NUMA if ACPI
>
> If the firmware didn't provide the SRAT/SLIT on ACPI based systems, then
> there will be a message "Failed to initialise from firmware" from
> arch_acpi_numa_init(). This is not specific to RISC-V. But I am
> wondering why should it be pr_info instead of pr_debug.
>

My understanding is maybe it just wants to expose explicit logs to
avoid any potential
bugs from FW or Kernel.

> Thanks,
> Sunil
> >       select OF_NUMA
> >       select USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
> >       help
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA
  2024-04-01  8:04     ` Haibo Xu
@ 2024-04-01 16:57       ` Luck, Tony
  2024-04-03  3:54         ` Sunil V L
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Luck, Tony @ 2024-04-01 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Haibo Xu, Sunil V L
  Cc: Xu, Haibo1, ajones, Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Moore, Robert, Conor Dooley,
	Guo Ren, Alexandre Ghiti, Greentime Hu, Charlie Jenkins,
	Sami Tolvanen, Zong Li, Jisheng Zhang, Baoquan He,
	Clément Léger, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chen Jiahao,
	Arnd Bergmann, James Morse, Russell King (Oracle),
	Evan Green, Samuel Holland, Marc Zyngier, Anup Patel,
	Ard Biesheuvel, Yuntao Wang, Schofield, Alison, Dave Hansen,
	Williams, Dan J, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, linux-acpi,
	acpica-devel

>> If the firmware didn't provide the SRAT/SLIT on ACPI based systems, then
>> there will be a message "Failed to initialise from firmware" from
>> arch_acpi_numa_init(). This is not specific to RISC-V. But I am
>> wondering why should it be pr_info instead of pr_debug.
>>
>
> My understanding is maybe it just wants to expose explicit logs to
> avoid any potential bugs from FW or Kernel.

There are lots of ACPI enabled systems that aren't NUMA (single
socket servers, desktops, laptops). Making this "pr_info()" would just
add noise to the boot on all of those.

-Tony

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
  2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT Haibo Xu
  2024-04-01  7:06   ` Sunil V L
@ 2024-04-02  9:31   ` Alexandre Ghiti
  2024-04-07  3:09     ` Haibo Xu
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Ghiti @ 2024-04-02  9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Haibo Xu
  Cc: Alison Schofield, Zong Li, Rafael J. Wysocki, Dave Hansen,
	linux-kernel, Conor Dooley, Guo Ren, Jisheng Zhang, James Morse,
	linux-riscv, Ard Biesheuvel, Baoquan He, Marc Zyngier,
	acpica-devel, Robert Moore, linux-acpi, Sami Tolvanen,
	Greentime Hu, Len Brown, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti,
	Arnd Bergmann, Dan Williams, Chen Jiahao, Yuntao Wang,
	Paul Walmsley, Clément L�=A 9ger, xiaobo55x,
	Anup Patel, Tony Luck, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Russell King (Oracle),
	Samuel Holland, Evan Green, Palmer Dabbelt, ajones

Hi Haibo,

On 07/03/2024 09:47, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Add acpi_numa.c file to enable parse NUMA information from
> ACPI SRAT and SLIT tables. SRAT table provide CPUs(Hart) and
> memory nodes to proximity domain mapping, while SLIT table
> provide the distance metrics between proximity domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> ---
>   arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h |  15 +++-
>   arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile    |   1 +
>   arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c      |   5 --
>   arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c     |   4 +-
>   arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c   |   2 -
>   include/linux/acpi.h          |   6 ++
>   7 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> index 7dad0cf9d701..e0a1f84404f3 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -61,11 +61,14 @@ static inline void arch_fix_phys_package_id(int num, u32 slot) { }
>   
>   void acpi_init_rintc_map(void);
>   struct acpi_madt_rintc *acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(int cpu);
> -u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu);
> +static inline u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu)
> +{
> +	return acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(cpu)->uid;
> +}
> +
>   int acpi_get_riscv_isa(struct acpi_table_header *table,
>   		       unsigned int cpu, const char **isa);
>   
> -static inline int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; }
>   void acpi_get_cbo_block_size(struct acpi_table_header *table, u32 *cbom_size,
>   			     u32 *cboz_size, u32 *cbop_size);
>   #else
> @@ -87,4 +90,12 @@ static inline void acpi_get_cbo_block_size(struct acpi_table_header *table,
>   
>   #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> +int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu);
> +void acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void);
> +#else
> +static inline int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; }
> +static inline void acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void) { }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
> +
>   #endif /*_ASM_ACPI_H*/
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> index f71910718053..5d3e9cf89b76 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -105,3 +105,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)		+= compat_vdso/
>   
>   obj-$(CONFIG_64BIT)		+= pi/
>   obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)		+= acpi.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA)	+= acpi_numa.o
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> index e619edc8b0cc..040bdbfea2b4 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -191,11 +191,6 @@ struct acpi_madt_rintc *acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(int cpu)
>   	return &cpu_madt_rintc[cpu];
>   }
>   
> -u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu)
> -{
> -	return acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(cpu)->uid;
> -}
> -
>   /*
>    * __acpi_map_table() will be called before paging_init(), so early_ioremap()
>    * or early_memremap() should be called here to for ACPI table mapping.
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0231482d6946
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * ACPI 6.6 based NUMA setup for RISCV
> + * Lots of code was borrowed from arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> + *
> + * Copyright 2004 Andi Kleen, SuSE Labs.
> + * Copyright (C) 2013-2016, Linaro Ltd.
> + *		Author: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Intel Corporation.
> + *
> + * Reads the ACPI SRAT table to figure out what memory belongs to which CPUs.
> + *
> + * Called from acpi_numa_init while reading the SRAT and SLIT tables.
> + * Assumes all memory regions belonging to a single proximity domain
> + * are in one chunk. Holes between them will be included in the node.
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: NUMA: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/memblock.h>
> +#include <linux/mmzone.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/topology.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/numa.h>
> +
> +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
> +
> +int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	return acpi_early_node_map[cpu];
> +}
> +
> +static inline int get_cpu_for_acpi_id(u32 uid)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++)
> +		if (uid == get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu))
> +			return cpu;
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init acpi_parse_rintc_pxm(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> +				       const unsigned long end)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa;
> +	int cpu, pxm, node;
> +
> +	if (srat_disabled())
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	pa = (struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *)header;
> +	if (!pa)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_RINTC_ENABLED))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
> +	node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If we can't map the UID to a logical cpu this
> +	 * means that the UID is not part of possible cpus
> +	 * so we do not need a NUMA mapping for it, skip
> +	 * the SRAT entry and keep parsing.
> +	 */
> +	cpu = get_cpu_for_acpi_id(pa->acpi_processor_uid);
> +	if (cpu < 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	acpi_early_node_map[cpu] = node;
> +	pr_info("SRAT: PXM %d -> HARTID 0x%lx -> Node %d\n", pxm,
> +		cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpu), node);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void __init acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * In ACPI, SMP and CPU NUMA information is provided in separate
> +	 * static tables, namely the MADT and the SRAT.
> +	 *
> +	 * Thus, it is simpler to first create the cpu logical map through
> +	 * an MADT walk and then map the logical cpus to their node ids
> +	 * as separate steps.
> +	 */
> +	acpi_table_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, sizeof(struct acpi_table_srat),
> +				 ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_RINTC_AFFINITY, acpi_parse_rintc_pxm, 0);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++)
> +		early_map_cpu_to_node(i, acpi_numa_get_nid(i));
> +}
> +
> +/* Callback for Proximity Domain -> logical node ID mapping */
> +void __init acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa)
> +{
> +	int pxm, node;
> +
> +	if (srat_disabled())
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (pa->header.length < sizeof(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity)) {
> +		pr_err("SRAT: Invalid SRAT header length: %d\n", pa->header.length);
> +		bad_srat();
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_RINTC_ENABLED))
> +		return;
> +
> +	pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
> +	node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
> +
> +	if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> +		pr_err("SRAT: Too many proximity domains %d\n", pxm);
> +		bad_srat();
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
> +}


What is riscv specific in the parsing of those tables? Can't we try to 
merge this into generic ACPI code? I know that's a burden to try and 
factorize code with other architectures instead of reusing it, but it 
showed numerous times that duplicating was even worse (I have the NAPOT 
code in mind).

Thanks,

Alex


> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 4f73c0ae44b2..a2cde65b69e9 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -281,8 +281,10 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>   	setup_smp();
>   #endif
>   
> -	if (!acpi_disabled)
> +	if (!acpi_disabled) {
>   		acpi_init_rintc_map();
> +		acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes();
> +	}
>   
>   	riscv_init_cbo_blocksizes();
>   	riscv_fill_hwcap();
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> index cfbe4b840d42..81a2aa77680c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const un
>   	if (hart == cpuid_to_hartid_map(0)) {
>   		BUG_ON(found_boot_cpu);
>   		found_boot_cpu = true;
> -		early_map_cpu_to_node(0, acpi_numa_get_nid(cpu_count));
>   		return 0;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -110,7 +109,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const un
>   	}
>   
>   	cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpu_count) = hart;
> -	early_map_cpu_to_node(cpu_count, acpi_numa_get_nid(cpu_count));
>   	cpu_count++;
>   
>   	return 0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index b7165e52b3c6..f74c62956e07 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -269,6 +269,12 @@ acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa) { }
>   
>   int acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma);
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV
> +void acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa);
> +#else
> +static inline void acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa) { }
> +#endif
> +
>   #ifndef PHYS_CPUID_INVALID
>   typedef u32 phys_cpuid_t;
>   #define PHYS_CPUID_INVALID (phys_cpuid_t)(-1)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA
  2024-04-01 16:57       ` Luck, Tony
@ 2024-04-03  3:54         ` Sunil V L
  2024-04-07  2:53           ` Haibo Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Sunil V L @ 2024-04-03  3:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Luck, Tony
  Cc: Haibo Xu, Xu, Haibo1, ajones, Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt,
	Albert Ou, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Moore, Robert,
	Conor Dooley, Guo Ren, Alexandre Ghiti, Greentime Hu,
	Charlie Jenkins, Sami Tolvanen, Zong Li, Jisheng Zhang,
	Baoquan He, Clément Léger, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	Chen Jiahao, Arnd Bergmann, James Morse, Russell King (Oracle),
	Evan Green, Samuel Holland, Marc Zyngier, Anup Patel,
	Ard Biesheuvel, Yuntao Wang, Schofield, Alison, Dave Hansen,
	Williams, Dan J, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, linux-acpi,
	acpica-devel

On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 04:57:30PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >> If the firmware didn't provide the SRAT/SLIT on ACPI based systems, then
> >> there will be a message "Failed to initialise from firmware" from
> >> arch_acpi_numa_init(). This is not specific to RISC-V. But I am
> >> wondering why should it be pr_info instead of pr_debug.
> >>
> >
> > My understanding is maybe it just wants to expose explicit logs to
> > avoid any potential bugs from FW or Kernel.
> 
> There are lots of ACPI enabled systems that aren't NUMA (single
> socket servers, desktops, laptops). Making this "pr_info()" would just
> add noise to the boot on all of those.
> 
Exactly. But this is an existing pr_info message across architectures.
My suggestion is to add one more patch in this series to convert
this to pr_debug unless someone has strong reason to keep it pr_info.

Thanks,
Sunil

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA
  2024-04-03  3:54         ` Sunil V L
@ 2024-04-07  2:53           ` Haibo Xu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Haibo Xu @ 2024-04-07  2:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sunil V L
  Cc: Luck, Tony, Xu, Haibo1, ajones, Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt,
	Albert Ou, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Moore, Robert,
	Conor Dooley, Guo Ren, Alexandre Ghiti, Greentime Hu,
	Charlie Jenkins, Sami Tolvanen, Zong Li, Jisheng Zhang,
	Baoquan He, Clément Léger, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	Chen Jiahao, Arnd Bergmann, James Morse, Russell King (Oracle),
	Evan Green, Samuel Holland, Marc Zyngier, Anup Patel,
	Ard Biesheuvel, Yuntao Wang, Schofield, Alison, Dave Hansen,
	Williams, Dan J, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, linux-acpi,
	acpica-devel

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 11:54 AM Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 04:57:30PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > >> If the firmware didn't provide the SRAT/SLIT on ACPI based systems, then
> > >> there will be a message "Failed to initialise from firmware" from
> > >> arch_acpi_numa_init(). This is not specific to RISC-V. But I am
> > >> wondering why should it be pr_info instead of pr_debug.
> > >>
> > >
> > > My understanding is maybe it just wants to expose explicit logs to
> > > avoid any potential bugs from FW or Kernel.
> >
> > There are lots of ACPI enabled systems that aren't NUMA (single
> > socket servers, desktops, laptops). Making this "pr_info()" would just
> > add noise to the boot on all of those.
> >
> Exactly. But this is an existing pr_info message across architectures.
> My suggestion is to add one more patch in this series to convert
> this to pr_debug unless someone has strong reason to keep it pr_info.
>

Sure. I will add a patch to fix it in v3.

Thanks,
Haibo

> Thanks,
> Sunil

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
  2024-04-02  9:31   ` Alexandre Ghiti
@ 2024-04-07  3:09     ` Haibo Xu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Haibo Xu @ 2024-04-07  3:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexandre Ghiti
  Cc: Haibo Xu, Alison Schofield, Zong Li, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	Dave Hansen, linux-kernel, Conor Dooley, Guo Ren, Jisheng Zhang,
	James Morse, linux-riscv, Ard Biesheuvel, Baoquan He,
	Marc Zyngier, acpica-devel, Robert Moore, linux-acpi,
	Sami Tolvanen, Greentime Hu, Len Brown, Albert Ou,
	Alexandre Ghiti, Arnd Bergmann, Dan Williams, Chen Jiahao,
	Yuntao Wang, Paul Walmsley, Clément L�=A 9ger,
	Anup Patel, Tony Luck, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Russell King (Oracle),
	Samuel Holland, Evan Green, Palmer Dabbelt, ajones

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 5:31 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi Haibo,
>
> On 07/03/2024 09:47, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > Add acpi_numa.c file to enable parse NUMA information from
> > ACPI SRAT and SLIT tables. SRAT table provide CPUs(Hart) and
> > memory nodes to proximity domain mapping, while SLIT table
> > provide the distance metrics between proximity domains.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h |  15 +++-
> >   arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile    |   1 +
> >   arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c      |   5 --
> >   arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c     |   4 +-
> >   arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c   |   2 -
> >   include/linux/acpi.h          |   6 ++
> >   7 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> > index 7dad0cf9d701..e0a1f84404f3 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/acpi.h
> > @@ -61,11 +61,14 @@ static inline void arch_fix_phys_package_id(int num, u32 slot) { }
> >
> >   void acpi_init_rintc_map(void);
> >   struct acpi_madt_rintc *acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(int cpu);
> > -u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu);
> > +static inline u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu)
> > +{
> > +     return acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(cpu)->uid;
> > +}
> > +
> >   int acpi_get_riscv_isa(struct acpi_table_header *table,
> >                      unsigned int cpu, const char **isa);
> >
> > -static inline int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; }
> >   void acpi_get_cbo_block_size(struct acpi_table_header *table, u32 *cbom_size,
> >                            u32 *cboz_size, u32 *cbop_size);
> >   #else
> > @@ -87,4 +90,12 @@ static inline void acpi_get_cbo_block_size(struct acpi_table_header *table,
> >
> >   #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> > +int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu);
> > +void acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void);
> > +#else
> > +static inline int acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; }
> > +static inline void acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void) { }
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
> > +
> >   #endif /*_ASM_ACPI_H*/
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> > index f71910718053..5d3e9cf89b76 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> > @@ -105,3 +105,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)              += compat_vdso/
> >
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_64BIT)         += pi/
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)          += acpi.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA)      += acpi_numa.o
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> > index e619edc8b0cc..040bdbfea2b4 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> > @@ -191,11 +191,6 @@ struct acpi_madt_rintc *acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(int cpu)
> >       return &cpu_madt_rintc[cpu];
> >   }
> >
> > -u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(int cpu)
> > -{
> > -     return acpi_cpu_get_madt_rintc(cpu)->uid;
> > -}
> > -
> >   /*
> >    * __acpi_map_table() will be called before paging_init(), so early_ioremap()
> >    * or early_memremap() should be called here to for ACPI table mapping.
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..0231482d6946
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * ACPI 6.6 based NUMA setup for RISCV
> > + * Lots of code was borrowed from arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > + *
> > + * Copyright 2004 Andi Kleen, SuSE Labs.
> > + * Copyright (C) 2013-2016, Linaro Ltd.
> > + *           Author: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> > + * Copyright (C) 2024 Intel Corporation.
> > + *
> > + * Reads the ACPI SRAT table to figure out what memory belongs to which CPUs.
> > + *
> > + * Called from acpi_numa_init while reading the SRAT and SLIT tables.
> > + * Assumes all memory regions belonging to a single proximity domain
> > + * are in one chunk. Holes between them will be included in the node.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: NUMA: " fmt
> > +
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/mm.h>
> > +#include <linux/memblock.h>
> > +#include <linux/mmzone.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/topology.h>
> > +
> > +#include <asm/numa.h>
> > +
> > +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
> > +
> > +int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > +     return acpi_early_node_map[cpu];
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int get_cpu_for_acpi_id(u32 uid)
> > +{
> > +     int cpu;
> > +
> > +     for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++)
> > +             if (uid == get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu))
> > +                     return cpu;
> > +
> > +     return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __init acpi_parse_rintc_pxm(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> > +                                    const unsigned long end)
> > +{
> > +     struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa;
> > +     int cpu, pxm, node;
> > +
> > +     if (srat_disabled())
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     pa = (struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *)header;
> > +     if (!pa)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_RINTC_ENABLED))
> > +             return 0;
> > +
> > +     pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
> > +     node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * If we can't map the UID to a logical cpu this
> > +      * means that the UID is not part of possible cpus
> > +      * so we do not need a NUMA mapping for it, skip
> > +      * the SRAT entry and keep parsing.
> > +      */
> > +     cpu = get_cpu_for_acpi_id(pa->acpi_processor_uid);
> > +     if (cpu < 0)
> > +             return 0;
> > +
> > +     acpi_early_node_map[cpu] = node;
> > +     pr_info("SRAT: PXM %d -> HARTID 0x%lx -> Node %d\n", pxm,
> > +             cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpu), node);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void __init acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes(void)
> > +{
> > +     int i;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * In ACPI, SMP and CPU NUMA information is provided in separate
> > +      * static tables, namely the MADT and the SRAT.
> > +      *
> > +      * Thus, it is simpler to first create the cpu logical map through
> > +      * an MADT walk and then map the logical cpus to their node ids
> > +      * as separate steps.
> > +      */
> > +     acpi_table_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, sizeof(struct acpi_table_srat),
> > +                              ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_RINTC_AFFINITY, acpi_parse_rintc_pxm, 0);
> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++)
> > +             early_map_cpu_to_node(i, acpi_numa_get_nid(i));
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Callback for Proximity Domain -> logical node ID mapping */
> > +void __init acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa)
> > +{
> > +     int pxm, node;
> > +
> > +     if (srat_disabled())
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     if (pa->header.length < sizeof(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity)) {
> > +             pr_err("SRAT: Invalid SRAT header length: %d\n", pa->header.length);
> > +             bad_srat();
> > +             return;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_RINTC_ENABLED))
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
> > +     node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
> > +
> > +     if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> > +             pr_err("SRAT: Too many proximity domains %d\n", pxm);
> > +             bad_srat();
> > +             return;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
> > +}
>
>
> What is riscv specific in the parsing of those tables? Can't we try to
> merge this into generic ACPI code? I know that's a burden to try and
> factorize code with other architectures instead of reusing it, but it
> showed numerous times that duplicating was even worse (I have the NAPOT
> code in mind).
>

Hi Alex,

The acpi_srat_rintc_affinity structure is RISC-V specific and that's
why I put the
callback in arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c.

Thanks,
Haibo


> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
>
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > index 4f73c0ae44b2..a2cde65b69e9 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > @@ -281,8 +281,10 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> >       setup_smp();
> >   #endif
> >
> > -     if (!acpi_disabled)
> > +     if (!acpi_disabled) {
> >               acpi_init_rintc_map();
> > +             acpi_map_cpus_to_nodes();
> > +     }
> >
> >       riscv_init_cbo_blocksizes();
> >       riscv_fill_hwcap();
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> > index cfbe4b840d42..81a2aa77680c 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> > @@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const un
> >       if (hart == cpuid_to_hartid_map(0)) {
> >               BUG_ON(found_boot_cpu);
> >               found_boot_cpu = true;
> > -             early_map_cpu_to_node(0, acpi_numa_get_nid(cpu_count));
> >               return 0;
> >       }
> >
> > @@ -110,7 +109,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const un
> >       }
> >
> >       cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpu_count) = hart;
> > -     early_map_cpu_to_node(cpu_count, acpi_numa_get_nid(cpu_count));
> >       cpu_count++;
> >
> >       return 0;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > index b7165e52b3c6..f74c62956e07 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -269,6 +269,12 @@ acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa) { }
> >
> >   int acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV
> > +void acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa);
> > +#else
> > +static inline void acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_rintc_affinity *pa) { }
> > +#endif
> > +
> >   #ifndef PHYS_CPUID_INVALID
> >   typedef u32 phys_cpuid_t;
> >   #define PHYS_CPUID_INVALID (phys_cpuid_t)(-1)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-07  3:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-07  8:47 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V Haibo Xu
2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ACPICA: SRAT: Add RISC-V RINTC affinity structure Haibo Xu
2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI: RISCV: Add NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT Haibo Xu
2024-04-01  7:06   ` Sunil V L
2024-04-01  7:41     ` Haibo Xu
2024-04-02  9:31   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2024-04-07  3:09     ` Haibo Xu
2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] ACPI: NUMA: Add handler for SRAT RINTC affinity structure Haibo Xu
2024-04-01  6:56   ` Sunil V L
2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] ACPI: NUMA: Make some NUMA related parse functions common Haibo Xu
2024-04-01  7:00   ` Sunil V L
2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI: NUMA: Remove ARCH depends option in ACPI_NUMA Kconfig Haibo Xu
2024-03-07  8:44   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-07  9:19     ` Haibo Xu
2024-03-07  9:22       ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-07  9:28         ` Haibo Xu
2024-03-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI: RISCV: Enable ACPI based NUMA Haibo Xu
2024-04-01  7:18   ` Sunil V L
2024-04-01  8:04     ` Haibo Xu
2024-04-01 16:57       ` Luck, Tony
2024-04-03  3:54         ` Sunil V L
2024-04-07  2:53           ` Haibo Xu
2024-03-27 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V Haibo Xu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).