Re: [PATCH 03/19] soundwire: amd: register sdw controller dai ops - Pierre-Louis Bossart

From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>,
	broonie@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@amd.com, Sunil-kumar.Dommati@amd.com,
	Mario.Limonciello@amd.com, Mastan.Katragadda@amd.com,
	arungopal.kondaveeti@amd.com,
	Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
	Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] soundwire: amd: register sdw controller dai ops
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:58:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad052efb-286e-4716-7608-d284782011cd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230111090222.2016499-4-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>

On 1/11/23 03:02, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
> Register dai ops for two controller instances.

manager instances

> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/amd_master.c b/drivers/soundwire/amd_master.c
> index 7e1f618254ac..93bffe6ff9e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/amd_master.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/amd_master.c
> @@ -952,6 +952,186 @@ static const struct sdw_master_ops amd_sdwc_ops = {
>  	.read_ping_status = amd_sdwc_read_ping_status,
>  };
>  
> +static int amd_sdwc_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> +			      struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
> +			      struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
> +{
> +	struct amd_sdwc_ctrl *ctrl = snd_soc_dai_get_drvdata(dai);
> +	struct sdw_amd_dma_data *dma;
> +	struct sdw_stream_config sconfig;
> +	struct sdw_port_config *pconfig;
> +	int ch, dir;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	dma = snd_soc_dai_get_dma_data(dai, substream);
> +	if (!dma)
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	ch = params_channels(params);
> +	if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE)
> +		dir = SDW_DATA_DIR_RX;
> +	else
> +		dir = SDW_DATA_DIR_TX;
> +	dev_dbg(ctrl->dev, "%s: dir:%d dai->id:0x%x\n", __func__, dir, dai->id);
> +	dma->hw_params = params;
> +
> +	sconfig.direction = dir;
> +	sconfig.ch_count = ch;
> +	sconfig.frame_rate = params_rate(params);
> +	sconfig.type = dma->stream_type;
> +
> +	sconfig.bps = snd_pcm_format_width(params_format(params));
> +
> +	/* Port configuration */
> +	pconfig = kzalloc(sizeof(*pconfig), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pconfig) {
> +		ret =  -ENOMEM;
> +		goto error;
> +	}
> +
> +	pconfig->num = dai->id;
> +	pconfig->ch_mask = (1 << ch) - 1;
> +	ret = sdw_stream_add_master(&ctrl->bus, &sconfig,
> +				    pconfig, 1, dma->stream);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(ctrl->dev, "add master to stream failed:%d\n", ret);
> +
> +	kfree(pconfig);
> +error:
> +	return ret;
> +}

This looks inspired from intel.c, but you are not programming ANY
registers here. is this intentional?

> +static int amd_sdwc_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
> +{
> +	struct amd_sdwc_ctrl *ctrl = snd_soc_dai_get_drvdata(dai);
> +	struct sdw_amd_dma_data *dma;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	dma = snd_soc_dai_get_dma_data(dai, substream);
> +	if (!dma)
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	ret = sdw_stream_remove_master(&ctrl->bus, dma->stream);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dai->dev, "remove master from stream %s failed: %d\n",
> +			dma->stream->name, ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	dma->hw_params = NULL;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_set_sdw_stream(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, void *stream, int direction)
> +{
> +	struct amd_sdwc_ctrl *ctrl = snd_soc_dai_get_drvdata(dai);
> +	struct sdw_amd_dma_data *dma;

you want to avoid using dma_data and use your own runtime. We made that
change recently for cadence_runtime.c

> +
> +	if (stream) {
> +		if (direction == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
> +			dma = dai->playback_dma_data;
> +		else
> +			dma = dai->capture_dma_data;
> +
> +		if (dma) {
> +			dev_err(dai->dev,
> +				"dma_data already allocated for dai %s\n",
> +				dai->name);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* allocate and set dma info */
> +		dma = kzalloc(sizeof(*dma), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!dma)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		dma->stream_type = SDW_STREAM_PCM;
> +		dma->bus = &ctrl->bus;
> +		dma->link_id = ctrl->instance;
> +		dma->stream = stream;
> +
> +		if (direction == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
> +			dai->playback_dma_data = dma;
> +		else
> +			dai->capture_dma_data = dma;
> +	} else {
> +		if (direction == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) {
> +			kfree(dai->playback_dma_data);
> +			dai->playback_dma_data = NULL;
> +		} else {
> +			kfree(dai->capture_dma_data);
> +			dai->capture_dma_data = NULL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_pcm_set_sdw_stream(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, void *stream, int direction)
> +{
> +	return amd_set_sdw_stream(dai, stream, direction);
> +}
> +
> +static void *amd_get_sdw_stream(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int direction)
> +{
> +	struct sdw_amd_dma_data *dma;
> +
> +	if (direction == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
> +		dma = dai->playback_dma_data;
> +	else
> +		dma = dai->capture_dma_data;
> +
> +	if (!dma)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +	return dma->stream;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops amd_sdwc_dai_ops = {
> +	.hw_params = amd_sdwc_hw_params,
> +	.hw_free = amd_sdwc_hw_free,
> +	.set_stream = amd_pcm_set_sdw_stream,

In the first patch there was support for PDM exposed, but here it's PDM
only?

> +	.get_stream = amd_get_sdw_stream,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct snd_soc_component_driver amd_sdwc_dai_component = {
> +	.name = "soundwire",
> +};
> +
> +static int amd_sdwc_register_dais(struct amd_sdwc_ctrl *ctrl)
> +{
> +	struct snd_soc_dai_driver *dais;
> +	struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *stream;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	int i, num_dais;
> +
> +	dev = ctrl->dev;
> +	num_dais = ctrl->num_dout_ports + ctrl->num_din_ports;
> +	dais = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_dais, sizeof(*dais), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!dais)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_dais; i++) {
> +		dais[i].name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "SDW%d Pin%d", ctrl->instance, i);
> +		if (!dais[i].name) {
> +			dev_err(ctrl->dev, "-ENOMEM dai name allocation failed\n");

remove, we don't add error logs on memory allocation issues.

> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (i < ctrl->num_dout_ports)
> +			stream = &dais[i].playback;
> +		else
> +			stream = &dais[i].capture;
> +
> +		stream->channels_min = 2;
> +		stream->channels_max = 2;

Is this a port limitation or just a software definition?

> +		stream->rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000;
> +		stream->formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE;

Wondering if this is needed. I don't even recall why it's in the Intel
code, we tested with 32 bit data and 192kHz, that looks unnecessary to
me unless the hardware is really limited to those values.

> +
> +		dais[i].ops = &amd_sdwc_dai_ops;
> +		dais[i].id = i;
> +	}
> +
> +	return devm_snd_soc_register_component(ctrl->dev, &amd_sdwc_dai_component,
> +					       dais, num_dais);
> +}
> +
>  static void amd_sdwc_probe_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct amd_sdwc_ctrl *ctrl  = container_of(work, struct amd_sdwc_ctrl, probe_work);
> @@ -1043,6 +1223,12 @@ static int amd_sdwc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			ret);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
> +	ret = amd_sdwc_register_dais(ctrl);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "CPU DAI registration failed\n");
> +		sdw_bus_master_delete(&ctrl->bus);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
>  	INIT_WORK(&ctrl->probe_work, amd_sdwc_probe_work);
>  	schedule_work(&ctrl->probe_work);
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw_amd.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw_amd.h
> index 5ec39f8c2f2e..7a99d782969f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw_amd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw_amd.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  #define ACP_SDW0	0
>  #define ACP_SDW1	1
>  #define ACP_SDW0_MAX_DAI	6
> +#define AMD_SDW_MAX_DAIS	8

How does this work? 6 dais for the first master and 2 for the second?

>  
>  struct acp_sdw_pdata {
>  	u16 instance;
> @@ -25,6 +26,7 @@ struct amd_sdwc_ctrl {
>  	void __iomem *mmio;
>  	struct work_struct probe_work;
>  	struct mutex *sdw_lock;
> +	struct sdw_stream_runtime *sruntime[AMD_SDW_MAX_DAIS];

well no, a stream runtime needs to be allocated per stream and usually
there's a 1:1 mapping between dailink and stream. A stream may use
multiple DAIs, possibly on different masters - just like a dailink can
rely on multiple cpu- and codec-dais.

You are conflating/confusing concepts I am afraid here.

>  	int num_din_ports;
>  	int num_dout_ports;
>  	int cols_index;
> @@ -36,4 +38,23 @@ struct amd_sdwc_ctrl {
>  	bool startup_done;
>  	u32 power_mode_mask;
>  };
> +
> +/**
> + * struct sdw_amd_dma_data: AMD DMA data
> + *
> + * @name: SoundWire stream name
> + * @stream: stream runtime
> + * @bus: Bus handle
> + * @stream_type: Stream type
> + * @link_id: Master link id
> + * @hw_params: hw_params to be applied in .prepare step
> + */
> +struct sdw_amd_dma_data {
> +	char *name;
> +	struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream;
> +	struct sdw_bus *bus;
> +	enum sdw_stream_type stream_type;
> +	int link_id;
> +	struct snd_pcm_hw_params *hw_params;
> +};
>  #endif