All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
To: "'Tomasz Figa'" <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	"'Kukjin Kim'" <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, t.figa@samsung.com,
	vikas.sajjan@samsung.com, joshi@samsung.com, naushad@samsung.com,
	thomas.ab@samsung.com, chow.kim@samsung.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 3/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Add platform driver support for Exynos PMU
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 08:40:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <002601cfaa11$93de5060$bb9af120$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53D238E1.3030901@gmail.com>

Hi Tomasz,

On Friday, July 25, 2014 Tomasz Figa wrote:

> To: Pankaj Dubey; 'Kukjin Kim'; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
linux-
> samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk; t.figa@samsung.com; vikas.sajjan@samsung.com;
> joshi@samsung.com; naushad@samsung.com; thomas.ab@samsung.com;
> chow.kim@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Add platform driver support for
> Exynos PMU
> 
> Hi Pankaj, Kukjin,
> 
> On 25.07.2014 07:32, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> > Hi Kukjin,
> >
> > On Friday, July 25, 2014 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >>>
> >> Looks good to me, will apply this and 4/4.
> >>
> >
> > We need to hold these two patches until dependent patch [1] from
> > Tomasz Figa gets merged.
> >
> > [1]: mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from syscon devices
> >       https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/24/188
> 
> That RFC patch had few comments from Arnd needed to be addressed, so it
needs a
> new revision.
> 
> Pankaj, If I remember correctly, we had talked about this and the
conclusion was that
> you would take care of addressing the comments and sending new version of
the
> patch. Any update on this or have I missed something?
> 

Well, I don't think we concluded as such anything.
Since this patch needs to get in so that Exynos PMU and PM related changes
can go in,
I discussed with you saying that I am not able to understand about Arnd's
comments and
if possible and time permits I will look into it. Meanwhile I got busy with
some other
official work, so could not get time to look into it.


> Best regards,
> Tomasz


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: pankaj.dubey@samsung.com (Pankaj Dubey)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 3/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Add platform driver support for Exynos PMU
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 08:40:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <002601cfaa11$93de5060$bb9af120$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53D238E1.3030901@gmail.com>

Hi Tomasz,

On Friday, July 25, 2014 Tomasz Figa wrote:

> To: Pankaj Dubey; 'Kukjin Kim'; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
linux-
> samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux at arm.linux.org.uk; t.figa at samsung.com; vikas.sajjan at samsung.com;
> joshi at samsung.com; naushad at samsung.com; thomas.ab at samsung.com;
> chow.kim at samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Add platform driver support for
> Exynos PMU
> 
> Hi Pankaj, Kukjin,
> 
> On 25.07.2014 07:32, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> > Hi Kukjin,
> >
> > On Friday, July 25, 2014 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >>>
> >> Looks good to me, will apply this and 4/4.
> >>
> >
> > We need to hold these two patches until dependent patch [1] from
> > Tomasz Figa gets merged.
> >
> > [1]: mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from syscon devices
> >       https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/24/188
> 
> That RFC patch had few comments from Arnd needed to be addressed, so it
needs a
> new revision.
> 
> Pankaj, If I remember correctly, we had talked about this and the
conclusion was that
> you would take care of addressing the comments and sending new version of
the
> patch. Any update on this or have I missed something?
> 

Well, I don't think we concluded as such anything.
Since this patch needs to get in so that Exynos PMU and PM related changes
can go in,
I discussed with you saying that I am not able to understand about Arnd's
comments and
if possible and time permits I will look into it. Meanwhile I got busy with
some other
official work, so could not get time to look into it.


> Best regards,
> Tomasz

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-28  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-09  4:00 [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: Exynos: PMU cleanup and refactoring for using DT Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-09  4:00 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-09  4:00 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for mapping PMU base address via DT Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-09  4:00   ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-10 13:49   ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-10 13:49     ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-27  3:33     ` Andreas Färber
2014-07-27  3:33       ` Andreas Färber
2014-07-09  4:00 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Refactored code for using PMU " Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-09  4:00   ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-10 13:52   ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-10 13:52     ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-09  4:00 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Add platform driver support for Exynos PMU Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-09  4:00   ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-25  4:04   ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-25  4:04     ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-25  5:32     ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-25  5:32       ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-25 11:00       ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-25 11:00         ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-28  3:10         ` Pankaj Dubey [this message]
2014-07-28  3:10           ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-08-18 17:42           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-08-18 17:42             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-08-19 14:30             ` Tomasz Figa
2014-08-19 14:30               ` Tomasz Figa
2014-08-21 14:07               ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-08-21 14:07                 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-08-21 15:59                 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-08-21 15:59                   ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-09  4:00 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Move PMU specific definitions from common.h Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-09  4:00   ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-07-11  6:10 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: Exynos: PMU cleanup and refactoring for using DT Naveen Krishna Ch
2014-07-11  6:10   ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2014-07-11  6:10   ` Naveen Krishna Ch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='002601cfaa11$93de5060$bb9af120$@samsung.com' \
    --to=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
    --cc=chow.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=joshi@samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=naushad@samsung.com \
    --cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
    --cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    --cc=vikas.sajjan@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.