[PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Avoid repeatedly harming the same innocent context

* [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Avoid repeatedly harming the same innocent context
@ 2018-03-30 13:18 Chris Wilson
  2018-03-30 13:30 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-03-30 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

We don't handle resetting the kernel context very well, or presumably any
context executing its breadcrumb commands in the ring as opposed to the
batchbuffer and flush. If we trigger a device reset twice in quick
succession while the kernel context is executing, we may end up skipping
the breadcrumb.  This is really only a problem for the selftest as
normally there is a large interlude between resets (hangcheck), or we
focus on resetting just one engine and so avoid repeatedly resetting
innocents.

Something to try would be a preempt-to-idle to quiesce the engine before
reset, so that innocent contexts would be spared the reset.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
CC: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c                  |  3 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index d354627882e3..684060ed8db6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -1886,6 +1886,8 @@ void i915_reset(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 	int ret;
 	int i;
 
+	GEM_TRACE("flags=%lx\n", error->flags);
+
 	might_sleep();
 	lockdep_assert_held(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!test_bit(I915_RESET_BACKOFF, &error->flags));
@@ -2016,6 +2018,7 @@ int i915_reset_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, const char *msg)
 	struct i915_request *active_request;
 	int ret;
 
+	GEM_TRACE("%s flags=%lx\n", engine->name, error->flags);
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!test_bit(I915_RESET_ENGINE + engine->id, &error->flags));
 
 	active_request = i915_gem_reset_prepare_engine(engine);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c
index 9e4e0ad62724..122a32e0a69d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c
@@ -979,6 +979,23 @@ static int igt_wait_reset(void *arg)
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int wait_for_others(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+			    struct intel_engine_cs *exclude)
+{
+	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
+	enum intel_engine_id id;
+
+	for_each_engine(engine, i915, id) {
+		if (engine == exclude)
+			continue;
+
+		if (wait_for(intel_engine_is_idle(engine), 10))
+			return -EIO;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int igt_reset_queue(void *arg)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
@@ -1027,13 +1044,36 @@ static int igt_reset_queue(void *arg)
 			i915_request_get(rq);
 			__i915_request_add(rq, true);
 
+			/*
+			 * XXX We don't handle resetting the kernel context
+			 * very well. If we trigger a device reset twice in
+			 * quick succession while the kernel context is
+			 * executing, we may end up skipping the breadcrumb.
+			 * This is really only a problem for the selftest as
+			 * normally there is a large interlude between resets
+			 * (hangcheck), or we focus on resetting just one
+			 * engine and so avoid repeatedly resetting innocents.
+			 */
+			err = wait_for_others(i915, engine);
+			if (err) {
+				pr_err("%s(%s): Failed to idle other inactive engines after device reset\n",
+				       __func__, engine->name);
+				i915_request_put(rq);
+				i915_request_put(prev);
+
+				GEM_TRACE_DUMP();
+				i915_gem_set_wedged(i915);
+				goto fini;
+			}
+
 			if (!wait_for_hang(&h, prev)) {
 				struct drm_printer p = drm_info_printer(i915->drm.dev);
 
-				pr_err("%s: Failed to start request %x, at %x\n",
-				       __func__, prev->fence.seqno, hws_seqno(&h, prev));
-				intel_engine_dump(prev->engine, &p,
-						  "%s\n", prev->engine->name);
+				pr_err("%s(%s): Failed to start request %x, at %x\n",
+				       __func__, engine->name,
+				       prev->fence.seqno, hws_seqno(&h, prev));
+				intel_engine_dump(engine, &p,
+						  "%s\n", engine->name);
 
 				i915_request_put(rq);
 				i915_request_put(prev);
-- 
2.16.3

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread