Re: [Xen-devel] Xen Solaris support still required? Illumos/Dilos Xen

[Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2577 bytes --]

Hi All,

sorry for long delay with XEN.

we have plans with Xen support on DilOS.
i have made some changes on dilos-illumos side for it.
but we have some priority to OpenZFS updates and XEN support will be a little bit later.

we have plans for XEN on 2021 year, but all depends on business needs and investments.

best regards,
-Igor

> On 2 Oct 2020, at 12:53, Jürgen Groß <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
> 
> On 05.12.16 06:32, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 04/12/16 18:11, Igor Kozhukhov wrote:
>>> Hi Pasi,
>>> 
>>> i’m using both addresses, but probably @gmale missed some emails with
>>> maillist.
>>> 
>>> About DilOS + Xen.
>>> 
>>> i’m using xen-3.4 - old version what i backported to DilOS based on old
>>> opensolaris varsion and upadted it to use python2.7 and some others zfs
>>> updates - more updates :)
>>> i tried to port Xen-4.3, but not finished it yet because i have no found
>>> sponsors and i have been moved to some aonther job without DilOS/illumos
>>> activities.
>>> try to do it by free time was/is overhead.
>>> 
>>> i have plans try to return back and look at latest Xen.
>>> 
>>> right now i try to move DilOS bulid env to use more Debian style build
>>> env and to use gcc-5.4 as primary compiler.
>>> Also, i have SPARC support with DilOS and it eat some additional free time.
>>> please do not drop solaris support :) - i’ll use and update it soon -
>>> probably on next year.
>> Got it. Thanks for the note and good luck for the port!
> 
> As a followup after nearly 4 years:
> 
> It seems nothing has happened, and Solaris specific coding in Xen is
> bit-rotting further. Last example is xenstored, which lost an interface
> mandatory for Solaris about 1 year ago (nobody noticed, as Solaris
> specific parts are neither built nor tested).
> 
> I stumbled over this one as I did some reorg of the Xen libraries and
> checked all the dependencies between those.
> 
> I think at least the no longer working Solaris stuff in xenstored should
> be removed now (in theory it would still be possible to use xenstore-
> stubdom in Solaris), but I honestly think all the other Solaris cruft in
> Xen tools should go away, too, in case nobody is really showing some
> interest in it (e.g. by doing some basic build tests and maybe a small
> functional test for each release of Xen).
> 
> So how does the realistic future of a Solaris dom0 look like? Is there
> a non-neglectable chance it will be revived in the near future, or can
> we remove the Solaris abstractions?
> 
> 
> Juergen


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 18730 bytes --]