All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] hw/i386: De-duplicate gsi_handler() to remove kvm_pc_gsi_handler()
@ 2019-12-13 11:07 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2019-12-13 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel
  Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Marcel Apfelbaum, kvm, Eduardo Habkost,
	Richard Henderson, Michael S. Tsirkin,
	Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Both gsi_handler() and kvm_pc_gsi_handler() have the same content,
except one comment. Move the comment, and de-duplicate the code.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 include/sysemu/kvm.h |  1 -
 hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c | 12 ------------
 hw/i386/pc.c         |  5 ++---
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
index 9fe233b9bf..f5d0d0d710 100644
--- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
+++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
@@ -515,7 +515,6 @@ int kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
 int kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
                                       qemu_irq irq);
 void kvm_irqchip_set_qemuirq_gsi(KVMState *s, qemu_irq irq, int gsi);
-void kvm_pc_gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level);
 void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled);
 void kvm_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s);
 
diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
index f94729c565..bae7413a39 100644
--- a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
+++ b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
@@ -48,18 +48,6 @@ void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled)
     }
 }
 
-void kvm_pc_gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level)
-{
-    GSIState *s = opaque;
-
-    if (n < ISA_NUM_IRQS) {
-        /* Kernel will forward to both PIC and IOAPIC */
-        qemu_set_irq(s->i8259_irq[n], level);
-    } else {
-        qemu_set_irq(s->ioapic_irq[n], level);
-    }
-}
-
 typedef struct KVMIOAPICState KVMIOAPICState;
 
 struct KVMIOAPICState {
diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
index ac08e63604..97e9049b71 100644
--- a/hw/i386/pc.c
+++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
@@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ void gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level)
 
     DPRINTF("pc: %s GSI %d\n", level ? "raising" : "lowering", n);
     if (n < ISA_NUM_IRQS) {
+        /* Under KVM, Kernel will forward to both PIC and IOAPIC */
         qemu_set_irq(s->i8259_irq[n], level);
     }
     qemu_set_irq(s->ioapic_irq[n], level);
@@ -362,10 +363,8 @@ GSIState *pc_gsi_create(qemu_irq **irqs, bool pci_enabled)
     s = g_new0(GSIState, 1);
     if (kvm_ioapic_in_kernel()) {
         kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(pci_enabled);
-        *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(kvm_pc_gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
-    } else {
-        *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
     }
+    *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
 
     return s;
 }
-- 
2.21.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] hw/i386: De-duplicate gsi_handler() to remove kvm_pc_gsi_handler()
@ 2019-12-13 11:07 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2019-12-13 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel
  Cc: Eduardo Habkost, kvm, Michael S. Tsirkin, Paolo Bonzini,
	Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
	Richard Henderson

Both gsi_handler() and kvm_pc_gsi_handler() have the same content,
except one comment. Move the comment, and de-duplicate the code.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 include/sysemu/kvm.h |  1 -
 hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c | 12 ------------
 hw/i386/pc.c         |  5 ++---
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
index 9fe233b9bf..f5d0d0d710 100644
--- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
+++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
@@ -515,7 +515,6 @@ int kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
 int kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
                                       qemu_irq irq);
 void kvm_irqchip_set_qemuirq_gsi(KVMState *s, qemu_irq irq, int gsi);
-void kvm_pc_gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level);
 void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled);
 void kvm_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s);
 
diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
index f94729c565..bae7413a39 100644
--- a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
+++ b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
@@ -48,18 +48,6 @@ void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled)
     }
 }
 
-void kvm_pc_gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level)
-{
-    GSIState *s = opaque;
-
-    if (n < ISA_NUM_IRQS) {
-        /* Kernel will forward to both PIC and IOAPIC */
-        qemu_set_irq(s->i8259_irq[n], level);
-    } else {
-        qemu_set_irq(s->ioapic_irq[n], level);
-    }
-}
-
 typedef struct KVMIOAPICState KVMIOAPICState;
 
 struct KVMIOAPICState {
diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
index ac08e63604..97e9049b71 100644
--- a/hw/i386/pc.c
+++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
@@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ void gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level)
 
     DPRINTF("pc: %s GSI %d\n", level ? "raising" : "lowering", n);
     if (n < ISA_NUM_IRQS) {
+        /* Under KVM, Kernel will forward to both PIC and IOAPIC */
         qemu_set_irq(s->i8259_irq[n], level);
     }
     qemu_set_irq(s->ioapic_irq[n], level);
@@ -362,10 +363,8 @@ GSIState *pc_gsi_create(qemu_irq **irqs, bool pci_enabled)
     s = g_new0(GSIState, 1);
     if (kvm_ioapic_in_kernel()) {
         kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(pci_enabled);
-        *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(kvm_pc_gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
-    } else {
-        *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
     }
+    *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
 
     return s;
 }
-- 
2.21.0



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] hw/i386: De-duplicate gsi_handler() to remove kvm_pc_gsi_handler()
  2019-12-13 11:07 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2019-12-13 11:53   ` Paolo Bonzini
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2019-12-13 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, qemu-devel
  Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum, kvm, Eduardo Habkost, Richard Henderson,
	Michael S. Tsirkin

On 13/12/19 12:07, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Both gsi_handler() and kvm_pc_gsi_handler() have the same content,
> except one comment. Move the comment, and de-duplicate the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/sysemu/kvm.h |  1 -
>  hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c | 12 ------------
>  hw/i386/pc.c         |  5 ++---
>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> index 9fe233b9bf..f5d0d0d710 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> @@ -515,7 +515,6 @@ int kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
>  int kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
>                                        qemu_irq irq);
>  void kvm_irqchip_set_qemuirq_gsi(KVMState *s, qemu_irq irq, int gsi);
> -void kvm_pc_gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level);
>  void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled);
>  void kvm_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s);
>  
> diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> index f94729c565..bae7413a39 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> @@ -48,18 +48,6 @@ void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -void kvm_pc_gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level)
> -{
> -    GSIState *s = opaque;
> -
> -    if (n < ISA_NUM_IRQS) {
> -        /* Kernel will forward to both PIC and IOAPIC */
> -        qemu_set_irq(s->i8259_irq[n], level);
> -    } else {
> -        qemu_set_irq(s->ioapic_irq[n], level);
> -    }
> -}
> -
>  typedef struct KVMIOAPICState KVMIOAPICState;
>  
>  struct KVMIOAPICState {
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index ac08e63604..97e9049b71 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ void gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level)
>  
>      DPRINTF("pc: %s GSI %d\n", level ? "raising" : "lowering", n);
>      if (n < ISA_NUM_IRQS) {
> +        /* Under KVM, Kernel will forward to both PIC and IOAPIC */
>          qemu_set_irq(s->i8259_irq[n], level);
>      }
>      qemu_set_irq(s->ioapic_irq[n], level);
> @@ -362,10 +363,8 @@ GSIState *pc_gsi_create(qemu_irq **irqs, bool pci_enabled)
>      s = g_new0(GSIState, 1);
>      if (kvm_ioapic_in_kernel()) {
>          kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(pci_enabled);
> -        *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(kvm_pc_gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
> -    } else {
> -        *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
>      }
> +    *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
>  
>      return s;
>  }
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] hw/i386: De-duplicate gsi_handler() to remove kvm_pc_gsi_handler()
@ 2019-12-13 11:53   ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2019-12-13 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, qemu-devel
  Cc: Richard Henderson, Michael S. Tsirkin, kvm, Eduardo Habkost

On 13/12/19 12:07, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Both gsi_handler() and kvm_pc_gsi_handler() have the same content,
> except one comment. Move the comment, and de-duplicate the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/sysemu/kvm.h |  1 -
>  hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c | 12 ------------
>  hw/i386/pc.c         |  5 ++---
>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> index 9fe233b9bf..f5d0d0d710 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> @@ -515,7 +515,6 @@ int kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
>  int kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
>                                        qemu_irq irq);
>  void kvm_irqchip_set_qemuirq_gsi(KVMState *s, qemu_irq irq, int gsi);
> -void kvm_pc_gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level);
>  void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled);
>  void kvm_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s);
>  
> diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> index f94729c565..bae7413a39 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> @@ -48,18 +48,6 @@ void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -void kvm_pc_gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level)
> -{
> -    GSIState *s = opaque;
> -
> -    if (n < ISA_NUM_IRQS) {
> -        /* Kernel will forward to both PIC and IOAPIC */
> -        qemu_set_irq(s->i8259_irq[n], level);
> -    } else {
> -        qemu_set_irq(s->ioapic_irq[n], level);
> -    }
> -}
> -
>  typedef struct KVMIOAPICState KVMIOAPICState;
>  
>  struct KVMIOAPICState {
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index ac08e63604..97e9049b71 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ void gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level)
>  
>      DPRINTF("pc: %s GSI %d\n", level ? "raising" : "lowering", n);
>      if (n < ISA_NUM_IRQS) {
> +        /* Under KVM, Kernel will forward to both PIC and IOAPIC */
>          qemu_set_irq(s->i8259_irq[n], level);
>      }
>      qemu_set_irq(s->ioapic_irq[n], level);
> @@ -362,10 +363,8 @@ GSIState *pc_gsi_create(qemu_irq **irqs, bool pci_enabled)
>      s = g_new0(GSIState, 1);
>      if (kvm_ioapic_in_kernel()) {
>          kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(pci_enabled);
> -        *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(kvm_pc_gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
> -    } else {
> -        *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
>      }
> +    *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
>  
>      return s;
>  }
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] hw/i386: De-duplicate gsi_handler() to remove kvm_pc_gsi_handler()
  2019-12-13 11:07 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2019-12-13 12:02   ` Paolo Bonzini
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2019-12-13 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, qemu-devel
  Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum, kvm, Eduardo Habkost, Richard Henderson,
	Michael S. Tsirkin

On 13/12/19 12:07, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Both gsi_handler() and kvm_pc_gsi_handler() have the same content,
> except one comment. Move the comment, and de-duplicate the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/sysemu/kvm.h |  1 -
>  hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c | 12 ------------
>  hw/i386/pc.c         |  5 ++---
>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> index 9fe233b9bf..f5d0d0d710 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> @@ -515,7 +515,6 @@ int kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
>  int kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
>                                        qemu_irq irq);
>  void kvm_irqchip_set_qemuirq_gsi(KVMState *s, qemu_irq irq, int gsi);
> -void kvm_pc_gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level);
>  void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled);
>  void kvm_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s);
>  
> diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> index f94729c565..bae7413a39 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> @@ -48,18 +48,6 @@ void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -void kvm_pc_gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level)
> -{
> -    GSIState *s = opaque;
> -
> -    if (n < ISA_NUM_IRQS) {
> -        /* Kernel will forward to both PIC and IOAPIC */
> -        qemu_set_irq(s->i8259_irq[n], level);
> -    } else {
> -        qemu_set_irq(s->ioapic_irq[n], level);
> -    }
> -}
> -
>  typedef struct KVMIOAPICState KVMIOAPICState;
>  
>  struct KVMIOAPICState {
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index ac08e63604..97e9049b71 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ void gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level)
>  
>      DPRINTF("pc: %s GSI %d\n", level ? "raising" : "lowering", n);
>      if (n < ISA_NUM_IRQS) {
> +        /* Under KVM, Kernel will forward to both PIC and IOAPIC */
>          qemu_set_irq(s->i8259_irq[n], level);
>      }
>      qemu_set_irq(s->ioapic_irq[n], level);
> @@ -362,10 +363,8 @@ GSIState *pc_gsi_create(qemu_irq **irqs, bool pci_enabled)
>      s = g_new0(GSIState, 1);
>      if (kvm_ioapic_in_kernel()) {
>          kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(pci_enabled);
> -        *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(kvm_pc_gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
> -    } else {
> -        *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
>      }
> +    *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
>  
>      return s;
>  }
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] hw/i386: De-duplicate gsi_handler() to remove kvm_pc_gsi_handler()
@ 2019-12-13 12:02   ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2019-12-13 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, qemu-devel
  Cc: Richard Henderson, Michael S. Tsirkin, kvm, Eduardo Habkost

On 13/12/19 12:07, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Both gsi_handler() and kvm_pc_gsi_handler() have the same content,
> except one comment. Move the comment, and de-duplicate the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/sysemu/kvm.h |  1 -
>  hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c | 12 ------------
>  hw/i386/pc.c         |  5 ++---
>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> index 9fe233b9bf..f5d0d0d710 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> @@ -515,7 +515,6 @@ int kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
>  int kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
>                                        qemu_irq irq);
>  void kvm_irqchip_set_qemuirq_gsi(KVMState *s, qemu_irq irq, int gsi);
> -void kvm_pc_gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level);
>  void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled);
>  void kvm_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s);
>  
> diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> index f94729c565..bae7413a39 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
> @@ -48,18 +48,6 @@ void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -void kvm_pc_gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level)
> -{
> -    GSIState *s = opaque;
> -
> -    if (n < ISA_NUM_IRQS) {
> -        /* Kernel will forward to both PIC and IOAPIC */
> -        qemu_set_irq(s->i8259_irq[n], level);
> -    } else {
> -        qemu_set_irq(s->ioapic_irq[n], level);
> -    }
> -}
> -
>  typedef struct KVMIOAPICState KVMIOAPICState;
>  
>  struct KVMIOAPICState {
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index ac08e63604..97e9049b71 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ void gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level)
>  
>      DPRINTF("pc: %s GSI %d\n", level ? "raising" : "lowering", n);
>      if (n < ISA_NUM_IRQS) {
> +        /* Under KVM, Kernel will forward to both PIC and IOAPIC */
>          qemu_set_irq(s->i8259_irq[n], level);
>      }
>      qemu_set_irq(s->ioapic_irq[n], level);
> @@ -362,10 +363,8 @@ GSIState *pc_gsi_create(qemu_irq **irqs, bool pci_enabled)
>      s = g_new0(GSIState, 1);
>      if (kvm_ioapic_in_kernel()) {
>          kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(pci_enabled);
> -        *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(kvm_pc_gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
> -    } else {
> -        *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
>      }
> +    *irqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(gsi_handler, s, GSI_NUM_PINS);
>  
>      return s;
>  }
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-12-13 21:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-12-13 11:07 [PATCH] hw/i386: De-duplicate gsi_handler() to remove kvm_pc_gsi_handler() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-12-13 11:07 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-12-13 11:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-13 11:53   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-13 12:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-13 12:02   ` Paolo Bonzini

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.