Re: [PATCH v9 06/10] usb: dwc3: qcom: Add support to read IRQ's related to multiport

[Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@quicinc.com>]

On 7/16/2023 12:31 AM, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/14/2023 4:10 PM, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/14/2023 2:35 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 11:56:33PM +0530, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
>>>> On 7/12/2023 5:42 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:06:24AM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
>>>>>> Add support to read Multiport IRQ's related to quad port controller
>>>>>> of SA8295 Device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@quicinc.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>    drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c | 108 
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>>>>    1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>>> +static int dwc3_qcom_setup_mp_irq(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +    struct dwc3_qcom *qcom = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>>>> +    char irq_name[15];
>>>>>
>>>>> The interrupt device-name string can not be allocated on the stack or
>>>>> reused as it is stored directly in each irqaction structure.
>>>>>
>>>>> This can otherwise lead to random crashes when accessing
>>>>> /proc/interrupts:
>>>>>
>>>>>     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZK6IV_jJPICX5r53@hovoldconsulting.com/
>>>
>>>>     Sure, will create a static array of names if possible in global
>>>> section of file and use it to read interrupts.
>>>
>>> Or just use devm_kasprintf(), which should allow for a cleaner
>>> implementation.
>>>
>>> I've fixed it up like this for my X13s wip branches:
>>>
>>>     https://github.com/jhovold/linux/commit/0898b54456bc2f4bd4d420480db98e6758771ace
>>>>     Are you fine with seperating out setup_irq and setup_mp_irq 
>>>> functions
>>>> ? Can you please review comments and suggestion on [1].
>>>
>>> I haven't had time to look at your latest replies yet, but as I already
>>> said when reviewing v9, it seems you should be using a common helper for
>>> non-mp and mp.
>>>
>> Hi Johan,
>>
>>   The gist of my mail was to see if I can defer qcom probe when dwc3 
>> probe fails/or doesn't happen on of_plat_pop (which is logical) so 
>> that we can move setup_irq to after dwc3_register_core so that we know 
>> whether we are MP capable or not. This would help us move all IRQ 
>> reading into one function.
>>
> Hi Johan,
> 
>   I see it is difficult to write a common helper. To do so, we need to 
> know whether the device is MP capable or not in advance. And since it is 
> not possible to know it before of_plat_pop is done, I see only few ways 
> to do it:
> 
> 1. Based on qcom node compatible string, I can read whether the device 
> is MP capable or not and get IRQ's accordingly.
> 
> 2. Read the port_info in advance but it needs me to go through some DT 
> props and try getting this info. Or read xhci regs like we are doing in 
> core (which is not good). Also since some Dt props can be missing, is it 
> difficult to get the MP capability info before of_plat_pop is done.
> 
> 3. Remove IRQ handling completely. Just because the device has IRQ's 
> present, I don't see a point in adding them to bindings, and because we 
> added them to bindings, we are making a patch to read them (and since 
> this is a little challenging, the whole of multiport series is blocked 
> although I don't need wakeup support on these interrupts right away).
> 
> Can't we let the rest of the patches go through and let interrupt 
> handling for 2nd, 3rd and 4rth ports be taken care later ? I am asking 
> this because I want the rest of the patches which are in good shape now 
> (after fixing the nits mentioned) to get merged atleast. I will make 
> sure to add interrupt handling later in a different series once this is 
> merged once I send v10.
> 
> Or if there is a simpler way to do it, I would be happy to take any 
> suggestions and complete this missing part in this series itself.
>

Hi Konrad, Bjorn,

  Can you also let me know your review on this. Can we add a compatible 
data to dwc3-qcom to identify whether we need to read MP irq's or non-NP 
irq's and also if it is better to split this series into two. (One for 
multiport and one for dwc3-qcom IRQ's)

Regards,
Krishna,