RE: [PATCH V2 02/10] Drivers: hv: utils: run polling callback always in interrupt context

[Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1553 bytes --]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: KY Srinivasan
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 7:23
> > It looks the patch has not been Greg's tree yet.
> >
> > I have 2 questions about the patch:
> >
> > 1. hv_poll_channel() is invoked in fcopy_handle_handshake(), but not in
> > vss_handle_handshake() and kvp_handle_handshake().
> > Why -- I guess we missed the vss/kvp cases somehow?
> I will fix this.

Thanks, KY!
BTW, I fixed another small issue by https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/10/50
(The mail is attached for your convenience)

> > 2.  With the patch, hv_fcopy_onchannelcallback() can be invoked in the
> > tasklet (i.e., vmbus_on_event(). NB: local irq is enabled), and in the
> > hard irq handler(the IPI handler, e.g.,
> > fcopy_poll_wrapper() -> fcopy_poll_wrapper()).
> >
> > Can the former be interrupted by the latter?
> > e.g., when the callback is running in the tasklet on vCPU0,
> > fcopy_timeout_func() or fcopy_on_msg() could send the IPI to
> > vCPU0 from another vCPU.
> 
> Keep in mind that when the poll function is run, the state will not be
> HVUTIL_READY. The state will be set to HVUTIL_READY in the IPI
> handler. So, it is ok if the tasklet is interrupted by the IPI handler.
> 
> K. Y

Got it.

BTW, in fcopy_handle_handshake(), IMO the line
fcopy_transaction.state = HVUTIL_READY;
just before 
hv_poll_channel(fcopy_transaction.recv_channel, fcopy_poll_wrapper);
should be removed? Because in fcopy_poll_wrapper() we always have
the same line. 

Ditto for kvp/vss.

Thanks,
-- Dexuan

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 7138 bytes --]

From: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
To: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org>, "olaf@aepfle.de" <olaf@aepfle.de>, "apw@canonical.com" <apw@canonical.com>, "jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>, KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>, "vkuznets@redhat.com" <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tools: hv: vss: fix the write()'s argument: error -> vss_msg
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:00:57 +0000
Message-ID: <1449738057-4596-1-git-send-email-decui@microsoft.com>

I found this by chance. I don't have a specific bug caused by this.

Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 tools/hv/hv_vss_daemon.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/hv/hv_vss_daemon.c b/tools/hv/hv_vss_daemon.c
index 96234b6..5d51d6f 100644
--- a/tools/hv/hv_vss_daemon.c
+++ b/tools/hv/hv_vss_daemon.c
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
                        syslog(LOG_ERR, "Illegal op:%d\n", op);
                }
                vss_msg->error = error;
-               len = write(vss_fd, &error, sizeof(struct hv_vss_msg));
+               len = write(vss_fd, vss_msg, sizeof(struct hv_vss_msg));
                if (len != sizeof(struct hv_vss_msg)) {
                        syslog(LOG_ERR, "write failed; error: %d %s", errno,
                               strerror(errno));
--
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdriverdev.linuxdriverproject.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fdriverdev-devel&data=01%7c01%7cdecui%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7c6038ce2d24784746fa0408d30134f8d9%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=6Hs1UNlA11wBtnU5XvHhpCgkUlIhWVMKxPHVj9UAZq8%3d