All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
To: "'Doug Anderson'" <dianders@chromium.org>,
	"'Wolfram Sang'" <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: "'Tomasz Figa'" <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk, ch.naveen@samsung.com,
	jg1.han@samsung.com, jdelvare@suse.de, sjg@google.com,
	paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, standby24x7@gmail.com,
	sachin.kamat@linaro.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] i2c: exynos5: Properly use the "noirq" variants of suspend/resume
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:13:10 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <02e701cf9066$7332b280$59981780$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403654093-24134-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org>

Doug Anderson wrote:
> 
> The original code for the exynos i2c controller registered for the
> "noirq" variants.  However during review feedback it was moved to
> SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS without anyone noticing that it meant we were no
> longer actually "noirq" (despite functions named
> exynos5_i2c_suspend_noirq and exynos5_i2c_resume_noirq).
> 
> i2c controllers that might have wakeup sources on them seem to need to
> resume at noirq time so that the individual drivers can actually read
> the i2c bus to handle their wakeup.
> 
> NOTE: I took the original review feedback from Wolfram and added
> poweroff, thaw, freeze, restore.
> 
Yeah I'm not sure except .suspend_noirq and .resume_noirq but I'm fine if
Wolfram suggested ;-)

> This patch has only been compile-tested since I don't have all the
> patches needed to make my machine using this i2c driver actually
> suspend/resume.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Added missing CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-
> exynos5.c
> index 63d2292..348b1cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> @@ -789,8 +789,16 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
>  }
>  #endif
> 
> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(exynos5_i2c_dev_pm_ops, exynos5_i2c_suspend_noirq,
> -			 exynos5_i2c_resume_noirq);
> +const struct dev_pm_ops exynos5_i2c_dev_pm_ops = {

Maybe static const struct...?

> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +	.suspend_noirq = exynos5_i2c_suspend_noirq,
> +	.resume_noirq = exynos5_i2c_resume_noirq,
> +	.freeze_noirq = exynos5_i2c_suspend_noirq,
> +	.thaw_noirq = exynos5_i2c_resume_noirq,
> +	.poweroff_noirq = exynos5_i2c_suspend_noirq,
> +	.restore_noirq = exynos5_i2c_resume_noirq,
> +#endif
> +};
> 
>  static struct platform_driver exynos5_i2c_driver = {
>  	.probe		= exynos5_i2c_probe,
> --
> 2.0.0.526.g5318336

Others look good to me,

Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>

Thanks,
Kukjin


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] i2c: exynos5: Properly use the "noirq" variants of suspend/resume
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:13:10 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <02e701cf9066$7332b280$59981780$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403654093-24134-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org>

Doug Anderson wrote:
> 
> The original code for the exynos i2c controller registered for the
> "noirq" variants.  However during review feedback it was moved to
> SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS without anyone noticing that it meant we were no
> longer actually "noirq" (despite functions named
> exynos5_i2c_suspend_noirq and exynos5_i2c_resume_noirq).
> 
> i2c controllers that might have wakeup sources on them seem to need to
> resume at noirq time so that the individual drivers can actually read
> the i2c bus to handle their wakeup.
> 
> NOTE: I took the original review feedback from Wolfram and added
> poweroff, thaw, freeze, restore.
> 
Yeah I'm not sure except .suspend_noirq and .resume_noirq but I'm fine if
Wolfram suggested ;-)

> This patch has only been compile-tested since I don't have all the
> patches needed to make my machine using this i2c driver actually
> suspend/resume.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Added missing CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-
> exynos5.c
> index 63d2292..348b1cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> @@ -789,8 +789,16 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
>  }
>  #endif
> 
> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(exynos5_i2c_dev_pm_ops, exynos5_i2c_suspend_noirq,
> -			 exynos5_i2c_resume_noirq);
> +const struct dev_pm_ops exynos5_i2c_dev_pm_ops = {

Maybe static const struct...?

> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +	.suspend_noirq = exynos5_i2c_suspend_noirq,
> +	.resume_noirq = exynos5_i2c_resume_noirq,
> +	.freeze_noirq = exynos5_i2c_suspend_noirq,
> +	.thaw_noirq = exynos5_i2c_resume_noirq,
> +	.poweroff_noirq = exynos5_i2c_suspend_noirq,
> +	.restore_noirq = exynos5_i2c_resume_noirq,
> +#endif
> +};
> 
>  static struct platform_driver exynos5_i2c_driver = {
>  	.probe		= exynos5_i2c_probe,
> --
> 2.0.0.526.g5318336

Others look good to me,

Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>

Thanks,
Kukjin

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-25 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-24 23:54 [PATCH v2] i2c: exynos5: Properly use the "noirq" variants of suspend/resume Doug Anderson
2014-06-24 23:54 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-25 11:13 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2014-06-25 11:13   ` Kukjin Kim
2014-06-25 16:33   ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-25 16:33     ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-25 16:33     ` Doug Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='02e701cf9066$7332b280$59981780$@samsung.com' \
    --to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=ch.naveen@samsung.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=sachin.kamat@linaro.org \
    --cc=sjg@google.com \
    --cc=standby24x7@gmail.com \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.