From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
To: 'Thomas Abraham' <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, t.figa@samsung.com,
sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com, mturquette@ti.com,
mturquette@linaro.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: Exynos4: Migrate clock support to common clock framework
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:25:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03a401cdc228$69f5a8c0$3de0fa40$%kim@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349629855-4962-6-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
Thomas Abraham wrote:
>
> Remove Samsung specific clock support in Exynos4 and migrate to using
> common clock framework.
>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile | 3 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.c | 1603
-------------------------
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.h | 35 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4210.c | 188 ----
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4212.c | 192 ----
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 22 +-
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 3 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-armlex4210.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos4-dt.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdk4x12.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdkv310.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c | 11 +-
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig | 4 +-
> 17 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2051 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.h
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4210.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4212.c
I think, would be better to us if we could keep this clock stuff with common
clock for a moment, e.g. 3.8. In addition, the clock stuff is still updating
at this moment so we need some time to move on common clock framework
entirely. Of course, I have no objection to support common clock on new SoC
such as exynos5440 :-)
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: Exynos4: Migrate clock support to common clock framework
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:25:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03a401cdc228$69f5a8c0$3de0fa40$%kim@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349629855-4962-6-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
Thomas Abraham wrote:
>
> Remove Samsung specific clock support in Exynos4 and migrate to using
> common clock framework.
>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile | 3 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.c | 1603
-------------------------
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.h | 35 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4210.c | 188 ----
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4212.c | 192 ----
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 22 +-
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 3 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-armlex4210.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos4-dt.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdk4x12.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdkv310.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c | 11 +-
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig | 4 +-
> 17 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2051 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4.h
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4210.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos4212.c
I think, would be better to us if we could keep this clock stuff with common
clock for a moment, e.g. 3.8. In addition, the clock stuff is still updating
at this moment so we need some time to move on common clock framework
entirely. Of course, I have no objection to support common clock on new SoC
such as exynos5440 :-)
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-14 5:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-07 17:10 [PATCH v2 0/5] clk: exynos4: migrate to common clock framework Thomas Abraham
2012-10-07 17:10 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-10-07 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: samsung: add common clock framework support for Samsung platforms Thomas Abraham
2012-10-07 17:10 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-10-22 15:55 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-10-22 15:55 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-10-29 10:09 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-10-29 10:09 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-10-30 23:10 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-10-30 23:10 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-10-30 23:32 ` Tomasz Figa
2012-10-30 23:32 ` Tomasz Figa
2012-11-05 7:41 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-11-05 7:41 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-11-05 7:36 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-11-05 7:36 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-10-30 16:30 ` Mike Turquette
2012-10-30 16:30 ` Mike Turquette
2012-11-05 7:22 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-11-05 7:22 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-10-07 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] clk: exynos4: register clocks using common clock framework Thomas Abraham
2012-10-07 17:10 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-10-08 7:54 ` Tomasz Figa
2012-10-08 7:54 ` Tomasz Figa
2012-11-14 5:14 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-11-14 5:14 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-10-07 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ARM: dts: Add Exynos4210 clock nodes Thomas Abraham
2012-10-07 17:10 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-10-07 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: dts: list the clock providers for serial ports Thomas Abraham
2012-10-07 17:10 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-10-07 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: Exynos4: Migrate clock support to common clock framework Thomas Abraham
2012-10-07 17:10 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-11-14 5:25 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2012-11-14 5:25 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-11-14 5:26 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-11-14 5:26 ` Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='03a401cdc228$69f5a8c0$3de0fa40$%kim@samsung.com' \
--to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=mturquette@ti.com \
--cc=sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.