All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel-stuff@comcast.net (Parag Warudkar)
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>,
	George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>,
	albert@users.sourceforge.net,
	Ulrich Windl <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.de>,
	David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	paulus@samba.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	keith maanthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>,
	Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>, Max Asbock <masbock@us.ibm.com>,
	mahuja@us.ibm.com, Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
	Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	donf@us.ibm.com, mpm@selenic.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 arch specific changes (v. B1)
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:27:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <060220051827.15835.429F4FA6000DF9D700003DDB220588617200009A9B9CD3040A029D0A05@comcast.net> (raw)

> If you grab Linus' current tree it should apply.
> 
> Sorry about the confusion.
> -john

I ignored the reject since it was from an #include section - the build went fine. I am even able to use it successfully. Couple things -

Very happy to report that I no longer get those annoying - "losing some ticks ..." "your time source is unreliable or some driver is hogging interrupts" messages - Not sure what change in TOD subsystem cured it - or was it just the removal of the printk? ;) 

Sadly, it somehow feels noticeably slower than vanilla 2.6.12-rc5. Especially using X/KDE - It is surely usable but not snappy. I will do more research to find out exactly why - but before that is such as loss of snappiness possible due to the TOD changes?

Thanks
Parag



             reply	other threads:[~2005-06-02 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-02 18:27 Parag Warudkar [this message]
2005-06-02 18:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 arch specific changes (v. B1) Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-06-02 23:05   ` Parag Warudkar
2005-06-02 23:20     ` john stultz
2005-06-02 23:33       ` Parag Warudkar
2005-06-02 23:50       ` Parag Warudkar
2005-06-03  7:05         ` Ulrich Windl
2005-06-03 15:24         ` john stultz
2005-06-05 17:05           ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-06-06  3:04             ` Parag Warudkar
2005-06-06  3:14               ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-06-10  0:48               ` George Anzinger
2005-06-06  9:21             ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-06  9:24               ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-06-06  9:30                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-06 13:32               ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-06-06 22:53             ` john stultz
2005-06-03 16:30         ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-03 18:27           ` john stultz
2005-06-03 19:02             ` Christoph Lameter
2005-06-03 19:21               ` john stultz
2005-06-05 11:27             ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-06 22:51               ` john stultz
2005-06-04 18:40           ` Parag Warudkar
2005-06-05 11:28             ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-05 14:15               ` Parag Warudkar
2005-06-05 20:51                 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-05 21:41                   ` Parag Warudkar
2005-06-05 22:13                     ` Lee Revell
2005-06-06  9:29                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-06 11:46                   ` Parag Warudkar
2005-06-08 13:51                     ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-09  1:47                       ` Lee Revell
2005-06-09  2:12                         ` john stultz
2005-06-09  2:42                           ` Parag Warudkar
2005-06-09 14:17                           ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-03 13:32       ` Parag Warudkar
2005-06-02 18:40 ` john stultz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-02 18:51 Parag Warudkar
2005-06-01 23:09 [PATCH 1/4] new timeofday core subsystem " john stultz
2005-06-01 23:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] new timeofday i386 arch specific changes " john stultz
2005-06-01 23:13   ` [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 " john stultz
2005-06-02  0:37     ` Parag Warudkar
2005-06-02 17:34       ` john stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=060220051827.15835.429F4FA6000DF9D700003DDB220588617200009A9B9CD3040A029D0A05@comcast.net \
    --to=kernel-stuff@comcast.net \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=donf@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.de \
    --cc=mahuja@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=masbock@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
    --cc=ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.