Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for XM25QH64C

[Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>]

Am 2021-06-28 06:55, schrieb Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com:
> On 6/14/21 9:56 AM, Michael Walle wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know 
>> the content is safe
>> 
>> Hi Reto,
>> 
>> Am 2021-06-13 14:12, schrieb Reto Schneider:
>>> From: Reto Schneider <reto.schneider@husqvarnagroup.com>
>>> 
>>> The data sheets can be found here:
>>> http://xmcwh.com/Uploads/2020-12-17/XM25QH64C_Ver1.1.pdf
>> 
>> Could you add that as a "Datasheet:" tag before your Sob tag?
>> 
>>> This chip has been (briefly) tested on the MediaTek MT7688 based
>>> GARDENA
>>> smart gateway.
>> 
>> Could you also apply my SFDP patch [1] and send the dump? 
>> Unfortunately,
>> I can't think of a good way to do that along with the patch and if 
>> this
>> in some way regarded as copyrighted material. So feel free to send it 
>> to
>> me privately. I'm starting to build a database.
>> 
> 
> Can the SFDP dump fit in the commit message when introducing a new 
> flash ID?

As ASCII hex dump? I'd guess we need some instructions how to do
that. 4k would be 256 lines with 16 byte per line.

But yes, I had the same thought.

> The SFDP standard is public. SFDP reveals just what the flash
> supports, why would that be sensitive information?

copyright material must not be sensitive information, no? I'm no
laywer, thus I'd played it safe.

> Reto, would you please dump the SFDP tables here?

FWIW, he already provided me a binary dump for the flash (actually
for the former version, too) and its already in my DB which you
should have access, too.

If we mandate that (and I am all for it) for new flashes, we will
have to come up with a common format. Something like

  echo "-----BEGIN SFDP (JEDEC ID ...)------"
  cat sfdp | xxd -ps -c 20
  echo "-----END SFDP------"

I really don't know if such meta data belongs into the
commit logs, though.

-michael