All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: nic_swsd <nic_swsd@realtek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] r8152: divide the tx and rx bottom functions
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:04:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2F18D4837@RTITMBSVM03.realtek.com.tw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a262d73b-0e91-7610-c88f-9670cc6fd18d@gmail.com>

Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 5:27 PM
[...]
> Maybe you would avoid messing with a tasklet (we really try to get rid
> of tasklets in general) using two NAPI, one for TX, one for RX.
> 
> Some drivers already use two NAPI, it is fine.
> 
> This might avoid the ugly dance in r8152_poll(),
> calling napi_schedule(napi) after napi_complete_done() !

The reason is that the USB device couldn't control
the interrupt of USB controller. That is, I couldn't
disable the interrupt before napi_schedule and
enable it after napi_complete_done. If the callback
function occurs during the following timing, it is
possible no one would schedule the napi again.

static int r8152_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
{
	struct r8152 *tp = container_of(napi, struct r8152, napi);
	int work_done;

	work_done = rx_bottom(tp, budget);
	bottom_half(tp);

	--> callback occurs here and try to call napi_schedule

	napi_complete_done(napi, work_done)

That is, no tx or rx could be handled unless
something trigger napi_schedule.


Best Regards,
Hayes




  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-16 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-14  8:30 [PATCH net-next] r8152: divide the tx and rx bottom functions Hayes Wang
2019-08-15 20:58 ` David Miller
2019-08-16  2:59   ` Hayes Wang
2019-08-16  5:17     ` David Miller
2019-08-16  6:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-08-16  8:10   ` Hayes Wang
2019-08-16  8:19     ` Eric Dumazet
2019-08-16  9:08       ` Hayes Wang
2019-08-16  9:27         ` Eric Dumazet
2019-08-16 10:04           ` Hayes Wang [this message]
2019-08-19  6:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2] " Hayes Wang
2019-08-20 19:19   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2F18D4837@RTITMBSVM03.realtek.com.tw \
    --to=hayeswang@realtek.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.