All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Qing Wang <wangqing@vivo.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] arch_topology: Add support to build llc_sibling on DT platforms
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:33:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <087176fc-1018-b107-06cc-055d7926b500@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220518093325.2070336-9-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

On 18/05/2022 11:33, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> ACPI PPTT provides cache identifiers and especially the last level cache
> identifier is used in obtaining last level cache siblings amongst CPUs.
> 
> While we have the cpu map representing all the CPUs sharing last level
> cache in the cacheinfo driver, it is populated quite late in the boot
> while the information is needed to build scheduler domains quite early.
> 
> On DT platforms we can use the pointer to the last level cache as the
> firmware identifier for the last level cache and build the cpumap sharing
> the last level cache based on the same.

[...]

> diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> index 58cbe18d825c..d8a36b0e27c9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct cpu_topology {
>  	int cluster_id;
>  	int package_id;
>  	int llc_id;
> +	void *llc_fw_node;

Would be nicer if you could set llc_id directly to avoid all this
addition sync `llc_id and llc_fw_node` code. ACPI PPTT has this
ACPI_PTR_DIFF() macro which IMHO lets it create distinct ids.

>  	cpumask_t thread_sibling;
>  	cpumask_t core_sibling;
>  	cpumask_t cluster_sibling;


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Qing Wang <wangqing@vivo.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] arch_topology: Add support to build llc_sibling on DT platforms
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:33:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <087176fc-1018-b107-06cc-055d7926b500@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220518093325.2070336-9-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

On 18/05/2022 11:33, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> ACPI PPTT provides cache identifiers and especially the last level cache
> identifier is used in obtaining last level cache siblings amongst CPUs.
> 
> While we have the cpu map representing all the CPUs sharing last level
> cache in the cacheinfo driver, it is populated quite late in the boot
> while the information is needed to build scheduler domains quite early.
> 
> On DT platforms we can use the pointer to the last level cache as the
> firmware identifier for the last level cache and build the cpumap sharing
> the last level cache based on the same.

[...]

> diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> index 58cbe18d825c..d8a36b0e27c9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct cpu_topology {
>  	int cluster_id;
>  	int package_id;
>  	int llc_id;
> +	void *llc_fw_node;

Would be nicer if you could set llc_id directly to avoid all this
addition sync `llc_id and llc_fw_node` code. ACPI PPTT has this
ACPI_PTR_DIFF() macro which IMHO lets it create distinct ids.

>  	cpumask_t thread_sibling;
>  	cpumask_t core_sibling;
>  	cpumask_t cluster_sibling;


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Qing Wang <wangqing@vivo.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] arch_topology: Add support to build llc_sibling on DT platforms
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:33:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <087176fc-1018-b107-06cc-055d7926b500@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220518093325.2070336-9-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

On 18/05/2022 11:33, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> ACPI PPTT provides cache identifiers and especially the last level cache
> identifier is used in obtaining last level cache siblings amongst CPUs.
> 
> While we have the cpu map representing all the CPUs sharing last level
> cache in the cacheinfo driver, it is populated quite late in the boot
> while the information is needed to build scheduler domains quite early.
> 
> On DT platforms we can use the pointer to the last level cache as the
> firmware identifier for the last level cache and build the cpumap sharing
> the last level cache based on the same.

[...]

> diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> index 58cbe18d825c..d8a36b0e27c9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct cpu_topology {
>  	int cluster_id;
>  	int package_id;
>  	int llc_id;
> +	void *llc_fw_node;

Would be nicer if you could set llc_id directly to avoid all this
addition sync `llc_id and llc_fw_node` code. ACPI PPTT has this
ACPI_PTR_DIFF() macro which IMHO lets it create distinct ids.

>  	cpumask_t thread_sibling;
>  	cpumask_t core_sibling;
>  	cpumask_t cluster_sibling;


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-20 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-18  9:33 [PATCH v2 0/8] arch_topology: Updates to add socket support and fix cluster ids Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] arch_topology: Don't set cluster identifier as physical package identifier Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 12:31   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-05-20 12:31     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-05-20 12:31     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-05-20 13:13     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 13:13       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 13:13       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] arch_topology: Set thread sibling cpumask only within the cluster Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 12:32   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-05-20 12:32     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-05-20 12:32     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-05-20 13:20     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 13:20       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 13:20       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] arch_topology: Set cluster identifier in each core/thread from /cpu-map Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-19 16:55   ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-05-19 16:55     ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-05-19 16:55     ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-05-20 12:33     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-05-20 12:33       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-05-20 12:33       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-05-20 13:54       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 13:54         ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 13:54         ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 15:27     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 15:27       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 15:27       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] arch_topology: Add support for parsing sockets in /cpu-map Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] arch_topology: Check for non-negative value rather than -1 for IDs validity Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] arch_topology: Avoid parsing through all the CPUs once a outlier CPU is found Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] of: base: add support to get the device node for the CPU's last level cache Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] arch_topology: Add support to build llc_sibling on DT platforms Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-18  9:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-19 18:10   ` Rob Herring
2022-05-19 18:10     ` Rob Herring
2022-05-19 18:10     ` Rob Herring
2022-05-20 12:59     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 12:59       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 12:59       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 14:36       ` Rob Herring
2022-05-20 14:36         ` Rob Herring
2022-05-20 14:36         ` Rob Herring
2022-05-20 15:06         ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 15:06           ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 15:06           ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 12:33   ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2022-05-20 12:33     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-05-20 12:33     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-05-20 14:56     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 14:56       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 14:56       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-19 16:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] arch_topology: Updates to add socket support and fix cluster ids Ionela Voinescu
2022-05-19 16:32   ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-05-19 16:32   ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-05-20 15:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 15:33     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-20 15:33     ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=087176fc-1018-b107-06cc-055d7926b500@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=wangqing@vivo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.