* DSW eventdev is getting "stuck"?
@ 2019-04-03 18:17 Venky Venkatesh
2019-04-03 18:33 ` Mattias Rönnblom
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Venky Venkatesh @ 2019-04-03 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Mattias Rönnblom
Hi,
I am using the DSW code from 18.11 with the default settings for all the #defines. Here are some more details:
I have an 8 port system with 1 queue.
All ports can inject events. Port 0 and 7 inject events rarely.
Ports 1-6 are linked to the queue and hence dequeue events.
I see that in steady state the total number enqueues into the system is much greater than the total number of dequeues.
eventdev deq#: 1948491 enq#: 1949007
However when I dump some of the data structure counters it doesn’t appear to be stuck. What may be going on?
Help appreciated
Thanks
-Venky
Below are the counters:
[root@PA-VM-venky ~]# cat y
dev_credits_on_loan: 883
------ port 0 --------
port_0_new_enqueued: 125
port_0_forward_enqueued: 0
port_0_release_enqueued: 0
port_0_queue_0_enqueued: 125
port_0_dequeued: 0
port_0_queue_0_dequeued: 0
port_0_migrations: 0
port_0_migration_latency: 0
port_0_event_proc_latency: 0
port_0_inflight_credits: 3
port_0_load: 49
port_0_last_bg: 39368511869708
------ port 1 --------
port_1_new_enqueued: 138947
port_1_forward_enqueued: 237896
port_1_release_enqueued: 0
port_1_queue_0_enqueued: 376843
port_1_dequeued: 475778
port_1_queue_0_dequeued: 475778
port_1_migrations: 0
port_1_migration_latency: 0
port_1_event_proc_latency: 119069
port_1_inflight_credits: 13
port_1_load: 0
port_1_last_bg: 77183632541672
------ port 2 --------
port_2_new_enqueued: 88834
port_2_forward_enqueued: 156687
port_2_release_enqueued: 0
port_2_queue_0_enqueued: 245521
port_2_dequeued: 313358
port_2_queue_0_dequeued: 313358
port_2_migrations: 0
port_2_migration_latency: 0
port_2_event_proc_latency: 176184
port_2_inflight_credits: 15
port_2_load: 0
port_2_last_bg: 77183632941696
------ port 3 --------
port_3_new_enqueued: 73170
port_3_forward_enqueued: 78087
port_3_release_enqueued: 0
port_3_queue_0_enqueued: 151257
port_3_dequeued: 165317
port_3_queue_0_dequeued: 165317
port_3_migrations: 0
port_3_migration_latency: 0
port_3_event_proc_latency: 329601
port_3_inflight_credits: 66
port_3_load: 0
port_3_last_bg: 77183632966910
------ port 4 --------
port_4_new_enqueued: 93182
port_4_forward_enqueued: 76422
port_4_release_enqueued: 0
port_4_queue_0_enqueued: 169604
port_4_dequeued: 207721
port_4_queue_0_dequeued: 207721
port_4_migrations: 0
port_4_migration_latency: 0
port_4_event_proc_latency: 262259
port_4_inflight_credits: 114
port_4_load: 0
port_4_last_bg: 77183632760588
------ port 5 --------
port_5_new_enqueued: 144855
port_5_forward_enqueued: 630897
port_5_release_enqueued: 0
port_5_queue_0_enqueued: 775752
port_5_dequeued: 633700
port_5_queue_0_dequeued: 633700
port_5_migrations: 0
port_5_migration_latency: 0
port_5_event_proc_latency: 88203
port_5_inflight_credits: 64
port_5_load: 0
port_5_last_bg: 77183632277448
------ port 6 --------
port_6_new_enqueued: 153590
port_6_forward_enqueued: 76315
port_6_release_enqueued: 0
port_6_queue_0_enqueued: 229905
port_6_dequeued: 152617
port_6_queue_0_dequeued: 152617
port_6_migrations: 0
port_6_migration_latency: 0
port_6_event_proc_latency: 354408
port_6_inflight_credits: 92
port_6_load: 0
port_6_last_bg: 77183632653092
------ port 7 --------
port_7_new_enqueued: 0
port_7_forward_enqueued: 0
port_7_release_enqueued: 0
port_7_queue_0_enqueued: 0
port_7_dequeued: 0
port_7_queue_0_dequeued: 0
port_7_migrations: 0
port_7_migration_latency: 0
port_7_event_proc_latency: 0
port_7_inflight_credits: 0
port_7_load: 0
Below are the data structure values:
(gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[0]->out_buffer_len
$2 = {0 <repeats 64 times>}
(gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[1]->out_buffer_len
$3 = {0 <repeats 64 times>}
(gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[2]->out_buffer_len
$4 = {0 <repeats 64 times>}
(gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[3]->out_buffer_len
$5 = {0 <repeats 64 times>}
(gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[4]->out_buffer_len
$6 = {0 <repeats 64 times>}
(gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[5]->out_buffer_len
$7 = {0 <repeats 64 times>}
(gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[6]->out_buffer_len
$8 = {0 <repeats 64 times>}
(gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[7]->out_buffer_len
$9 = {0 <repeats 64 times>}
(gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[0]->in_ring
$10 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p0", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000090, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 0, tail = 0,
single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 0, tail = 0, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}}
(gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[1]->in_ring
$11 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p1", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000120, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 475778,
tail = 475778, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 475778, tail = 475778, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}}
(gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[2]->in_ring
$12 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p2", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc0000001b0, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 313358,
tail = 313358, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 313358, tail = 313358, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}}
(gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[3]->in_ring
$13 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p3", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000240, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 165403,
tail = 165403, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 165403, tail = 165403, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}}
(gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[4]->in_ring
$14 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p4", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc0000002d0, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 208237,
tail = 208237, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 208237, tail = 208237, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}}
(gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[5]->in_ring
$15 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p5", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000360, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 633700,
tail = 633700, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 633700, tail = 633700, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}}
(gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[6]->in_ring
$16 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p6", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc0000003f0, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 152617,
tail = 152617, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 152617, tail = 152617, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}}
(gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[7]->in_ring
$17 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p7", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000480, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 0, tail = 0,
single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 0, tail = 0, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: DSW eventdev is getting "stuck"? 2019-04-03 18:17 DSW eventdev is getting "stuck"? Venky Venkatesh @ 2019-04-03 18:33 ` Mattias Rönnblom 2019-04-03 18:36 ` Venky Venkatesh 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Mattias Rönnblom @ 2019-04-03 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Venky Venkatesh, dev On 2019-04-03 20:17, Venky Venkatesh wrote: > Hi, > I am using the DSW code from 18.11 with the default settings for all the #defines. Here are some more details: > I have an 8 port system with 1 queue. > All ports can inject events. Port 0 and 7 inject events rarely. > Ports 1-6 are linked to the queue and hence dequeue events. > > I see that in steady state the total number enqueues into the system is much greater than the total number of dequeues. > eventdev deq#: 1948491 enq#: 1949007 > If you have more enqueues than dequeues, it means there are events in flight in the scheduler. In the above case, it's roughly 516 events, which sounds perfectly healthy and normal. I say roughly, because there's no way to take a consistent, global snapshot of all xstats counters. You will see a higher value than this on dev_credits_on_loan, because the ports will borrow (and return) credits in chunks of 64 to the shared pool, for efficiently reasons. > However when I dump some of the data structure counters it doesn’t appear to be stuck. What may be going on? I'm guessing it doesn't appear stuck because it's not stuck. /M ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: DSW eventdev is getting "stuck"? 2019-04-03 18:33 ` Mattias Rönnblom @ 2019-04-03 18:36 ` Venky Venkatesh 2019-04-03 19:02 ` Mattias Rönnblom 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Venky Venkatesh @ 2019-04-03 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mattias Rönnblom, dev On 4/3/19, 11:34 AM, "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> wrote: On 2019-04-03 20:17, Venky Venkatesh wrote: > Hi, > I am using the DSW code from 18.11 with the default settings for all the #defines. Here are some more details: > I have an 8 port system with 1 queue. > All ports can inject events. Port 0 and 7 inject events rarely. > Ports 1-6 are linked to the queue and hence dequeue events. > > I see that in steady state the total number enqueues into the system is much greater than the total number of dequeues. > eventdev deq#: 1948491 enq#: 1949007 > If you have more enqueues than dequeues, it means there are events in flight in the scheduler. In the above case, it's roughly 516 events, which sounds perfectly healthy and normal. I say roughly, because there's no way to take a consistent, global snapshot of all xstats counters. [VV]: This is in steady state i.e. there are no more events being injected into the system. So shouldn’t everything get drained out at some point? You will see a higher value than this on dev_credits_on_loan, because the ports will borrow (and return) credits in chunks of 64 to the shared pool, for efficiently reasons. > However when I dump some of the data structure counters it doesn’t appear to be stuck. What may be going on? I'm guessing it doesn't appear stuck because it's not stuck. /M ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: DSW eventdev is getting "stuck"? 2019-04-03 18:36 ` Venky Venkatesh @ 2019-04-03 19:02 ` Mattias Rönnblom 2019-04-04 5:39 ` Venky Venkatesh 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Mattias Rönnblom @ 2019-04-03 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Venky Venkatesh, dev On 2019-04-03 20:36, Venky Venkatesh wrote: > > > On 4/3/19, 11:34 AM, "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> wrote: > > On 2019-04-03 20:17, Venky Venkatesh wrote: > > Hi, > > I am using the DSW code from 18.11 with the default settings for all the #defines. Here are some more details: > > I have an 8 port system with 1 queue. > > All ports can inject events. Port 0 and 7 inject events rarely. > > Ports 1-6 are linked to the queue and hence dequeue events. > > > > I see that in steady state the total number enqueues into the system is much greater than the total number of dequeues. > > eventdev deq#: 1948491 enq#: 1949007 > > > > If you have more enqueues than dequeues, it means there are events in > flight in the scheduler. In the above case, it's roughly 516 events, > which sounds perfectly healthy and normal. I say roughly, because > there's no way to take a consistent, global snapshot of all xstats counters. > > [VV]: This is in steady state i.e. there are no more events being injected into the system. So shouldn’t everything get drained out at some point? > Assuming appropriate application behavior, sure, of course. Events in flight are either in the output buffer on the producer port, or the input ring on the consumer. Inappropriate behavior would be if any port (producer, consumer or producer+consumer) is left unattended (i.e. no enqueue or dequeue operation is performed). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: DSW eventdev is getting "stuck"? 2019-04-03 19:02 ` Mattias Rönnblom @ 2019-04-04 5:39 ` Venky Venkatesh 2019-04-04 7:39 ` Mattias Rönnblom 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Venky Venkatesh @ 2019-04-04 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mattias Rönnblom, dev On 4/3/19, 12:02 PM, "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> wrote: On 2019-04-03 20:36, Venky Venkatesh wrote: > > > On 4/3/19, 11:34 AM, "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> wrote: > > On 2019-04-03 20:17, Venky Venkatesh wrote: > > Hi, > > I am using the DSW code from 18.11 with the default settings for all the #defines. Here are some more details: > > I have an 8 port system with 1 queue. > > All ports can inject events. Port 0 and 7 inject events rarely. > > Ports 1-6 are linked to the queue and hence dequeue events. > > > > I see that in steady state the total number enqueues into the system is much greater than the total number of dequeues. > > eventdev deq#: 1948491 enq#: 1949007 > > > > If you have more enqueues than dequeues, it means there are events in > flight in the scheduler. In the above case, it's roughly 516 events, > which sounds perfectly healthy and normal. I say roughly, because > there's no way to take a consistent, global snapshot of all xstats counters. > > [VV]: This is in steady state i.e. there are no more events being injected into the system. So shouldn’t everything get drained out at some point? > Assuming appropriate application behavior, sure, of course. Events in flight are either in the output buffer on the producer port, or the input ring on the consumer. Inappropriate behavior would be if any port (producer, consumer or producer+consumer) is left unattended (i.e. no enqueue or dequeue operation is performed). [VV]: I am pasting the original data again below. If about 516 events are inflight, atleast a few should show up in one of the data structures that you refer to -- but they don’t as seen below. Isn't that odd? Do you have any other places I can look -- there were no migrations too to look at some other transient buffers. Below are the counters: [root@PA-VM-venky ~]# cat y dev_credits_on_loan: 883 ------ port 0 -------- port_0_new_enqueued: 125 port_0_forward_enqueued: 0 port_0_release_enqueued: 0 port_0_queue_0_enqueued: 125 port_0_dequeued: 0 port_0_queue_0_dequeued: 0 port_0_migrations: 0 port_0_migration_latency: 0 port_0_event_proc_latency: 0 port_0_inflight_credits: 3 port_0_load: 49 port_0_last_bg: 39368511869708 ------ port 1 -------- port_1_new_enqueued: 138947 port_1_forward_enqueued: 237896 port_1_release_enqueued: 0 port_1_queue_0_enqueued: 376843 port_1_dequeued: 475778 port_1_queue_0_dequeued: 475778 port_1_migrations: 0 port_1_migration_latency: 0 port_1_event_proc_latency: 119069 port_1_inflight_credits: 13 port_1_load: 0 port_1_last_bg: 77183632541672 ------ port 2 -------- port_2_new_enqueued: 88834 port_2_forward_enqueued: 156687 port_2_release_enqueued: 0 port_2_queue_0_enqueued: 245521 port_2_dequeued: 313358 port_2_queue_0_dequeued: 313358 port_2_migrations: 0 port_2_migration_latency: 0 port_2_event_proc_latency: 176184 port_2_inflight_credits: 15 port_2_load: 0 port_2_last_bg: 77183632941696 ------ port 3 -------- port_3_new_enqueued: 73170 port_3_forward_enqueued: 78087 port_3_release_enqueued: 0 port_3_queue_0_enqueued: 151257 port_3_dequeued: 165317 port_3_queue_0_dequeued: 165317 port_3_migrations: 0 port_3_migration_latency: 0 port_3_event_proc_latency: 329601 port_3_inflight_credits: 66 port_3_load: 0 port_3_last_bg: 77183632966910 ------ port 4 -------- port_4_new_enqueued: 93182 port_4_forward_enqueued: 76422 port_4_release_enqueued: 0 port_4_queue_0_enqueued: 169604 port_4_dequeued: 207721 port_4_queue_0_dequeued: 207721 port_4_migrations: 0 port_4_migration_latency: 0 port_4_event_proc_latency: 262259 port_4_inflight_credits: 114 port_4_load: 0 port_4_last_bg: 77183632760588 ------ port 5 -------- port_5_new_enqueued: 144855 port_5_forward_enqueued: 630897 port_5_release_enqueued: 0 port_5_queue_0_enqueued: 775752 port_5_dequeued: 633700 port_5_queue_0_dequeued: 633700 port_5_migrations: 0 port_5_migration_latency: 0 port_5_event_proc_latency: 88203 port_5_inflight_credits: 64 port_5_load: 0 port_5_last_bg: 77183632277448 ------ port 6 -------- port_6_new_enqueued: 153590 port_6_forward_enqueued: 76315 port_6_release_enqueued: 0 port_6_queue_0_enqueued: 229905 port_6_dequeued: 152617 port_6_queue_0_dequeued: 152617 port_6_migrations: 0 port_6_migration_latency: 0 port_6_event_proc_latency: 354408 port_6_inflight_credits: 92 port_6_load: 0 port_6_last_bg: 77183632653092 ------ port 7 -------- port_7_new_enqueued: 0 port_7_forward_enqueued: 0 port_7_release_enqueued: 0 port_7_queue_0_enqueued: 0 port_7_dequeued: 0 port_7_queue_0_dequeued: 0 port_7_migrations: 0 port_7_migration_latency: 0 port_7_event_proc_latency: 0 port_7_inflight_credits: 0 port_7_load: 0 Below are the data structure values: (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[0]->out_buffer_len $2 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[1]->out_buffer_len $3 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[2]->out_buffer_len $4 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[3]->out_buffer_len $5 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[4]->out_buffer_len $6 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[5]->out_buffer_len $7 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[6]->out_buffer_len $8 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[7]->out_buffer_len $9 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[0]->in_ring $10 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p0", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000090, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 0, tail = 0, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 0, tail = 0, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[1]->in_ring $11 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p1", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000120, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 475778, tail = 475778, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 475778, tail = 475778, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[2]->in_ring $12 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p2", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc0000001b0, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 313358, tail = 313358, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 313358, tail = 313358, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[3]->in_ring $13 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p3", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000240, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 165403, tail = 165403, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 165403, tail = 165403, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[4]->in_ring $14 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p4", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc0000002d0, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 208237, tail = 208237, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 208237, tail = 208237, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[5]->in_ring $15 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p5", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000360, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 633700, tail = 633700, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 633700, tail = 633700, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[6]->in_ring $16 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p6", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc0000003f0, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 152617, tail = 152617, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 152617, tail = 152617, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[7]->in_ring $17 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p7", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000480, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 0, tail = 0, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 0, tail = 0, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: DSW eventdev is getting "stuck"? 2019-04-04 5:39 ` Venky Venkatesh @ 2019-04-04 7:39 ` Mattias Rönnblom 2019-04-04 18:13 ` Venky Venkatesh 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Mattias Rönnblom @ 2019-04-04 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Venky Venkatesh, dev On 2019-04-04 07:39, Venky Venkatesh wrote: > > > On 4/3/19, 12:02 PM, "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> wrote: > > On 2019-04-03 20:36, Venky Venkatesh wrote: > > > > > > On 4/3/19, 11:34 AM, "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> wrote: > > > > On 2019-04-03 20:17, Venky Venkatesh wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I am using the DSW code from 18.11 with the default settings for all the #defines. Here are some more details: > > > I have an 8 port system with 1 queue. > > > All ports can inject events. Port 0 and 7 inject events rarely. > > > Ports 1-6 are linked to the queue and hence dequeue events. > > > > > > I see that in steady state the total number enqueues into the system is much greater than the total number of dequeues. > > > eventdev deq#: 1948491 enq#: 1949007 > > > > > > > If you have more enqueues than dequeues, it means there are events in > > flight in the scheduler. In the above case, it's roughly 516 events, > > which sounds perfectly healthy and normal. I say roughly, because > > there's no way to take a consistent, global snapshot of all xstats counters. > > > > [VV]: This is in steady state i.e. there are no more events being injected into the system. So shouldn’t everything get drained out at some point? > > > > Assuming appropriate application behavior, sure, of course. > > Events in flight are either in the output buffer on the producer port, > or the input ring on the consumer. > > Inappropriate behavior would be if any port (producer, consumer or > producer+consumer) is left unattended (i.e. no enqueue or dequeue > operation is performed). > > [VV]: I am pasting the original data again below. If about 516 events are inflight, atleast a few should show up in one of the data structures that you refer to -- but they don’t as seen below. Isn't that odd? Do you have any other places I can look -- there were no migrations too to look at some other transient buffers. > > Below are the counters: > > [root@PA-VM-venky ~]# cat y > dev_credits_on_loan: 883 > ------ port 0 -------- > port_0_new_enqueued: 125 > port_0_forward_enqueued: 0 > port_0_release_enqueued: 0 > port_0_queue_0_enqueued: 125 > port_0_dequeued: 0 > port_0_queue_0_dequeued: 0 > port_0_migrations: 0 Zero migrations? Looks suspicions, unless you've had a very light load throughout the duration of the test. > port_0_migration_latency: 0 > port_0_event_proc_latency: 0 > port_0_inflight_credits: 3 > port_0_load: 49 > port_0_last_bg: 39368511869708 This is an unattended port. "last_bg" is a timestamp of when this port last checked for ongoing "background operations" (included just for the purpose of finding offending ports). A background operation is handling the signaling required for migration to progress, or flushing the output buffers - for producers going idle. If you compare this "last_bg" the others', you'll see that this port has been idle for something like 3.8e+13 TSC cycles. Assuming 2,4 GHz TSC clock, this port hasn't received any love in ~4h. An unattended port blocks completion of a migration. This in turn means that there might well be events sitting in the "paused_events" array at the various ports, related to the in-progress migration. Check "paused_events_len" in gdb to verify that this is indeed the case. > ------ port 1 -------- > port_1_new_enqueued: 138947 > port_1_forward_enqueued: 237896 > port_1_release_enqueued: 0 > port_1_queue_0_enqueued: 376843 > port_1_dequeued: 475778 > port_1_queue_0_dequeued: 475778 > port_1_migrations: 0 > port_1_migration_latency: 0 > port_1_event_proc_latency: 119069 > port_1_inflight_credits: 13 > port_1_load: 0 > port_1_last_bg: 77183632541672 > ------ port 2 -------- > port_2_new_enqueued: 88834 > port_2_forward_enqueued: 156687 > port_2_release_enqueued: 0 > port_2_queue_0_enqueued: 245521 > port_2_dequeued: 313358 > port_2_queue_0_dequeued: 313358 > port_2_migrations: 0 > port_2_migration_latency: 0 > port_2_event_proc_latency: 176184 > port_2_inflight_credits: 15 > port_2_load: 0 > port_2_last_bg: 77183632941696 > ------ port 3 -------- > port_3_new_enqueued: 73170 > port_3_forward_enqueued: 78087 > port_3_release_enqueued: 0 > port_3_queue_0_enqueued: 151257 > port_3_dequeued: 165317 > port_3_queue_0_dequeued: 165317 > port_3_migrations: 0 > port_3_migration_latency: 0 > port_3_event_proc_latency: 329601 > port_3_inflight_credits: 66 > port_3_load: 0 > port_3_last_bg: 77183632966910 > ------ port 4 -------- > port_4_new_enqueued: 93182 > port_4_forward_enqueued: 76422 > port_4_release_enqueued: 0 > port_4_queue_0_enqueued: 169604 > port_4_dequeued: 207721 > port_4_queue_0_dequeued: 207721 > port_4_migrations: 0 > port_4_migration_latency: 0 > port_4_event_proc_latency: 262259 > port_4_inflight_credits: 114 > port_4_load: 0 > port_4_last_bg: 77183632760588 > ------ port 5 -------- > port_5_new_enqueued: 144855 > port_5_forward_enqueued: 630897 > port_5_release_enqueued: 0 > port_5_queue_0_enqueued: 775752 > port_5_dequeued: 633700 > port_5_queue_0_dequeued: 633700 > port_5_migrations: 0 > port_5_migration_latency: 0 > port_5_event_proc_latency: 88203 > port_5_inflight_credits: 64 > port_5_load: 0 > port_5_last_bg: 77183632277448 > ------ port 6 -------- > port_6_new_enqueued: 153590 > port_6_forward_enqueued: 76315 > port_6_release_enqueued: 0 > port_6_queue_0_enqueued: 229905 > port_6_dequeued: 152617 > port_6_queue_0_dequeued: 152617 > port_6_migrations: 0 > port_6_migration_latency: 0 > port_6_event_proc_latency: 354408 > port_6_inflight_credits: 92 > port_6_load: 0 > port_6_last_bg: 77183632653092 > ------ port 7 -------- > port_7_new_enqueued: 0 > port_7_forward_enqueued: 0 > port_7_release_enqueued: 0 > port_7_queue_0_enqueued: 0 > port_7_dequeued: 0 > port_7_queue_0_dequeued: 0 > port_7_migrations: 0 > port_7_migration_latency: 0 > port_7_event_proc_latency: 0 > port_7_inflight_credits: 0 > port_7_load: 0 Where's the "last_bg" for this port? > > > > Below are the data structure values: > > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[0]->out_buffer_len > $2 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[1]->out_buffer_len > $3 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[2]->out_buffer_len > $4 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[3]->out_buffer_len > $5 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[4]->out_buffer_len > $6 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[5]->out_buffer_len > $7 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[6]->out_buffer_len > $8 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[7]->out_buffer_len > $9 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[0]->in_ring > $10 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p0", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000090, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 0, tail = 0, > single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 0, tail = 0, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[1]->in_ring > $11 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p1", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000120, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 475778, > tail = 475778, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 475778, tail = 475778, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[2]->in_ring > $12 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p2", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc0000001b0, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 313358, > tail = 313358, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 313358, tail = 313358, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[3]->in_ring > $13 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p3", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000240, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 165403, > tail = 165403, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 165403, tail = 165403, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[4]->in_ring > $14 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p4", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc0000002d0, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 208237, > tail = 208237, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 208237, tail = 208237, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[5]->in_ring > $15 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p5", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000360, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 633700, > tail = 633700, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 633700, tail = 633700, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[6]->in_ring > $16 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p6", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc0000003f0, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 152617, > tail = 152617, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 152617, tail = 152617, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[7]->in_ring > $17 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p7", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000480, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 0, tail = 0, > single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 0, tail = 0, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: DSW eventdev is getting "stuck"? 2019-04-04 7:39 ` Mattias Rönnblom @ 2019-04-04 18:13 ` Venky Venkatesh 2019-04-04 19:29 ` Mattias Rönnblom 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Venky Venkatesh @ 2019-04-04 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mattias Rönnblom, dev On 4/4/19, 12:40 AM, "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> wrote: On 2019-04-04 07:39, Venky Venkatesh wrote: > > > On 4/3/19, 12:02 PM, "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> wrote: > > On 2019-04-03 20:36, Venky Venkatesh wrote: > > > > > > On 4/3/19, 11:34 AM, "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> wrote: > > > > On 2019-04-03 20:17, Venky Venkatesh wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I am using the DSW code from 18.11 with the default settings for all the #defines. Here are some more details: > > > I have an 8 port system with 1 queue. > > > All ports can inject events. Port 0 and 7 inject events rarely. > > > Ports 1-6 are linked to the queue and hence dequeue events. > > > > > > I see that in steady state the total number enqueues into the system is much greater than the total number of dequeues. > > > eventdev deq#: 1948491 enq#: 1949007 > > > > > > > If you have more enqueues than dequeues, it means there are events in > > flight in the scheduler. In the above case, it's roughly 516 events, > > which sounds perfectly healthy and normal. I say roughly, because > > there's no way to take a consistent, global snapshot of all xstats counters. > > > > [VV]: This is in steady state i.e. there are no more events being injected into the system. So shouldn’t everything get drained out at some point? > > > > Assuming appropriate application behavior, sure, of course. > > Events in flight are either in the output buffer on the producer port, > or the input ring on the consumer. > > Inappropriate behavior would be if any port (producer, consumer or > producer+consumer) is left unattended (i.e. no enqueue or dequeue > operation is performed). > > [VV]: I am pasting the original data again below. If about 516 events are inflight, atleast a few should show up in one of the data structures that you refer to -- but they don’t as seen below. Isn't that odd? Do you have any other places I can look -- there were no migrations too to look at some other transient buffers. > > Below are the counters: > > [root@PA-VM-venky ~]# cat y > dev_credits_on_loan: 883 > ------ port 0 -------- > port_0_new_enqueued: 125 > port_0_forward_enqueued: 0 > port_0_release_enqueued: 0 > port_0_queue_0_enqueued: 125 > port_0_dequeued: 0 > port_0_queue_0_dequeued: 0 > port_0_migrations: 0 Zero migrations? Looks suspicions, unless you've had a very light load throughout the duration of the test. > port_0_migration_latency: 0 > port_0_event_proc_latency: 0 > port_0_inflight_credits: 3 > port_0_load: 49 > port_0_last_bg: 39368511869708 This is an unattended port. "last_bg" is a timestamp of when this port last checked for ongoing "background operations" (included just for the purpose of finding offending ports). A background operation is handling the signaling required for migration to progress, or flushing the output buffers - for producers going idle. If you compare this "last_bg" the others', you'll see that this port has been idle for something like 3.8e+13 TSC cycles. Assuming 2,4 GHz TSC clock, this port hasn't received any love in ~4h. An unattended port blocks completion of a migration. This in turn means that there might well be events sitting in the "paused_events" array at the various ports, related to the in-progress migration. Check "paused_events_len" in gdb to verify that this is indeed the case. [VV]: Bingo! You nailed it. I checked the above in gdb. It is exactly what you said. Let me fix it and see. On a side note on the design, suppose you have 1 massive flow in terms of work per packet and is "long" lived. Then 1 core would be super busy while others would be idle. Then would it constantly consider migrating that flow since the busy-ness of the core would be above a threshold while others are idle? Again (after migrating) to figure out that the new core is super busy while others are idle and so on ...? A sort of thrashing effect. Thanks -Venky > ------ port 1 -------- > port_1_new_enqueued: 138947 > port_1_forward_enqueued: 237896 > port_1_release_enqueued: 0 > port_1_queue_0_enqueued: 376843 > port_1_dequeued: 475778 > port_1_queue_0_dequeued: 475778 > port_1_migrations: 0 > port_1_migration_latency: 0 > port_1_event_proc_latency: 119069 > port_1_inflight_credits: 13 > port_1_load: 0 > port_1_last_bg: 77183632541672 > ------ port 2 -------- > port_2_new_enqueued: 88834 > port_2_forward_enqueued: 156687 > port_2_release_enqueued: 0 > port_2_queue_0_enqueued: 245521 > port_2_dequeued: 313358 > port_2_queue_0_dequeued: 313358 > port_2_migrations: 0 > port_2_migration_latency: 0 > port_2_event_proc_latency: 176184 > port_2_inflight_credits: 15 > port_2_load: 0 > port_2_last_bg: 77183632941696 > ------ port 3 -------- > port_3_new_enqueued: 73170 > port_3_forward_enqueued: 78087 > port_3_release_enqueued: 0 > port_3_queue_0_enqueued: 151257 > port_3_dequeued: 165317 > port_3_queue_0_dequeued: 165317 > port_3_migrations: 0 > port_3_migration_latency: 0 > port_3_event_proc_latency: 329601 > port_3_inflight_credits: 66 > port_3_load: 0 > port_3_last_bg: 77183632966910 > ------ port 4 -------- > port_4_new_enqueued: 93182 > port_4_forward_enqueued: 76422 > port_4_release_enqueued: 0 > port_4_queue_0_enqueued: 169604 > port_4_dequeued: 207721 > port_4_queue_0_dequeued: 207721 > port_4_migrations: 0 > port_4_migration_latency: 0 > port_4_event_proc_latency: 262259 > port_4_inflight_credits: 114 > port_4_load: 0 > port_4_last_bg: 77183632760588 > ------ port 5 -------- > port_5_new_enqueued: 144855 > port_5_forward_enqueued: 630897 > port_5_release_enqueued: 0 > port_5_queue_0_enqueued: 775752 > port_5_dequeued: 633700 > port_5_queue_0_dequeued: 633700 > port_5_migrations: 0 > port_5_migration_latency: 0 > port_5_event_proc_latency: 88203 > port_5_inflight_credits: 64 > port_5_load: 0 > port_5_last_bg: 77183632277448 > ------ port 6 -------- > port_6_new_enqueued: 153590 > port_6_forward_enqueued: 76315 > port_6_release_enqueued: 0 > port_6_queue_0_enqueued: 229905 > port_6_dequeued: 152617 > port_6_queue_0_dequeued: 152617 > port_6_migrations: 0 > port_6_migration_latency: 0 > port_6_event_proc_latency: 354408 > port_6_inflight_credits: 92 > port_6_load: 0 > port_6_last_bg: 77183632653092 > ------ port 7 -------- > port_7_new_enqueued: 0 > port_7_forward_enqueued: 0 > port_7_release_enqueued: 0 > port_7_queue_0_enqueued: 0 > port_7_dequeued: 0 > port_7_queue_0_dequeued: 0 > port_7_migrations: 0 > port_7_migration_latency: 0 > port_7_event_proc_latency: 0 > port_7_inflight_credits: 0 > port_7_load: 0 Where's the "last_bg" for this port? > > > > Below are the data structure values: > > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[0]->out_buffer_len > $2 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[1]->out_buffer_len > $3 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[2]->out_buffer_len > $4 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[3]->out_buffer_len > $5 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[4]->out_buffer_len > $6 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[5]->out_buffer_len > $7 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[6]->out_buffer_len > $8 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p ((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[7]->out_buffer_len > $9 = {0 <repeats 64 times>} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[0]->in_ring > $10 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p0", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000090, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 0, tail = 0, > single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 0, tail = 0, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[1]->in_ring > $11 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p1", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000120, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 475778, > tail = 475778, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 475778, tail = 475778, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[2]->in_ring > $12 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p2", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc0000001b0, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 313358, > tail = 313358, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 313358, tail = 313358, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[3]->in_ring > $13 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p3", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000240, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 165403, > tail = 165403, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 165403, tail = 165403, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[4]->in_ring > $14 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p4", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc0000002d0, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 208237, > tail = 208237, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 208237, tail = 208237, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[5]->in_ring > $15 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p5", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000360, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 633700, > tail = 633700, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 633700, tail = 633700, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[6]->in_ring > $16 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p6", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc0000003f0, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 152617, > tail = 152617, single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 152617, tail = 152617, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > (gdb) p *((struct dsw_evdev *)rte_eventdevs[0].data->dev_private)->ports[7]->in_ring > $17 = {r = {name = "dsw0_p7", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, flags = 6, memzone = 0xc000000480, size = 32768, mask = 32767, capacity = 16384, pad0 = 0 '\000', prod = {head = 0, tail = 0, > single = 0}, pad1 = 0 '\000', cons = {head = 0, tail = 0, single = 1}, pad2 = 0 '\000'}} > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: DSW eventdev is getting "stuck"? 2019-04-04 18:13 ` Venky Venkatesh @ 2019-04-04 19:29 ` Mattias Rönnblom 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Mattias Rönnblom @ 2019-04-04 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Venky Venkatesh, dev On 2019-04-04 20:13, Venky Venkatesh wrote: > On a side note on the design, suppose you have 1 massive flow in terms of work per packet and is "long" lived. Then 1 core would be super busy while others would be idle. Then would it constantly consider migrating that flow since the busy-ness of the core would be above a threshold while others are idle? Again (after migrating) to figure out that the new core is super busy while others are idle and so on ...? A sort of thrashing effect. > When a port considers migration (to reduce its load), it consults the last 128 seen events dequeued on that port. If all those events originate from the same flow, no flow will be migrated. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-04 19:29 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-04-03 18:17 DSW eventdev is getting "stuck"? Venky Venkatesh 2019-04-03 18:33 ` Mattias Rönnblom 2019-04-03 18:36 ` Venky Venkatesh 2019-04-03 19:02 ` Mattias Rönnblom 2019-04-04 5:39 ` Venky Venkatesh 2019-04-04 7:39 ` Mattias Rönnblom 2019-04-04 18:13 ` Venky Venkatesh 2019-04-04 19:29 ` Mattias Rönnblom
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.