Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 5/9] net/ipn3ke: remove useless if statement

["Xu, Rosen" <rosen.xu@intel.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 16:01
> To: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Xu, Rosen <rosen.xu@intel.com>; dpdk stable
> <stable@dpdk.org>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 5/9] net/ipn3ke: remove useless if
> statement
> 
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:04 PM Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Coverity complains that this statement is not needed as the goto label
> > is on the next line anyway. Remove the if statement.
> >
> > 653        ret = ipn3ke_cfg_parse_i40e_pf_ethdev(afu_name, pf_name);
> >    CID 337930 (#1 of 1): Identical code for different branches
> >    (IDENTICAL_BRANCHES)identical_branches: The same code is executed
> >    when the condition ret is true or false, because the code in the
> >    if-then branch and after the if statement is identical. Should
> >    the if statement be removed?
> > 654        if (ret)
> > 655                goto end;
> >    implicit_else: The code from the above if-then branch is identical
> >    to the code after the if statement.
> > 656end:
> >
> > Coverity issue: 337930
> > Fixes: c01c748e4ae6 ("net/ipn3ke: add new driver")
> > Cc: rosen.xu@intel.com
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c
> > index c226d6313..282295f49 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c
> > @@ -652,6 +652,5 @@ ipn3ke_cfg_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
> >
> >         ret = ipn3ke_cfg_parse_i40e_pf_ethdev(afu_name, pf_name);
> > -       if (ret)
> > -               goto end;
> > +
> >  end:
> >         if (kvlist)
> > --
> > 2.21.0
> >
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> 
> --
> David Marchand

Reviewed-by: Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@intel.com>