All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] selftests: bpf: add malloc failures checks in bpf_iter
@ 2023-10-24  2:59 Yuran Pereira
  2023-10-24  3:28 ` Yonghong Song
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yuran Pereira @ 2023-10-24  2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuah
  Cc: Yuran Pereira, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, song,
	yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa,
	mykolal, brauner, iii, kuifeng, bpf, linux-kselftest,
	linux-kernel

Since some malloc calls in bpf_iter may at times fail,
this patch adds the appropriate fail checks, and ensures that
any previously allocated resource is appropriately destroyed
before returning the function.

Signed-off-by: Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira@hotmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
index 1f02168103dd..6d47ea9211a4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
@@ -878,6 +878,11 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void)
 
 	skel->rodata->num_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
 	val = malloc(8 * bpf_num_possible_cpus());
+	if (CHECK(!val, "malloc", "memory allocation failed: %s",
+				strerror(errno))) {
+		bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__destroy(skel);
+		return;
+	}
 
 	err = bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__load(skel);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__load"))
@@ -1057,6 +1062,11 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_array_map(void)
 
 	skel->rodata->num_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
 	val = malloc(8 * bpf_num_possible_cpus());
+	if (CHECK(!val, "malloc", "memory allocation failed: %s",
+				strerror(errno))) {
+		bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__destroy(skel);
+		return;
+	}
 
 	err = bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__load(skel);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__load"))
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] selftests: bpf: add malloc failures checks in bpf_iter
  2023-10-24  2:59 [PATCH] selftests: bpf: add malloc failures checks in bpf_iter Yuran Pereira
@ 2023-10-24  3:28 ` Yonghong Song
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2023-10-24  3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yuran Pereira, shuah
  Cc: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, song, john.fastabend, kpsingh,
	sdf, haoluo, jolsa, mykolal, brauner, iii, kuifeng, bpf,
	linux-kselftest, linux-kernel


On 10/23/23 7:59 PM, Yuran Pereira wrote:
> Since some malloc calls in bpf_iter may at times fail,
> this patch adds the appropriate fail checks, and ensures that
> any previously allocated resource is appropriately destroyed
> before returning the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira@hotmail.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 10 ++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
> index 1f02168103dd..6d47ea9211a4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
> @@ -878,6 +878,11 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void)
>   
>   	skel->rodata->num_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
>   	val = malloc(8 * bpf_num_possible_cpus());
> +	if (CHECK(!val, "malloc", "memory allocation failed: %s",
> +				strerror(errno))) {
> +		bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__destroy(skel);
> +		return;
> +	}


Could you use !ASSERT_OK_PTR(...) instead of CHECK? bpf selftest
prefers to use ASSERT_* series of macros instead of CHECK.
In the above example, printing out strerror is not required,
see some other examples in the same folder.

Also bpf_iter.c has some other usages of CHECK macro.
Since you are touching this file, could you convert all
CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros?

Basically you need two patches:
   patch 1: convert existing CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros in bpf_iter.c.
            this should not check any functionality except error messages.
   patch 2: your patch with ASSERT_* macros.

You can use the following as your subject line:
   [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Add malloc failure checks in bpf_iter

>   
>   	err = bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__load(skel);
>   	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__load"))
> @@ -1057,6 +1062,11 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_array_map(void)
>   
>   	skel->rodata->num_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
>   	val = malloc(8 * bpf_num_possible_cpus());
> +	if (CHECK(!val, "malloc", "memory allocation failed: %s",
> +				strerror(errno))) {
> +		bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__destroy(skel);
> +		return;
> +	}
>   
>   	err = bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__load(skel);
>   	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__load"))

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-24  3:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-10-24  2:59 [PATCH] selftests: bpf: add malloc failures checks in bpf_iter Yuran Pereira
2023-10-24  3:28 ` Yonghong Song

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.