From: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com> To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 4/7] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: add initial rk3588 boards Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 14:27:21 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <0a3c520c75dcfe6ff86e96aa18fc5b52ce1e3f30.camel@collabora.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20230107002854.2kok76qdvl4a3hzw@mercury.elektranox.org> > > Hi Sebastian, > > To better match other boards from this vendor (e.g. RADXA ROCK 4) > > > > would it be best to capitalise this (and obviously the model field > > in > > the respective DTS patches) the same? > > > > So it would become "Radxa ROCK 5A" and "Radxa ROCK 5B". > > > > It's also capitalised this way on the documentation website [1]. > > > > (I think the vendor has specifically dropped the Pi reference from > > these boards, but I don't know why) > > > > Thanks! > > Chris > > > > [1]: https://wiki.radxa.com/Rock5/5B > > The current format has been requested by Radxa: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/892CB3E963AEF095+eaed7498-2324-9476-6a24-f940d62adb74@radxa.com/ > The comment there suggests to use "Radxa ROCK 5 Model A" and "Radxa ROCK 5 Model B", so can we make the following changes before the next revision, to align on the model names? PS. I think "board" is a terrible suffix, it's almost like when people say "PCB Board". But maybe I am missing some historical context here ? - Patch 4: "description: Radxa Rock 5 Model A" > "description: Radxa ROCK 5 Model A" - Patch 4: "description: Radxa Rock 5 Model B" > "description: Radxa ROCK 5 Model B" - Patch 6: "Radxa Rock 5A Board" > "Radxa ROCK 5 Model A" - Patch 7: "Radxa Rock 5B Board" > "Radxa ROCK 5 Model B" Thanks! Chris
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com> To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 4/7] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: add initial rk3588 boards Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 14:27:21 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <0a3c520c75dcfe6ff86e96aa18fc5b52ce1e3f30.camel@collabora.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20230107002854.2kok76qdvl4a3hzw@mercury.elektranox.org> > > Hi Sebastian, > > To better match other boards from this vendor (e.g. RADXA ROCK 4) > > > > would it be best to capitalise this (and obviously the model field > > in > > the respective DTS patches) the same? > > > > So it would become "Radxa ROCK 5A" and "Radxa ROCK 5B". > > > > It's also capitalised this way on the documentation website [1]. > > > > (I think the vendor has specifically dropped the Pi reference from > > these boards, but I don't know why) > > > > Thanks! > > Chris > > > > [1]: https://wiki.radxa.com/Rock5/5B > > The current format has been requested by Radxa: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/892CB3E963AEF095+eaed7498-2324-9476-6a24-f940d62adb74@radxa.com/ > The comment there suggests to use "Radxa ROCK 5 Model A" and "Radxa ROCK 5 Model B", so can we make the following changes before the next revision, to align on the model names? PS. I think "board" is a terrible suffix, it's almost like when people say "PCB Board". But maybe I am missing some historical context here ? - Patch 4: "description: Radxa Rock 5 Model A" > "description: Radxa ROCK 5 Model A" - Patch 4: "description: Radxa Rock 5 Model B" > "description: Radxa ROCK 5 Model B" - Patch 6: "Radxa Rock 5A Board" > "Radxa ROCK 5 Model A" - Patch 7: "Radxa Rock 5B Board" > "Radxa ROCK 5 Model B" Thanks! Chris _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-09 14:27 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-12-14 18:22 [PATCHv6 0/7] Initial rk3588 DT Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-14 18:22 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-14 18:22 ` [PATCHv6 1/7] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: add initial rk3588 syscon compatibles Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-14 18:22 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-14 18:22 ` [PATCHv6 2/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3588 pinctrl data Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-14 18:22 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-14 18:22 ` [PATCHv6 3/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add base DT for rk3588 SoC Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-14 18:22 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-15 9:22 ` Marc Zyngier 2022-12-15 9:22 ` Marc Zyngier 2022-12-15 14:00 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-15 14:00 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-15 10:45 ` Jagan Teki 2022-12-15 10:45 ` Jagan Teki 2022-12-15 10:50 ` Marc Zyngier 2022-12-15 10:50 ` Marc Zyngier 2022-12-15 10:55 ` Jagan Teki 2022-12-15 10:55 ` Jagan Teki 2022-12-14 18:22 ` [PATCHv6 4/7] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: add initial rk3588 boards Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-14 18:22 ` Sebastian Reichel 2023-01-05 19:20 ` Christopher Obbard 2023-01-05 19:20 ` Christopher Obbard 2023-01-07 0:28 ` Sebastian Reichel 2023-01-07 0:28 ` Sebastian Reichel 2023-01-09 14:27 ` Christopher Obbard [this message] 2023-01-09 14:27 ` Christopher Obbard 2022-12-14 18:22 ` [PATCHv6 5/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3588-evb1 board Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-14 18:22 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-15 13:07 ` Jagan Teki 2022-12-15 13:07 ` Jagan Teki 2022-12-15 13:56 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-15 13:56 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-14 18:22 ` [PATCHv6 6/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rock-5a board Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-14 18:22 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-14 18:22 ` [PATCHv6 7/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rock-5b board Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-14 18:22 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-15 17:18 ` [PATCHv6 0/7] Initial rk3588 DT Rob Herring 2022-12-15 17:18 ` Rob Herring 2022-12-15 18:17 ` Sebastian Reichel 2022-12-15 18:17 ` Sebastian Reichel
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=0a3c520c75dcfe6ff86e96aa18fc5b52ce1e3f30.camel@collabora.com \ --to=chris.obbard@collabora.com \ --cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=heiko@sntech.de \ --cc=kernel@collabora.com \ --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \ --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \ --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.