* [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Is it useful to create a seperate address space for cpu-memory on x86 platform?
@ 2017-05-26 9:59 Gonglei (Arei)
2017-05-26 11:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gonglei (Arei) @ 2017-05-26 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini, peter.crosthwaite, peter.maydell, edgar.iglesias
Cc: qemu-devel, Huangweidong (C)
Hi all,
I found that the memory consumption increase about 5M since below commit on Qemu process.
commit 6731d864f80938e404dc3e5eb7f6b76b891e3e43
Author: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
Date: Thu Jan 21 14:15:06 2016 +0000
qom/cpu: Add MemoryRegion property
Add a MemoryRegion property, which if set is used to construct
the CPU's initial (default) AddressSpace.
Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
[PMM: code is moved from qom/cpu.c to exec.c to avoid having to
make qom/cpu.o be a non-common object file; code to use the
MemoryRegion and to default it to system_memory added.]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
The result before this commit:
linux-arei:/mnt/sdb/gonglei/opensource/qemu # ps aux|grep qemu
root 12658 17.2 0.0 375996 21412 pts/1 Sl+ 12:53 0:00 ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -machine pc-i440fx-2.5,accel=kvm,usb=off -nodefaults
after the commit:
linux-arei:/mnt/sdb/gonglei/opensource/qemu # ps aux|grep qemu
root 23201 17.2 0.0 384196 25736 pts/1 Sl+ 12:54 0:00 ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -machine pc-i440fx-2.5,accel=kvm,usb=off -nodefaults
I couldn't find any benefits on x86 platform (I'm not familiar with ARM), am I missing something?
And It works well if I revert this commit. Can I?
Thanks,
-Gonglei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Is it useful to create a seperate address space for cpu-memory on x86 platform?
2017-05-26 9:59 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Is it useful to create a seperate address space for cpu-memory on x86 platform? Gonglei (Arei)
@ 2017-05-26 11:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2017-05-26 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gonglei (Arei), peter.crosthwaite, peter.maydell, edgar.iglesias
Cc: qemu-devel, Huangweidong (C)
On 26/05/2017 11:59, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> The result before this commit:
>
> linux-arei:/mnt/sdb/gonglei/opensource/qemu # ps aux|grep qemu
> root 12658 17.2 0.0 375996 21412 pts/1 Sl+ 12:53 0:00 ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -machine pc-i440fx-2.5,accel=kvm,usb=off -nodefaults
>
> after the commit:
>
> linux-arei:/mnt/sdb/gonglei/opensource/qemu # ps aux|grep qemu
> root 23201 17.2 0.0 384196 25736 pts/1 Sl+ 12:54 0:00 ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -machine pc-i440fx-2.5,accel=kvm,usb=off -nodefaults
>
> I couldn't find any benefits on x86 platform (I'm not familiar with ARM), am I missing something?
Hi,
this was also reported by Anthony Xu. I am working on reducing the time
and space cost of multiple address spaces by sharing the FlatView and
AddressSpaceDispatch.
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-26 11:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-26 9:59 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Is it useful to create a seperate address space for cpu-memory on x86 platform? Gonglei (Arei)
2017-05-26 11:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.