From: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
Hongyan Xia <hongyxia@amazon.com>,
Dmitry Isaikin <isaikin-dmitry@yandex.ru>,
Ian Jackson <iwj@xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.16] Revert "domctl: improve locking during domain destruction"
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:28:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d79cc56-f3e8-bf6a-4ed9-ac2fe64aba43@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YYqL9nViQiDw9C30@Air-de-Roger>
Hi,
On 09/11/2021 14:55, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 02:42:58PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>> On 09/11/2021 14:31, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> This reverts commit 228ab9992ffb1d8f9d2475f2581e68b2913acb88.
>>>
>>> Performance analysis has shown that dropping the domctl lock during
>>> domain destruction greatly increases the contention in the heap_lock,
>>> thus making parallel destruction of domains slower.
>>>
>>> The following lockperf data shows the difference between the current
>>> code and the reverted one:
>>>
>>> lock: 3342357(2.268295505s), block: 3263853(18.556650797s)
>>> lock: 2788704(0.362311723s), block: 222681( 0.091152276s)
>>
>> Thanks for the numbers, this is already an improvement from the reverted.
>>
>> Can you also please provide some details on the setup that was used to get
>> the number? (e.g. how many guests, amount of memory...).
>
> Those are from Dmitry, and are gathered after destroying 5 guests in
> parallel. Given his previous emails he seems to use 2GB HVM guests for
> other tests, so I would assume that's the case for the lock profile data
> also (albeit it's not said explicitly):
>
> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2021-09/msg01515.html
>
> I'm not sure it's worth adding this explicitly, as it's not a very
> complex test case. Probably any attempts to destroy a minimal amount
> of guests in parallel (5?) will already show the lock contention in
> the profiling.
In this case, I am not too concerned about not been able to reproduce
it. However, I think it is a good practice to always post the setup
along with the numbers.
This makes easier to understand the context of the patch and avoid
spending time digging into the archives to find the original report.
Anyway, you already wrote everything above. So this is a matter of
adding your first paragraph in the commit message + maybe a link to the
original discussion(s).
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-09 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-12 12:02 [PATCH for-4.16 v2] Revert "domctl: improve locking during domain destruction" Roger Pau Monne
2021-11-09 14:31 ` [PATCH for-4.16] " Roger Pau Monne
2021-11-09 14:34 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-11-09 14:42 ` Julien Grall
2021-11-09 14:55 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-11-09 15:28 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2021-11-09 15:04 ` Ian Jackson
2021-11-09 15:15 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-11-16 14:51 ` [PATCH for-4.16] Revert "domctl: improve locking during domain destruction" [and 2 more messages] Ian Jackson
2021-11-15 11:51 ` [PATCH for-4.16 v2] Revert "domctl: improve locking during domain destruction" Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d79cc56-f3e8-bf6a-4ed9-ac2fe64aba43@xen.org \
--to=julien@xen.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=hongyxia@amazon.com \
--cc=isaikin-dmitry@yandex.ru \
--cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.