Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: update mvneta binding document

From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: update mvneta binding document
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 17:30:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0dc0916f-2654-53fe-226d-f75c9498bb39@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181207113301.GZ30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>

Hi,

On 07/12/18 5:03 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 04:43:27PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Russell,
>>
>> No, I haven't merged patches from this series. That would have failed
>> compilation since Grygorii modified enum phy_mode which is used in this series.
>> You have also noted this in your cover letter.
> 
> Ok, but in any case, given the complexities of modifying the patch
> and properly testing it, I think I'll wait until those changes have
> hit mainline before re-spinning this series.  Alternatively, if
> you're happy to take just build-tested version, I could re-spin
> with that so at least we can get the phy bits queued for the merge
> window.

I'd prefer we test it before merging.
> 
> In any case, I'm busy trying to get to the bottom of several OMAP4
> bugs while ill, so this isn't something I want to do at the moment.

Take care!

Thanks
Kishon
> 