From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, npiggin@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] powerpc/fault: Avoid heavy search_exception_tables() verification Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:30:49 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <0e25f03d-9f59-b963-312c-c3ae1d7953a2@linux.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <731bdee26a5a5c81cd815ed624a6fb3bdef8b4db.1607416578.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> On 12/8/20 2:07 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote: > search_exception_tables() is an heavy operation, we have to avoid it. > When KUAP is selected, we'll know the fault has been blocked by KUAP. > Otherwise, it behaves just as if the address was already in the TLBs > and no fault was generated. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> > Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> > --- > v3: rebased > v2: Squashed with the preceeding patch which was re-ordering tests that get removed in this patch. > --- > arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 23 +++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c > index 3fcd34c28e10..1770b41e4730 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c > @@ -210,28 +210,19 @@ static bool bad_kernel_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, > return true; > } > > - if (!is_exec && address < TASK_SIZE && (error_code & (DSISR_PROTFAULT | DSISR_KEYFAULT)) && > - !search_exception_tables(regs->nip)) { > - pr_crit_ratelimited("Kernel attempted to access user page (%lx) - exploit attempt? (uid: %d)\n", > - address, > - from_kuid(&init_user_ns, current_uid())); > - } > - > // Kernel fault on kernel address is bad > if (address >= TASK_SIZE) > return true; > > - // Fault on user outside of certain regions (eg. copy_tofrom_user()) is bad > - if (!search_exception_tables(regs->nip)) > - return true; > - > - // Read/write fault in a valid region (the exception table search passed > - // above), but blocked by KUAP is bad, it can never succeed. > - if (bad_kuap_fault(regs, address, is_write)) > + // Read/write fault blocked by KUAP is bad, it can never succeed. > + if (bad_kuap_fault(regs, address, is_write)) { > + pr_crit_ratelimited("Kernel attempted to %s user page (%lx) - exploit attempt? (uid: %d)\n", > + is_write ? "write" : "read", address, > + from_kuid(&init_user_ns, current_uid())); > return true; > + } Should we update bad_kuap_fault to check for !is_kernel_addr() and error_code & (DSISIR_PROT_FAULT | DSISIR_KEYFAULT). I am wondering whether we can take another fault w.r.t kernel address/user address and end up reporting that as KUAP fault? > > - // What's left? Kernel fault on user in well defined regions (extable > - // matched), and allowed by KUAP in the faulting context. > + // What's left? Kernel fault on user and allowed by KUAP in the faulting context. > return false; > } > > -aneesh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, npiggin@gmail.com Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] powerpc/fault: Avoid heavy search_exception_tables() verification Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:30:49 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <0e25f03d-9f59-b963-312c-c3ae1d7953a2@linux.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <731bdee26a5a5c81cd815ed624a6fb3bdef8b4db.1607416578.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> On 12/8/20 2:07 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote: > search_exception_tables() is an heavy operation, we have to avoid it. > When KUAP is selected, we'll know the fault has been blocked by KUAP. > Otherwise, it behaves just as if the address was already in the TLBs > and no fault was generated. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> > Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> > --- > v3: rebased > v2: Squashed with the preceeding patch which was re-ordering tests that get removed in this patch. > --- > arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 23 +++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c > index 3fcd34c28e10..1770b41e4730 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c > @@ -210,28 +210,19 @@ static bool bad_kernel_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, > return true; > } > > - if (!is_exec && address < TASK_SIZE && (error_code & (DSISR_PROTFAULT | DSISR_KEYFAULT)) && > - !search_exception_tables(regs->nip)) { > - pr_crit_ratelimited("Kernel attempted to access user page (%lx) - exploit attempt? (uid: %d)\n", > - address, > - from_kuid(&init_user_ns, current_uid())); > - } > - > // Kernel fault on kernel address is bad > if (address >= TASK_SIZE) > return true; > > - // Fault on user outside of certain regions (eg. copy_tofrom_user()) is bad > - if (!search_exception_tables(regs->nip)) > - return true; > - > - // Read/write fault in a valid region (the exception table search passed > - // above), but blocked by KUAP is bad, it can never succeed. > - if (bad_kuap_fault(regs, address, is_write)) > + // Read/write fault blocked by KUAP is bad, it can never succeed. > + if (bad_kuap_fault(regs, address, is_write)) { > + pr_crit_ratelimited("Kernel attempted to %s user page (%lx) - exploit attempt? (uid: %d)\n", > + is_write ? "write" : "read", address, > + from_kuid(&init_user_ns, current_uid())); > return true; > + } Should we update bad_kuap_fault to check for !is_kernel_addr() and error_code & (DSISIR_PROT_FAULT | DSISIR_KEYFAULT). I am wondering whether we can take another fault w.r.t kernel address/user address and end up reporting that as KUAP fault? > > - // What's left? Kernel fault on user in well defined regions (extable > - // matched), and allowed by KUAP in the faulting context. > + // What's left? Kernel fault on user and allowed by KUAP in the faulting context. > return false; > } > > -aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-08 13:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-12-08 8:36 [PATCH v3 1/5] powerpc/book3s64/kuap: Improve error reporting with KUAP Christophe Leroy 2020-12-08 8:36 ` Christophe Leroy 2020-12-08 8:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] powerpc/mm: sanity_check_fault() should work for all, not only BOOK3S Christophe Leroy 2020-12-08 8:36 ` Christophe Leroy 2020-12-08 8:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] powerpc/fault: Unnest definition of page_fault_is_write() and page_fault_is_bad() Christophe Leroy 2020-12-08 8:37 ` Christophe Leroy 2020-12-08 8:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] powerpc/fault: Avoid heavy search_exception_tables() verification Christophe Leroy 2020-12-08 8:37 ` Christophe Leroy 2020-12-08 13:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message] 2020-12-08 13:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2020-12-08 14:26 ` Christophe Leroy 2020-12-08 14:26 ` Christophe Leroy 2020-12-08 14:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2020-12-08 14:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2020-12-08 14:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2020-12-08 14:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2020-12-08 15:07 ` Christophe Leroy 2020-12-08 15:07 ` Christophe Leroy 2020-12-09 5:34 ` Christophe Leroy 2020-12-08 8:37 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] powerpc/fault: Perform exception fixup in do_page_fault() Christophe Leroy 2020-12-08 8:37 ` Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=0e25f03d-9f59-b963-312c-c3ae1d7953a2@linux.ibm.com \ --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \ --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \ --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \ --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \ --cc=paulus@samba.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.