All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
To: 'Thomas Abraham' <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>,
	'Mark Brown' <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com,
	grant.likely@secretlab.ca, jaswinder.singh@linaro.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:11:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fae01cd600e$442ed160$cc8c7420$%kim@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuYYwQA_x112xqOnQmwZjzoXoR-DAvT8YdB90Wm=78CH72uOg@mail.gmail.com>

Thomas Abraham wrote:
> 
> On 11 July 2012 23:19, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:10:59PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> >> Changes since v4:
> >> - Includes the missing gpio request for slave select line gpio as
> suggested
> >>   by Mark Brown.
> >
> > These looked OK (and have had quite a bit of review already so we're
> > probably at the stage where incremental fixes are better anyway) so I
> > tried to apply them but git am was really unhappy.  I tried applying on
> >
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/misc.git spi-
> next
> >
> > and -next.  Can you check what's going on here please?
> 
Firstly, this patches look ok to me.

And Mark, this touches various samsung stuff in arch/arm/ so if you're ok,
I'd like to pick this up in samsung tree. We don't want to see conflicts...

> These patches were based on Samsung maintainer's for-next branch with
> Grant's spi/next branch merged. I will check with your spi-next
> branch. Thanks.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:11:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fae01cd600e$442ed160$cc8c7420$%kim@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuYYwQA_x112xqOnQmwZjzoXoR-DAvT8YdB90Wm=78CH72uOg@mail.gmail.com>

Thomas Abraham wrote:
> 
> On 11 July 2012 23:19, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:10:59PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> >> Changes since v4:
> >> - Includes the missing gpio request for slave select line gpio as
> suggested
> >>   by Mark Brown.
> >
> > These looked OK (and have had quite a bit of review already so we're
> > probably at the stage where incremental fixes are better anyway) so I
> > tried to apply them but git am was really unhappy.  I tried applying on
> >
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/misc.git spi-
> next
> >
> > and -next.  Can you check what's going on here please?
> 
Firstly, this patches look ok to me.

And Mark, this touches various samsung stuff in arch/arm/ so if you're ok,
I'd like to pick this up in samsung tree. We don't want to see conflicts...

> These patches were based on Samsung maintainer's for-next branch with
> Grant's spi/next branch merged. I will check with your spi-next
> branch. Thanks.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-12  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-11 15:40 [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree Thomas Abraham
2012-07-11 15:40 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-11 15:41 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] spi: s3c64xx: remove unused S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TRLCNTZ macro Thomas Abraham
2012-07-11 15:41   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-11 15:41 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] spi: s3c64xx: move controller information into driver data Thomas Abraham
2012-07-11 15:41   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-11 15:41 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] ARM: Samsung: Remove pdev pointer parameter from spi gpio setup functions Thomas Abraham
2012-07-11 15:41   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-11 15:41 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] ARM: Samsung: Modify s3c64xx_spi{0|1|2}_set_platdata function Thomas Abraham
2012-07-11 15:41   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-11 15:41 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] spi: s3c64xx: Remove the 'set_level' callback from controller data Thomas Abraham
2012-07-11 15:41   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-11 15:41 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] spi: s3c64xx: add device tree support Thomas Abraham
2012-07-11 15:41   ` Thomas Abraham
     [not found]   ` <1342021265-11212-7-git-send-email-thomas.abraham-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-12 22:38     ` Kukjin Kim
2012-07-12 22:38       ` Kukjin Kim
2012-07-13  3:55       ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-13  3:55         ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-13 11:28         ` Kukjin Kim
2012-07-13 11:28           ` Kukjin Kim
2012-07-13 11:38           ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-13 11:38             ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-13 13:42             ` Kukjin Kim
2012-07-13 13:42               ` Kukjin Kim
2012-07-13 14:51               ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-13 14:51                 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-15 10:39                 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-07-15 10:39                   ` Kukjin Kim
2012-07-11 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree Mark Brown
2012-07-11 17:49   ` Mark Brown
2012-07-11 18:00   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-11 18:00     ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-12  8:47     ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-12  8:47       ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-12  9:11     ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2012-07-12  9:11       ` Kukjin Kim
2012-07-12 13:02       ` Mark Brown
2012-07-12 13:02         ` Mark Brown
2012-07-12 13:43         ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-12 13:43           ` Thomas Abraham
2012-07-12 16:16           ` Mark Brown
2012-07-12 16:16             ` Mark Brown
     [not found]             ` <20120712161657.GC7256-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-12 22:35               ` Kukjin Kim
2012-07-12 22:35                 ` Kukjin Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='0fae01cd600e$442ed160$cc8c7420$%kim@samsung.com' \
    --to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.