All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] powerpc/fadump: update documentation about 'fadump_append=' parameter
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 23:30:37 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <102276aa-cddb-dc60-269c-b29dedc89eab@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170515112901.67d32e76@kitsune.suse.cz>

Hi Michal,

Sorry for taking this long to respond. I was working on a few other things.

On Monday 15 May 2017 02:59 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 15 May 2017 12:59:46 +0530
> Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On Friday 12 May 2017 09:12 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 May 2017 15:15:33 +0530
>>> Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> On Thursday 11 May 2017 06:46 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 11 May 2017 02:00:11 +0530
>>>>> Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>>      
>>>>>> Hello Michal,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wednesday 10 May 2017 09:31 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 03 May 2017 23:52:52 +0530
>>>>>>> Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>> With the introduction of 'fadump_append=' parameter to pass
>>>>>>>> additional parameters to fadump (capture) kernel, update
>>>>>>>> documentation about it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Changes from v4:
>>>>>>>> * Based on top of patchset that includes
>>>>>>>>       https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=akpm&id=05f383cdfba8793240e73f9a9fbff4e25d66003f
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt |   10
>>>>>>>> +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt
>>>>>>>> b/Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt index
>>>>>>>> 8394bc8..6327193 100644 ---
>>>>>>>> a/Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt +++
>>>>>>>> b/Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt @@ -162,7
>>>>>>>> +162,15 @@ How to enable firmware-assisted dump (fadump):
>>>>>>>>      1. Set config option CONFIG_FA_DUMP=y and build kernel.
>>>>>>>>      2. Boot into linux kernel with 'fadump=on' kernel cmdline
>>>>>>>> option. -3. Optionally, user can also set 'crashkernel=' kernel
>>>>>>>> cmdline +3. A user can pass additional command line parameters
>>>>>>>> as a comma
>>>>>>>> +   separated list through 'fadump_append=' parameter, to be
>>>>>>>> enforced
>>>>>>>> +   when fadump is active. For example, if parameters like
>>>>>>>> nr_cpus=1,
>>>>>>>> +   numa=off & udev.children-max=2 are to be enforced when
>>>>>>>> fadump is
>>>>>>>> +   active,
>>>>>>>> 'fadump_append=nr_cpus=1,numa=off,udev.children-max=2'
>>>>>>>> +   can be passed in command line, which will be replaced with
>>>>>>>> +   "nr_cpus=1 numa=off udev.children-max=2" when fadump is
>>>>>>>> active.
>>>>>>>> +   This helps in reducing memory consumption during dump
>>>>>>>> capture. +4. Optionally, user can also set 'crashkernel='
>>>>>>>> kernel cmdline to specify size of the memory to reserve for
>>>>>>>> boot memory dump preservation.
>>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>> Writing your own deficient parser for comma separated arguments
>>>>>>> when perfectly fine parser for space separated quoted arguments
>>>>>>> exists in the kernel and the bootloader does not seem like a
>>>>>>> good idea to me.
>>>>>> Couple of things that prompted me for v5 are:
>>>>>>       1. Using parse_early_options() limits the kind of parameters
>>>>>>          that can be passed to fadump capture kernel. Passing
>>>>>> parameters like systemd.unit= & udev.childern.max= has no effect
>>>>>> with v4. Updating
>>>>>>          boot_command_line parameter, when fadump is active,
>>>>>> seems a better alternative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       2. Passing space-separated quoted arguments is not working
>>>>>>          as intended with lilo. Updating bootloader with the below
>>>>>>          entry in /etc/lilo.conf file results in a missing append
>>>>>>          entry in /etc/yaboot.conf file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            append = "quiet sysrq=1 insmod=sym53c8xx insmod=ipr
>>>>>> crashkernel=512M-:256M fadump_append=\"nr_cpus=1 numa=off
>>>>>> udev.children-max=2\""
>>>>> Meaning that a script that emulates LILO semantics on top of
>>>>> yaboot which is completely capable of passing qouted space
>>>>> separated arguments fails. IMHO it is more reasonable to fix the
>>>>> script or whatever adaptation layer or use yaboot directly than
>>>>> working around bug in said script by introducing a new argument
>>>>> parser in the kernel.
>>>>>
>>>>>      
>>>> Hmmm.. while trying to implement space-separated parameter list
>>>> with quotes as syntax for fadump_append parameter, noticed that it
>>>> can make implemenation
>>>> more vulnerable. Here are some problems I am facing while
>>>> implementing this..
>>> How so?
>>>
>>> presumably you can reuse parse_args even if you do not register with
>>> early_param and call it yourself. Then your parsing of
>>> fadump_append is
>>
>> I wasn't aware of that. Thanks for pointing it out, Michal.
>> Will try to use parse_args and get back.
>>
> I was thinking a bit more about the uses of the commandline and how
> fadump_append potentially breaks it.
>
> The first thing that should be addressed and is the special -- argument
> which denotes the start of init arguments that are not to be parsed by
> the kernel. Incidentally the initial implementation using early_param
> happened to handles that without issue. parse_args surely handles that
> so adding a hook somewhere should give you location of that argument
> (if any). And interesting thing that can happen is passing an -- inside
> the fadump_append argument. It should be handled (or not) in some way
> or other and the handling documented.


The intention with this patch is to replace

   "root=/dev/sda2 ro fadump_append=nr_cpus=1,numa=off crashkernel=1024M"

with

   "root=/dev/sda2 ro nr_cpus=1 numa=off crashkernel=1024M"

when kernel is booting for dump capture.
While parse_args() is making parsing relatively easy, the main idea is
to replace parameters as above when fadump capture kernel is booting.
The code is relatively complicated to replace parameters using 
space-separated
quoted string even though parse_args() may parse them easily. 
Comma-separated
list was easier to implement and seemed less error prone for replacing 
parameters.

Want to replace fadump_append=, to avoid command line overflow issues and
also to not have to deal with special cases like --. Actually, 
fadump_append=
seems to be confusing in that sense. How about 
fadump_args=comma-separated-list-
of-params-for-capture-kernel ? Please share your thoughts.


> The second thing that breaks is reusing content of /proc/cmdline in
> kexec calls for passing arguments to the loaded kernel. It works
> flawlessly passing the same arguments the currently running kernel was
> started with unless fadump_append argument handler appends content of
> the fadump_append argument to actual commandline that appears there. So
> this would be an argument against modifying the commandline. You could
> argue using fadump and kexec together is an exotic use case but I would
> expect that the very machines that require fadump_append to reduce dump
> memory requirement benefit from using kexec for reboots because the BIOS
> probing the hardware takes quite a while as well. If rewriting the
> commandline is desired then this side effect of recursively adding the
> content of fadump_append on kexecs which reuse /proc/cmdline should be
> documented.
>
>

fadump capture kernel (the kernel where we expand "fadump_append=x,y,z"
to "x y z") only advised to be used for saving dump (just like kdump 
kernel).
We are expected to boot into production kernel immediately after saving 
dump.
Only in special cases where a user configures to stay in fadump capture 
kernel
will he encounter the above problem. And someone choosing such scenario 
is most
likely aware of what to make of /proc/cmdline?

Thanks
Hari

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-08 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-03 18:22 [PATCH v5 1/2] powerpc/fadump: reduce memory consumption for capture kernel Hari Bathini
2017-05-03 18:22 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] powerpc/fadump: update documentation about 'fadump_append=' parameter Hari Bathini
2017-05-10 16:01   ` Michal Suchánek
2017-05-10 20:30     ` Hari Bathini
2017-05-11 13:16       ` Michal Suchánek
2017-05-12  9:45         ` Hari Bathini
2017-05-12 15:42           ` Michal Suchánek
2017-05-15  7:29             ` Hari Bathini
2017-05-15  9:29               ` Michal Suchánek
2017-06-08 18:00                 ` Hari Bathini [this message]
2017-06-09 12:04                   ` Michal Suchánek
2017-06-20 15:44                     ` Hari Bathini
2017-06-26 12:15                       ` Michal Suchánek
2017-07-11 18:30                         ` Hari Bathini
2017-07-12 11:31                           ` msuchanek
2017-07-12 12:15                             ` Hari Bathini
2017-05-11 15:07       ` Michal Suchánek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=102276aa-cddb-dc60-269c-b29dedc89eab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.