From: "Steven P. Cole" <elenstev@mesatop.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.65-mm2
Date: 19 Mar 2003 16:45:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1048117516.1602.6.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030319163337.602160d8.akpm@digeo.com>
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 17:33, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Steven P. Cole" <elenstev@mesatop.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Summary: using ext3, the simple window shake and scrollbar wiggle tests
> > > were much improved, but really using Evolution left much to be desired.
> >
> > Replying to myself for a followup,
> >
> > I repeated the tests with 2.5.65-mm2 elevator=deadline and the situation
> > was similar to elevator=as. Running dbench on ext3, the response to
> > desktop switches and window wiggles was improved over running dbench on
> > reiserfs, but typing in Evolution was subject to long delays with dbench
> > clients greater than 16.
>
> OK, final question before I get off my butt and find a way to reproduce this:
>
> Does reverting
>
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.65/2.5.65-mm2/broken-out/sched-2.5.64-D3.patch
>
> help?
Sorry, didn't have much time for a lot of testing, but no miracles
occurred. With 5 minutes of testing 2.5.65-mm2 and dbench 24 on ext3
and that patch reverted (first hunk had to be manually fixed), I don't
see any improvement. Still the same long long delays in trying to use
Evolution.
Steven
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Steven P. Cole" <elenstev@mesatop.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.65-mm2
Date: 19 Mar 2003 16:45:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1048117516.1602.6.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030319163337.602160d8.akpm@digeo.com>
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 17:33, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Steven P. Cole" <elenstev@mesatop.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Summary: using ext3, the simple window shake and scrollbar wiggle tests
> > > were much improved, but really using Evolution left much to be desired.
> >
> > Replying to myself for a followup,
> >
> > I repeated the tests with 2.5.65-mm2 elevator=deadline and the situation
> > was similar to elevator=as. Running dbench on ext3, the response to
> > desktop switches and window wiggles was improved over running dbench on
> > reiserfs, but typing in Evolution was subject to long delays with dbench
> > clients greater than 16.
>
> OK, final question before I get off my butt and find a way to reproduce this:
>
> Does reverting
>
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.65/2.5.65-mm2/broken-out/sched-2.5.64-D3.patch
>
> help?
Sorry, didn't have much time for a lot of testing, but no miracles
occurred. With 5 minutes of testing 2.5.65-mm2 and dbench 24 on ext3
and that patch reverted (first hunk had to be manually fixed), I don't
see any improvement. Still the same long long delays in trying to use
Evolution.
Steven
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-19 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-19 9:21 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 9:21 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 10:07 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-03-19 10:16 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-03-19 10:16 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-03-19 10:26 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Danny ter Haar
2003-03-19 19:51 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-19 19:51 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-19 20:10 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 20:10 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 20:57 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-19 20:57 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-19 22:02 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-19 22:02 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-19 22:17 ` 2.5.65-mm2 jjs
2003-03-19 22:51 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-19 23:04 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Robert Love
2003-03-19 23:19 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 4:50 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-19 23:09 ` 2.5.65-mm2 jjs
2003-03-20 0:33 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-20 0:33 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 23:45 ` Steven P. Cole [this message]
2003-03-19 23:45 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 4:27 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ed Tomlinson
2003-03-20 5:04 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-20 5:04 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-20 14:36 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-20 14:36 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-20 19:48 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-20 19:48 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-20 20:12 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 20:12 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 21:07 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-20 21:15 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 21:15 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-21 5:20 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-21 6:06 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ingo Molnar
2003-03-21 6:06 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ingo Molnar
2003-03-21 6:16 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ingo Molnar
2003-03-21 6:16 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303210710490.2533-100000@localhost.localdom ain>
2003-03-22 19:50 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-22 19:50 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-19 23:17 2.5.65-mm2 Charles Baylis
2003-03-20 1:38 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-20 4:56 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1048117516.1602.6.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov \
--to=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.