From: Stewart Smith <stewart@flamingspork.com>
To: Steve Glines <sglines@is-cs.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: file system technical comparisons
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 06:32:06 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1073676726.7366.3.camel@faith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FF5E4CE.60606@is-cs.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 633 bytes --]
http://www.flamingspork.com/honors/
I did some (theoretical) comparisons between a number of file systems in
my Honors thesis. Notable exceptions are NTFS and JFS. Some good
reasoning behind why some designs are better than others.
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 08:38, Steve Glines wrote:
> I'm looking for a technical comparison between the major file systems.
> At a minimum I'd like to see a comparison between ext3, reiserfs, xfs
> and jfs. In the oh so perfect world I'd like to see detailed info on all
> supported file systems.
>
> Please CC or mail me directly as I am not a subscriber to this list.
>
> Thanks
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-09 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-02 21:38 file system technical comparisons Steve Glines
2004-01-05 9:42 ` venom
2004-01-05 11:04 ` Hans Reiser
2004-01-05 17:08 ` venom
2004-01-05 17:18 ` Hans Reiser
2004-01-06 11:58 ` venom
2004-01-06 12:07 ` Hans Reiser
2004-01-06 23:48 ` venom
2004-01-07 9:13 ` Hans Reiser
2004-01-05 17:37 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-01-06 12:04 ` venom
2004-01-06 14:55 ` Hans Reiser
2004-01-06 20:32 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-01-09 19:32 ` Stewart Smith [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1073676726.7366.3.camel@faith \
--to=stewart@flamingspork.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sglines@is-cs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.