Re: file system technical comparisons

From: venom@sns.it
To: Steve Glines <sglines@is-cs.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: file system technical comparisons
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:42:32 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0401051037310.32446-100000@cibs9.sns.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FF5E4CE.60606@is-cs.com>

http://www.linux-mag.com/2002-10/jfs_01.html

On some point it could be discussed, but it is a good starting point.

if you know italian, I will send you another article published in three part
on Linux&C (http://www.oltrelinux.com) about journaled filesystems available in
Linux kernel.

bests

Luigi

On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Steve Glines wrote:

> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:38:22 -0500
> From: Steve Glines <sglines@is-cs.com>
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: file system technical comparisons
>
> I'm looking for a technical comparison between the major file systems.
> At a minimum I'd like to see a comparison between ext3, reiserfs, xfs
> and jfs. In the oh so perfect world I'd like to see detailed info on all
> supported file systems.
>
> Please CC or mail me directly as I am not a subscriber to this list.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Steve Glines
>
> In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice, but in
> practice there is.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>