* More on i/o wait problems ->
@ 2004-01-25 15:33 Jaakko Helminen
2004-01-25 16:15 ` Martin Josefsson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jaakko Helminen @ 2004-01-25 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I switched back to 2.6.0 and it works like a charm, 10,8MBps over 100M LAN
with http. Something's definitely broken in 2.6.1.
-Jaakko Helminen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: More on i/o wait problems ->
2004-01-25 15:33 More on i/o wait problems -> Jaakko Helminen
@ 2004-01-25 16:15 ` Martin Josefsson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Martin Josefsson @ 2004-01-25 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaakko Helminen; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 354 bytes --]
On Sun, 2004-01-25 at 16:33, Jaakko Helminen wrote:
> I switched back to 2.6.0 and it works like a charm, 10,8MBps over 100M LAN
> with http. Something's definitely broken in 2.6.1.
Yes a hardly tested readahead patch somehow got integrated.
I/O sucks bigtime in 2.6.1
Try the latest -mm or -bk kernels, it should be fixed there.
--
/Martin
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-25 16:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-25 15:33 More on i/o wait problems -> Jaakko Helminen
2004-01-25 16:15 ` Martin Josefsson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.