All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: PARISC list <parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix the cpumask rewrite
Date: 26 Jun 2004 11:08:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1088266111.1943.15.camel@mulgrave> (raw)

This patch:

ChangeSet 1.1828.1.25 2004/06/24 08:51:00 akpm@osdl.org
  [PATCH] cpumask: rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation
  
  From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
  
  Major rewrite of cpumask to use a single implementation, as a struct-wrapped
  bitmap.
 
Altered the cpumask iterators to add a volatile to the bitmap type. 
This might be correct for x86 and itanium, but it isn't for parisc where
our bitmap operators don't take volatile pointers.  This makes our
compile incredibly noisy in just about every file:

  CC      mm/rmap.o
In file included from include/linux/sched.h:15,
                 from include/linux/mm.h:4,
                 from mm/rmap.c:29:
include/linux/cpumask.h: In function `__cpu_set':
include/linux/cpumask.h:86: warning: passing arg 2 of `set_bit' discards
qualifiers from pointer target type
include/linux/cpumask.h: In function `__cpu_clear':
include/linux/cpumask.h:92: warning: passing arg 2 of `clear_bit'
discards qualifiers from pointer target type

Since whether the bitmap operators are volatile or not is within the
province of the architecture to decide, I think the correct fix is just
to drop the spurious volatiles from cpumask.h

James

===== include/linux/cpumask.h 1.15 vs edited =====
--- 1.15/include/linux/cpumask.h	2004-06-24 13:57:31 -05:00
+++ edited/include/linux/cpumask.h	2004-06-26 11:00:14 -05:00
@@ -81,13 +81,13 @@
 extern cpumask_t _unused_cpumask_arg_;
 
 #define cpu_set(cpu, dst) __cpu_set((cpu), &(dst))
-static inline void __cpu_set(int cpu, volatile cpumask_t *dstp)
+static inline void __cpu_set(int cpu, cpumask_t *dstp)
 {
 	set_bit(cpu, dstp->bits);
 }
 
 #define cpu_clear(cpu, dst) __cpu_clear((cpu), &(dst))
-static inline void __cpu_clear(int cpu, volatile cpumask_t *dstp)
+static inline void __cpu_clear(int cpu, cpumask_t *dstp)
 {
 	clear_bit(cpu, dstp->bits);
 }


             reply	other threads:[~2004-06-26 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-26 16:08 James Bottomley [this message]
2004-06-26 16:32 ` [PATCH] Fix the cpumask rewrite Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 16:44   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 16:46   ` James Bottomley
2004-06-26 16:54     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 17:18       ` James Bottomley
2004-06-26 18:01         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 18:28           ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-06-26 18:54             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 19:02               ` James Bottomley
2004-06-26 19:13                 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 19:13               ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-06-26 18:59           ` James Bottomley
2004-06-26 19:11             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 19:33               ` James Bottomley
2004-06-28 23:16           ` Jonathan Lundell
2004-07-01 13:11       ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-01 14:07         ` [parisc-linux] " Alan Cox
2004-07-01 16:15           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-01 16:52             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-07-01 17:42               ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 22:18   ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-26 22:48     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 22:54       ` [parisc-linux] " Alan Cox
2004-06-27  0:05         ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-27 12:00           ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-06-27 22:41             ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-28  1:24               ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-06-28  5:42                 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-28  6:55                   ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-06-28  7:02                     ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-28  7:19                       ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-06-27 14:37           ` Alan Cox
2004-07-01 13:33             ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-01 17:43               ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-26 23:37       ` jiffies_64 Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-27  1:55       ` more (insane) jiffies ranting Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-27 17:39         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-27 17:39         ` [parisc-linux] " Linus Torvalds
2004-06-27 17:39         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 16:32 ` [PATCH] Fix the cpumask rewrite Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1088266111.1943.15.camel@mulgrave \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.