All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Wieser <pwieser@trychlos.org>
To: Can Jeuleers <can.jeuleers@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Migrating a RAID 5 from 4x2TB to 3x6TB ?
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 20:46:12 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1222347192.1017.1433875572719.JavaMail.zimbra@wieser.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55767860.5000803@gmail.com>

---- Original Message -----
> On 08/06/15 21:28, Pierre Wieser wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I currently have an almost full RAID 5 built with 4 x 2 TB disks.
> > I wonder if it would be possible to migrate it to a bigger RAID 5
> > with 3 x 6TB new disks.
> 
> I'd recommend against it:
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID#Unrecoverable_read_errors_during_rebuild

Oop's! I was not conscious at all of this issue. It happens that I am currenly
living dangerously as I have another RAID 5 11,5 TB device :( I had already
seen various administration issues when the size increases to this level, but
I tought this was only an issue regarding the volumes organization (not tought
deeply enough, obviously)....

Starting from your link, and searching a bit, I understand now that the 10TB
is a maximal limit for desktop-grade disks (regarding the URE at least). And
thus for any element of a RAID device which needs to be scanned at recovery
time.
Apart from my poor english, would you say I'm right with this ?

Does linux-raid have any recommandation(s) when managing more than 10TB of data ?

I may imagine:
- several smaller RAID 5 devices
- would RAID10 be a valuable solution in your opinion ?

(as a precision, all my servers have been migrated to CentOS 7.1)

Nonetheless, I thank you very much for the link, which may prevent me to
lose a big bunch of data !

> Jan
> 
Pierre

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-09 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1419435054.589.1433790714774.JavaMail.zimbra@wieser.fr>
2015-06-08 19:28 ` Migrating a RAID 5 from 4x2TB to 3x6TB ? Pierre Wieser
2015-06-08 20:10   ` Wols Lists
2015-06-09 18:33     ` Pierre Wieser
2015-06-09  5:23   ` Can Jeuleers
2015-06-09 18:46     ` Pierre Wieser [this message]
2015-06-09 19:06       ` Wols Lists
2015-06-09 19:15       ` Roman Mamedov
2015-06-09 18:46     ` Wols Lists
2015-06-09 19:06       ` Another Sillyname
2015-06-09 19:18       ` Can Jeuleers
2015-06-15 11:31       ` Wilson, Jonathan
     [not found]   ` <CAOS+5GHzBgx2DuDe0+RLgZj9Q1BZ944i-9q4NEERq66Sk78b2g@mail.gmail.com>
2015-06-09 18:26     ` Pierre Wieser
2015-06-10 19:37   ` Pierre Wieser
2015-06-15 10:46     ` Wilson, Jonathan
2015-06-15 21:45       ` Wols Lists

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1222347192.1017.1433875572719.JavaMail.zimbra@wieser.fr \
    --to=pwieser@trychlos.org \
    --cc=can.jeuleers@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.