* [PATCH -tip] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
@ 2009-03-26 12:02 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-26 13:12 ` Robert Richter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-03-26 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar, x86 maintainers, LKML, Andi Kleen
This patch is based on -tip x86/core:
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:14:38 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
Impact: Unification, cleanup
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 5 +--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c | 33 ------------------
3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
index 4e242f9..90a96ee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
@@ -9,10 +9,9 @@ endif
obj-y := intel_cacheinfo.o addon_cpuid_features.o
obj-y += proc.o capflags.o powerflags.o common.o
-obj-y += vmware.o hypervisor.o
+obj-y += vmware.o hypervisor.o bugs.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += bugs.o cmpxchg.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += bugs_64.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += cmpxchg.o
obj-$(CONFIG_X86_CPU_DEBUG) += cpu_debug.o
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index c8e315f..05ec583 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -6,17 +6,23 @@
* <rreilova@ececs.uc.edu>
* - Channing Corn (tests & fixes),
* - Andrew D. Balsa (code cleanup).
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2000 SuSE
*/
-#include <linux/init.h>
+
#include <linux/utsname.h>
-#include <asm/bugs.h>
-#include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+
#include <asm/processor-flags.h>
+#include <asm/alternative.h>
+#include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <asm/paravirt.h>
#include <asm/i387.h>
+#include <asm/bugs.h>
#include <asm/msr.h>
-#include <asm/paravirt.h>
-#include <asm/alternative.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
static int __init no_halt(char *s)
{
boot_cpu_data.hlt_works_ok = 0;
@@ -56,7 +62,8 @@ static void __init check_fpu(void)
#ifndef CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION
printk(KERN_EMERG "No coprocessor found and no math emulation present.\n");
printk(KERN_EMERG "Giving up.\n");
- for (;;) ;
+ for (;;)
+ ;
#endif
return;
}
@@ -67,21 +74,21 @@ static void __init check_fpu(void)
*
* Test for the divl bug..
*/
- __asm__("fninit\n\t"
- "fldl %1\n\t"
- "fdivl %2\n\t"
- "fmull %2\n\t"
- "fldl %1\n\t"
- "fsubp %%st,%%st(1)\n\t"
- "fistpl %0\n\t"
- "fwait\n\t"
+ __asm__("fninit \n\t"
+ "fldl %1 \n\t"
+ "fdivl %2 \n\t"
+ "fmull %2 \n\t"
+ "fldl %1 \n\t"
+ "fsubp %%st,%%st(1) \n\t"
+ "fistpl %0 \n\t"
+ "fwait \n\t"
"fninit"
: "=m" (*&fdiv_bug)
: "m" (*&x), "m" (*&y));
boot_cpu_data.fdiv_bug = fdiv_bug;
if (boot_cpu_data.fdiv_bug)
- printk("Hmm, FPU with FDIV bug.\n");
+ printk(KERN_INFO "Hmm, FPU with FDIV bug.\n");
}
static void __init check_hlt(void)
@@ -91,14 +98,14 @@ static void __init check_hlt(void)
printk(KERN_INFO "Checking 'hlt' instruction... ");
if (!boot_cpu_data.hlt_works_ok) {
- printk("disabled\n");
+ printk(KERN_INFO "disabled\n");
return;
}
halt();
halt();
halt();
halt();
- printk("OK.\n");
+ printk(KERN_INFO "OK.\n");
}
/*
@@ -122,9 +129,9 @@ static void __init check_popad(void)
* CPU hard. Too bad.
*/
if (res != 12345678)
- printk("Buggy.\n");
+ printk(KERN_INFO "Buggy.\n");
else
- printk("OK.\n");
+ printk(KERN_INFO "OK.\n");
#endif
}
@@ -149,21 +156,36 @@ static void __init check_config(void)
if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 3)
panic("Kernel requires i486+ for 'invlpg' and other features");
#endif
+ check_fpu();
+ check_hlt();
+ check_popad();
+ init_utsname()->machine[1] =
+ '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86);
}
-
+#else /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
+static inline void __init check_config(void) {}
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
void __init check_bugs(void)
{
identify_boot_cpu();
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
- printk("CPU: ");
+ printk(KERN_INFO "CPU: ");
print_cpu_info(&boot_cpu_data);
#endif
check_config();
- check_fpu();
- check_hlt();
- check_popad();
- init_utsname()->machine[1] =
- '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86);
alternative_instructions();
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ /*
+ * Make sure the first 2MB area is not mapped by huge pages
+ * There are typically fixed size MTRRs in there and overlapping
+ * MTRRs into large pages causes slow downs.
+ *
+ * Right now we don't do that with gbpages because there seems
+ * very little benefit for that case.
+ */
+ if (!direct_gbpages)
+ set_memory_4k((unsigned long)__va(0), 1);
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 9a3ed06..0000000
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Copyright (C) 1994 Linus Torvalds
- * Copyright (C) 2000 SuSE
- */
-
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <asm/alternative.h>
-#include <asm/bugs.h>
-#include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/mtrr.h>
-#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
-
-void __init check_bugs(void)
-{
- identify_boot_cpu();
-#if !defined(CONFIG_SMP)
- printk("CPU: ");
- print_cpu_info(&boot_cpu_data);
-#endif
- alternative_instructions();
-
- /*
- * Make sure the first 2MB area is not mapped by huge pages
- * There are typically fixed size MTRRs in there and overlapping
- * MTRRs into large pages causes slow downs.
- *
- * Right now we don't do that with gbpages because there seems
- * very little benefit for that case.
- */
- if (!direct_gbpages)
- set_memory_4k((unsigned long)__va(0), 1);
-}
--
1.6.0.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
2009-03-26 12:02 [PATCH -tip] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c Jaswinder Singh Rajput
@ 2009-03-26 13:12 ` Robert Richter
2009-03-26 13:42 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert Richter @ 2009-03-26 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, x86 maintainers, LKML, Andi Kleen
On 26.03.09 17:32:09, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> This patch is based on -tip x86/core:
>
> From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:14:38 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
>
> Impact: Unification, cleanup
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 5 +--
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c | 33 ------------------
> 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
Jaswinder,
please send separate patches for separate changes (e.g. make separate
whitespace changes).
[...]
> @@ -91,14 +98,14 @@ static void __init check_hlt(void)
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "Checking 'hlt' instruction... ");
> if (!boot_cpu_data.hlt_works_ok) {
> - printk("disabled\n");
> + printk(KERN_INFO "disabled\n");
All this is continuing the printk above.
-Robert
> return;
> }
> halt();
> halt();
> halt();
> halt();
> - printk("OK.\n");
> + printk(KERN_INFO "OK.\n");
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -122,9 +129,9 @@ static void __init check_popad(void)
> * CPU hard. Too bad.
> */
> if (res != 12345678)
> - printk("Buggy.\n");
> + printk(KERN_INFO "Buggy.\n");
> else
> - printk("OK.\n");
> + printk(KERN_INFO "OK.\n");
> #endif
> }
>
[...]
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@amd.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
2009-03-26 13:12 ` Robert Richter
@ 2009-03-26 13:42 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-26 14:12 ` Robert Richter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-03-26 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Richter; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, x86 maintainers, LKML, Andi Kleen
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 14:12 +0100, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 26.03.09 17:32:09, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > This patch is based on -tip x86/core:
> >
> > From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:14:38 +0530
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
> >
> > Impact: Unification, cleanup
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 5 +--
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c | 33 ------------------
> > 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
>
> Jaswinder,
>
> please send separate patches for separate changes (e.g. make separate
> whitespace changes).
>
Ok I removed cleanup:
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:14:38 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
Impact: unification
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 5 +--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c | 33 --------------------------
3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
index 4e242f9..90a96ee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
@@ -9,10 +9,9 @@ endif
obj-y := intel_cacheinfo.o addon_cpuid_features.o
obj-y += proc.o capflags.o powerflags.o common.o
-obj-y += vmware.o hypervisor.o
+obj-y += vmware.o hypervisor.o bugs.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += bugs.o cmpxchg.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += bugs_64.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += cmpxchg.o
obj-$(CONFIG_X86_CPU_DEBUG) += cpu_debug.o
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index c8e315f..9be7218 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -6,17 +6,23 @@
* <rreilova@ececs.uc.edu>
* - Channing Corn (tests & fixes),
* - Andrew D. Balsa (code cleanup).
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2000 SuSE
*/
-#include <linux/init.h>
+
#include <linux/utsname.h>
-#include <asm/bugs.h>
-#include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+
#include <asm/processor-flags.h>
+#include <asm/alternative.h>
+#include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <asm/paravirt.h>
#include <asm/i387.h>
+#include <asm/bugs.h>
#include <asm/msr.h>
-#include <asm/paravirt.h>
-#include <asm/alternative.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
static int __init no_halt(char *s)
{
boot_cpu_data.hlt_works_ok = 0;
@@ -151,6 +157,22 @@ static void __init check_config(void)
#endif
}
+/*
+ * Check various bugs
+ */
+static void __init check_various_bugs(void)
+{
+ check_config();
+ check_fpu();
+ check_hlt();
+ check_popad();
+
+ init_utsname()->machine[1] =
+ '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86);
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
+static inline void __init check_various_bugs(void) {}
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
void __init check_bugs(void)
{
@@ -159,11 +181,19 @@ void __init check_bugs(void)
printk("CPU: ");
print_cpu_info(&boot_cpu_data);
#endif
- check_config();
- check_fpu();
- check_hlt();
- check_popad();
- init_utsname()->machine[1] =
- '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86);
+ check_various_bugs();
alternative_instructions();
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ /*
+ * Make sure the first 2MB area is not mapped by huge pages
+ * There are typically fixed size MTRRs in there and overlapping
+ * MTRRs into large pages causes slow downs.
+ *
+ * Right now we don't do that with gbpages because there seems
+ * very little benefit for that case.
+ */
+ if (!direct_gbpages)
+ set_memory_4k((unsigned long)__va(0), 1);
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 9a3ed06..0000000
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Copyright (C) 1994 Linus Torvalds
- * Copyright (C) 2000 SuSE
- */
-
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <asm/alternative.h>
-#include <asm/bugs.h>
-#include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/mtrr.h>
-#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
-
-void __init check_bugs(void)
-{
- identify_boot_cpu();
-#if !defined(CONFIG_SMP)
- printk("CPU: ");
- print_cpu_info(&boot_cpu_data);
-#endif
- alternative_instructions();
-
- /*
- * Make sure the first 2MB area is not mapped by huge pages
- * There are typically fixed size MTRRs in there and overlapping
- * MTRRs into large pages causes slow downs.
- *
- * Right now we don't do that with gbpages because there seems
- * very little benefit for that case.
- */
- if (!direct_gbpages)
- set_memory_4k((unsigned long)__va(0), 1);
-}
--
1.6.0.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
2009-03-26 13:42 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
@ 2009-03-26 14:12 ` Robert Richter
2009-03-26 14:29 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert Richter @ 2009-03-26 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, x86 maintainers, LKML, Andi Kleen
On 26.03.09 19:12:35, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 14:12 +0100, Robert Richter wrote:
> > On 26.03.09 17:32:09, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > This patch is based on -tip x86/core:
> > >
> > > From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:14:38 +0530
> > > Subject: [PATCH] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
> > >
> > > Impact: Unification, cleanup
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 5 +--
> > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c | 33 ------------------
> > > 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> > > delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
> >
> > Jaswinder,
> >
> > please send separate patches for separate changes (e.g. make separate
> > whitespace changes).
> >
>
> Ok I removed cleanup:
>
> From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:14:38 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
>
> Impact: unification
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 5 +--
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c | 33 --------------------------
> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> index 4e242f9..90a96ee 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> @@ -9,10 +9,9 @@ endif
>
> obj-y := intel_cacheinfo.o addon_cpuid_features.o
> obj-y += proc.o capflags.o powerflags.o common.o
> -obj-y += vmware.o hypervisor.o
> +obj-y += vmware.o hypervisor.o bugs.o
>
> -obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += bugs.o cmpxchg.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += bugs_64.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += cmpxchg.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_X86_CPU_DEBUG) += cpu_debug.o
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index c8e315f..9be7218 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -6,17 +6,23 @@
> * <rreilova@ececs.uc.edu>
> * - Channing Corn (tests & fixes),
> * - Andrew D. Balsa (code cleanup).
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2000 SuSE
> */
> -#include <linux/init.h>
> +
> #include <linux/utsname.h>
> -#include <asm/bugs.h>
> -#include <asm/processor.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +
> #include <asm/processor-flags.h>
> +#include <asm/alternative.h>
> +#include <asm/processor.h>
> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> #include <asm/i387.h>
> +#include <asm/bugs.h>
> #include <asm/msr.h>
> -#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> -#include <asm/alternative.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> static int __init no_halt(char *s)
> {
> boot_cpu_data.hlt_works_ok = 0;
> @@ -151,6 +157,22 @@ static void __init check_config(void)
> #endif
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Check various bugs
> + */
> +static void __init check_various_bugs(void)
> +{
> + check_config();
> + check_fpu();
> + check_hlt();
> + check_popad();
> +
> + init_utsname()->machine[1] =
> + '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86);
Did you evaluate why these functions are 32 bit only? Same applies to
64 bit below. It seems this is not a unification and instead only some
move-around of code.
-Robert
> +}
> +#else /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
> +static inline void __init check_various_bugs(void) {}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
>
> void __init check_bugs(void)
> {
> @@ -159,11 +181,19 @@ void __init check_bugs(void)
> printk("CPU: ");
> print_cpu_info(&boot_cpu_data);
> #endif
> - check_config();
> - check_fpu();
> - check_hlt();
> - check_popad();
> - init_utsname()->machine[1] =
> - '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86);
> + check_various_bugs();
> alternative_instructions();
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> + /*
> + * Make sure the first 2MB area is not mapped by huge pages
> + * There are typically fixed size MTRRs in there and overlapping
> + * MTRRs into large pages causes slow downs.
> + *
> + * Right now we don't do that with gbpages because there seems
> + * very little benefit for that case.
> + */
> + if (!direct_gbpages)
> + set_memory_4k((unsigned long)__va(0), 1);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 9a3ed06..0000000
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
> -/*
> - * Copyright (C) 1994 Linus Torvalds
> - * Copyright (C) 2000 SuSE
> - */
> -
> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> -#include <linux/init.h>
> -#include <asm/alternative.h>
> -#include <asm/bugs.h>
> -#include <asm/processor.h>
> -#include <asm/mtrr.h>
> -#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> -
> -void __init check_bugs(void)
> -{
> - identify_boot_cpu();
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> - printk("CPU: ");
> - print_cpu_info(&boot_cpu_data);
> -#endif
> - alternative_instructions();
> -
> - /*
> - * Make sure the first 2MB area is not mapped by huge pages
> - * There are typically fixed size MTRRs in there and overlapping
> - * MTRRs into large pages causes slow downs.
> - *
> - * Right now we don't do that with gbpages because there seems
> - * very little benefit for that case.
> - */
> - if (!direct_gbpages)
> - set_memory_4k((unsigned long)__va(0), 1);
> -}
> --
> 1.6.0.6
>
>
>
>
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@amd.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
2009-03-26 14:12 ` Robert Richter
@ 2009-03-26 14:29 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-03-26 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Richter; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, x86 maintainers, LKML, Andi Kleen
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 15:12 +0100, Robert Richter wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Check various bugs
> > + */
> > +static void __init check_various_bugs(void)
> > +{
> > + check_config();
> > + check_fpu();
> > + check_hlt();
> > + check_popad();
> > +
This is applicable to 32 bit only. right ?
> > + init_utsname()->machine[1] =
> > + '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86);
>
hmm. this can be common.
> Did you evaluate why these functions are 32 bit only? Same applies to
> 64 bit below. It seems this is not a unification and instead only some
> move-around of code.
>
Thanks for pointing.
--
JSR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-26 14:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-26 12:02 [PATCH -tip] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-26 13:12 ` Robert Richter
2009-03-26 13:42 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-26 14:12 ` Robert Richter
2009-03-26 14:29 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.