All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* EFI and 32bit vs. 64bit
@ 2009-06-03 21:32 Felix Zielcke
  2009-06-03 23:23 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Felix Zielcke @ 2009-06-03 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The development of GRUB 2

Hello,

just talked with a guy from the debian-boot people about using grub-efi
for the Intel Mac Users.
Is there any way avaible in Linux to detect somehow if the EFI is 64bit
or 32bit?
Maybe some list of CPUs which could be grep'ed from /proc/cpuinfo or so?
I read on refit page that Apple introducted fat binaries, which would
work on both, but can they actually be created outside of MacOSX?
Or is there maybe another solution to solve this problem?

-- 
Felix Zielcke




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: EFI and 32bit vs. 64bit
  2009-06-03 21:32 EFI and 32bit vs. 64bit Felix Zielcke
@ 2009-06-03 23:23 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
  2009-06-04  7:35   ` James Jarvis
  2009-06-04 10:17   ` Felix Zielcke
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko @ 2009-06-03 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The development of GRUB 2

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Felix Zielcke <fzielcke@z-51.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just talked with a guy from the debian-boot people about using grub-efi
> for the Intel Mac Users.
> Is there any way avaible in Linux to detect somehow if the EFI is 64bit
> or 32bit?
If you EFI-boot linux then its architecture is also the one of efi
(afaik linux doesn't support efi64 with i386 kernel or otherway round)
If it's not the only reasonable way is to use dmidecode's output
(especially ProductName)
> Maybe some list of CPUs which could be grep'ed from /proc/cpuinfo or so?
> I read on refit page that Apple introducted fat binaries, which would
> work on both, but can they actually be created outside of MacOSX?
fat binary is just a concateneting of 2 binaries with an extra header.
So it's quite easy to create one
> Or is there maybe another solution to solve this problem?
>
> --
> Felix Zielcke
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>



-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: EFI and 32bit vs. 64bit
  2009-06-03 23:23 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
@ 2009-06-04  7:35   ` James Jarvis
  2009-06-04 10:17   ` Felix Zielcke
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Jarvis @ 2009-06-04  7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The development of GRUB 2

Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Felix Zielcke <fzielcke@z-51.de> wrote:
>   
>> Hello,
>>
>> just talked with a guy from the debian-boot people about using grub-efi
>> for the Intel Mac Users.
>> Is there any way avaible in Linux to detect somehow if the EFI is 64bit
>> or 32bit?
>>     
> If you EFI-boot linux then its architecture is also the one of efi
> (afaik linux doesn't support efi64 with i386 kernel or otherway round)
> If it's not the only reasonable way is to use dmidecode's output
> (especially ProductName)
>   
I have a 2.6.29.2 i386 linux kernel boot on a 64bit computer (Apple iMac 
8,1). With fakebios it all works fine (although one cannot access 
efivars). When I boot the i386 kernel (and initrd and root in memory) in 
EFI mode on 64 bit it boots but not all modules insert. It loads and can 
start the init script. That suggests that Felix is right the assumption 
may not be absolute.

Also, will the results of dmidecode be reliable if using fakebios???
>> Maybe some list of CPUs which could be grep'ed from /proc/cpuinfo or so?
>> I read on refit page that Apple introducted fat binaries, which would
>> work on both, but can they actually be created outside of MacOSX?
>>     
> fat binary is just a concateneting of 2 binaries with an extra header.
> So it's quite easy to create one
>   
I have already done this using the fatglue.py python script from refit. 
It works for grub.efi but not for modules. Another solution would be at 
module insertion that the process tries <name>.<arch>.mod first before 
<name>.mod. This means i386 and x86_64 modules could coexist in the same 
directory and be inserted accordingly.

James

-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: EFI and 32bit vs. 64bit
  2009-06-03 23:23 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
  2009-06-04  7:35   ` James Jarvis
@ 2009-06-04 10:17   ` Felix Zielcke
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Felix Zielcke @ 2009-06-04 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The development of GRUB 2

Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 01:23 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Felix Zielcke <fzielcke@z-51.de> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > just talked with a guy from the debian-boot people about using grub-efi
> > for the Intel Mac Users.
> > Is there any way avaible in Linux to detect somehow if the EFI is 64bit
> > or 32bit?
> If you EFI-boot linux then its architecture is also the one of efi
> (afaik linux doesn't support efi64 with i386 kernel or otherway round)
> If it's not the only reasonable way is to use dmidecode's output
> (especially ProductName)

Hm but ProductName is for me the motherboard name.
So it looks like we'll have to maintain a list?
Bah why is EFI so stupid that it can be a different bit size then the
CPU uses.

> > Maybe some list of CPUs which could be grep'ed from /proc/cpuinfo or so?
> > I read on refit page that Apple introducted fat binaries, which would
> > work on both, but can they actually be created outside of MacOSX?
> fat binary is just a concateneting of 2 binaries with an extra header.
> So it's quite easy to create one

On refit homepage stands that they're Apple specific, so I don't think
it would be a good solution for longterm.
Seems like more and more adopt EFI now [0]

Otavio thought this would be grub's business not grub-installer's but I
start to think this just can't be properly solved in grub.
And as James said that efivars won't work if you boot the wrong kernel,
we even can't use that to detect EFI properly.

[0]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Firmware_Interface#Platforms_that_use_UEFI_or_the_Framework
-- 
Felix Zielcke




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-05  0:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-03 21:32 EFI and 32bit vs. 64bit Felix Zielcke
2009-06-03 23:23 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
2009-06-04  7:35   ` James Jarvis
2009-06-04 10:17   ` Felix Zielcke

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.