All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
To: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
	"Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Another crash in linux kernel at diconnect of usb strorage
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:36:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257240996-23118-2-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1257240996-23118-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org>

From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>

Asynchronous scan (scsi_add_lun()) sets state to SDEV_RUNNING,
but the device is not registered in sysfs.
Before async scan it was OK, because before releasing scan_mutex
old code called either scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() or scsi_destroy_sdev()
and, therefore, completed the work or discarded it.

With async scan the invariant is broken and scsi crashes
in __scsi_remove_device() when trying to unregister not registered
devices.

The fix could be introducing new state(s), which is equivalent
to SDEV_RUNNING, except for one thing, we know that scsi_sysfs_add_sdev()
has not been called yet. Or a separate flag, because the state
can be SDEV_BLOCK or even something else.

Simpler way is just to check that the device is regstered in sysfs
before unregistering. Another operations in __scsi_remove_device()
seem to be idempotent or even required, because  scsi_add_lun()
makes some part of work duplicated in scsi_sysfs_add_sdev().

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
CC: James E.J. Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
index 5c7eb63..ea02e9b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
@@ -927,9 +927,17 @@ void __scsi_remove_device(struct scsi_device *sdev)
 		return;
 
 	bsg_unregister_queue(sdev->request_queue);
-	device_unregister(&sdev->sdev_dev);
+	/* Asynchronous scan violates invariant that SDEV_RUNNING
+	 * implies that device is registered in sysfs.
+	 * We could introduce new state flag or extend set of state,
+	 * but just plain checking that device is registered already
+	 * before trying to unregister it is enough.
+	 */
+	if (sdev->sdev_dev.kobj.parent)
+		device_unregister(&sdev->sdev_dev);
 	transport_remove_device(dev);
-	device_del(dev);
+	if (dev->kobj.parent)
+		device_del(dev);
 	scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_DEL);
 	if (sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy)
 		sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy(sdev);
-- 
1.6.4.4


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
	"Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Another crash in linux kernel at diconnect of usb strorage
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:36:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257240996-23118-2-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1257240996-23118-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org>

From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>

Asynchronous scan (scsi_add_lun()) sets state to SDEV_RUNNING,
but the device is not registered in sysfs.
Before async scan it was OK, because before releasing scan_mutex
old code called either scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() or scsi_destroy_sdev()
and, therefore, completed the work or discarded it.

With async scan the invariant is broken and scsi crashes
in __scsi_remove_device() when trying to unregister not registered
devices.

The fix could be introducing new state(s), which is equivalent
to SDEV_RUNNING, except for one thing, we know that scsi_sysfs_add_sdev()
has not been called yet. Or a separate flag, because the state
can be SDEV_BLOCK or even something else.

Simpler way is just to check that the device is regstered in sysfs
before unregistering. Another operations in __scsi_remove_device()
seem to be idempotent or even required, because  scsi_add_lun()
makes some part of work duplicated in scsi_sysfs_add_sdev().

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
CC: James E.J. Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
index 5c7eb63..ea02e9b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
@@ -927,9 +927,17 @@ void __scsi_remove_device(struct scsi_device *sdev)
 		return;
 
 	bsg_unregister_queue(sdev->request_queue);
-	device_unregister(&sdev->sdev_dev);
+	/* Asynchronous scan violates invariant that SDEV_RUNNING
+	 * implies that device is registered in sysfs.
+	 * We could introduce new state flag or extend set of state,
+	 * but just plain checking that device is registered already
+	 * before trying to unregister it is enough.
+	 */
+	if (sdev->sdev_dev.kobj.parent)
+		device_unregister(&sdev->sdev_dev);
 	transport_remove_device(dev);
-	device_del(dev);
+	if (dev->kobj.parent)
+		device_del(dev);
 	scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_DEL);
 	if (sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy)
 		sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy(sdev);
-- 
1.6.4.4


  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-03  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-03  9:36 [PATCH 1/2] Crash in linux kernel when disconnecting usb storage Denis V. Lunev
2009-11-03  9:36 ` Denis V. Lunev
2009-11-03  9:36 ` Denis V. Lunev [this message]
2009-11-03  9:36   ` [PATCH 2/2] Another crash in linux kernel at diconnect of usb strorage Denis V. Lunev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1257240996-23118-2-git-send-email-den@openvz.org \
    --to=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.