All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 00/10 v6]  Fix 8xx MMU/TLB
@ 2009-11-20 10:21 Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 10:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] 8xx: invalidate non present TLBs Joakim Tjernlund
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-11-20 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

Yet again an iteration of the series.
Rex & Scott, please test and signoff.
Changes since last version:
 - Fix rlwimi insn(from Scott)

Joakim Tjernlund (10):
  8xx: invalidate non present TLBs
  8xx: Update TLB asm so it behaves as linux mm expects.
  8xx: Tag DAR with 0x00f0 to catch buggy instructions.
  8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB
  8xx: Fixup DAR from buggy dcbX instructions.
  8xx: Add missing Guarded setting in DTLB Error.
  8xx: Restore _PAGE_WRITETHRU
  8xx: start using dcbX instructions in various copy routines
  8xx: Remove DIRTY pte handling in DTLB Error.
  8xx: DTLB Miss cleanup

 arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h |   14 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S     |  315 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S      |   18 --
 arch/powerpc/lib/copy_32.S         |   24 ---
 arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c            |    8 +-
 5 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 168 deletions(-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 01/10] 8xx: invalidate non present TLBs
  2009-11-20 10:21 [PATCH 00/10 v6] Fix 8xx MMU/TLB Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-11-20 10:21 ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 10:21   ` [PATCH 02/10] 8xx: Update TLB asm so it behaves as linux mm expects Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 20:28 ` [PATCH 00/10 v6] Fix 8xx MMU/TLB Rex Feany
  2009-11-27 10:57 ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-11-20 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

8xx sometimes need to load a invalid/non-present TLBs in
it DTLB asm handler.
These must be invalidated separaly as linux mm don't.

Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
index e7dae82..26fb6b9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 #include <asm/siginfo.h>
-
+#include <mm/mmu_decl.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
 static inline int notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -246,6 +246,12 @@ good_area:
 		goto bad_area;
 #endif /* CONFIG_6xx */
 #if defined(CONFIG_8xx)
+	/* 8xx sometimes need to load a invalid/non-present TLBs.
+	 * These must be invalidated separately as linux mm don't.
+	 */
+	if (error_code & 0x40000000) /* no translation? */
+		_tlbil_va(address, 0, 0, 0);
+
         /* The MPC8xx seems to always set 0x80000000, which is
          * "undefined".  Of those that can be set, this is the only
          * one which seems bad.
-- 
1.6.4.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 02/10] 8xx: Update TLB asm so it behaves as linux mm expects.
  2009-11-20 10:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] 8xx: invalidate non present TLBs Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-11-20 10:21   ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 10:21     ` [PATCH 03/10] 8xx: Tag DAR with 0x00f0 to catch buggy instructions Joakim Tjernlund
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-11-20 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

Update the TLB asm to make proper use of _PAGE_DIRY and _PAGE_ACCESSED.
Get rid of _PAGE_HWWRITE too.
Pros:
 - I/D TLB Miss never needs to write to the linux pte.
 - _PAGE_ACCESSED is only set on TLB Error fixing accounting
 - _PAGE_DIRTY is mapped to 0x100, the changed bit, and is set directly
    when a page has been made dirty.
 - Proper RO/RW mapping of user space.
 - Free up 2 SW TLB bits in the linux pte(add back _PAGE_WRITETHRU ?)
 - kernel RO/user NA support.
Cons:
 - A few more instructions in the TLB Miss routines.

Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h |   13 ++---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S     |   99 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h
index dd5ea95..68ba861 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h
@@ -33,21 +33,20 @@
 #define _PAGE_NO_CACHE	0x0002	/* I: cache inhibit */
 #define _PAGE_SHARED	0x0004	/* No ASID (context) compare */
 #define _PAGE_SPECIAL	0x0008	/* SW entry, forced to 0 by the TLB miss */
+#define _PAGE_DIRTY	0x0100	/* C: page changed */
 
-/* These five software bits must be masked out when the entry is loaded
- * into the TLB.
+/* These 3 software bits must be masked out when the entry is loaded
+ * into the TLB, 2 SW bits left.
  */
 #define _PAGE_GUARDED	0x0010	/* software: guarded access */
-#define _PAGE_DIRTY	0x0020	/* software: page changed */
-#define _PAGE_RW	0x0040	/* software: user write access allowed */
-#define _PAGE_ACCESSED	0x0080	/* software: page referenced */
+#define _PAGE_ACCESSED	0x0020	/* software: page referenced */
 
 /* Setting any bits in the nibble with the follow two controls will
  * require a TLB exception handler change.  It is assumed unused bits
  * are always zero.
  */
-#define _PAGE_HWWRITE	0x0100	/* h/w write enable: never set in Linux PTE */
-#define _PAGE_USER	0x0800	/* One of the PP bits, the other is USER&~RW */
+#define _PAGE_RW	0x0400	/* lsb PP bits, inverted in HW */
+#define _PAGE_USER	0x0800	/* msb PP bits */
 
 #define _PMD_PRESENT	0x0001
 #define _PMD_BAD	0x0ff0
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 6ded19d..97bd523 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -333,26 +333,20 @@ InstructionTLBMiss:
 	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* ....and get the pte address */
 	lwz	r10, 0(r11)	/* Get the pte */
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
-	/* do not set the _PAGE_ACCESSED bit of a non-present page */
-	andi.	r11, r10, _PAGE_PRESENT
-	beq	4f
-	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
-	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* get the pte address again */
-	stw	r10, 0(r11)
-4:
-#else
-	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
-	stw	r10, 0(r11)
-#endif
+	andi.	r11, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_PRESENT
+	cmpwi	cr0, r11, _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_PRESENT
+	bne-	cr0, 2f
+
+	/* Clear PP lsb, 0x400 */
+	rlwinm 	r10, r10, 0, 22, 20
 
 	/* The Linux PTE won't go exactly into the MMU TLB.
-	 * Software indicator bits 21, 22 and 28 must be clear.
+	 * Software indicator bits 22 and 28 must be clear.
 	 * Software indicator bits 24, 25, 26, and 27 must be
 	 * set.  All other Linux PTE bits control the behavior
 	 * of the MMU.
 	 */
-2:	li	r11, 0x00f0
+	li	r11, 0x00f0
 	rlwimi	r10, r11, 0, 24, 28	/* Set 24-27, clear 28 */
 	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x2d80, r3)
 	mtspr	SPRN_MI_RPN, r10	/* Update TLB entry */
@@ -365,6 +359,22 @@ InstructionTLBMiss:
 	lwz	r3, 8(r0)
 #endif
 	rfi
+2:
+	mfspr	r11, SPRN_SRR1
+	/* clear all error bits as TLB Miss
+	 * sets a few unconditionally
+	*/
+	rlwinm	r11, r11, 0, 0xffff
+	mtspr	SPRN_SRR1, r11
+
+	mfspr	r10, SPRN_M_TW	/* Restore registers */
+	lwz	r11, 0(r0)
+	mtcr	r11
+	lwz	r11, 4(r0)
+#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
+	lwz	r3, 8(r0)
+#endif
+	b	InstructionAccess
 
 	. = 0x1200
 DataStoreTLBMiss:
@@ -409,21 +419,27 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
 	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
 	mtspr	SPRN_MD_TWC, r11
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
-	/* do not set the _PAGE_ACCESSED bit of a non-present page */
-	andi.	r11, r10, _PAGE_PRESENT
-	beq	4f
-	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
-4:
-	/* and update pte in table */
-#else
-	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
-#endif
-	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* get the pte address again */
-	stw	r10, 0(r11)
+	/* Both _PAGE_ACCESSED and _PAGE_PRESENT has to be set.
+	 * We also need to know if the insn is a load/store, so:
+	 * Clear _PAGE_PRESENT and load that which will
+	 * trap into DTLB Error with store bit set accordinly.
+	 */
+	/* PRESENT=0x1, ACCESSED=0x20
+	 * r11 = ((r10 & PRESENT) & ((r10 & ACCESSED) >> 5));
+	 * r10 = (r10 & ~PRESENT) | r11;
+	 */
+	rlwinm	r11, r10, 32-5, 31, 31
+	and	r11, r11, r10
+	rlwimi	r10, r11, 0, 31, 31
+
+	/* Honour kernel RO, User NA */
+	andi.	r11, r10, _PAGE_USER | _PAGE_RW
+	bne-	cr0, 5f
+	ori	r10,r10, 0x200 /* Extended encoding, bit 22 */
+5:	xori	r10, r10, _PAGE_RW  /* invert RW bit */
 
 	/* The Linux PTE won't go exactly into the MMU TLB.
-	 * Software indicator bits 21, 22 and 28 must be clear.
+	 * Software indicator bits 22 and 28 must be clear.
 	 * Software indicator bits 24, 25, 26, and 27 must be
 	 * set.  All other Linux PTE bits control the behavior
 	 * of the MMU.
@@ -469,11 +485,12 @@ DataTLBError:
 	stw	r10, 0(r0)
 	stw	r11, 4(r0)
 
-	/* First, make sure this was a store operation.
+	mfspr	r11, SPRN_DSISR
+	andis.	r11, r11, 0x4800	/* !translation or protection */
+	bne	2f	/* branch if either is set */
+	/* Only Change bit left now, do it here as it is faster
+	 * than trapping to the C fault handler.
 	*/
-	mfspr	r10, SPRN_DSISR
-	andis.	r11, r10, 0x0200	/* If set, indicates store op */
-	beq	2f
 
 	/* The EA of a data TLB miss is automatically stored in the MD_EPN
 	 * register.  The EA of a data TLB error is automatically stored in
@@ -522,26 +539,12 @@ DataTLBError:
 	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC		/* ....and get the pte address */
 	lwz	r10, 0(r11)		/* Get the pte */
 
-	andi.	r11, r10, _PAGE_RW	/* Is it writeable? */
-	beq	2f			/* Bail out if not */
-
-	/* Update 'changed', among others.
-	*/
-#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
-	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_DIRTY|_PAGE_HWWRITE
-	/* do not set the _PAGE_ACCESSED bit of a non-present page */
-	andi.	r11, r10, _PAGE_PRESENT
-	beq	4f
-	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_ACCESSED
-4:
-#else
-	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_DIRTY|_PAGE_ACCESSED|_PAGE_HWWRITE
-#endif
-	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC		/* Get pte address again */
+	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_DIRTY | _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_HWWRITE
 	stw	r10, 0(r11)		/* and update pte in table */
+	xori	r10, r10, _PAGE_RW	/* RW bit is inverted */
 
 	/* The Linux PTE won't go exactly into the MMU TLB.
-	 * Software indicator bits 21, 22 and 28 must be clear.
+	 * Software indicator bits 22 and 28 must be clear.
 	 * Software indicator bits 24, 25, 26, and 27 must be
 	 * set.  All other Linux PTE bits control the behavior
 	 * of the MMU.
-- 
1.6.4.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 03/10] 8xx: Tag DAR with 0x00f0 to catch buggy instructions.
  2009-11-20 10:21   ` [PATCH 02/10] 8xx: Update TLB asm so it behaves as linux mm expects Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-11-20 10:21     ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 10:21       ` [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB Joakim Tjernlund
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-11-20 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

dcbz, dcbf, dcbi, dcbst and icbi do not set DAR when they
cause a DTLB Error. Dectect this by tagging DAR with 0x00f0
at every exception exit that modifies DAR.
Test for DAR=0x00f0 in DataTLBError and bail
to handle_page_fault().

Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S |   15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 97bd523..a9f1ace 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -206,6 +206,8 @@ MachineCheck:
 	EXCEPTION_PROLOG
 	mfspr r4,SPRN_DAR
 	stw r4,_DAR(r11)
+	li r5,0x00f0
+	mtspr SPRN_DAR,r5	/* Tag DAR, to be used in DTLB Error */
 	mfspr r5,SPRN_DSISR
 	stw r5,_DSISR(r11)
 	addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
@@ -222,6 +224,8 @@ DataAccess:
 	stw	r10,_DSISR(r11)
 	mr	r5,r10
 	mfspr	r4,SPRN_DAR
+	li	r10,0x00f0
+	mtspr	SPRN_DAR,r10	/* Tag DAR, to be used in DTLB Error */
 	EXC_XFER_EE_LITE(0x300, handle_page_fault)
 
 /* Instruction access exception.
@@ -244,6 +248,8 @@ Alignment:
 	EXCEPTION_PROLOG
 	mfspr	r4,SPRN_DAR
 	stw	r4,_DAR(r11)
+	li	r5,0x00f0
+	mtspr	SPRN_DAR,r5	/* Tag DAR, to be used in DTLB Error */
 	mfspr	r5,SPRN_DSISR
 	stw	r5,_DSISR(r11)
 	addi	r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
@@ -445,6 +451,7 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
 	 * of the MMU.
 	 */
 2:	li	r11, 0x00f0
+	mtspr	SPRN_DAR,r11	/* Tag DAR */
 	rlwimi	r10, r11, 0, 24, 28	/* Set 24-27, clear 28 */
 	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3d80, r3)
 	mtspr	SPRN_MD_RPN, r10	/* Update TLB entry */
@@ -485,6 +492,10 @@ DataTLBError:
 	stw	r10, 0(r0)
 	stw	r11, 4(r0)
 
+	mfspr	r10, SPRN_DAR
+	cmpwi	cr0, r10, 0x00f0
+	beq-	2f	/* must be a buggy dcbX, icbi insn. */
+
 	mfspr	r11, SPRN_DSISR
 	andis.	r11, r11, 0x4800	/* !translation or protection */
 	bne	2f	/* branch if either is set */
@@ -508,7 +519,8 @@ DataTLBError:
 	 * are initialized in mapin_ram().  This will avoid the problem,
 	 * assuming we only use the dcbi instruction on kernel addresses.
 	 */
-	mfspr	r10, SPRN_DAR
+
+	/* DAR is in r10 already */
 	rlwinm	r11, r10, 0, 0, 19
 	ori	r11, r11, MD_EVALID
 	mfspr	r10, SPRN_M_CASID
@@ -550,6 +562,7 @@ DataTLBError:
 	 * of the MMU.
 	 */
 	li	r11, 0x00f0
+	mtspr	SPRN_DAR,r11	/* Tag DAR */
 	rlwimi	r10, r11, 0, 24, 28	/* Set 24-27, clear 28 */
 	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3d80, r3)
 	mtspr	SPRN_MD_RPN, r10	/* Update TLB entry */
-- 
1.6.4.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB
  2009-11-20 10:21     ` [PATCH 03/10] 8xx: Tag DAR with 0x00f0 to catch buggy instructions Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-11-20 10:21       ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 10:21         ` [PATCH 05/10] 8xx: Fixup DAR from buggy dcbX instructions Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-12-09  4:19         ` [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-11-20 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

Various kernel asm modifies SRR0/SRR1 just before executing
a rfi. If such code crosses a page boundary you risk a TLB miss
which will clobber SRR0/SRR1. Avoid this by always pinning
kernel instruction TLB space.

Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index a9f1ace..e70503d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ start_here:
  */
 initial_mmu:
 	tlbia			/* Invalidate all TLB entries */
-#ifdef CONFIG_PIN_TLB
+#if 1 /* CONFIG_PIN_TLB */
 	lis	r8, MI_RSV4I@h
 	ori	r8, r8, 0x1c00
 #else
-- 
1.6.4.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 05/10] 8xx: Fixup DAR from buggy dcbX instructions.
  2009-11-20 10:21       ` [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-11-20 10:21         ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 10:21           ` [PATCH 06/10] 8xx: Add missing Guarded setting in DTLB Error Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-12-09  4:19         ` [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-11-20 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

This is an assembler version to fixup DAR not being set
by dcbX, icbi instructions. There are two versions, one
uses selfmodifing code, the other uses a
jump table but is much bigger(default).

Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S |  147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index e70503d..6d664f2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -494,11 +494,16 @@ DataTLBError:
 
 	mfspr	r10, SPRN_DAR
 	cmpwi	cr0, r10, 0x00f0
-	beq-	2f	/* must be a buggy dcbX, icbi insn. */
-
+	beq-	FixupDAR	/* must be a buggy dcbX, icbi insn. */
+DARFixed:/* Return from dcbx instruction bug workaround, r10 holds value of DAR */
 	mfspr	r11, SPRN_DSISR
-	andis.	r11, r11, 0x4800	/* !translation or protection */
-	bne	2f	/* branch if either is set */
+	/* As the DAR fixup may clear store we may have all 3 states zero.
+	 * Make sure only 0x0200(store) falls down into DIRTY handling
+	 */
+	andis.	r11, r11, 0x4a00	/* !translation, protection or store */
+	srwi	r11, r11, 16
+	cmpwi	cr0, r11, 0x0200	/* just store ? */
+	bne	2f
 	/* Only Change bit left now, do it here as it is faster
 	 * than trapping to the C fault handler.
 	*/
@@ -604,6 +609,140 @@ DataTLBError:
 
 	. = 0x2000
 
+/* This is the procedure to calculate the data EA for buggy dcbx,dcbi instructions
+ * by decoding the registers used by the dcbx instruction and adding them.
+ * DAR is set to the calculated address and r10 also holds the EA on exit.
+ */
+ /* define if you don't want to use self modifying code */
+#define NO_SELF_MODIFYING_CODE
+FixupDAR:/* Entry point for dcbx workaround. */
+	/* fetch instruction from memory. */
+	mfspr	r10, SPRN_SRR0
+	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3780, r3)
+	mtspr	SPRN_MD_EPN, r10
+	mfspr	r11, SPRN_M_TWB	/* Get level 1 table entry address */
+	cmplwi	cr0, r11, 0x0800
+	blt-	3f		/* Branch if user space */
+	lis	r11, (swapper_pg_dir-PAGE_OFFSET)@h
+	ori	r11, r11, (swapper_pg_dir-PAGE_OFFSET)@l
+	rlwimi	r11, r10, 32-20, 0xffc /* r11 = r11&~0xffc|(r10>>20)&0xffc */
+3:	lwz	r11, 0(r11)	/* Get the level 1 entry */
+	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
+	mtspr	SPRN_MD_TWC, r11	/* Load pte table base address */
+	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* ....and get the pte address */
+	lwz	r11, 0(r11)	/* Get the pte */
+	/* concat physical page address(r11) and page offset(r10) */
+	rlwimi	r11, r10, 0, 20, 31
+	lwz	r11,0(r11)
+/* Check if it really is a dcbx instruction. */
+/* dcbt and dcbtst does not generate DTLB Misses/Errors,
+ * no need to include them here */
+	srwi	r10, r11, 26	/* check if major OP code is 31 */
+	cmpwi	cr0, r10, 31
+	bne-	141f
+	rlwinm	r10, r11, 0, 21, 30
+	cmpwi	cr0, r10, 2028	/* Is dcbz? */
+	beq+	142f
+	cmpwi	cr0, r10, 940	/* Is dcbi? */
+	beq+	142f
+	cmpwi	cr0, r10, 108	/* Is dcbst? */
+	beq+	144f		/* Fix up store bit! */
+	cmpwi	cr0, r10, 172	/* Is dcbf? */
+	beq+	142f
+	cmpwi	cr0, r10, 1964	/* Is icbi? */
+	beq+	142f
+141:	mfspr	r10, SPRN_DAR	/* r10 must hold DAR at exit */
+	b	DARFixed	/* Nope, go back to normal TLB processing */
+
+144:	mfspr	r10, SPRN_DSISR
+	rlwinm	r10, r10,0,7,5	/* Clear store bit for buggy dcbst insn */
+	mtspr	SPRN_DSISR, r10
+142:	/* continue, it was a dcbx, dcbi instruction. */
+#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
+	lwz	r3, 8(r0)	/* restore r3 from memory */
+#endif
+#ifndef NO_SELF_MODIFYING_CODE
+	andis.	r10,r11,0x1f	/* test if reg RA is r0 */
+	li	r10,modified_instr@l
+	dcbtst	r0,r10		/* touch for store */
+	rlwinm	r11,r11,0,0,20	/* Zero lower 10 bits */
+	oris	r11,r11,640	/* Transform instr. to a "add r10,RA,RB" */
+	ori	r11,r11,532
+	stw	r11,0(r10)	/* store add/and instruction */
+	dcbf	0,r10		/* flush new instr. to memory. */
+	icbi	0,r10		/* invalidate instr. cache line */
+	lwz	r11, 4(r0)	/* restore r11 from memory */
+	mfspr	r10, SPRN_M_TW	/* restore r10 from M_TW */
+	isync			/* Wait until new instr is loaded from memory */
+modified_instr:
+	.space	4		/* this is where the add instr. is stored */
+	bne+	143f
+	subf	r10,r0,r10	/* r10=r10-r0, only if reg RA is r0 */
+143:	mtdar	r10		/* store faulting EA in DAR */
+	b	DARFixed	/* Go back to normal TLB handling */
+#else
+	mfctr	r10
+	mtdar	r10			/* save ctr reg in DAR */
+	rlwinm	r10, r11, 24, 24, 28	/* offset into jump table for reg RB */
+	addi	r10, r10, 150f@l	/* add start of table */
+	mtctr	r10			/* load ctr with jump address */
+	xor	r10, r10, r10		/* sum starts at zero */
+	bctr				/* jump into table */
+150:
+	add	r10, r10, r0	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r1	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r2	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r3	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r4	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r5	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r6	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r7	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r8	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r9	;b	151f
+	mtctr	r11	;b	154f	/* r10 needs special handling */
+	mtctr	r11	;b	153f	/* r11 needs special handling */
+	add	r10, r10, r12	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r13	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r14	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r15	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r16	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r17	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r18	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r19	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r20	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r21	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r22	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r23	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r24	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r25	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r26	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r27	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r28	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r29	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r30	;b	151f
+	add	r10, r10, r31
+151:
+	rlwinm. r11,r11,19,24,28	/* offset into jump table for reg RA */
+	beq	152f			/* if reg RA is zero, don't add it */ 
+	addi	r11, r11, 150b@l	/* add start of table */
+	mtctr	r11			/* load ctr with jump address */
+	rlwinm	r11,r11,0,16,10		/* make sure we don't execute this more than once */
+	bctr				/* jump into table */
+152:
+	mfdar	r11
+	mtctr	r11			/* restore ctr reg from DAR */
+	mtdar	r10			/* save fault EA to DAR */
+	b	DARFixed		/* Go back to normal TLB handling */
+
+	/* special handling for r10,r11 since these are modified already */
+153:	lwz	r11, 4(r0)	/* load r11 from memory */
+	b	155f
+154:	mfspr	r11, SPRN_M_TW	/* load r10 from M_TW */
+155:	add	r10, r10, r11	/* add it */
+	mfctr	r11		/* restore r11 */
+	b	151b
+#endif
+
 	.globl	giveup_fpu
 giveup_fpu:
 	blr
-- 
1.6.4.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 06/10] 8xx: Add missing Guarded setting in DTLB Error.
  2009-11-20 10:21         ` [PATCH 05/10] 8xx: Fixup DAR from buggy dcbX instructions Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-11-20 10:21           ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 10:21             ` [PATCH 07/10] 8xx: Restore _PAGE_WRITETHRU Joakim Tjernlund
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-11-20 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

only DTLB Miss did set this bit, DTLB Error needs too otherwise
the setting is lost when the page becomes dirty.

Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S |   13 ++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 6d664f2..9a5a34b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -552,9 +552,16 @@ DARFixed:/* Return from dcbx instruction bug workaround, r10 holds value of DAR
 	 */
 	ori	r11, r11, 1		/* Set valid bit in physical L2 page */
 	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
-	mtspr	SPRN_MD_TWC, r11		/* Load pte table base address */
-	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC		/* ....and get the pte address */
-	lwz	r10, 0(r11)		/* Get the pte */
+	mtspr	SPRN_MD_TWC, r11	/* Load pte table base address */
+	mfspr	r10, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* ....and get the pte address */
+	lwz	r10, 0(r10)		/* Get the pte */
+	/* Insert the Guarded flag into the TWC from the Linux PTE.
+	 * It is bit 27 of both the Linux PTE and the TWC
+	 */
+	rlwimi	r11, r10, 0, 27, 27
+	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
+	mtspr	SPRN_MD_TWC, r11
+	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* get the pte address again */
 
 	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_DIRTY | _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_HWWRITE
 	stw	r10, 0(r11)		/* and update pte in table */
-- 
1.6.4.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 07/10] 8xx: Restore _PAGE_WRITETHRU
  2009-11-20 10:21           ` [PATCH 06/10] 8xx: Add missing Guarded setting in DTLB Error Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-11-20 10:21             ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 10:21               ` [PATCH 08/10] 8xx: start using dcbX instructions in various copy routines Joakim Tjernlund
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-11-20 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

8xx has not had WRITETHRU due to lack of bits in the pte.
After the recent rewrite of the 8xx TLB code, there are
two bits left. Use one of them to WRITETHRU.

Perhaps use the last SW bit to PAGE_SPECIAL or PAGE_FILE?

Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h |    5 +++--
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S     |    8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h
index 68ba861..d44826e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h
@@ -35,11 +35,12 @@
 #define _PAGE_SPECIAL	0x0008	/* SW entry, forced to 0 by the TLB miss */
 #define _PAGE_DIRTY	0x0100	/* C: page changed */
 
-/* These 3 software bits must be masked out when the entry is loaded
- * into the TLB, 2 SW bits left.
+/* These 4 software bits must be masked out when the entry is loaded
+ * into the TLB, 1 SW bit left(0x0080).
  */
 #define _PAGE_GUARDED	0x0010	/* software: guarded access */
 #define _PAGE_ACCESSED	0x0020	/* software: page referenced */
+#define _PAGE_WRITETHRU	0x0040	/* software: caching is write through */
 
 /* Setting any bits in the nibble with the follow two controls will
  * require a TLB exception handler change.  It is assumed unused bits
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 9a5a34b..d3f09ef 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -422,6 +422,10 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
 	 * above.
 	 */
 	rlwimi	r11, r10, 0, 27, 27
+	/* Insert the WriteThru flag into the TWC from the Linux PTE.
+	 * It is bit 25 in the Linux PTE and bit 30 in the TWC
+	 */
+	rlwimi	r11, r10, 32-5, 30, 30
 	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
 	mtspr	SPRN_MD_TWC, r11
 
@@ -559,6 +563,10 @@ DARFixed:/* Return from dcbx instruction bug workaround, r10 holds value of DAR
 	 * It is bit 27 of both the Linux PTE and the TWC
 	 */
 	rlwimi	r11, r10, 0, 27, 27
+	/* Insert the WriteThru flag into the TWC from the Linux PTE.
+	 * It is bit 25 in the Linux PTE and bit 30 in the TWC
+	 */
+	rlwimi	r11, r10, 32-5, 30, 30
 	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
 	mtspr	SPRN_MD_TWC, r11
 	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* get the pte address again */
-- 
1.6.4.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 08/10] 8xx: start using dcbX instructions in various copy routines
  2009-11-20 10:21             ` [PATCH 07/10] 8xx: Restore _PAGE_WRITETHRU Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-11-20 10:21               ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 10:21                 ` [PATCH 09/10] 8xx: Remove DIRTY pte handling in DTLB Error Joakim Tjernlund
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-11-20 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

Now that 8xx can fixup dcbX instructions, start using them
where possible like every other PowerPc arch do.

Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S |   18 ------------------
 arch/powerpc/lib/copy_32.S    |   24 ------------------------
 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S
index da9c0c4..8649f53 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S
@@ -502,15 +502,7 @@ _GLOBAL(clear_pages)
 	li	r0,PAGE_SIZE/L1_CACHE_BYTES
 	slw	r0,r0,r4
 	mtctr	r0
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx
-	li	r4, 0
-1:	stw	r4, 0(r3)
-	stw	r4, 4(r3)
-	stw	r4, 8(r3)
-	stw	r4, 12(r3)
-#else
 1:	dcbz	0,r3
-#endif
 	addi	r3,r3,L1_CACHE_BYTES
 	bdnz	1b
 	blr
@@ -535,15 +527,6 @@ _GLOBAL(copy_page)
 	addi	r3,r3,-4
 	addi	r4,r4,-4
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx
-	/* don't use prefetch on 8xx */
-    	li	r0,4096/L1_CACHE_BYTES
-	mtctr	r0
-1:	COPY_16_BYTES
-	bdnz	1b
-	blr
-
-#else	/* not 8xx, we can prefetch */
 	li	r5,4
 
 #if MAX_COPY_PREFETCH > 1
@@ -584,7 +567,6 @@ _GLOBAL(copy_page)
 	li	r0,MAX_COPY_PREFETCH
 	li	r11,4
 	b	2b
-#endif	/* CONFIG_8xx */
 
 /*
  * void atomic_clear_mask(atomic_t mask, atomic_t *addr)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/copy_32.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/copy_32.S
index c657de5..74a7f41 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/copy_32.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/copy_32.S
@@ -98,20 +98,7 @@ _GLOBAL(cacheable_memzero)
 	bdnz	4b
 3:	mtctr	r9
 	li	r7,4
-#if !defined(CONFIG_8xx)
 10:	dcbz	r7,r6
-#else
-10:	stw	r4, 4(r6)
-	stw	r4, 8(r6)
-	stw	r4, 12(r6)
-	stw	r4, 16(r6)
-#if CACHE_LINE_SIZE >= 32
-	stw	r4, 20(r6)
-	stw	r4, 24(r6)
-	stw	r4, 28(r6)
-	stw	r4, 32(r6)
-#endif /* CACHE_LINE_SIZE */
-#endif
 	addi	r6,r6,CACHELINE_BYTES
 	bdnz	10b
 	clrlwi	r5,r8,32-LG_CACHELINE_BYTES
@@ -200,9 +187,7 @@ _GLOBAL(cacheable_memcpy)
 	mtctr	r0
 	beq	63f
 53:
-#if !defined(CONFIG_8xx)
 	dcbz	r11,r6
-#endif
 	COPY_16_BYTES
 #if L1_CACHE_BYTES >= 32
 	COPY_16_BYTES
@@ -356,14 +341,6 @@ _GLOBAL(__copy_tofrom_user)
 	li	r11,4
 	beq	63f
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx
-	/* Don't use prefetch on 8xx */
-	mtctr	r0
-	li	r0,0
-53:	COPY_16_BYTES_WITHEX(0)
-	bdnz	53b
-
-#else /* not CONFIG_8xx */
 	/* Here we decide how far ahead to prefetch the source */
 	li	r3,4
 	cmpwi	r0,1
@@ -416,7 +393,6 @@ _GLOBAL(__copy_tofrom_user)
 	li	r3,4
 	li	r7,0
 	bne	114b
-#endif /* CONFIG_8xx */
 
 63:	srwi.	r0,r5,2
 	mtctr	r0
-- 
1.6.4.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 09/10] 8xx: Remove DIRTY pte handling in DTLB Error.
  2009-11-20 10:21               ` [PATCH 08/10] 8xx: start using dcbX instructions in various copy routines Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-11-20 10:21                 ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 10:21                   ` [PATCH 10/10] 8xx: DTLB Miss cleanup Joakim Tjernlund
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-11-20 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

There is no need to do set the DIRTY bit directly in DTLB Error.
Trap to do_page_fault() and let the generic MM code do the work.

Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S |   96 ----------------------------------------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index d3f09ef..36af721 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -500,102 +500,6 @@ DataTLBError:
 	cmpwi	cr0, r10, 0x00f0
 	beq-	FixupDAR	/* must be a buggy dcbX, icbi insn. */
 DARFixed:/* Return from dcbx instruction bug workaround, r10 holds value of DAR */
-	mfspr	r11, SPRN_DSISR
-	/* As the DAR fixup may clear store we may have all 3 states zero.
-	 * Make sure only 0x0200(store) falls down into DIRTY handling
-	 */
-	andis.	r11, r11, 0x4a00	/* !translation, protection or store */
-	srwi	r11, r11, 16
-	cmpwi	cr0, r11, 0x0200	/* just store ? */
-	bne	2f
-	/* Only Change bit left now, do it here as it is faster
-	 * than trapping to the C fault handler.
-	*/
-
-	/* The EA of a data TLB miss is automatically stored in the MD_EPN
-	 * register.  The EA of a data TLB error is automatically stored in
-	 * the DAR, but not the MD_EPN register.  We must copy the 20 most
-	 * significant bits of the EA from the DAR to MD_EPN before we
-	 * start walking the page tables.  We also need to copy the CASID
-	 * value from the M_CASID register.
-	 * Addendum:  The EA of a data TLB error is _supposed_ to be stored
-	 * in DAR, but it seems that this doesn't happen in some cases, such
-	 * as when the error is due to a dcbi instruction to a page with a
-	 * TLB that doesn't have the changed bit set.  In such cases, there
-	 * does not appear to be any way  to recover the EA of the error
-	 * since it is neither in DAR nor MD_EPN.  As a workaround, the
-	 * _PAGE_HWWRITE bit is set for all kernel data pages when the PTEs
-	 * are initialized in mapin_ram().  This will avoid the problem,
-	 * assuming we only use the dcbi instruction on kernel addresses.
-	 */
-
-	/* DAR is in r10 already */
-	rlwinm	r11, r10, 0, 0, 19
-	ori	r11, r11, MD_EVALID
-	mfspr	r10, SPRN_M_CASID
-	rlwimi	r11, r10, 0, 28, 31
-	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3780, r3)
-	mtspr	SPRN_MD_EPN, r11
-
-	mfspr	r10, SPRN_M_TWB	/* Get level 1 table entry address */
-
-	/* If we are faulting a kernel address, we have to use the
-	 * kernel page tables.
-	 */
-	andi.	r11, r10, 0x0800
-	beq	3f
-	lis	r11, swapper_pg_dir@h
-	ori	r11, r11, swapper_pg_dir@l
-	rlwimi	r10, r11, 0, 2, 19
-3:
-	lwz	r11, 0(r10)	/* Get the level 1 entry */
-	rlwinm.	r10, r11,0,0,19	/* Extract page descriptor page address */
-	beq	2f		/* If zero, bail */
-
-	/* We have a pte table, so fetch the pte from the table.
-	 */
-	ori	r11, r11, 1		/* Set valid bit in physical L2 page */
-	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
-	mtspr	SPRN_MD_TWC, r11	/* Load pte table base address */
-	mfspr	r10, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* ....and get the pte address */
-	lwz	r10, 0(r10)		/* Get the pte */
-	/* Insert the Guarded flag into the TWC from the Linux PTE.
-	 * It is bit 27 of both the Linux PTE and the TWC
-	 */
-	rlwimi	r11, r10, 0, 27, 27
-	/* Insert the WriteThru flag into the TWC from the Linux PTE.
-	 * It is bit 25 in the Linux PTE and bit 30 in the TWC
-	 */
-	rlwimi	r11, r10, 32-5, 30, 30
-	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3b80, r3)
-	mtspr	SPRN_MD_TWC, r11
-	mfspr	r11, SPRN_MD_TWC	/* get the pte address again */
-
-	ori	r10, r10, _PAGE_DIRTY | _PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_HWWRITE
-	stw	r10, 0(r11)		/* and update pte in table */
-	xori	r10, r10, _PAGE_RW	/* RW bit is inverted */
-
-	/* The Linux PTE won't go exactly into the MMU TLB.
-	 * Software indicator bits 22 and 28 must be clear.
-	 * Software indicator bits 24, 25, 26, and 27 must be
-	 * set.  All other Linux PTE bits control the behavior
-	 * of the MMU.
-	 */
-	li	r11, 0x00f0
-	mtspr	SPRN_DAR,r11	/* Tag DAR */
-	rlwimi	r10, r11, 0, 24, 28	/* Set 24-27, clear 28 */
-	DO_8xx_CPU6(0x3d80, r3)
-	mtspr	SPRN_MD_RPN, r10	/* Update TLB entry */
-
-	mfspr	r10, SPRN_M_TW	/* Restore registers */
-	lwz	r11, 0(r0)
-	mtcr	r11
-	lwz	r11, 4(r0)
-#ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
-	lwz	r3, 8(r0)
-#endif
-	rfi
-2:
 	mfspr	r10, SPRN_M_TW	/* Restore registers */
 	lwz	r11, 0(r0)
 	mtcr	r11
-- 
1.6.4.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 10/10] 8xx: DTLB Miss cleanup
  2009-11-20 10:21                 ` [PATCH 09/10] 8xx: Remove DIRTY pte handling in DTLB Error Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-11-20 10:21                   ` Joakim Tjernlund
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-11-20 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

Use symbolic constant for PRESENT and avoid branching.

Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S |   17 +++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 36af721..ce327c5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -438,15 +438,20 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
 	 * r11 = ((r10 & PRESENT) & ((r10 & ACCESSED) >> 5));
 	 * r10 = (r10 & ~PRESENT) | r11;
 	 */
-	rlwinm	r11, r10, 32-5, 31, 31
+	rlwinm	r11, r10, 32-5, _PAGE_PRESENT
 	and	r11, r11, r10
-	rlwimi	r10, r11, 0, 31, 31
+	rlwimi	r10, r11, 0, _PAGE_PRESENT
 
 	/* Honour kernel RO, User NA */
-	andi.	r11, r10, _PAGE_USER | _PAGE_RW
-	bne-	cr0, 5f
-	ori	r10,r10, 0x200 /* Extended encoding, bit 22 */
-5:	xori	r10, r10, _PAGE_RW  /* invert RW bit */
+	/* 0x200 == Extended encoding, bit 22 */
+	/* r11 =  (r10 & _PAGE_USER) >> 2 */
+	rlwinm	r11, r10, 32-2, 0x200
+	or	r10, r11, r10
+	/* r11 =  (r10 & _PAGE_RW) >> 1 */
+	rlwinm	r11, r10, 32-1, 0x200
+	or	r10, r11, r10
+	/* invert RW and 0x200 bits */
+	xori	r10, r10, _PAGE_RW | 0x200
 
 	/* The Linux PTE won't go exactly into the MMU TLB.
 	 * Software indicator bits 22 and 28 must be clear.
-- 
1.6.4.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/10 v6]  Fix 8xx MMU/TLB
  2009-11-20 10:21 [PATCH 00/10 v6] Fix 8xx MMU/TLB Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 10:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] 8xx: invalidate non present TLBs Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-11-20 20:28 ` Rex Feany
  2009-11-21 10:27   ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-27 10:57 ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Rex Feany @ 2009-11-20 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joakim Tjernlund; +Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev

Thus spake Joakim Tjernlund (Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se):

> Yet again an iteration of the series.
> Rex & Scott, please test and signoff.
> Changes since last version:
>  - Fix rlwimi insn(from Scott)

Hi Joakim,

Things look much better with this patch set, I see none
of the random crashes that I had with the earlier patches.
I'll leave it running on a few boards here over the weekend and
see if anything bad happens. 

Since patch #1 fixes a regression in the current kernel
is there any way you can get that into .32? I know it is late,
but without that patch .32 doesn't work for 8xx boards.

On another note, how does your patch set affect performance?
Have you been able to do any testing?  What is the advantage
of using dcbX in the kernel, besides keeping the code
similar to other ppc platforms?  Maybe it is good to
catch/fixup userspace uses of dcbX, but why change the
kernel? How does it affect performance?

thanks!
/rex.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/10 v6]  Fix 8xx MMU/TLB
  2009-11-20 20:28 ` [PATCH 00/10 v6] Fix 8xx MMU/TLB Rex Feany
@ 2009-11-21 10:27   ` Joakim Tjernlund
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-11-21 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rex Feany; +Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev



Rex Feany <RFeany@mrv.com> wrote on 20/11/2009 21:28:38:
>
> Thus spake Joakim Tjernlund (Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se):
>
> > Yet again an iteration of the series.
> > Rex & Scott, please test and signoff.
> > Changes since last version:
> >  - Fix rlwimi insn(from Scott)
>
> Hi Joakim,
>
> Things look much better with this patch set, I see none
> of the random crashes that I had with the earlier patches.
> I'll leave it running on a few boards here over the weekend and
> see if anything bad happens.

Good to hear that.

>
> Since patch #1 fixes a regression in the current kernel
> is there any way you can get that into .32? I know it is late,
> but without that patch .32 doesn't work for 8xx boards.

You need to convince Ben of that. I guess the best you can do
is to reply(include Ben too) with your s-o-b and explain that this
fixes a regression for you.

>
> On another note, how does your patch set affect performance?
> Have you been able to do any testing?  What is the advantage
> of using dcbX in the kernel, besides keeping the code
> similar to other ppc platforms?

I consider this a big plus, not having to pay special attention
to 8xx anymore. There aren't many 8xx people around
to fix problems that are specific for 8xx.

> Maybe it is good to
> catch/fixup userspace uses of dcbX, but why change the
> kernel? How does it affect performance?

when I originally did the dcbX path many years ago I did
some perf testing and it was a win. Perhaps you could
run a some tests?

Consider that the dcbx workaround is only triggered by a DTLB errors
and the kernel never gets into DTLB errors for normal activity.

TLB errors are the slow path anyway with lots of mm code
so a few more insn won't matter.

There is also the case of dcbst setting the store bit wrongly
and this could generate a SEGV if it hits a RO page.

The kernel isn't free of dcbX insn anyway so if it ever hit
a DTLB error, it is possible that could bring down the kernel.

The only perf regression I can think of is the
  8xx: Remove DIRTY pte handling in DTLB Error.
which will make dirty handling much slower.
I am happy to leave that one out, but Ben requested
this.

 Jocke

PS.
    You should consider fixing glibc's mem* functions to make
    use of dcbX for 8xx once the kernel has this patchset.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/10 v6]  Fix 8xx MMU/TLB
  2009-11-20 10:21 [PATCH 00/10 v6] Fix 8xx MMU/TLB Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 10:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] 8xx: invalidate non present TLBs Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 20:28 ` [PATCH 00/10 v6] Fix 8xx MMU/TLB Rex Feany
@ 2009-11-27 10:57 ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-27 21:37   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-11-27 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

Scott and Rex, I think we need you s-o-b to make it into the kernel proper.

Marcelo and Vitaly, I noticed you guys are listed as 8xx maintainers.
Have you seen this? What do you think?

        Jocke

Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se> wrote on 20/11/2009 11:21:01:
>
> Yet again an iteration of the series.
> Rex & Scott, please test and signoff.
> Changes since last version:
>  - Fix rlwimi insn(from Scott)
>
> Joakim Tjernlund (10):
>   8xx: invalidate non present TLBs
>   8xx: Update TLB asm so it behaves as linux mm expects.
>   8xx: Tag DAR with 0x00f0 to catch buggy instructions.
>   8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB
>   8xx: Fixup DAR from buggy dcbX instructions.
>   8xx: Add missing Guarded setting in DTLB Error.
>   8xx: Restore _PAGE_WRITETHRU
>   8xx: start using dcbX instructions in various copy routines
>   8xx: Remove DIRTY pte handling in DTLB Error.
>   8xx: DTLB Miss cleanup
>
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h |   14 +-
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S     |  315 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S      |   18 --
>  arch/powerpc/lib/copy_32.S         |   24 ---
>  arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c            |    8 +-
>  5 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 168 deletions(-)
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/10 v6]  Fix 8xx MMU/TLB
  2009-11-27 10:57 ` Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-11-27 21:37   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  2009-11-30 22:25     ` Scott Wood
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2009-11-27 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joakim Tjernlund; +Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 11:57 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Scott and Rex, I think we need you s-o-b to make it into the kernel proper.
> 
> Marcelo and Vitaly, I noticed you guys are listed as 8xx maintainers.
> Have you seen this? What do you think?

I think Marcelo isn't much involved with 8xx anymore. I'd say if Scott
and Vitaly are ok, then the patches are good. But I'll wait for at least
Scott to give an Ack as he can at least test which I can't :-)

Cheers,
Ben.

>         Jocke
> 
> Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se> wrote on 20/11/2009 11:21:01:
> >
> > Yet again an iteration of the series.
> > Rex & Scott, please test and signoff.
> > Changes since last version:
> >  - Fix rlwimi insn(from Scott)
> >
> > Joakim Tjernlund (10):
> >   8xx: invalidate non present TLBs
> >   8xx: Update TLB asm so it behaves as linux mm expects.
> >   8xx: Tag DAR with 0x00f0 to catch buggy instructions.
> >   8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB
> >   8xx: Fixup DAR from buggy dcbX instructions.
> >   8xx: Add missing Guarded setting in DTLB Error.
> >   8xx: Restore _PAGE_WRITETHRU
> >   8xx: start using dcbX instructions in various copy routines
> >   8xx: Remove DIRTY pte handling in DTLB Error.
> >   8xx: DTLB Miss cleanup
> >
> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-8xx.h |   14 +-
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S     |  315 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S      |   18 --
> >  arch/powerpc/lib/copy_32.S         |   24 ---
> >  arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c            |    8 +-
> >  5 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 168 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/10 v6]  Fix 8xx MMU/TLB
  2009-11-27 21:37   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2009-11-30 22:25     ` Scott Wood
  2009-11-30 22:30       ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-12-08  8:38       ` Joakim Tjernlund
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2009-11-30 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 11:57 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>> Scott and Rex, I think we need you s-o-b to make it into the kernel proper.
>>
>> Marcelo and Vitaly, I noticed you guys are listed as 8xx maintainers.
>> Have you seen this? What do you think?
> 
> I think Marcelo isn't much involved with 8xx anymore. I'd say if Scott
> and Vitaly are ok, then the patches are good. But I'll wait for at least
> Scott to give an Ack as he can at least test which I can't :-)

ACK

-Scott

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/10 v6]  Fix 8xx MMU/TLB
  2009-11-30 22:25     ` Scott Wood
@ 2009-11-30 22:30       ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-12-08  8:38       ` Joakim Tjernlund
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-11-30 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Scott Wood; +Cc: Rex Feany, linuxppc-dev

Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote on 30/11/2009 23:25:30:
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 11:57 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >> Scott and Rex, I think we need you s-o-b to make it into the kernel proper.
> >>
> >> Marcelo and Vitaly, I noticed you guys are listed as 8xx maintainers.
> >> Have you seen this? What do you think?
> >
> > I think Marcelo isn't much involved with 8xx anymore. I'd say if Scott
> > and Vitaly are ok, then the patches are good. But I'll wait for at least
> > Scott to give an Ack as he can at least test which I can't :-)
>
> ACK

Yippie, lets see if I can work up the energy to do the
same for 2.4 once this is in 2.6 :)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/10 v6]  Fix 8xx MMU/TLB
  2009-11-30 22:25     ` Scott Wood
  2009-11-30 22:30       ` Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-12-08  8:38       ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-12-08 20:01         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-12-08  8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Scott Wood; +Cc: Rex Feany, linuxppc-dev

Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote on 30/11/2009 23:25:30:
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 11:57 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >> Scott and Rex, I think we need you s-o-b to make it into the kernel proper.
> >>
> >> Marcelo and Vitaly, I noticed you guys are listed as 8xx maintainers.
> >> Have you seen this? What do you think?
> >
> > I think Marcelo isn't much involved with 8xx anymore. I'd say if Scott
> > and Vitaly are ok, then the patches are good. But I'll wait for at least
> > Scott to give an Ack as he can at least test which I can't :-)
>
> ACK

Can't see these patches in next yet, did they go somewhere else?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/10 v6]  Fix 8xx MMU/TLB
  2009-12-08  8:38       ` Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-12-08 20:01         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2009-12-08 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joakim Tjernlund; +Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 09:38 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote on 30/11/2009 23:25:30:
> >
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 11:57 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > >> Scott and Rex, I think we need you s-o-b to make it into the kernel proper.
> > >>
> > >> Marcelo and Vitaly, I noticed you guys are listed as 8xx maintainers.
> > >> Have you seen this? What do you think?
> > >
> > > I think Marcelo isn't much involved with 8xx anymore. I'd say if Scott
> > > and Vitaly are ok, then the patches are good. But I'll wait for at least
> > > Scott to give an Ack as he can at least test which I can't :-)
> >
> > ACK
> 
> Can't see these patches in next yet, did they go somewhere else?

No, but Scott has been to lazy to write proper Acked-by: lines and I've
been too lazy to do it for him so they'll go in the next batch, probably
today :-)

Cheers,
Ben.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB
  2009-11-20 10:21       ` [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-11-20 10:21         ` [PATCH 05/10] 8xx: Fixup DAR from buggy dcbX instructions Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-12-09  4:19         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  2009-12-09  7:39           ` Joakim Tjernlund
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2009-12-09  4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joakim Tjernlund; +Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 11:21 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Various kernel asm modifies SRR0/SRR1 just before executing
> a rfi. If such code crosses a page boundary you risk a TLB miss
> which will clobber SRR0/SRR1. Avoid this by always pinning
> kernel instruction TLB space.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> index a9f1ace..e70503d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> @@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ start_here:
>   */
>  initial_mmu:
>  	tlbia			/* Invalidate all TLB entries */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PIN_TLB
> +#if 1 /* CONFIG_PIN_TLB */
>  	lis	r8, MI_RSV4I@h
>  	ori	r8, r8, 0x1c00
>  #else

Not nice. Either remove the config option or make sure all those code
sequences are appropriately aligned so it doesn't happen. I recommend
the later :-)

I'll apply the other patches.

Cheers,
Ben.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB
  2009-12-09  4:19         ` [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2009-12-09  7:39           ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-12-09  8:56             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-12-09  7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote on 09/12/2009 05:19:59:

> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> To: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>, "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-
> dev@ozlabs.org>, Rex Feany <RFeany@mrv.com>
> Date: 09/12/2009 05:20
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB
>
> On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 11:21 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Various kernel asm modifies SRR0/SRR1 just before executing
> > a rfi. If such code crosses a page boundary you risk a TLB miss
> > which will clobber SRR0/SRR1. Avoid this by always pinning
> > kernel instruction TLB space.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> > index a9f1ace..e70503d 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
> > @@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ start_here:
> >   */
> >  initial_mmu:
> >     tlbia         /* Invalidate all TLB entries */
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PIN_TLB
> > +#if 1 /* CONFIG_PIN_TLB */
> >     lis   r8, MI_RSV4I@h
> >     ori   r8, r8, 0x1c00
> >  #else
>
> Not nice. Either remove the config option or make sure all those code
> sequences are appropriately aligned so it doesn't happen. I recommend
> the later :-)

The later isn't as simple :) I believe the bulk of such code in entry_32.S.
Anyhow, the config option is still valid as if enabled
it will pin several DTLB's too. Scott had some concerns about removing the
config option completely so this was the next best thing.

>
> I'll apply the other patches.
OK, great.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB
  2009-12-09  7:39           ` Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-12-09  8:56             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  2009-12-09  9:24               ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-12-29 15:10               ` Joakim Tjernlund
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2009-12-09  8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joakim Tjernlund; +Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 08:39 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> The later isn't as simple :) I believe the bulk of such code in
> entry_32.S.

Yeah but it would be useful for hash I suppose if one really wants to
boot with nobats. Though at least on hash most of the time we have ways
to recover by mean of MSR:RI being cleared, which your TLB miss code
doesn't check...

> Anyhow, the config option is still valid as if enabled
> it will pin several DTLB's too. Scott had some concerns about removing
> the config option completely so this was the next best thing.

Well, if you want to pin at least one entry, then just remove the #if
completely but don't leave a #if 1 :-)

Cheers,
Ben.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB
  2009-12-09  8:56             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2009-12-09  9:24               ` Joakim Tjernlund
  2009-12-29 15:10               ` Joakim Tjernlund
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-12-09  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote on 09/12/2009 09:56:35:
>
> On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 08:39 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > The later isn't as simple :) I believe the bulk of such code in
> > entry_32.S.
>
> Yeah but it would be useful for hash I suppose if one really wants to
> boot with nobats. Though at least on hash most of the time we have ways
> to recover by mean of MSR:RI being cleared, which your TLB miss code
> doesn't check...

Never looked at this so I cannot comment.

>
> > Anyhow, the config option is still valid as if enabled
> > it will pin several DTLB's too. Scott had some concerns about removing
> > the config option completely so this was the next best thing.
>
> Well, if you want to pin at least one entry, then just remove the #if
> completely but don't leave a #if 1 :-)

I could, but I wanted to have an easy way back to the old way if
the need arises.
Anyway, I am rather busy ATM with more pressing matters so I would
appreciate if you could take the patch as is.

 Jocke

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB
  2009-12-09  8:56             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  2009-12-09  9:24               ` Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2009-12-29 15:10               ` Joakim Tjernlund
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: Scott Wood, linuxppc-dev, Rex Feany

Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote on 09/12/2009 09:56:35:

> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> To: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se>
> Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>, Rex Feany
> <RFeany@mrv.com>, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> Date: 09/12/2009 09:56
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB
>
> On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 08:39 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > The later isn't as simple :) I believe the bulk of such code in
> > entry_32.S.
>
> Yeah but it would be useful for hash I suppose if one really wants to
> boot with nobats. Though at least on hash most of the time we have ways
> to recover by mean of MSR:RI being cleared, which your TLB miss code
> doesn't check...
>
> > Anyhow, the config option is still valid as if enabled
> > it will pin several DTLB's too. Scott had some concerns about removing
> > the config option completely so this was the next best thing.
>
> Well, if you want to pin at least one entry, then just remove the #if
> completely but don't leave a #if 1 :-)

As you wish. Here is a new version without the #if 1
This is required for 8xx to work in Linus current tree.

>From 5a4fa5078ba1774b037dbfd88b9c87b74cf76db7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:26:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB

Various kernel asm modifies SRR0/SRR1 just before executing
a rfi. If such code crosses a page boundary you risk a TLB miss
which will clobber SRR0/SRR1. Avoid this by always pinning
kernel instruction TLB space.

Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S |    8 ++++----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index adc5a32..c80e7c5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -767,12 +767,12 @@ start_here:
  */
 initial_mmu:
 	tlbia			/* Invalidate all TLB entries */
-#ifdef CONFIG_PIN_TLB
+/* Always pin the first 8 MB ITLB to prevent ITLB
+   misses while mucking around with SRR0/SRR1 in asm
+*/
 	lis	r8, MI_RSV4I@h
 	ori	r8, r8, 0x1c00
-#else
-	li	r8, 0
-#endif
+
 	mtspr	SPRN_MI_CTR, r8	/* Set instruction MMU control */

 #ifdef CONFIG_PIN_TLB
--
1.6.4.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-29 15:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-20 10:21 [PATCH 00/10 v6] Fix 8xx MMU/TLB Joakim Tjernlund
2009-11-20 10:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] 8xx: invalidate non present TLBs Joakim Tjernlund
2009-11-20 10:21   ` [PATCH 02/10] 8xx: Update TLB asm so it behaves as linux mm expects Joakim Tjernlund
2009-11-20 10:21     ` [PATCH 03/10] 8xx: Tag DAR with 0x00f0 to catch buggy instructions Joakim Tjernlund
2009-11-20 10:21       ` [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB Joakim Tjernlund
2009-11-20 10:21         ` [PATCH 05/10] 8xx: Fixup DAR from buggy dcbX instructions Joakim Tjernlund
2009-11-20 10:21           ` [PATCH 06/10] 8xx: Add missing Guarded setting in DTLB Error Joakim Tjernlund
2009-11-20 10:21             ` [PATCH 07/10] 8xx: Restore _PAGE_WRITETHRU Joakim Tjernlund
2009-11-20 10:21               ` [PATCH 08/10] 8xx: start using dcbX instructions in various copy routines Joakim Tjernlund
2009-11-20 10:21                 ` [PATCH 09/10] 8xx: Remove DIRTY pte handling in DTLB Error Joakim Tjernlund
2009-11-20 10:21                   ` [PATCH 10/10] 8xx: DTLB Miss cleanup Joakim Tjernlund
2009-12-09  4:19         ` [PATCH 04/10] 8xx: Always pin kernel instruction TLB Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-09  7:39           ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-12-09  8:56             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-09  9:24               ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-12-29 15:10               ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-11-20 20:28 ` [PATCH 00/10 v6] Fix 8xx MMU/TLB Rex Feany
2009-11-21 10:27   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-11-27 10:57 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-11-27 21:37   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-30 22:25     ` Scott Wood
2009-11-30 22:30       ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-12-08  8:38       ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-12-08 20:01         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.