From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, robert@herjulf.net,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: rps: question
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:42:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1265568122.3688.36.camel@bigi> (raw)
Hi Tom,
First off: Kudos on the numbers you are seeing; they are
impressive. Do you have any numbers on a forwarding path test?
My first impression when i saw the numbers was one of suprise.
Back in the days when we tried to split stack processing the way
you did(it was one of the experiments on early NAPI), IPIs were
_damn_ expensive. What changed in current architecture that makes
this more palatable? IPIs are still synchronous AFAIK (and the more
IPI receiver there are, the worse the ACK latency). Did you test this
across other archs or say 3-4 year old machines?
cheers,
jamal
next reply other threads:[~2010-02-07 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-07 18:42 jamal [this message]
2010-02-08 5:58 ` rps: question Tom Herbert
2010-02-08 15:09 ` jamal
2010-04-14 11:53 ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: " jamal
2010-04-14 17:31 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 18:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 18:53 ` jamal
2010-04-14 19:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-14 19:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 8:51 ` David Miller
2010-04-14 20:22 ` jamal
2010-04-14 20:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 20:38 ` jamal
2010-04-14 20:45 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 20:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 22:51 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-14 23:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-15 2:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 2:50 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 8:57 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 12:10 ` jamal
2010-04-15 12:32 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 12:50 ` jamal
2010-04-15 23:51 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 8:51 ` David Miller
2010-04-14 20:34 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-15 8:50 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 8:48 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 11:55 ` jamal
2010-04-15 16:41 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-15 20:16 ` jamal
2010-04-15 20:25 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-15 23:56 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 5:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 6:02 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 6:28 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-16 6:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 13:42 ` jamal
2010-04-16 7:15 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-16 13:27 ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:37 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-16 13:58 ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:21 ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:34 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 13:49 ` jamal
2010-04-16 14:10 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 14:43 ` jamal
2010-04-16 14:58 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 12:48 ` jamal
2010-04-17 7:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 8:43 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-17 9:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 14:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 17:26 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-17 14:17 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: remove time limit in process_backlog() Eric Dumazet
2010-04-18 9:36 ` David Miller
2010-04-17 17:31 ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question jamal
2010-04-18 9:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-18 11:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 2:09 ` jamal
2010-04-19 9:37 ` [RFC] rps: shortcut net_rps_action() Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 9:48 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 12:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 12:28 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 13:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 14:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] " Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 16:02 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-19 20:21 ` David Miller
2010-04-20 7:17 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: cleanups Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20 8:18 ` David Miller
2010-04-19 23:56 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: shortcut net_rps_action() Changli Gao
2010-04-20 0:32 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-20 5:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20 12:02 ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question jamal
2010-04-20 13:13 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <1271853570.4032.21.camel@bigi>
2010-04-21 19:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 1:27 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-22 12:12 ` jamal
2010-04-25 2:31 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-26 11:35 ` jamal
2010-04-26 13:35 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-21 21:53 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-16 15:57 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 18:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-15 8:42 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1265568122.3688.36.camel@bigi \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert@herjulf.net \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.