* Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
@ 2010-05-26 12:34 Stefan Hajnoczi
2010-05-28 16:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2010-05-26 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker, Steven Rostedt, Marcelo Tosatti, Avi Kivity,
Peter Zijlstra
The "perf trace" command produces the following messages:
For kvm:kvm_apic:
$ perf trace
Warning: Error: expected type 4 but read 7
Warning: Error: expected type 5 but read 0
Warning: failed to read event print fmt for kvm_apic
For kvm:kvm_inj_exception:
$ perf trace
Warning: Error: expected type 4 but read 7
Warning: Error: expected type 5 but read 0
Warning: failed to read event print fmt for kvm_inj_exception
For kvm:kvm_emulate_insn:
$ perf trace
Fatal: bad op token {
The other KVM trace events work fine.
To reproduce this issue (you don't need any actual KVM activity while running):
$ perf record -a -f -e 'kvm:kvm_apic' sleep 1
$ perf trace
Both linux-2.6.git 7e125f7b9cbfce4101191b8076d606c517a73066 and Avi's kvm.git
show this problem.
It appears that the perf.data written by "perf record" cannot be parsed by
"perf trace" run using the same perf binary. The perf binary was built from
the same kernel tree that I am running (there should be no mismatch between the
kernel and the perf binary).
At the end of this email is a gdb session that shows where the
kvm:kvm_apic "expected type 4 but read 7" error occurs.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Stefan
$ sudo gdb --args ./perf trace
[...]
(gdb) b warning
Breakpoint 1 at 0x42d000: file util/usage.c, line 74.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/stefanha/linux-2.6/tools/perf/perf trace
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Breakpoint 1, warning (warn=0x463390 "Error: expected type %d but read %d") at util/usage.c:74
74 {
(gdb) bt
#0 warning (warn=0x463390 "Error: expected type %d but read %d") at util/usage.c:74
#1 0x0000000000443123 in __test_type_token (event=0x9d0d40, list=<value optimized out>, tok=<value optimized out>) at util/trace-event-parse.c:639
#2 test_type_token (event=0x9d0d40, list=<value optimized out>, tok=<value optimized out>) at util/trace-event-parse.c:656
#3 process_fields (event=0x9d0d40, list=<value optimized out>, tok=<value optimized out>) at util/trace-event-parse.c:1499
#4 0x0000000000442598 in process_symbols (event=0x9d0d40, arg=0x9d2110, tok=0x7fffffff9fa8, type=<value optimized out>) at util/trace-event-parse.c:1588
#5 process_arg_token (event=0x9d0d40, arg=0x9d2110, tok=0x7fffffff9fa8, type=<value optimized out>) at util/trace-event-parse.c:1703
#6 0x0000000000443cee in process_arg (event=0x9d0d40) at util/trace-event-parse.c:1034
#7 event_read_print_args (event=0x9d0d40) at util/trace-event-parse.c:1774
#8 event_read_print (event=0x9d0d40) at util/trace-event-parse.c:1853
#9 0x0000000000444c0e in parse_event_file (buf=<value optimized out>, size=<value optimized out>, sys=0x9ccf90 "kvm") at util/trace-event-parse.c:3192
#10 0x0000000000445e3d in read_event_file (fd=<value optimized out>, __repipe=<value optimized out>) at util/trace-event-read.c:236
#11 read_event_files (fd=<value optimized out>, __repipe=<value optimized out>) at util/trace-event-read.c:270
#12 trace_report (fd=<value optimized out>, __repipe=<value optimized out>) at util/trace-event-read.c:514
#13 0x0000000000434c52 in perf_file_section__process (self=0x9cc540, ph=0x9cc9a0, feat=1, fd=5) at util/header.c:777
#14 0x0000000000435ad9 in perf_header__process_sections (self=0x9cc9a0, fd=5, process=0x434b80 <perf_file_section__process>) at util/header.c:618
#15 0x0000000000436c31 in perf_header__read (session=0x9cc9a0, fd=5) at util/header.c:893
#16 0x000000000043d566 in perf_session__open (filename=<value optimized out>, mode=0, force=<value optimized out>, repipe=false) at util/session.c:51
#17 perf_session__new (filename=<value optimized out>, mode=0, force=<value optimized out>, repipe=false) at util/session.c:103
#18 0x00000000004169b7 in cmd_trace (argc=0, argv=0x7fffffffe6e0, prefix=<value optimized out>) at builtin-trace.c:666
#19 0x0000000000404dd7 in run_builtin (p=0x66ee58, argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe6e0) at perf.c:265
#20 0x0000000000405876 in handle_internal_command (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe6e0) at perf.c:336
#21 run_argv (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe6e0) at perf.c:380
#22 main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe6e0) at perf.c:464
(gdb) p *(struct event*)0x9d0d40
$1 = {next = 0x0, name = 0x9d0d90 "kvm_apic", id = 762, flags = 0, format = {nr_common = 5, nr_fields = 3, common_fields = 0x9d0df0, fields = 0x9d1d20},
print_fmt = {format = 0x9d1ef0 "apic_%s %s = 0x%x", args = 0x9d1f30}, system = 0x0}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-05-26 12:34 Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events Stefan Hajnoczi
@ 2010-05-28 16:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2010-05-28 21:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-28 21:45 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2010-05-28 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-perf-users
Cc: linux-kernel, kvm, Frederic Weisbecker, Steven Rostedt,
Marcelo Tosatti, Avi Kivity, Peter Zijlstra, Stefan Hajnoczi
I get parse errors when using Steven Rostedt's trace-cmd tool, too.
Any ideas what is going on here? I can provide more info (e.g. trace
files) if necessary.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-05-28 16:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
@ 2010-05-28 21:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-28 21:45 ` Steven Rostedt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2010-05-28 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Hajnoczi
Cc: linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm, Frederic Weisbecker,
Steven Rostedt, Avi Kivity, Peter Zijlstra, Stefan Hajnoczi
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 05:42:51PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> I get parse errors when using Steven Rostedt's trace-cmd tool, too.
>
> Any ideas what is going on here? I can provide more info (e.g. trace
> files) if necessary.
Non standard print_format for the problematic entries?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-05-28 16:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2010-05-28 21:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
@ 2010-05-28 21:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-29 8:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2010-05-29 11:50 ` Avi Kivity
1 sibling, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2010-05-28 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Hajnoczi
Cc: linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm, Frederic Weisbecker,
Marcelo Tosatti, Avi Kivity, Peter Zijlstra, Stefan Hajnoczi
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 17:42 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> I get parse errors when using Steven Rostedt's trace-cmd tool, too.
>
> Any ideas what is going on here? I can provide more info (e.g. trace
> files) if necessary.
Does trace-cmd fail on the same tracepoints? Have you checkout the
latest code?.
I do know it fails on some of the KVM tracerpoints since the formatting
they use is obnoxious.
Could you show the "print-fmt" of the failing events?
Thanks,
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-05-28 21:45 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2010-05-29 8:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2010-05-29 11:50 ` Avi Kivity
1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2010-05-29 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Avi Kivity, Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 05:45:57PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 17:42 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > I get parse errors when using Steven Rostedt's trace-cmd tool, too.
> >
> > Any ideas what is going on here? I can provide more info (e.g. trace
> > files) if necessary.
>
> Does trace-cmd fail on the same tracepoints? Have you checkout the
> latest code?.
$ sudo trace-cmd record -e kvm:kvm_pio
$ trace-cmd report
version = 6
bad op token {
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_mmu_get_page
bad op token {
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_mmu_sync_page
bad op token {
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_mmu_unsync_page
bad op token {
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_mmu_zap_page
Error: expected type 4 but read 7
Error: expected type 5 but read 0
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_apic
function ftrace_print_symbols_seq not defined
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_exit
Error: expected type 4 but read 7
Error: expected type 5 but read 0
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_inj_exception
function ftrace_print_symbols_seq not defined
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_nested_vmexit
function ftrace_print_symbols_seq not defined
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_nested_vmexit_inject
bad op token {
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_emulate_insn
These are different from those reported by perf.
Yes, I use trace-cmd.git master branch (currently built from
b530a23f0442be322b1717e6dbce2bd502634cb4).
My kernel is 2.6.34 based.
> I do know it fails on some of the KVM tracerpoints since the formatting
> they use is obnoxious.
>
> Could you show the "print-fmt" of the failing events?
Here are the details along with my amateur comments on what might have gone wrong:
$ for event in kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_get_page kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_sync_page kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_unsync_page kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_zap_page kvm/kvm_apic kvm/kvm_exit kvm/kvm_inj_exception kvm/kvm_nested_vmexit kvm/kvm_nested_vmexit_inject kvm/kvm_emulate_insn; do echo -n "$event: "; grep 'print fmt:' /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/$event/format; done
kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_get_page: print fmt: "%s %s", ({ const char *ret = p->buffer + p->len; static const char *access_str[] = { "---", "--x", "w--", "w-x", "-u-", "-ux", "wu-", "wux" }; union kvm_mmu_page_role role; role.word = REC->role; trace_seq_printf(p, "sp gfn %llx %u%s q%u%s %s%s" " %snxe root %u %s%c", REC->gfn, role.level, role.cr4_pae ? " pae" : "", role.quadrant, role.direct ? " direct" : "", access_str[role.access], role.invalid ? " invalid" : "", role.nxe ? "" : "!", REC->root_count, REC->unsync ? "unsync" : "sync", 0); ret; }), REC->created ? "new" : "existing"
kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_sync_page: print fmt: "%s", ({ const char *ret = p->buffer + p->len; static const char *access_str[] = { "---", "--x", "w--", "w-x", "-u-", "-ux", "wu-", "wux" }; union kvm_mmu_page_role role; role.word = REC->role; trace_seq_printf(p, "sp gfn %llx %u%s q%u%s %s%s" " %snxe root %u %s%c", REC->gfn, role.level, role.cr4_pae ? " pae" : "", role.quadrant, role.direct ? " direct" : "", access_str[role.access], role.invalid ? " invalid" : "", role.nxe ? "" : "!", REC->root_count, REC->unsync ? "unsync" : "sync", 0); ret; })
kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_unsync_page: print fmt: "%s", ({ const char *ret = p->buffer + p->len; static const char *access_str[] = { "---", "--x", "w--", "w-x", "-u-", "-ux", "wu-", "wux" }; union kvm_mmu_page_role role; role.word = REC->role; trace_seq_printf(p, "sp gfn %llx %u%s q%u%s %s%s" " %snxe root %u %s%c", REC->gfn, role.level, role.cr4_pae ? " pae" : "", role.quadrant, role.direct ? " direct" : "", access_str[role.access], role.invalid ? " invalid" : "", role.nxe ? "" : "!", REC->root_count, REC->unsync ? "unsync" : "sync", 0); ret; })
kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_zap_page: print fmt: "%s", ({ const char *ret = p->buffer + p->len; static const char *access_str[] = { "---", "--x", "w--", "w-x", "-u-", "-ux", "wu-", "wux" }; union kvm_mmu_page_role role; role.word = REC->role; trace_seq_printf(p, "sp gfn %llx %u%s q%u%s %s%s" " %snxe root %u %s%c", REC->gfn, role.level, role.cr4_pae ? " pae" : "", role.quadrant, role.direct ? " direct" : "", access_str[role.access], role.invalid ? " invalid" : "", role.nxe ? "" : "!", REC->root_count, REC->unsync ? "unsync" : "sync", 0); ret; })
kvm/kvm_emulate_insn: print fmt: "%x:%llx:%s (%s)%s", REC->csbase, REC->rip, ({ int i; const char *ret = p->buffer + p->len; for (i = 0; i < REC->len; ++i) trace_seq_printf(p, " %02x", REC->insn[i]); trace_seq_printf(p, "%c", 0); ret; }), __print_symbolic(REC->flags, { 0, "real" }, { (1 << 0) | (1 << 1), "vm16" }, { (1 << 0), "prot16" }, { (1 << 0) | (1 << 2), "prot32" }, { (1 << 0) | (1 << 3), "prot64" }), REC->failed ? " failed" : ""
Macro expanded into C code that shouldn't have?
kvm/kvm_apic: print fmt: "apic_%s %s = 0x%x", REC->rw ? "write" : "read", __print_symbolic(REC->reg, { 0x20, "APIC_" "ID" }, { 0x30, "APIC_" "LVR" }, { 0x80, "APIC_" "TASKPRI" }, { 0x90, "APIC_" "ARBPRI" }, { 0xA0, "APIC_" "PROCPRI" }, { 0xB0, "APIC_" "EOI" }, { 0xC0, "APIC_" "RRR" }, { 0xD0, "APIC_" "LDR" }, { 0xE0, "APIC_" "DFR" }, { 0xF0, "APIC_" "SPIV" }, { 0x100, "APIC_" "ISR" }, { 0x180, "APIC_" "TMR" }, { 0x200, "APIC_" "IRR" }, { 0x280, "APIC_" "ESR" }, { 0x300, "APIC_" "ICR" }, { 0x310, "APIC_" "ICR2" }, { 0x320, "APIC_" "LVTT" }, { 0x330, "APIC_" "LVTTHMR" }, { 0x340, "APIC_" "LVTPC" }, { 0x350, "APIC_" "LVT0" }, { 0x360, "APIC_" "LVT1" }, { 0x370, "APIC_" "LVTERR" }, { 0x380, "APIC_" "TMICT" }, { 0x390, "APIC_" "TMCCT" }, { 0x3E0, "APIC_" "TDCR" }, { 0x3F0, "APIC_" "SELF_IPI" }, { 0x400, "APIC_" "EFEAT" }, { 0x410, "APIC_" "ECTRL" }), REC->val
kvm/kvm_inj_exception: print fmt: "%s (0x%x)", __print_symbolic(REC->exception, { 0, "#" "DE" }, { 1, "#" "DB" }, { 3, "#" "BP" }, { 4, "#" "OF" }, { 5, "#" "BR" }, { 6, "#" "UD" }, { 7, "#" "NM" }, { 8, "#" "DF" }, { 10, "#" "TS" }, { 11, "#" "NP" }, { 12, "#" "SS" }, { 13, "#" "GP" }, { 14, "#" "PF" }, { 16, "#" "MF" }, { 18, "#" "MC" }), REC->has_error ? REC->error_code : 0
String literal concatenation not handled by parser?
kvm/kvm_exit: print fmt: "reason %s rip 0x%lx", ftrace_print_symbols_seq(p, REC->exit_reason, kvm_x86_ops->exit_reasons_str), REC->guest_rip
kvm/kvm_nested_vmexit: print fmt: "rip: 0x%016llx reason: %s ext_inf1: 0x%016llx ext_inf2: 0x%016llx ext_int: 0x%08x ext_int_err: 0x%08x", REC->rip, ftrace_print_symbols_seq(p, REC->exit_code, kvm_x86_ops->exit_reasons_str), REC->exit_info1, REC->exit_info2, REC->exit_int_info, REC->exit_int_info_err
kvm/kvm_nested_vmexit_inject: print fmt: "reason: %s ext_inf1: 0x%016llx ext_inf2: 0x%016llx ext_int: 0x%08x ext_int_err: 0x%08x", ftrace_print_symbols_seq(p, REC->exit_code, kvm_x86_ops->exit_reasons_str), REC->exit_info1, REC->exit_info2, REC->exit_int_info, REC->exit_int_info_err
ftrace_print_symbols_seq() not implemented in trace-cmd?
There are four problem cases in scsi too:
function scsi_trace_parse_cdb not defined
failed to read event print fmt for scsi_dispatch_cmd_start
function scsi_trace_parse_cdb not defined
failed to read event print fmt for scsi_dispatch_cmd_error
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/scsi/scsi_dispatch_cmd_done/format:FORMAT TOO BIG
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/scsi/scsi_dispatch_cmd_timeout/format:FORMAT TOO BIG
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
@ 2010-05-29 8:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2010-05-29 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Avi Kivity, Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 05:45:57PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 17:42 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > I get parse errors when using Steven Rostedt's trace-cmd tool, too.
> >
> > Any ideas what is going on here? I can provide more info (e.g. trace
> > files) if necessary.
>
> Does trace-cmd fail on the same tracepoints? Have you checkout the
> latest code?.
$ sudo trace-cmd record -e kvm:kvm_pio
$ trace-cmd report
version = 6
bad op token {
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_mmu_get_page
bad op token {
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_mmu_sync_page
bad op token {
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_mmu_unsync_page
bad op token {
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_mmu_zap_page
Error: expected type 4 but read 7
Error: expected type 5 but read 0
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_apic
function ftrace_print_symbols_seq not defined
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_exit
Error: expected type 4 but read 7
Error: expected type 5 but read 0
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_inj_exception
function ftrace_print_symbols_seq not defined
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_nested_vmexit
function ftrace_print_symbols_seq not defined
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_nested_vmexit_inject
bad op token {
failed to read event print fmt for kvm_emulate_insn
These are different from those reported by perf.
Yes, I use trace-cmd.git master branch (currently built from
b530a23f0442be322b1717e6dbce2bd502634cb4).
My kernel is 2.6.34 based.
> I do know it fails on some of the KVM tracerpoints since the formatting
> they use is obnoxious.
>
> Could you show the "print-fmt" of the failing events?
Here are the details along with my amateur comments on what might have gone wrong:
$ for event in kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_get_page kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_sync_page kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_unsync_page kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_zap_page kvm/kvm_apic kvm/kvm_exit kvm/kvm_inj_exception kvm/kvm_nested_vmexit kvm/kvm_nested_vmexit_inject kvm/kvm_emulate_insn; do echo -n "$event: "; grep 'print fmt:' /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/$event/format; done
kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_get_page: print fmt: "%s %s", ({ const char *ret = p->buffer + p->len; static const char *access_str[] = { "---", "--x", "w--", "w-x", "-u-", "-ux", "wu-", "wux" }; union kvm_mmu_page_role role; role.word = REC->role; trace_seq_printf(p, "sp gfn %llx %u%s q%u%s %s%s" " %snxe root %u %s%c", REC->gfn, role.level, role.cr4_pae ? " pae" : "", role.quadrant, role.direct ? " direct" : "", access_str[role.access], role.invalid ? " invalid" : "", role.nxe ? "" : "!", REC->root_count, REC->unsync ? "unsync" : "sync", 0); ret; }), REC->created ? "new" : "existing"
kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_sync_page: print fmt: "%s", ({ const char *ret = p->buffer + p->len; static const char *access_str[] = { "---", "--x", "w--", "w-x", "-u-", "-ux", "wu-", "wux" }; union kvm_mmu_page_role role; role.word = REC->role; trace_seq_printf(p, "sp gfn %llx %u%s q%u%s %s%s" " %snxe root %u %s%c", REC->gfn, role.level, role.cr4_pae ? " pae" : "", role.quadrant, role.direct ? " direct" : "", access_str[role.access], role.invalid ? " invalid" : "", role.nxe ? "" : "!", REC->root_count, REC->unsync ? "unsync" : "sync", 0); ret; })
kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_unsync_page: print fmt: "%s", ({ const char *ret = p->buffer + p->len; static const char *access_str[] = { "---", "--x", "w--", "w-x", "-u-", "-ux", "wu-", "wux" }; union kvm_mmu_page_role role; role.word = REC->role; trace_seq_printf(p, "sp gfn %llx %u%s q%u%s %s%s" " %snxe root %u %s%c", REC->gfn, role.level, role.cr4_pae ? " pae" : "", role.quadrant, role.direct ? " direct" : "", access_str[role.access], role.invalid ? " invalid" : "", role.nxe ? "" : "!", REC->root_count, REC->unsync ? "unsync" : "sync", 0); ret; })
kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_zap_page: print fmt: "%s", ({ const char *ret = p->buffer + p->len; static const char *access_str[] = { "---", "--x", "w--", "w-x", "-u-", "-ux", "wu-", "wux" }; union kvm_mmu_page_role role; role.word = REC->role; trace_seq_printf(p, "sp gfn %llx %u%s q%u%s %s%s" " %snxe root %u %s%c", REC->gfn, role.level, role.cr4_pae ? " pae" : "", role.quadrant, role.direct ? " direct" : "", access_str[role.access], role.invalid ? " invalid" : "", role.nxe ? "" : "!", REC->root_count, REC->unsync ? "unsync" : "sync", 0); ret; })
kvm/kvm_emulate_insn: print fmt: "%x:%llx:%s (%s)%s", REC->csbase, REC->rip, ({ int i; const char *ret = p->buffer + p->len; for (i = 0; i < REC->len; ++i) trace_seq_printf(p, " %02x", REC->insn[i]); trace_seq_printf(p, "%c", 0); ret; }), __print_symbolic(REC->flags, { 0, "real" }, { (1 << 0) | (1 << 1), "vm16" }, { (1 << 0), "prot16" }, { (1 << 0) | (1 << 2), "prot32" }, { (1 << 0) | (1 << 3), "prot64" }), REC->failed ? " failed" : ""
Macro expanded into C code that shouldn't have?
kvm/kvm_apic: print fmt: "apic_%s %s = 0x%x", REC->rw ? "write" : "read", __print_symbolic(REC->reg, { 0x20, "APIC_" "ID" }, { 0x30, "APIC_" "LVR" }, { 0x80, "APIC_" "TASKPRI" }, { 0x90, "APIC_" "ARBPRI" }, { 0xA0, "APIC_" "PROCPRI" }, { 0xB0, "APIC_" "EOI" }, { 0xC0, "APIC_" "RRR" }, { 0xD0, "APIC_" "LDR" }, { 0xE0, "APIC_" "DFR" }, { 0xF0, "APIC_" "SPIV" }, { 0x100, "APIC_" "ISR" }, { 0x180, "APIC_" "TMR" }, { 0x200, "APIC_" "IRR" }, { 0x280, "APIC_" "ESR" }, { 0x300, "APIC_" "ICR" }, { 0x310, "APIC_" "ICR2" }, { 0x320, "APIC_" "LVTT" }, { 0x330, "APIC_" "LVTTHMR" }, { 0x340, "APIC_" "LVTPC" }, { 0x350, "APIC_" "LVT0" }, { 0x360, "APIC_" "LVT1" }, { 0x370, "APIC_" "LVTERR" }, { 0x380, "APIC_" "TMICT" }, { 0x390, "APIC_" "TMCCT" }, { 0x3E0, "APIC_" "TDCR" }, { 0x3F0, "APIC_" "SELF_IPI" },
{ 0x400, "APIC_" "EFEAT" }, { 0x410, "APIC_" "ECTRL" }), REC->val
kvm/kvm_inj_exception: print fmt: "%s (0x%x)", __print_symbolic(REC->exception, { 0, "#" "DE" }, { 1, "#" "DB" }, { 3, "#" "BP" }, { 4, "#" "OF" }, { 5, "#" "BR" }, { 6, "#" "UD" }, { 7, "#" "NM" }, { 8, "#" "DF" }, { 10, "#" "TS" }, { 11, "#" "NP" }, { 12, "#" "SS" }, { 13, "#" "GP" }, { 14, "#" "PF" }, { 16, "#" "MF" }, { 18, "#" "MC" }), REC->has_error ? REC->error_code : 0
String literal concatenation not handled by parser?
kvm/kvm_exit: print fmt: "reason %s rip 0x%lx", ftrace_print_symbols_seq(p, REC->exit_reason, kvm_x86_ops->exit_reasons_str), REC->guest_rip
kvm/kvm_nested_vmexit: print fmt: "rip: 0x%016llx reason: %s ext_inf1: 0x%016llx ext_inf2: 0x%016llx ext_int: 0x%08x ext_int_err: 0x%08x", REC->rip, ftrace_print_symbols_seq(p, REC->exit_code, kvm_x86_ops->exit_reasons_str), REC->exit_info1, REC->exit_info2, REC->exit_int_info, REC->exit_int_info_err
kvm/kvm_nested_vmexit_inject: print fmt: "reason: %s ext_inf1: 0x%016llx ext_inf2: 0x%016llx ext_int: 0x%08x ext_int_err: 0x%08x", ftrace_print_symbols_seq(p, REC->exit_code, kvm_x86_ops->exit_reasons_str), REC->exit_info1, REC->exit_info2, REC->exit_int_info, REC->exit_int_info_err
ftrace_print_symbols_seq() not implemented in trace-cmd?
There are four problem cases in scsi too:
function scsi_trace_parse_cdb not defined
failed to read event print fmt for scsi_dispatch_cmd_start
function scsi_trace_parse_cdb not defined
failed to read event print fmt for scsi_dispatch_cmd_error
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/scsi/scsi_dispatch_cmd_done/format:FORMAT TOO BIG
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/scsi/scsi_dispatch_cmd_timeout/format:FORMAT TOO BIG
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-05-28 21:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-29 8:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
@ 2010-05-29 11:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-29 13:19 ` Steven Rostedt
1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-05-29 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rostedt
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Peter Zijlstra,
Stefan Hajnoczi
On 05/29/2010 12:45 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 17:42 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>
>> I get parse errors when using Steven Rostedt's trace-cmd tool, too.
>>
>> Any ideas what is going on here? I can provide more info (e.g. trace
>> files) if necessary.
>>
> Does trace-cmd fail on the same tracepoints? Have you checkout the
> latest code?.
>
> I do know it fails on some of the KVM tracerpoints since the formatting
> they use is obnoxious.
>
>
Isn't there a binary trace for this?
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-05-29 11:50 ` Avi Kivity
@ 2010-05-29 13:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-30 8:10 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2010-05-29 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Peter Zijlstra,
Stefan Hajnoczi
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 14:50 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/29/2010 12:45 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 17:42 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >
> >> I get parse errors when using Steven Rostedt's trace-cmd tool, too.
> >>
> >> Any ideas what is going on here? I can provide more info (e.g. trace
> >> files) if necessary.
> >>
> > Does trace-cmd fail on the same tracepoints? Have you checkout the
> > latest code?.
> >
> > I do know it fails on some of the KVM tracerpoints since the formatting
> > they use is obnoxious.
> >
> >
>
> Isn't there a binary trace for this?
>
The pretty printing from the kernel handles this fine. But there's
pressure to pass the format to userspace in binary and have the tool
parse it. Currently it uses the print fmt to figure out how to parse.
Using one of the examples that Stefan showed:
kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_get_page: print fmt: "%s %s", ({ const char *ret =
p->buffer + p->len; static const char *access_str[] = { "---", "--x",
"w--", "w-x", "-u-", "-ux", "wu-", "wux" }; union kvm_mmu_page_role
role; role.word = REC->role; trace_seq_printf(p, "sp gfn %llx %u%s q%u%s
%s%s" " %snxe root %u %s%c", REC->gfn, role.level, role.cr4_pae ? "
pae" : "", role.quadrant, role.direct ? " direct" : "",
access_str[role.access], role.invalid ? " invalid" : "", role.nxe ? "" :
"!", REC->root_count, REC->unsync ? "unsync" : "sync", 0); ret; }),
REC->created ? "new" : "existing"
You need a full C parser/interpreter to understand the above.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-05-29 13:19 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2010-05-30 8:10 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-30 14:03 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-05-30 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rostedt
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Peter Zijlstra,
Stefan Hajnoczi
On 05/29/2010 04:19 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 14:50 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 05/29/2010 12:45 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 17:42 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I get parse errors when using Steven Rostedt's trace-cmd tool, too.
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas what is going on here? I can provide more info (e.g. trace
>>>> files) if necessary.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Does trace-cmd fail on the same tracepoints? Have you checkout the
>>> latest code?.
>>>
>>> I do know it fails on some of the KVM tracerpoints since the formatting
>>> they use is obnoxious.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Isn't there a binary trace for this?
>>
>>
> The pretty printing from the kernel handles this fine. But there's
> pressure to pass the format to userspace in binary and have the tool
> parse it. Currently it uses the print fmt to figure out how to parse.
>
> Using one of the examples that Stefan showed:
>
> kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_get_page: print fmt: "%s %s", ({ const char *ret =
> p->buffer + p->len; static const char *access_str[] = { "---", "--x",
> "w--", "w-x", "-u-", "-ux", "wu-", "wux" }; union kvm_mmu_page_role
> role; role.word = REC->role; trace_seq_printf(p, "sp gfn %llx %u%s q%u%s
> %s%s" " %snxe root %u %s%c", REC->gfn, role.level, role.cr4_pae ? "
> pae" : "", role.quadrant, role.direct ? " direct" : "",
> access_str[role.access], role.invalid ? " invalid" : "", role.nxe ? "" :
> "!", REC->root_count, REC->unsync ? "unsync" : "sync", 0); ret; }),
> REC->created ? "new" : "existing"
>
>
> You need a full C parser/interpreter to understand the above.
>
Right. The tools can fall back to %x/%s based on the structure
descriptor if they can't parse the format string.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-05-30 8:10 ` Avi Kivity
@ 2010-05-30 14:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-30 14:07 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2010-05-30 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Peter Zijlstra,
Stefan Hajnoczi, Johannes Berg, Darren Hart
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 11:10 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/29/2010 04:19 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > The pretty printing from the kernel handles this fine. But there's
> > pressure to pass the format to userspace in binary and have the tool
> > parse it. Currently it uses the print fmt to figure out how to parse.
> >
> > Using one of the examples that Stefan showed:
> >
> > kvmmmu/kvm_mmu_get_page: print fmt: "%s %s", ({ const char *ret =
> > p->buffer + p->len; static const char *access_str[] = { "---", "--x",
> > "w--", "w-x", "-u-", "-ux", "wu-", "wux" }; union kvm_mmu_page_role
> > role; role.word = REC->role; trace_seq_printf(p, "sp gfn %llx %u%s q%u%s
> > %s%s" " %snxe root %u %s%c", REC->gfn, role.level, role.cr4_pae ? "
> > pae" : "", role.quadrant, role.direct ? " direct" : "",
> > access_str[role.access], role.invalid ? " invalid" : "", role.nxe ? "" :
> > "!", REC->root_count, REC->unsync ? "unsync" : "sync", 0); ret; }),
> > REC->created ? "new" : "existing"
> >
> >
> > You need a full C parser/interpreter to understand the above.
> >
>
> Right. The tools can fall back to %x/%s based on the structure
> descriptor if they can't parse the format string.
>
trace-cmd has plugin support to override how to read the format and
print it out. It now has the ability to write those plugins in python.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-05-30 14:03 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2010-05-30 14:07 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-30 15:34 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-05-30 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rostedt
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Peter Zijlstra,
Stefan Hajnoczi, Johannes Berg, Darren Hart
On 05/30/2010 05:03 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
>> Right. The tools can fall back to %x/%s based on the structure
>> descriptor if they can't parse the format string.
>>
>>
> trace-cmd has plugin support to override how to read the format and
> print it out. It now has the ability to write those plugins in python.
>
Cool. May make sense to use simpler formatting in the kernel, and use
trace-cmd plugins for the complicated cases.
It does raise issues with ABIs. Can trace-cmd read plugins from
/lib/modules/*? We can then distribute the plugins with the kernel.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-05-30 14:07 ` Avi Kivity
@ 2010-05-30 15:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-06-01 8:39 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2010-05-30 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Peter Zijlstra,
Stefan Hajnoczi, Johannes Berg, Darren Hart
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 17:07 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/30/2010 05:03 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> >> Right. The tools can fall back to %x/%s based on the structure
> >> descriptor if they can't parse the format string.
> >>
> >>
> > trace-cmd has plugin support to override how to read the format and
> > print it out. It now has the ability to write those plugins in python.
> >
>
> Cool. May make sense to use simpler formatting in the kernel, and use
> trace-cmd plugins for the complicated cases.
>
> It does raise issues with ABIs. Can trace-cmd read plugins from
> /lib/modules/*? We can then distribute the plugins with the kernel.
>
We probably could do that. Perhaps if we can port the python code to
perf, then it would work for both. Then the plugins could be just python
scripts, (or binary .so modules) and have a tools/plugins dir?
The python part probably would be easier to port, since the .so modules
are a bit more specific to trace-cmd.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-05-30 15:34 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2010-06-01 8:39 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-01 11:59 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-06-01 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rostedt
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Peter Zijlstra,
Stefan Hajnoczi, Johannes Berg, Darren Hart
On 05/30/2010 06:34 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
>> Cool. May make sense to use simpler formatting in the kernel, and use
>> trace-cmd plugins for the complicated cases.
>>
>> It does raise issues with ABIs. Can trace-cmd read plugins from
>> /lib/modules/*? We can then distribute the plugins with the kernel.
>>
>>
> We probably could do that. Perhaps if we can port the python code to
> perf, then it would work for both. Then the plugins could be just python
> scripts, (or binary .so modules) and have a tools/plugins dir?
>
> The python part probably would be easier to port, since the .so modules
> are a bit more specific to trace-cmd.
>
One concern is performance. Traces tend to be long, and running python
code on each line will be slow.
If trace-cmd integrates a pager and a search mechanism that looks at the
binary data instead of the text, we could format only the lines that are
displayed. But that is going to be a lot of work and I don't think it's
worth the effort.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-06-01 8:39 ` Avi Kivity
@ 2010-06-01 11:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-06-01 12:39 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2010-06-01 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Peter Zijlstra,
Stefan Hajnoczi, Johannes Berg, Darren Hart
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 11:39 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/30/2010 06:34 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> >> Cool. May make sense to use simpler formatting in the kernel, and use
> >> trace-cmd plugins for the complicated cases.
> >>
> >> It does raise issues with ABIs. Can trace-cmd read plugins from
> >> /lib/modules/*? We can then distribute the plugins with the kernel.
> >>
> >>
> > We probably could do that. Perhaps if we can port the python code to
> > perf, then it would work for both. Then the plugins could be just python
> > scripts, (or binary .so modules) and have a tools/plugins dir?
> >
> > The python part probably would be easier to port, since the .so modules
> > are a bit more specific to trace-cmd.
> >
>
> One concern is performance. Traces tend to be long, and running python
> code on each line will be slow.
>
> If trace-cmd integrates a pager and a search mechanism that looks at the
> binary data instead of the text, we could format only the lines that are
> displayed. But that is going to be a lot of work and I don't think it's
> worth the effort.
>
Every event gets its own ID. The plugin registers a callback to that ID.
When the ID is hit, the plugin is executed on that event to display its
binary format.
This is done after the data has been saved in binary format to a file.
It may slow down the executing of reading a data file, but it does not
affect the running of the trace one bit.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-06-01 11:59 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2010-06-01 12:39 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-03 21:57 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-06-01 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rostedt
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Peter Zijlstra,
Stefan Hajnoczi, Johannes Berg, Darren Hart
On 06/01/2010 02:59 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
>> One concern is performance. Traces tend to be long, and running python
>> code on each line will be slow.
>>
>> If trace-cmd integrates a pager and a search mechanism that looks at the
>> binary data instead of the text, we could format only the lines that are
>> displayed. But that is going to be a lot of work and I don't think it's
>> worth the effort.
>>
>>
> Every event gets its own ID. The plugin registers a callback to that ID.
> When the ID is hit, the plugin is executed on that event to display its
> binary format.
>
> This is done after the data has been saved in binary format to a file.
> It may slow down the executing of reading a data file, but it does not
> affect the running of the trace one bit.
>
I meant that viewing would be slowed down. It's an important part of
using ftrace!
How long does the Python formatter take to process 100k or 1M events?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-06-01 12:39 ` Avi Kivity
@ 2010-06-03 21:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-06-06 8:08 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2010-06-03 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Peter Zijlstra,
Stefan Hajnoczi, Johannes Berg, Darren Hart
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 15:39 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/01/2010 02:59 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I meant that viewing would be slowed down. It's an important part of
> using ftrace!
>
> How long does the Python formatter take to process 100k or 1M events?
>
I finally got around to testing this.
I ran a trace on lock_acquire, and traced 1,253,296 events.
I then created a python plugin to analyze the trace:
----
def lock_acquire(trace_seq, event):
t = ''
r = ''
if int(event['flags']) & 1:
t = 'try'
if int(event['flags']) & 2:
r = 'read'
trace_seq.puts('t %x %s%s%s' % (
event['lockdep_addr'], t, r,
event['name']))
def register(pevent):
pevent.register_event_handler("lock", "lock_acquire", lock_acquire)
----
Disclaimer, I'm not a python expert, and I'm sure the above python code
sucks.
[root@ixf9 trace-cmd.git]# time ./trace-cmd report -N >/dev/null 2>&1
real 0m4.653s
user 0m4.234s
sys 0m0.419s
* -N keeps trace-cmd from loading any plugins.
[root@ixf9 trace-cmd.git]# time PYTHONPATH=`pwd` ./trace-cmd report >/dev/null 2>&1
real 0m53.916s
user 0m53.047s
sys 0m0.859s
Yes, running a python interpreter is a bit more expensive. It took 4
seconds to read the million events with plain C, but 53 seconds to read
it in python.
That said... This would only affect you if you were writing this to a
file. I doubt that you would notice this if you were scanning the trace
with less.
Also, I kicked this off in kernelshark, and it made no difference that I
can see. This is because kernelshark only evaluates the viewable area of
the screen.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-06-03 21:57 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2010-06-06 8:08 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-06 15:02 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-06-06 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rostedt
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Peter Zijlstra,
Stefan Hajnoczi, Johannes Berg, Darren Hart
On 06/04/2010 12:57 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 15:39 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 06/01/2010 02:59 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
>
>> I meant that viewing would be slowed down. It's an important part of
>> using ftrace!
>>
>> How long does the Python formatter take to process 100k or 1M events?
>>
>>
> I finally got around to testing this.
>
> I ran a trace on lock_acquire, and traced 1,253,296 events.
>
> I then created a python plugin to analyze the trace:
>
> ----
> def lock_acquire(trace_seq, event):
> t = ''
> r = ''
> if int(event['flags'])& 1:
> t = 'try'
> if int(event['flags'])& 2:
> r = 'read'
> trace_seq.puts('t %x %s%s%s' % (
> event['lockdep_addr'], t, r,
> event['name']))
>
> def register(pevent):
> pevent.register_event_handler("lock", "lock_acquire", lock_acquire)
> ----
>
> Disclaimer, I'm not a python expert, and I'm sure the above python code
> sucks.
>
I think Python more or less guarantees your code will suck no matter
what you do.
> [root@ixf9 trace-cmd.git]# time ./trace-cmd report -N>/dev/null 2>&1
>
> real 0m4.653s
> user 0m4.234s
> sys 0m0.419s
>
> * -N keeps trace-cmd from loading any plugins.
>
>
> [root@ixf9 trace-cmd.git]# time PYTHONPATH=`pwd` ./trace-cmd report>/dev/null 2>&1
>
> real 0m53.916s
> user 0m53.047s
> sys 0m0.859s
>
>
> Yes, running a python interpreter is a bit more expensive. It took 4
> seconds to read the million events with plain C, but 53 seconds to read
> it in python.
>
> That said... This would only affect you if you were writing this to a
> file. I doubt that you would notice this if you were scanning the trace
> with less.
>
I'm more worried about searching with less. But a minute for a million
events isn't that bad.
> Also, I kicked this off in kernelshark, and it made no difference that I
> can see. This is because kernelshark only evaluates the viewable area of
> the screen.
>
Neat. Can it also search? Where can I find it? <googles, finds, gawks>
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-06-06 8:08 ` Avi Kivity
@ 2010-06-06 15:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-06-06 16:21 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2010-06-06 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Peter Zijlstra,
Stefan Hajnoczi, Johannes Berg, Darren Hart
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 11:08 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Also, I kicked this off in kernelshark, and it made no difference that I
> > can see. This is because kernelshark only evaluates the viewable area of
> > the screen.
> >
>
> Neat. Can it also search? Where can I find it? <googles, finds, gawks>
>
It's in the same repo as trace-cmd:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/trace-cmd.git
I'm still working on it. The latest is in the branch kernelshark-devel.
And yes, it does searches.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events
2010-06-06 15:02 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2010-06-06 16:21 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2010-06-06 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rostedt
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, kvm,
Frederic Weisbecker, Marcelo Tosatti, Peter Zijlstra,
Stefan Hajnoczi, Johannes Berg, Darren Hart
On 06/06/2010 06:02 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 11:08 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>
>>> Also, I kicked this off in kernelshark, and it made no difference that I
>>> can see. This is because kernelshark only evaluates the viewable area of
>>> the screen.
>>>
>>>
>> Neat. Can it also search? Where can I find it?<googles, finds, gawks>
>>
>>
> It's in the same repo as trace-cmd:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/trace-cmd.git
>
> I'm still working on it. The latest is in the branch kernelshark-devel.
>
> And yes, it does searches.
>
I'll be tracking it.
In case you're interested in wishlists, my #1 would be to be able to
initiate traces from the GUI (so it's easy to explore the available
trace events and enable them interactively).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-06 16:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-26 12:34 Perf trace event parse errors for KVM events Stefan Hajnoczi
2010-05-28 16:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2010-05-28 21:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-28 21:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-29 8:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2010-05-29 8:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2010-05-29 11:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-29 13:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-30 8:10 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-30 14:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-30 14:07 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-30 15:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-06-01 8:39 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-01 11:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-06-01 12:39 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-03 21:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-06-06 8:08 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-06 15:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-06-06 16:21 ` Avi Kivity
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.