* 2.6.36-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.34 -> 2.6.35
@ 2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, DRI,
Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds,
Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.34 regressions introduced before
2.6.35, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.34 regressions, please let us know
either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any
of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2010-08-30 124 38 34
2010-08-01 100 27 23
2010-07-23 94 33 25
2010-07-09 79 45 37
2010-06-21 46 37 26
2010-06-09 15 13 10
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17071
Subject : possible esata regression in 2.6.35
Submitter : Nicolas Jungers <nicolas@jungers.net>
Date : 2010-08-21 18:52 (9 days old)
Message-ID : <4C702070.5020809@jungers.net>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128241685406276&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@superonline.com>
Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
Message-ID : <4C677A49.4030904@superonline.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16691
Subject : IPW5100: iwlagn broken with 2.6.34.x to 2.6.35.2 update
Submitter : Can Celasun <dcelasun@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-21 08:28 (9 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16633
Subject : ath5k + 2.6.35 x86 + hostapd - Failed to set channel
Submitter : NiTr0 <nitr0@seti.kr.ua>
Date : 2010-08-19 19:37 (11 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16620
Subject : [REGRESSION 2.6.35+] crash (maybe kmemleak related)
Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-12 20:37 (18 days old)
Message-ID : <1281645464.3893.25.camel@maxim-laptop>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128164549415081&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16614
Subject : [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa004fbc5>] [<ffffffffa004fbc5>] em28xx_isoc_copy_vbi+0x62e/0x812 [em28xx]
Submitter : Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Date : 2010-08-10 22:12 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <61936849.20100811001257@eikelenboom.it>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128152075830927&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16613
Subject : i8042 kernel module failed to load after unloading
Submitter : Seryodkin Victor <vvscore@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-17 17:01 (13 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16562
Subject : 2.6.35: cpu_idle bug report / on i7 870 cpu (x86_64)
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date : 2010-08-06 22:09 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008061800530.5241@p34.internal.lan>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128113260904048&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16549
Subject : 2.6.35: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage
Submitter : Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>
Date : 2010-08-04 10:56 (26 days old)
Message-ID : <4C594740.1090608@vlnb.net>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128091938215177&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16537
Subject : TREE_RCU hangs at boot
Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
Date : 2010-08-07 12:18 (23 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16536
Subject : audio stop playing after while
Submitter : okias <d.okias@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-07 11:00 (23 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16525
Subject : unexpected high load since 2.6.35
Submitter : MadLoisae@gmx.net <MadLoisae@gmx.net>
Date : 2010-08-02 20:53 (28 days old)
Message-ID : <4C573041.1070103@gmx.net>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128078243726655&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16515
Subject : Radeon rv280 can't boot on kernel 2.6.35.
Submitter : Albert Gall <ss3vdr@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-04 16:10 (26 days old)
Handled-By : Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16506
Subject : 2.6.35.0 compilation errors and excessive warnings.
Submitter : <software+linux-kernel@kd6lvw.ampr.org>
Date : 2010-08-04 01:06 (26 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16495
Subject : Kernel 2.6.35 takes almost half an hour to boot
Submitter : Claudio M. Camacho <claudiomkd@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-02 17:16 (28 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16488
Subject : [i915] Framebuffer ID error after suspend/hibernate leading to X crash
Submitter : Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimilan@club.fr>
Date : 2010-08-01 08:55 (29 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16462
Subject : unable to connect to AP on legal channel 13
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-25 17:06 (36 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16458
Subject : Bluetooth disabled after resume
Submitter : AttilaN <attila123456@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-25 09:33 (36 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16448
Subject : 2.6.35-rc5 panic at __br_deliver+0x64/0xe0 with kvm bridge networking
Submitter : caiqian@redhat.com
Date : 2010-07-23 3:25 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <198123598.1050221279855515402.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127985553916052&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16423
Subject : netfilter/iptables stopped logging 2.6.35-rc
Submitter : auto401300@hushmail.com
Date : 2010-07-17 10:20 (44 days old)
Message-ID : <20100717072036.1BBE52804B@smtp.hushmail.com>
References : http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1007.2/00440.html
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16406
Subject : Badness with the kernel version 2.6.35-rc1-git1 running on P6 box
Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2010-07-16 8:50 (45 days old)
Message-ID : <4C401D56.3070108@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127927024906085&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
Message-ID : <1279008849.2096.913.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16396
Subject : [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system
Submitter : tomas m <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-15 02:32 (46 days old)
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Date : 2010-07-14 13:52 (47 days old)
Message-ID : <20100714135217.GA1797@arch.tripp.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127911564213748&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16380
Subject : Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35
Submitter : Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem@mailcity.com>
Date : 2010-07-13 23:21 (48 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
Message-ID : <<4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323
Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (60 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322
Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70()
Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net>
Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (60 days old)
Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307
Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es>
Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (65 days old)
Message-ID : <<4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (82 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c
Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228
Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine)
Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (75 days old)
Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221
Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (80 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184
Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca>
Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (79 days old)
Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (82 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16505
Subject : 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
Submitter : archman <spermmail001@yahoo.com>
Date : 2010-08-03 23:53 (27 days old)
Handled-By : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27335
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16405
Subject : Brightness Adjustment on Toshiba nb305 Netbooks is non-functional.
Submitter : John Mesmon <jmesmon@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-15 23:40 (46 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/74a365b3f354fafc537efa5867deb7a9fadbfe27
Handled-By : Matthew Garrett <mjg59-kernel@srcf.ucam.org>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27236
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16400
Subject : 2.6.35-rc5 inconsistent lock state
Submitter : Martin Pirker <lkml.collector@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-14 20:33 (47 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTikDF0TL6OyPVCzPlUTwxFehcrETn3ysgSSeTq92@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127913961025267&w=2
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127939627513154&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (63 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2
Handled-By : Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27272
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35, unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16055
Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Hill,
Eric W. Biederman, H. Peter Anvin, H. Peter Anvin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (82 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
@ 2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Hill,
Eric W. Biederman, H. Peter Anvin, H. Peter Anvin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
Submitter : David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (82 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2010-08-29 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
David Hill, H. Peter Anvin, H. Peter Anvin
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
Looks like it's fixed.
Eric
"David Hill" <hilld@binarystorm.net> writes:
> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:09:52 -0700
>
> Eureka!
>
> This seems to solve my problem! My Dual P3-500MHZ is now booting with that
> patch.
>
> Good work guys!!!!
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
> Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
> Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
> Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (82 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
> Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
@ 2010-08-29 23:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2010-08-29 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
David Hill, H. Peter Anvin, H. Peter Anvin
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
Looks like it's fixed.
Eric
"David Hill" <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org> writes:
> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:09:52 -0700
>
> Eureka!
>
> This seems to solve my problem! My Dual P3-500MHZ is now booting with that
> patch.
>
> Good work guys!!!!
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
> Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
> Submitter : David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (82 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
> Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
@ 2010-08-29 23:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
David Hill, H. Peter Anvin, H. Peter Anvin
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
>
> Looks like it's fixed.
Good. What mainlne commit is that?
Rafael
> "David Hill" <hilld@binarystorm.net> writes:
> > Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:09:52 -0700
> >
> > Eureka!
> >
> > This seems to solve my problem! My Dual P3-500MHZ is now booting with that
> > patch.
> >
> > Good work guys!!!!
> >
> > Thank you very much,
>
>
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
> > Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
> > Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
> > Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (82 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
> > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
@ 2010-08-29 23:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
David Hill, H. Peter Anvin, H. Peter Anvin
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
>
> Looks like it's fixed.
Good. What mainlne commit is that?
Rafael
> "David Hill" <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org> writes:
> > Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:09:52 -0700
> >
> > Eureka!
> >
> > This seems to solve my problem! My Dual P3-500MHZ is now booting with that
> > patch.
> >
> > Good work guys!!!!
> >
> > Thank you very much,
>
>
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
> > Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
> > Submitter : David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (82 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
> > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
@ 2010-08-29 23:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2010-08-29 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
David Hill, H. Peter Anvin, H. Peter Anvin
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
>>
>> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>> >
>> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
>> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>> >
>>
>> Looks like it's fixed.
>
> Good. What mainlne commit is that?
commit 910081322bf9c4ed392dc8f2ecbc33fdb42a2958
Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date: Wed Aug 4 12:51:11 2010 -0700
x86/apic: Map the local apic when parsing the MP table.
This fixes a regression in 2.6.35 from 2.6.34, that is
present for select models of Intel cpus when people are
using an MP table.
The commit cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
"x86, ioapic: In mpparse use mp_register_ioapic" started
calling mp_register_ioapic from MP_ioapic_info. An extremely
simple change that was obviously correct. Unfortunately
mp_register_ioapic did just a little more than the previous
hand crafted code and so we gained this call path.
The problem call path is:
MP_ioapic_info()
mp_register_ioapic()
io_apic_unique_id()
io_apic_get_unique_id()
get_physical_broadcast()
modern_apic()
lapic_get_version()
apic_read(APIC_LVR)
Which turned out to be a problem because the local apic
was not mapped, at that point, unlike the similar point
in the ACPI parsing code.
This problem is fixed by mapping the local apic when
parsing the mptable as soon as we reasonably can.
Looking at the number of places we setup the fixmap for
the local apic, I see some serious simplification opportunities.
For the moment except for not duplicating the setting up of the
fixmap in init_apic_mappings, I have not acted on them.
The regression from 2.6.34 is tracked in bug
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com>
Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
@ 2010-08-29 23:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2010-08-29 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
David Hill, H. Peter Anvin, H. Peter Anvin
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
> On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>
>> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>> >
>> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
>> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>> >
>>
>> Looks like it's fixed.
>
> Good. What mainlne commit is that?
commit 910081322bf9c4ed392dc8f2ecbc33fdb42a2958
Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Date: Wed Aug 4 12:51:11 2010 -0700
x86/apic: Map the local apic when parsing the MP table.
This fixes a regression in 2.6.35 from 2.6.34, that is
present for select models of Intel cpus when people are
using an MP table.
The commit cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
"x86, ioapic: In mpparse use mp_register_ioapic" started
calling mp_register_ioapic from MP_ioapic_info. An extremely
simple change that was obviously correct. Unfortunately
mp_register_ioapic did just a little more than the previous
hand crafted code and so we gained this call path.
The problem call path is:
MP_ioapic_info()
mp_register_ioapic()
io_apic_unique_id()
io_apic_get_unique_id()
get_physical_broadcast()
modern_apic()
lapic_get_version()
apic_read(APIC_LVR)
Which turned out to be a problem because the local apic
was not mapped, at that point, unlike the similar point
in the ACPI parsing code.
This problem is fixed by mapping the local apic when
parsing the mptable as soon as we reasonably can.
Looking at the number of places we setup the fixmap for
the local apic, I see some serious simplification opportunities.
For the moment except for not duplicating the setting up of the
fixmap in init_apic_mappings, I have not acted on them.
The regression from 2.6.34 is tracked in bug
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
Cc: stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
Reported-by: David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin-j34lQMj1tz/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin-j34lQMj1tz/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread[parent not found: <m1wrr9asjx.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
[not found] ` <m1wrr9asjx.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-08-30 9:31 ` Florian Mickler
2010-08-30 9:31 ` Florian Mickler
1 sibling, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Florian Mickler @ 2010-08-30 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA; +Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:49:06 -0700
ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman)
wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
> > On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >> >
> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> >> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >> >
> >>
> >> Looks like it's fixed.
> >
> > Good. What mainlne commit is that?
>
> commit 910081322bf9c4ed392dc8f2ecbc33fdb42a2958
> Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Wed Aug 4 12:51:11 2010 -0700
>
> x86/apic: Map the local apic when parsing the MP table.
>
> This fixes a regression in 2.6.35 from 2.6.34, that is
> present for select models of Intel cpus when people are
> using an MP table.
>
> The commit cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
> "x86, ioapic: In mpparse use mp_register_ioapic" started
> calling mp_register_ioapic from MP_ioapic_info. An extremely
> simple change that was obviously correct. Unfortunately
> mp_register_ioapic did just a little more than the previous
> hand crafted code and so we gained this call path.
>
> The problem call path is:
> MP_ioapic_info()
> mp_register_ioapic()
> io_apic_unique_id()
> io_apic_get_unique_id()
> get_physical_broadcast()
> modern_apic()
> lapic_get_version()
> apic_read(APIC_LVR)
>
> Which turned out to be a problem because the local apic
> was not mapped, at that point, unlike the similar point
> in the ACPI parsing code.
>
> This problem is fixed by mapping the local apic when
> parsing the mptable as soon as we reasonably can.
>
> Looking at the number of places we setup the fixmap for
> the local apic, I see some serious simplification opportunities.
> For the moment except for not duplicating the setting up of the
> fixmap in init_apic_mappings, I have not acted on them.
>
> The regression from 2.6.34 is tracked in bug
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
>
> Cc: stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
> Reported-by: David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
> Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin-j34lQMj1tz/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin-j34lQMj1tz/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Closed, thx.
Guan Xin reported a stable regression from 2.6.35.1->2.6.35.2
in this bugreport which I moved to
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17411 .
Cheers,
Flo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
[not found] ` <m1wrr9asjx.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-30 9:31 ` Florian Mickler
@ 2010-08-30 9:31 ` Florian Mickler
1 sibling, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Florian Mickler @ 2010-08-30 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Hill, H. Peter Anvin,
H. Peter Anvin
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:49:06 -0700
ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman)
wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
> > On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >> >
> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> >> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >> >
> >>
> >> Looks like it's fixed.
> >
> > Good. What mainlne commit is that?
>
> commit 910081322bf9c4ed392dc8f2ecbc33fdb42a2958
> Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Wed Aug 4 12:51:11 2010 -0700
>
> x86/apic: Map the local apic when parsing the MP table.
>
> This fixes a regression in 2.6.35 from 2.6.34, that is
> present for select models of Intel cpus when people are
> using an MP table.
>
> The commit cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
> "x86, ioapic: In mpparse use mp_register_ioapic" started
> calling mp_register_ioapic from MP_ioapic_info. An extremely
> simple change that was obviously correct. Unfortunately
> mp_register_ioapic did just a little more than the previous
> hand crafted code and so we gained this call path.
>
> The problem call path is:
> MP_ioapic_info()
> mp_register_ioapic()
> io_apic_unique_id()
> io_apic_get_unique_id()
> get_physical_broadcast()
> modern_apic()
> lapic_get_version()
> apic_read(APIC_LVR)
>
> Which turned out to be a problem because the local apic
> was not mapped, at that point, unlike the similar point
> in the ACPI parsing code.
>
> This problem is fixed by mapping the local apic when
> parsing the mptable as soon as we reasonably can.
>
> Looking at the number of places we setup the fixmap for
> the local apic, I see some serious simplification opportunities.
> For the moment except for not duplicating the setting up of the
> fixmap in init_apic_mappings, I have not acted on them.
>
> The regression from 2.6.34 is tracked in bug
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
>
> Cc: stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org
> Reported-by: David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org>
> Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin-j34lQMj1tz/QT0dZR+AlfA-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org>
> Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin-j34lQMj1tz/QT0dZR+AlfA-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Closed, thx.
Guan Xin reported a stable regression from 2.6.35.1->2.6.35.2
in this bugreport which I moved to
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17411 .
Cheers,
Flo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
2010-08-29 23:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
(?)
(?)
@ 2010-08-30 9:31 ` Florian Mickler
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Florian Mickler @ 2010-08-30 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David Hill, H. Peter Anvin,
H. Peter Anvin
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:49:06 -0700
ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman)
wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
> > On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >> >
> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> >> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >> >
> >>
> >> Looks like it's fixed.
> >
> > Good. What mainlne commit is that?
>
> commit 910081322bf9c4ed392dc8f2ecbc33fdb42a2958
> Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Wed Aug 4 12:51:11 2010 -0700
>
> x86/apic: Map the local apic when parsing the MP table.
>
> This fixes a regression in 2.6.35 from 2.6.34, that is
> present for select models of Intel cpus when people are
> using an MP table.
>
> The commit cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
> "x86, ioapic: In mpparse use mp_register_ioapic" started
> calling mp_register_ioapic from MP_ioapic_info. An extremely
> simple change that was obviously correct. Unfortunately
> mp_register_ioapic did just a little more than the previous
> hand crafted code and so we gained this call path.
>
> The problem call path is:
> MP_ioapic_info()
> mp_register_ioapic()
> io_apic_unique_id()
> io_apic_get_unique_id()
> get_physical_broadcast()
> modern_apic()
> lapic_get_version()
> apic_read(APIC_LVR)
>
> Which turned out to be a problem because the local apic
> was not mapped, at that point, unlike the similar point
> in the ACPI parsing code.
>
> This problem is fixed by mapping the local apic when
> parsing the mptable as soon as we reasonably can.
>
> Looking at the number of places we setup the fixmap for
> the local apic, I see some serious simplification opportunities.
> For the moment except for not duplicating the setting up of the
> fixmap in init_apic_mappings, I have not acted on them.
>
> The regression from 2.6.34 is tracked in bug
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
>
> Cc: stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
> Reported-by: David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
> Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin-j34lQMj1tz/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin-j34lQMj1tz/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Closed, thx.
Guan Xin reported a stable regression from 2.6.35.1->2.6.35.2
in this bugreport which I moved to
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17411 .
Cheers,
Flo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
[not found] ` <m1wrr9asjx.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-08-30 17:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-30 9:31 ` Florian Mickler
1 sibling, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-30 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
David Hill, H. Peter Anvin, H. Peter Anvin
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
>
> > On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> >>
> >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >> >
> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> >> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >> >
> >>
> >> Looks like it's fixed.
> >
> > Good. What mainlne commit is that?
>
> commit 910081322bf9c4ed392dc8f2ecbc33fdb42a2958
> Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Date: Wed Aug 4 12:51:11 2010 -0700
>
> x86/apic: Map the local apic when parsing the MP table.
>
> This fixes a regression in 2.6.35 from 2.6.34, that is
> present for select models of Intel cpus when people are
> using an MP table.
>
> The commit cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
> "x86, ioapic: In mpparse use mp_register_ioapic" started
> calling mp_register_ioapic from MP_ioapic_info. An extremely
> simple change that was obviously correct. Unfortunately
> mp_register_ioapic did just a little more than the previous
> hand crafted code and so we gained this call path.
>
> The problem call path is:
> MP_ioapic_info()
> mp_register_ioapic()
> io_apic_unique_id()
> io_apic_get_unique_id()
> get_physical_broadcast()
> modern_apic()
> lapic_get_version()
> apic_read(APIC_LVR)
>
> Which turned out to be a problem because the local apic
> was not mapped, at that point, unlike the similar point
> in the ACPI parsing code.
>
> This problem is fixed by mapping the local apic when
> parsing the mptable as soon as we reasonably can.
>
> Looking at the number of places we setup the fixmap for
> the local apic, I see some serious simplification opportunities.
> For the moment except for not duplicating the setting up of the
> fixmap in init_apic_mappings, I have not acted on them.
>
> The regression from 2.6.34 is tracked in bug
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Reported-by: David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
> Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com>
> Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #16173] After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
@ 2010-08-30 17:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-30 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
David Hill, H. Peter Anvin, H. Peter Anvin
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
> > On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >> >
> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> >> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >> >
> >>
> >> Looks like it's fixed.
> >
> > Good. What mainlne commit is that?
>
> commit 910081322bf9c4ed392dc8f2ecbc33fdb42a2958
> Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Wed Aug 4 12:51:11 2010 -0700
>
> x86/apic: Map the local apic when parsing the MP table.
>
> This fixes a regression in 2.6.35 from 2.6.34, that is
> present for select models of Intel cpus when people are
> using an MP table.
>
> The commit cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
> "x86, ioapic: In mpparse use mp_register_ioapic" started
> calling mp_register_ioapic from MP_ioapic_info. An extremely
> simple change that was obviously correct. Unfortunately
> mp_register_ioapic did just a little more than the previous
> hand crafted code and so we gained this call path.
>
> The problem call path is:
> MP_ioapic_info()
> mp_register_ioapic()
> io_apic_unique_id()
> io_apic_get_unique_id()
> get_physical_broadcast()
> modern_apic()
> lapic_get_version()
> apic_read(APIC_LVR)
>
> Which turned out to be a problem because the local apic
> was not mapped, at that point, unlike the similar point
> in the ACPI parsing code.
>
> This problem is fixed by mapping the local apic when
> parsing the mptable as soon as we reasonably can.
>
> Looking at the number of places we setup the fixmap for
> the local apic, I see some serious simplification opportunities.
> For the moment except for not duplicating the setting up of the
> fixmap in init_apic_mappings, I have not acted on them.
>
> The regression from 2.6.34 is tracked in bug
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
>
> Cc: stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
> Reported-by: David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
> Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin-j34lQMj1tz/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin-j34lQMj1tz/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16184] Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jean-Marc Pigeon, Patrick McHardy
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184
Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp@safe.ca>
Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (79 days old)
Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16184] Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jean-Marc Pigeon, Patrick McHardy
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184
Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp-4qkeo2rQ0gg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (79 days old)
Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <kaber-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16221] 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Miles Lane
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221
Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (80 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTim0jVRyqkwlGOcrg_XTvUQwcBYfWJX-aRzkkrLG@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16228] BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine)
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Bjorn Helgaas,
Brian Bloniarz, Yinghai Lu
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228
Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine)
Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@hotmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (75 days old)
Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16228] BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Bjorn Helgaas,
Brian Bloniarz, Yinghai Lu
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228
Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine)
Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0-PkbjNfxxIARBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (75 days old)
Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16322] WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70()
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, boris64, H. Peter Anvin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322
Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70()
Submitter : boris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net>
Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (60 days old)
Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dave Airlie, Theodore Ts'o
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (82 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c
Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@closure.thunk.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16323] 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Miles Lane
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323
Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (60 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16323] 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Miles Lane
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323
Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (60 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTini6hz2LFeZi8CMUmY3xw1MU7NxmyesuxZ4oCdo-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jan Kara, Zdenek Kabelac
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (63 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTin24fr5O4_q5Xbo9Y_NKkEmtcp6Hgmr9_4qXaFz@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2
Handled-By : Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27272
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-31 2:19 ` Kan-Ru Chen
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Enrico Bandiello
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307
Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es>
Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (65 days old)
Message-ID : <<4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
2010-08-29 23:13 ` [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-31 2:19 ` Kan-Ru Chen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Kan-Ru Chen @ 2010-08-31 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Enrico Bandiello
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307
> Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
> Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@postal.uv.es>
> Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (65 days old)
> Message-ID : <<4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2
Same with v2.6.36-rc3
$ sudo powertop -d -t 20
...
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 196.2 interval: 20.0s
no ACPI power usage estimate available
Top causes for wakeups:
25.4% ( 59.6) [i915@pci:0000:00:02.0] <interrupt>
...
- Kanru
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
@ 2010-08-31 2:19 ` Kan-Ru Chen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Kan-Ru Chen @ 2010-08-31 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Enrico Bandiello
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307
> Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
> Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (65 days old)
> Message-ID : <<4C26317A.5070309-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2
Same with v2.6.36-rc3
$ sudo powertop -d -t 20
...
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 196.2 interval: 20.0s
no ACPI power usage estimate available
Top causes for wakeups:
25.4% ( 59.6) [i915@pci:0000:00:02.0] <interrupt>
...
- Kanru
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
@ 2010-08-31 7:38 ` Enrico Bandiello
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Enrico Bandiello @ 2010-08-31 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kan-Ru Chen
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Enrico Bandiello
On 08/31/2010 04:19 AM, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Same with v2.6.36-rc3
>
> $ sudo powertop -d -t 20
> ...
> Wakeups-from-idle per second : 196.2 interval: 20.0s
> no ACPI power usage estimate available
> Top causes for wakeups:
> 25.4% ( 59.6) [i915@pci:0000:00:02.0]<interrupt>
I can confir this behaviour until 2.6.32-rc2. Couldn't try with -rc3
because compilation exited with error on my laptop...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
@ 2010-08-31 7:38 ` Enrico Bandiello
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Enrico Bandiello @ 2010-08-31 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kan-Ru Chen
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Enrico Bandiello
On 08/31/2010 04:19 AM, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Same with v2.6.36-rc3
>
> $ sudo powertop -d -t 20
> ...
> Wakeups-from-idle per second : 196.2 interval: 20.0s
> no ACPI power usage estimate available
> Top causes for wakeups:
> 25.4% ( 59.6) [i915@pci:0000:00:02.0]<interrupt>
I can confir this behaviour until 2.6.32-rc2. Couldn't try with -rc3
because compilation exited with error on my laptop...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16380] Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Artem S. Tashkinov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16380
Subject : Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35
Submitter : Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem@mailcity.com>
Date : 2010-07-13 23:21 (48 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16393] kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-30 0:56 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Markus Trippelsdorf
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Date : 2010-07-14 13:52 (47 days old)
Message-ID : <20100714135217.GA1797@arch.tripp.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127911564213748&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #16393] kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
2010-08-29 23:13 ` [Bug #16393] kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765! Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-30 0:56 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-08-30 9:32 ` Florian Mickler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 111+ messages in thread
From: Markus Trippelsdorf @ 2010-08-30 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
> Subject : kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
> Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
> Date : 2010-07-14 13:52 (47 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100714135217.GA1797@arch.tripp.de>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127911564213748&w=2
>
This bug is already fixed by:
e75aa85892b2ee78c79edac720868cbef16e62eb
Please close this entry.
Thanks.
--
»A man who doesn't know he is in prison can never escape.«
William S. Burroughs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16393] kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
@ 2010-08-30 9:32 ` Florian Mickler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Florian Mickler @ 2010-08-30 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Trippelsdorf
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:56:04 +0200
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
> > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
> > Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
> > Date : 2010-07-14 13:52 (47 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100714135217.GA1797@arch.tripp.de>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127911564213748&w=2
> >
>
> This bug is already fixed by:
> e75aa85892b2ee78c79edac720868cbef16e62eb
>
> Please close this entry.
> Thanks.
>
Closed.
Thx,
Flo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16393] kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
@ 2010-08-30 9:32 ` Florian Mickler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Florian Mickler @ 2010-08-30 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Trippelsdorf
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:56:04 +0200
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus-xp2qqqlHh3xzoYq+O6RWwA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
> > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
> > Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf <markus-xp2qqqlHh3xzoYq+O6RWwA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-07-14 13:52 (47 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100714135217.GA1797-joY5NpejW+Hx3b7vapvTcQ@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127911564213748&w=2
> >
>
> This bug is already fixed by:
> e75aa85892b2ee78c79edac720868cbef16e62eb
>
> Please close this entry.
> Thanks.
>
Closed.
Thx,
Flo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16396] [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Rafael J. Wysocki, tomas m
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16396
Subject : [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system
Submitter : tomas m <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-15 02:32 (46 days old)
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16396] [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Rafael J. Wysocki, tomas m
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16396
Subject : [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system
Submitter : tomas m <tmezzadra-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-07-15 02:32 (46 days old)
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin P. Mattock, Pauli Nieminen
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
Message-ID : <<4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin P. Mattock, Pauli Nieminen
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
Message-ID : <<4C2FC0E3.6050101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:52 ` Justin P. Mattock
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-08-29 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Pauli Nieminen
On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Submitter : Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
> Message-ID :<<4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
>
>
>
only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or
pauli where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.
Justin P. Mattock
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
@ 2010-08-29 23:52 ` Justin P. Mattock
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-08-29 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Pauli Nieminen
On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Submitter : Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
> Message-ID :<<4C2FC0E3.6050101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
>
>
>
only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or
pauli where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.
Justin P. Mattock
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
@ 2010-08-30 7:38 ` Pauli Nieminen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Pauli Nieminen @ 2010-08-30 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Justin P. Mattock
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
>> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
>> Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> Submitter : Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
>> Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
>> Message-ID :<<4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>>
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or pauli
> where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.
>
> Justin P. Mattock
>
I was able to reproduce this with about 50% chance in boot. But that
happened in a few rc (rc2-rc4 iirc) versions only. After that never
again.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
@ 2010-08-30 7:38 ` Pauli Nieminen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Pauli Nieminen @ 2010-08-30 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Justin P. Mattock
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
>> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
>> Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> Submitter : Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
>> Message-ID :<<4C2FC0E3.6050101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>>
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or pauli
> where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.
>
> Justin P. Mattock
>
I was able to reproduce this with about 50% chance in boot. But that
happened in a few rc (rc2-rc4 iirc) versions only. After that never
again.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
@ 2010-08-30 17:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-30 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pauli Nieminen
Cc: Justin P. Mattock, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Justin P. Mattock
> <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >>
> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> >> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >>
> >>
> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> >> Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> >> Submitter : Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
> >> Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
> >> Message-ID :<<4C2FC0E3.6050101@gmail.com>>
> >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or pauli
> > where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.
> >
> > Justin P. Mattock
> >
>
> I was able to reproduce this with about 50% chance in boot. But that
> happened in a few rc (rc2-rc4 iirc) versions only. After that never
> again.
OK, I'm closing it now, please reopen if you see it again.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16337] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
@ 2010-08-30 17:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-30 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pauli Nieminen
Cc: Justin P. Mattock, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Justin P. Mattock
> <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >>
> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> >> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >>
> >>
> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> >> Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> >> Submitter : Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >> Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
> >> Message-ID :<<4C2FC0E3.6050101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>>
> >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or pauli
> > where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.
> >
> > Justin P. Mattock
> >
>
> I was able to reproduce this with about 50% chance in boot. But that
> happened in a few rc (rc2-rc4 iirc) versions only. After that never
> again.
OK, I'm closing it now, please reopen if you see it again.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16400] 2.6.35-rc5 inconsistent lock state
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jens Axboe, Martin Pirker
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16400
Subject : 2.6.35-rc5 inconsistent lock state
Submitter : Martin Pirker <lkml.collector@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-14 20:33 (47 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTikDF0TL6OyPVCzPlUTwxFehcrETn3ysgSSeTq92@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127913961025267&w=2
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127939627513154&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16399] perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-30 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Peter Zijlstra, Zhang, Yanmin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
Message-ID : <1279008849.2096.913.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #16399] perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
2010-08-29 23:13 ` [Bug #16399] perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-30 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2010-08-30 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Zhang, Yanmin
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
> Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
> Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
> Message-ID : <1279008849.2096.913.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
>
>
Should be fixed by:
commit 351af0725e5222e35741011d1ea62215c1ed06db
Author: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri Aug 6 13:39:08 2010 +0800
perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming errata workaround
Fix the Errata AAK100/AAP53/BD53 workaround, the officialy documented
workaround we implemented in:
11164cd: perf, x86: Add Nehelem PMU programming errata workaround
doesn't actually work fully and causes a stuck PMU state
under load and non-functioning perf profiling.
A functional workaround was found by trial & error.
Affects all Nehalem-class Intel PMUs.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1281073148.2125.63.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # .35.x
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #16399] perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
@ 2010-08-30 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2010-08-30 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Zhang, Yanmin
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
> Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
> Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
> Message-ID : <1279008849.2096.913.camel-sz7BYL/Y5Hu/P+R7jlPCFVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
>
>
Should be fixed by:
commit 351af0725e5222e35741011d1ea62215c1ed06db
Author: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Date: Fri Aug 6 13:39:08 2010 +0800
perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming errata workaround
Fix the Errata AAK100/AAP53/BD53 workaround, the officialy documented
workaround we implemented in:
11164cd: perf, x86: Add Nehelem PMU programming errata workaround
doesn't actually work fully and causes a stuck PMU state
under load and non-functioning perf profiling.
A functional workaround was found by trial & error.
Affects all Nehalem-class Intel PMUs.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
LKML-Reference: <1281073148.2125.63.camel-sz7BYL/Y5Hu/P+R7jlPCFVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: <stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> # .35.x
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #16399] perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
2010-08-30 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
(?)
@ 2010-08-30 13:56 ` Florian Mickler
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Florian Mickler @ 2010-08-30 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA; +Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:12:43 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
> > Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
> > Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
> > Message-ID : <1279008849.2096.913.camel-sz7BYL/Y5Hu/P+R7jlPCFVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
> >
> >
>
> Should be fixed by:
>
> commit 351af0725e5222e35741011d1ea62215c1ed06db
> Author: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Fri Aug 6 13:39:08 2010 +0800
>
> perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming errata workaround
Thx, closed.
Cheers,
Flo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16399] perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
2010-08-30 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
(?)
(?)
@ 2010-08-30 13:56 ` Florian Mickler
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Florian Mickler @ 2010-08-30 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Zhang, Yanmin
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:12:43 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
> > Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
> > Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
> > Message-ID : <1279008849.2096.913.camel-sz7BYL/Y5Hu/P+R7jlPCFVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
> >
> >
>
> Should be fixed by:
>
> commit 351af0725e5222e35741011d1ea62215c1ed06db
> Author: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Fri Aug 6 13:39:08 2010 +0800
>
> perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming errata workaround
Thx, closed.
Cheers,
Flo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16399] perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
2010-08-30 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-30 13:56 ` Florian Mickler
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Florian Mickler @ 2010-08-30 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Zhang, Yanmin
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:12:43 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
> > Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
> > Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
> > Message-ID : <1279008849.2096.913.camel-sz7BYL/Y5Hu/P+R7jlPCFVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
> >
> >
>
> Should be fixed by:
>
> commit 351af0725e5222e35741011d1ea62215c1ed06db
> Author: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Fri Aug 6 13:39:08 2010 +0800
>
> perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming errata workaround
Thx, closed.
Cheers,
Flo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #16399] perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
2010-08-30 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2010-08-30 17:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-30 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Zhang, Yanmin
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
> > Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
> > Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> > Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
> > Message-ID : <1279008849.2096.913.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
> >
> >
>
> Should be fixed by:
>
> commit 351af0725e5222e35741011d1ea62215c1ed06db
> Author: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Fri Aug 6 13:39:08 2010 +0800
>
> perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming errata workaround
>
> Fix the Errata AAK100/AAP53/BD53 workaround, the officialy documented
> workaround we implemented in:
>
> 11164cd: perf, x86: Add Nehelem PMU programming errata workaround
>
> doesn't actually work fully and causes a stuck PMU state
> under load and non-functioning perf profiling.
>
> A functional workaround was found by trial & error.
>
> Affects all Nehalem-class Intel PMUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> LKML-Reference: <1281073148.2125.63.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # .35.x
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16399] perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
@ 2010-08-30 17:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-30 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Zhang, Yanmin
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
> > Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
> > Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
> > Message-ID : <1279008849.2096.913.camel-sz7BYL/Y5Hu/P+R7jlPCFVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
> >
> >
>
> Should be fixed by:
>
> commit 351af0725e5222e35741011d1ea62215c1ed06db
> Author: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Fri Aug 6 13:39:08 2010 +0800
>
> perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming errata workaround
>
> Fix the Errata AAK100/AAP53/BD53 workaround, the officialy documented
> workaround we implemented in:
>
> 11164cd: perf, x86: Add Nehelem PMU programming errata workaround
>
> doesn't actually work fully and causes a stuck PMU state
> under load and non-functioning perf profiling.
>
> A functional workaround was found by trial & error.
>
> Affects all Nehalem-class Intel PMUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
> LKML-Reference: <1281073148.2125.63.camel-sz7BYL/Y5Hu/P+R7jlPCFVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: <stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> # .35.x
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16405] Brightness Adjustment on Toshiba nb305 Netbooks is non-functional.
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, John Mesmon, Matthew Garrett
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16405
Subject : Brightness Adjustment on Toshiba nb305 Netbooks is non-functional.
Submitter : John Mesmon <jmesmon@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-15 23:40 (46 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/74a365b3f354fafc537efa5867deb7a9fadbfe27
Handled-By : Matthew Garrett <mjg59-kernel@srcf.ucam.org>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27236
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16423] netfilter/iptables stopped logging 2.6.35-rc
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, auto401300@hushmail.com
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16423
Subject : netfilter/iptables stopped logging 2.6.35-rc
Submitter : auto401300@hushmail.com
Date : 2010-07-17 10:20 (44 days old)
Message-ID : <20100717072036.1BBE52804B@smtp.hushmail.com>
References : http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1007.2/00440.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16406] Badness with the kernel version 2.6.35-rc1-git1 running on P6 box
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, divya
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16406
Subject : Badness with the kernel version 2.6.35-rc1-git1 running on P6 box
Submitter : divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2010-07-16 8:50 (45 days old)
Message-ID : <4C401D56.3070108@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127927024906085&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16406] Badness with the kernel version 2.6.35-rc1-git1 running on P6 box
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, divya
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16406
Subject : Badness with the kernel version 2.6.35-rc1-git1 running on P6 box
Submitter : divya <dipraksh-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-07-16 8:50 (45 days old)
Message-ID : <4C401D56.3070108-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127927024906085&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16462] unable to connect to AP on legal channel 13
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Daniel J Blueman
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16462
Subject : unable to connect to AP on legal channel 13
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-25 17:06 (36 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16495] Kernel 2.6.35 takes almost half an hour to boot
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Claudio M. Camacho
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16495
Subject : Kernel 2.6.35 takes almost half an hour to boot
Submitter : Claudio M. Camacho <claudiomkd@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-02 17:16 (28 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16488] [i915] Framebuffer ID error after suspend/hibernate leading to X crash
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Linus Torvalds, Milan Bouchet-Valat
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16488
Subject : [i915] Framebuffer ID error after suspend/hibernate leading to X crash
Submitter : Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimilan@club.fr>
Date : 2010-08-01 08:55 (29 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16505] 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-30 0:41 ` Larry Finger
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, archman, Larry Finger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16505
Subject : 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
Submitter : archman <spermmail001@yahoo.com>
Date : 2010-08-03 23:53 (27 days old)
Handled-By : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #16505] 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
2010-08-29 23:13 ` [Bug #16505] 2.6.34.2 breaks b43 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-30 0:41 ` Larry Finger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2010-08-30 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, archman
On 08/29/2010 06:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16505
> Subject : 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
> Submitter : archman <spermmail001@yahoo.com>
> Date : 2010-08-03 23:53 (27 days old)
> Handled-By : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27335
This one was fixed in 2.6.34.3. Mainline was OK - only the patches to stable
were affected. The bug should be closed.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16505] 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
@ 2010-08-30 0:41 ` Larry Finger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2010-08-30 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, archman
On 08/29/2010 06:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16505
> Subject : 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
> Submitter : archman <spermmail001-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-08-03 23:53 (27 days old)
> Handled-By : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27335
This one was fixed in 2.6.34.3. Mainline was OK - only the patches to stable
were affected. The bug should be closed.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16505] 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
@ 2010-08-30 14:21 ` Florian Mickler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Florian Mickler @ 2010-08-30 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, archman
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:41:16 -0500
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> On 08/29/2010 06:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16505
> > Subject : 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
> > Submitter : archman <spermmail001-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-08-03 23:53 (27 days old)
> > Handled-By : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27335
>
> This one was fixed in 2.6.34.3. Mainline was OK - only the patches to stable
> were affected. The bug should be closed.
>
> Larry
>
In the bugzilla entry someone mentioned that 2.6.32.y need this
too?
Cheers,
Flo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16505] 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
@ 2010-08-30 14:21 ` Florian Mickler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Florian Mickler @ 2010-08-30 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, archman
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:41:16 -0500
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> On 08/29/2010 06:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16505
> > Subject : 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
> > Submitter : archman <spermmail001-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-08-03 23:53 (27 days old)
> > Handled-By : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27335
>
> This one was fixed in 2.6.34.3. Mainline was OK - only the patches to stable
> were affected. The bug should be closed.
>
> Larry
>
In the bugzilla entry someone mentioned that 2.6.32.y need this
too?
Cheers,
Flo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16505] 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
@ 2010-08-30 17:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-30 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, archman
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 08/29/2010 06:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16505
> > Subject : 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
> > Submitter : archman <spermmail001@yahoo.com>
> > Date : 2010-08-03 23:53 (27 days old)
> > Handled-By : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27335
>
> This one was fixed in 2.6.34.3. Mainline was OK - only the patches to stable
> were affected. The bug should be closed.
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16505] 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
@ 2010-08-30 17:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-30 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, archman
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 08/29/2010 06:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16505
> > Subject : 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
> > Submitter : archman <spermmail001-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-08-03 23:53 (27 days old)
> > Handled-By : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27335
>
> This one was fixed in 2.6.34.3. Mainline was OK - only the patches to stable
> were affected. The bug should be closed.
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16458] Bluetooth disabled after resume
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, AttilaN
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16458
Subject : Bluetooth disabled after resume
Submitter : AttilaN <attila123456@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-07-25 09:33 (36 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16448] 2.6.35-rc5 panic at __br_deliver+0x64/0xe0 with kvm bridge networking
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, caiqian@redhat.com
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16448
Subject : 2.6.35-rc5 panic at __br_deliver+0x64/0xe0 with kvm bridge networking
Submitter : caiqian@redhat.com
Date : 2010-07-23 3:25 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <198123598.1050221279855515402.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127985553916052&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16506] 2.6.35.0 compilation errors and excessive warnings.
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Luca Barbieri,
software+linux-kernel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16506
Subject : 2.6.35.0 compilation errors and excessive warnings.
Submitter : <software+linux-kernel@kd6lvw.ampr.org>
Date : 2010-08-04 01:06 (26 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16506] 2.6.35.0 compilation errors and excessive warnings.
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Luca Barbieri,
software+linux-kernel-H2s9xCTXMMqQBB8Stu2aiw
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16506
Subject : 2.6.35.0 compilation errors and excessive warnings.
Submitter : <software+linux-kernel-H2s9xCTXMMqQBB8Stu2aiw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-08-04 01:06 (26 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16525] unexpected high load since 2.6.35
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, MadLoisae
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16525
Subject : unexpected high load since 2.6.35
Submitter : MadLoisae@gmx.net <MadLoisae@gmx.net>
Date : 2010-08-02 20:53 (28 days old)
Message-ID : <4C573041.1070103@gmx.net>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128078243726655&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16515] Radeon rv280 can't boot on kernel 2.6.35.
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Albert Gall, Alex Deucher
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16515
Subject : Radeon rv280 can't boot on kernel 2.6.35.
Submitter : Albert Gall <ss3vdr@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-04 16:10 (26 days old)
Handled-By : Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16515] Radeon rv280 can't boot on kernel 2.6.35.
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Albert Gall, Alex Deucher
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16515
Subject : Radeon rv280 can't boot on kernel 2.6.35.
Submitter : Albert Gall <ss3vdr-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-08-04 16:10 (26 days old)
Handled-By : Alex Deucher <alexdeucher-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16515] Radeon rv280 can't boot on kernel 2.6.35.
2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2010-09-01 19:42 ` Johan Kullstam
2010-09-01 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 111+ messages in thread
From: Johan Kullstam @ 2010-09-01 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16515
> Subject : Radeon rv280 can't boot on kernel 2.6.35.
> Submitter : Albert Gall <ss3vdr@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-08-04 16:10 (26 days old)
> Handled-By : Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
This bug was introduced with 2.6.35-rc1 and continues through
2.6.36-rc3. It is still a bug. I cannot boot with modeset=1 on DVI
port (not sure about VGA port status).
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Johan KULLSTAM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16515] Radeon rv280 can't boot on kernel 2.6.35.
2010-09-01 19:42 ` Johan Kullstam
@ 2010-09-01 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-01 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johan Kullstam; +Cc: linux-kernel, Alex Deucher, DRI
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010, Johan Kullstam wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16515
> > Subject : Radeon rv280 can't boot on kernel 2.6.35.
> > Submitter : Albert Gall <ss3vdr@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-08-04 16:10 (26 days old)
> > Handled-By : Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
>
> This bug was introduced with 2.6.35-rc1 and continues through
> 2.6.36-rc3. It is still a bug. I cannot boot with modeset=1 on DVI
> port (not sure about VGA port status).
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16562] 2.6.35: cpu_idle bug report / on i7 870 cpu (x86_64)
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin Piszcz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16562
Subject : 2.6.35: cpu_idle bug report / on i7 870 cpu (x86_64)
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date : 2010-08-06 22:09 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008061800530.5241@p34.internal.lan>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128113260904048&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16562] 2.6.35: cpu_idle bug report / on i7 870 cpu (x86_64)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Justin Piszcz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16562
Subject : 2.6.35: cpu_idle bug report / on i7 870 cpu (x86_64)
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-08-06 22:09 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008061800530.5241-0qmrozcXWo8bm2hyYBkBBg@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128113260904048&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16613] i8042 kernel module failed to load after unloading
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-30 5:13 ` Victor Seryodkin
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Seryodkin Victor
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16613
Subject : i8042 kernel module failed to load after unloading
Submitter : Seryodkin Victor <vvscore@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-17 17:01 (13 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #16613] i8042 kernel module failed to load after unloading
2010-08-29 23:13 ` [Bug #16613] i8042 kernel module failed to load after unloading Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-30 5:13 ` Victor Seryodkin
2010-08-30 9:34 ` Florian Mickler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 111+ messages in thread
From: Victor Seryodkin @ 2010-08-30 5:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
Verifying: the bug is still actual
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16613
> Subject : i8042 kernel module failed to load after unloading
> Submitter : Seryodkin Victor <vvscore@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-08-17 17:01 (13 days old)
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16613] i8042 kernel module failed to load after unloading
@ 2010-08-30 9:34 ` Florian Mickler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Florian Mickler @ 2010-08-30 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Victor Seryodkin
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:13:04 +0400
Victor Seryodkin <vvscore@gmail.com> wrote:
> Verifying: the bug is still actual
>
I updated the bugzilla entry accordingly.
Thx,
Flo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16613] i8042 kernel module failed to load after unloading
@ 2010-08-30 9:34 ` Florian Mickler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Florian Mickler @ 2010-08-30 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Victor Seryodkin
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:13:04 +0400
Victor Seryodkin <vvscore-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Verifying: the bug is still actual
>
I updated the bugzilla entry accordingly.
Thx,
Flo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16537] TREE_RCU hangs at boot
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-30 8:08 ` Rolf Eike Beer
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Rolf Eike Beer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16537
Subject : TREE_RCU hangs at boot
Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
Date : 2010-08-07 12:18 (23 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16549] 2.6.35: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Vladislav Bolkhovitin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16549
Subject : 2.6.35: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage
Submitter : Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>
Date : 2010-08-04 10:56 (26 days old)
Message-ID : <4C594740.1090608@vlnb.net>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128091938215177&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16536] audio stop playing after while
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, okias
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16536
Subject : audio stop playing after while
Submitter : okias <d.okias@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-07 11:00 (23 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16633] ath5k + 2.6.35 x86 + hostapd - Failed to set channel
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, NiTr0
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16633
Subject : ath5k + 2.6.35 x86 + hostapd - Failed to set channel
Submitter : NiTr0 <nitr0@seti.kr.ua>
Date : 2010-08-19 19:37 (11 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #16620] [REGRESSION 2.6.35+] crash (maybe kmemleak related)
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Maxim Levitsky
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16620
Subject : [REGRESSION 2.6.35+] crash (maybe kmemleak related)
Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-12 20:37 (18 days old)
Message-ID : <1281645464.3893.25.camel@maxim-laptop>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128164549415081&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16614] [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa004fbc5>] [<ffffffffa004fbc5>] em28xx_isoc_copy_vbi+0x62e/0x812 [em28xx]
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Sander Eikelenboom
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16614
Subject : [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa004fbc5>] [<ffffffffa004fbc5>] em28xx_isoc_copy_vbi+0x62e/0x812 [em28xx]
Submitter : Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Date : 2010-08-10 22:12 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <61936849.20100811001257@eikelenboom.it>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128152075830927&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16614] [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa004fbc5>] [<ffffffffa004fbc5>] em28xx_isoc_copy_vbi+0x62e/0x812 [em28xx]
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Sander Eikelenboom
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16614
Subject : [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa004fbc5>] [<ffffffffa004fbc5>] em28xx_isoc_copy_vbi+0x62e/0x812 [em28xx]
Submitter : Sander Eikelenboom <linux-6SM94LqRVpn6gRhOQ7JHfg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-08-10 22:12 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <61936849.20100811001257-6SM94LqRVpn6gRhOQ7JHfg@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128152075830927&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16771] [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, KOSAKI Motohiro, M. Vefa Bicakci
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@superonline.com>
Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
Message-ID : <4C677A49.4030904@superonline.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16771] [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, KOSAKI Motohiro, M. Vefa Bicakci
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave-qUEp0r/b3FNfOZc0+OmrVg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
Message-ID : <4C677A49.4030904-qUEp0r/b3FNfOZc0+OmrVg@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16771] [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystemcauses hibernationto hang
2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2010-08-31 14:40 ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2010-08-31 20:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 111+ messages in thread
From: M. Vefa Bicakci @ 2010-08-31 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
KOSAKI Motohiro
On 30/08/10 02:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
> Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
> Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@superonline.com>
> Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
> Message-ID : <4C677A49.4030904@superonline.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
>
Dear Rafael Wysocki,
This regression still exists in 2.6.35.4. (I haven't tested 2.6.36-rcX
series.) Kosaki Motohiro has kindly helped me with this issue and found
a fix for the regression. Today I have successfully tested his patch,
but I don't know whether the patch needs to be further refined and tested.
Regards,
M. Vefa Bicakci
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16771] [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystemcauses hibernationto hang
@ 2010-08-31 20:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-31 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: M. Vefa Bicakci
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
KOSAKI Motohiro
On Tuesday, August 31, 2010, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
> On 30/08/10 02:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
> > Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
> > Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@superonline.com>
> > Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
> > Message-ID : <4C677A49.4030904@superonline.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
> >
>
> Dear Rafael Wysocki,
>
> This regression still exists in 2.6.35.4. (I haven't tested 2.6.36-rcX
> series.) Kosaki Motohiro has kindly helped me with this issue and found
> a fix for the regression. Today I have successfully tested his patch,
> but I don't know whether the patch needs to be further refined and tested.
Thanks for the information. Do you have a pointer to the patch?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16771] [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystemcauses hibernationto hang
@ 2010-08-31 20:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-31 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: M. Vefa Bicakci
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
KOSAKI Motohiro
On Tuesday, August 31, 2010, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
> On 30/08/10 02:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
> > Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
> > Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave-qUEp0r/b3FNfOZc0+OmrVg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
> > Message-ID : <4C677A49.4030904-qUEp0r/b3FNfOZc0+OmrVg@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
> >
>
> Dear Rafael Wysocki,
>
> This regression still exists in 2.6.35.4. (I haven't tested 2.6.36-rcX
> series.) Kosaki Motohiro has kindly helped me with this issue and found
> a fix for the regression. Today I have successfully tested his patch,
> but I don't know whether the patch needs to be further refined and tested.
Thanks for the information. Do you have a pointer to the patch?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16771] [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystemcauses hibernationto hang
@ 2010-09-01 1:28 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2010-09-01 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: kosaki.motohiro, M. Vefa Bicakci, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
> On Tuesday, August 31, 2010, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
> > On 30/08/10 02:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
> > > Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
> > > Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@superonline.com>
> > > Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
> > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
> > > Message-ID : <4C677A49.4030904@superonline.com>
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
> > >
> >
> > Dear Rafael Wysocki,
> >
> > This regression still exists in 2.6.35.4. (I haven't tested 2.6.36-rcX
> > series.) Kosaki Motohiro has kindly helped me with this issue and found
> > a fix for the regression. Today I have successfully tested his patch,
> > but I don't know whether the patch needs to be further refined and tested.
>
> Thanks for the information. Do you have a pointer to the patch?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/31/429
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16771] [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystemcauses hibernationto hang
@ 2010-09-01 1:28 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2010-09-01 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: kosaki.motohiro-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A, M. Vefa Bicakci,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
> On Tuesday, August 31, 2010, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
> > On 30/08/10 02:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
> > > Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
> > > Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave-qUEp0r/b3FNfOZc0+OmrVg@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
> > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
> > > Message-ID : <4C677A49.4030904-qUEp0r/b3FNfOZc0+OmrVg@public.gmane.org>
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
> > >
> >
> > Dear Rafael Wysocki,
> >
> > This regression still exists in 2.6.35.4. (I haven't tested 2.6.36-rcX
> > series.) Kosaki Motohiro has kindly helped me with this issue and found
> > a fix for the regression. Today I have successfully tested his patch,
> > but I don't know whether the patch needs to be further refined and tested.
>
> Thanks for the information. Do you have a pointer to the patch?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/31/429
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16771] [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystemcauses hibernationto hang
@ 2010-09-01 19:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-01 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: M. Vefa Bicakci, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Maciej Rutecki
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 31, 2010, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
> > > On 30/08/10 02:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> > > >
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
> > > > Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
> > > > Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@superonline.com>
> > > > Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
> > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
> > > > Message-ID : <4C677A49.4030904@superonline.com>
> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
> > > >
> > >
> > > Dear Rafael Wysocki,
> > >
> > > This regression still exists in 2.6.35.4. (I haven't tested 2.6.36-rcX
> > > series.) Kosaki Motohiro has kindly helped me with this issue and found
> > > a fix for the regression. Today I have successfully tested his patch,
> > > but I don't know whether the patch needs to be further refined and tested.
> >
> > Thanks for the information. Do you have a pointer to the patch?
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/31/429
Thanks, I updated the bug entry with the patch information.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16771] [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystemcauses hibernationto hang
@ 2010-09-01 19:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-09-01 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: M. Vefa Bicakci, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Maciej Rutecki
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 31, 2010, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
> > > On 30/08/10 02:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> > > >
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
> > > > Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
> > > > Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave-qUEp0r/b3FNfOZc0+OmrVg@public.gmane.org>
> > > > Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
> > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
> > > > Message-ID : <4C677A49.4030904-qUEp0r/b3FNfOZc0+OmrVg@public.gmane.org>
> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
> > > >
> > >
> > > Dear Rafael Wysocki,
> > >
> > > This regression still exists in 2.6.35.4. (I haven't tested 2.6.36-rcX
> > > series.) Kosaki Motohiro has kindly helped me with this issue and found
> > > a fix for the regression. Today I have successfully tested his patch,
> > > but I don't know whether the patch needs to be further refined and tested.
> >
> > Thanks for the information. Do you have a pointer to the patch?
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/31/429
Thanks, I updated the bug entry with the patch information.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16691] IPW5100: iwlagn broken with 2.6.34.x to 2.6.35.2 update
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (36 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Can Celasun
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16691
Subject : IPW5100: iwlagn broken with 2.6.34.x to 2.6.35.2 update
Submitter : Can Celasun <dcelasun@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-08-21 08:28 (9 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread* [Bug #17071] possible esata regression in 2.6.35
2010-08-29 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-08-29 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 111+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-08-29 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Nicolas Jungers
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17071
Subject : possible esata regression in 2.6.35
Submitter : Nicolas Jungers <nicolas@jungers.net>
Date : 2010-08-21 18:52 (9 days old)
Message-ID : <4C702070.5020809@jungers.net>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128241685406276&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 111+ messages in thread