All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bluetooth-2.6] Bluetooth: Fix inconsistent lock state with RFCOMM
@ 2010-09-04  9:16 Gustavo F. Padovan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Gustavo F. Padovan @ 2010-09-04  9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-bluetooth; +Cc: marcel, Gustavo F. Padovan

From: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>

When receiving a rfcomm connection with the old dund deamon a
inconsistent lock state happens. That's because interrupts were already
disabled by l2cap_conn_start() when rfcomm_sk_state_change() try to lock
the spin_lock.

As result we may have a inconsistent lock state for l2cap_conn_start()
after rfcomm_sk_state_change() calls bh_lock_sock() and disable interrupts
as well.

[ 2833.151999]
[ 2833.151999] =================================
[ 2833.151999] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
[ 2833.151999] 2.6.36-rc3 #2
[ 2833.151999] ---------------------------------
[ 2833.151999] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[ 2833.151999] krfcommd/2306 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
[ 2833.151999]  (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffffa00bcb56>] rfcomm_sk_state_change+0x46/0x170 [rfcomm]
[ 2833.151999] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff81094346>] __lock_acquire+0x5b6/0x1560
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff8109534a>] lock_acquire+0x5a/0x70
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff81392b6c>] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffffa00a5092>] l2cap_conn_start+0x92/0x640 [l2cap]
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffffa00a6a3f>] l2cap_sig_channel+0x6bf/0x1320 [l2cap]
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffffa00a9173>] l2cap_recv_frame+0x133/0x770 [l2cap]
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffffa00a997b>] l2cap_recv_acldata+0x1cb/0x390 [l2cap]
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffffa000db4b>] hci_rx_task+0x2ab/0x450 [bluetooth]
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff8106b22b>] tasklet_action+0xcb/0xe0
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff8106b91e>] __do_softirq+0xae/0x150
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff8102bc0c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff8102ddb5>] do_softirq+0x75/0xb0
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff8106b56d>] irq_exit+0x8d/0xa0
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff8104484b>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6b/0xa0
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff8102b6d3>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff81029dfa>] cpu_idle+0x5a/0xb0
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff81381ded>] rest_init+0xad/0xc0
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff817ebc4d>] start_kernel+0x2dd/0x2e8
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff817eb2e6>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xf6/0xfa
[ 2833.151999]   [<ffffffff817eb3ce>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xe4/0xeb
[ 2833.151999] irq event stamp: 731
[ 2833.151999] hardirqs last  enabled at (731): [<ffffffff8106b762>] local_bh_enable_ip+0x82/0xe0
[ 2833.151999] hardirqs last disabled at (729): [<ffffffff8106b93e>] __do_softirq+0xce/0x150
[ 2833.151999] softirqs last  enabled at (730): [<ffffffff8106b96e>] __do_softirq+0xfe/0x150
[ 2833.151999] softirqs last disabled at (711): [<ffffffff8102bc0c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[ 2833.151999]
[ 2833.151999] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 2833.151999] 2 locks held by krfcommd/2306:
[ 2833.151999]  #0:  (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00bb744>] rfcomm_run+0x174/0xb20 [rfcomm]
[ 2833.151999]  #1:  (&(&d->lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00b9223>] rfcomm_dlc_accept+0x53/0x100 [rfcomm]
[ 2833.151999]
[ 2833.151999] stack backtrace:
[ 2833.151999] Pid: 2306, comm: krfcommd Tainted: G        W   2.6.36-rc3 #2
[ 2833.151999] Call Trace:
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff810928e1>] print_usage_bug+0x171/0x180
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff810936c3>] mark_lock+0x333/0x400
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff810943ca>] __lock_acquire+0x63a/0x1560
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff810948b5>] ? __lock_acquire+0xb25/0x1560
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff8109534a>] lock_acquire+0x5a/0x70
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffffa00bcb56>] ? rfcomm_sk_state_change+0x46/0x170 [rfcomm]
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff81392b6c>] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffffa00bcb56>] ? rfcomm_sk_state_change+0x46/0x170 [rfcomm]
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffffa00bcb56>] rfcomm_sk_state_change+0x46/0x170 [rfcomm]
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffffa00b9239>] rfcomm_dlc_accept+0x69/0x100 [rfcomm]
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffffa00b9a49>] rfcomm_check_accept+0x59/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffffa00bacab>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x9fb/0x1320 [rfcomm]
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff813932bb>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3b/0x60
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff81093acd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff81093b1d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffffa00bb7f1>] rfcomm_run+0x221/0xb20 [rfcomm]
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff813905e7>] ? schedule+0x287/0x780
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffffa00bb5d0>] ? rfcomm_run+0x0/0xb20 [rfcomm]
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff81081026>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff8102bb14>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff813936bc>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff81080f90>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
[ 2833.151999]  [<ffffffff8102bb10>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10

Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
---
 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c |    4 ++++
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
index 44a6232..194b3a0 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
@@ -82,11 +82,14 @@ static void rfcomm_sk_data_ready(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, struct sk_buff *skb)
 static void rfcomm_sk_state_change(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, int err)
 {
 	struct sock *sk = d->owner, *parent;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
 	if (!sk)
 		return;
 
 	BT_DBG("dlc %p state %ld err %d", d, d->state, err);
 
+	local_irq_save(flags);
 	bh_lock_sock(sk);
 
 	if (err)
@@ -108,6 +111,7 @@ static void rfcomm_sk_state_change(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, int err)
 	}
 
 	bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	if (parent && sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED)) {
 		/* We have to drop DLC lock here, otherwise
-- 
1.7.1.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-09-04  9:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-04  9:16 [PATCH bluetooth-2.6] Bluetooth: Fix inconsistent lock state with RFCOMM Gustavo F. Padovan

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.