* [U-Boot] [PATCHv2] pca953x: support 16-pin devices
@ 2010-12-07 22:00 Chris Packham
2010-12-09 0:08 ` Peter Tyser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Packham @ 2010-12-07 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
This adds support for for the PCA9535/PCA9539 family of gpio devices which
have 16 output pins.
To let the driver know which devices are 16-pin it is necessary to define
CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH in your board config file. This is used to
create an array of {chip, ngpio} tuples that are used to determine the
width of a particular chip. For backwards compatibility it is assumed that
any chip not defined in CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH has 8 pins.
---
As suggested by Peter I've implemented the 16-pin support in the existing
pca953x driver. So this is pretty much a re-write of the v1 patch. Is the commit
message sufficient to document CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH or is
there something under doc/ that I should be adding to.
drivers/gpio/pca953x.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c
index 6e82bd6..491b79e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@
*/
/*
- * Driver for NXP's 4 and 8 bit I2C gpio expanders (eg pca9537, pca9557, etc)
- * TODO: support additional devices with more than 8-bits GPIO
+ * Driver for NXP's 4, 8 and 16 bit I2C gpio expanders (eg pca9537, pca9557,
+ * pca9539, etc)
*/
#include <common.h>
@@ -38,22 +38,78 @@ enum {
PCA953X_CMD_INVERT,
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH
+struct chip_ngpio {
+ uint8_t chip;
+ uint8_t ngpio;
+};
+
+static struct chip_ngpio chip_ngpios[] = CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH;
+#define NUM_CHIP_GPIOS (sizeof(chip_ngpios) / sizeof(struct chip_ngpio))
+
+/*
+ * Determine the number of GPIO pins supported. If we don't know we assume
+ * 8 pins.
+ */
+static int ngpio(uint8_t chip)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHIP_GPIOS; i++) {
+ if (chip_ngpios[i].chip == chip)
+ return chip_ngpios[i].ngpio;
+ }
+ return 8;
+}
+#else
+#define ngpio(chip) 8
+#endif
+
/*
* Modify masked bits in register
*/
static int pca953x_reg_write(uint8_t chip, uint addr, uint mask, uint data)
{
- uint8_t val;
+ uint8_t valb;
+ uint16_t valw;
- if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &val, 1))
- return -1;
+ if (ngpio(chip) <= 8) {
+ if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1))
+ return -1;
+
+ valb &= ~mask;
+ valb |= data;
+
+ return i2c_write(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1);
+ } else {
+ if (i2c_read(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2))
+ return -1;
+
+ valw &= ~mask;
+ valw |= data;
+
+ return i2c_write(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2);
+ }
+}
- val &= ~mask;
- val |= data;
+static int pca953x_reg_read(uint8_t chip, uint addr, uint *data)
+{
+ uint8_t valb;
+ uint16_t valw;
- return i2c_write(chip, addr, 1, &val, 1);
+ if (ngpio(chip) <= 8) {
+ if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1))
+ return -1;
+ *data = (int) valb;
+ } else {
+ if (i2c_read(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2))
+ return -1;
+ *data = (int) valw;
+ }
+ return 0;
}
+
/*
* Set output value of IO pins in 'mask' to corresponding value in 'data'
* 0 = low, 1 = high
@@ -86,9 +142,9 @@ int pca953x_set_dir(uint8_t chip, uint mask, uint data)
*/
int pca953x_get_val(uint8_t chip)
{
- uint8_t val;
+ uint val;
- if (i2c_read(chip, 0, 1, &val, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_IN, &val) < 0)
return -1;
return (int)val;
@@ -102,37 +158,44 @@ int pca953x_get_val(uint8_t chip)
static int pca953x_info(uint8_t chip)
{
int i;
- uint8_t data;
+ uint data;
+ int nr_gpio = ngpio(chip);
+ int msb = nr_gpio - 1;
- printf("pca953x@ 0x%x:\n\n", chip);
- printf("gpio pins: 76543210\n");
+ printf("pca953x@ 0x%x (%d pins):\n\n", chip, nr_gpio);
+ printf("gpio pins: ");
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
+ printf("%x",i);
+ printf("\n");
+ if (nr_gpio > 8)
+ printf("--------");
printf("-------------------\n");
- if (i2c_read(chip, PCA953X_CONF, 1, &data, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_CONF, &data) < 0)
return -1;
printf("conf: ");
- for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--)
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
printf("%c", data & (1 << i) ? 'i' : 'o');
printf("\n");
- if (i2c_read(chip, PCA953X_POL, 1, &data, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_POL, &data) < 0)
return -1;
printf("invert: ");
- for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--)
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
printf("%c", data & (1 << i) ? '1' : '0');
printf("\n");
- if (i2c_read(chip, PCA953X_IN, 1, &data, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_IN, &data) < 0)
return -1;
printf("input: ");
- for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--)
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
printf("%c", data & (1 << i) ? '1' : '0');
printf("\n");
- if (i2c_read(chip, PCA953X_OUT, 1, &data, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_OUT, &data) < 0)
return -1;
printf("output: ");
- for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--)
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
printf("%c", data & (1 << i) ? '1' : '0');
printf("\n");
--
1.7.3.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCHv2] pca953x: support 16-pin devices
2010-12-07 22:00 [U-Boot] [PATCHv2] pca953x: support 16-pin devices Chris Packham
@ 2010-12-09 0:08 ` Peter Tyser
2010-12-09 4:40 ` Chris Packham
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Peter Tyser @ 2010-12-09 0:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
The patch looks good. I had a few minor nitpicky style comments below:
> As suggested by Peter I've implemented the 16-pin support in the existing
> pca953x driver. So this is pretty much a re-write of the v1 patch. Is the commit
> message sufficient to document CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH or is
> there something under doc/ that I should be adding to.
You could add a brief description to the top-level README file. There
is currently a bit of info in the "GPIO Support" section that could be
added to.
> #include <common.h>
> @@ -38,22 +38,78 @@ enum {
> PCA953X_CMD_INVERT,
> };
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH
> +struct chip_ngpio {
> + uint8_t chip;
> + uint8_t ngpio;
> +};
Since this structure is 953x-specific I'd rename chip_ngpio
pca953x_chip_ngpio to clarify its a driver-specific structure and to
prevent the (unlikely) name collision down the road.
The same comment applies to ngpio()->pca953x_ngpio(),
chip_ngpios[]->pca953x_chip_ngpios[].
> +static struct chip_ngpio chip_ngpios[] = CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH;
> +#define NUM_CHIP_GPIOS (sizeof(chip_ngpios) / sizeof(struct chip_ngpio))
> +
> +/*
> + * Determine the number of GPIO pins supported. If we don't know we assume
> + * 8 pins.
> + */
> +static int ngpio(uint8_t chip)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHIP_GPIOS; i++) {
> + if (chip_ngpios[i].chip == chip)
> + return chip_ngpios[i].ngpio;
> + }
I'd remove the for loop braces above per the Linux CodingStyle
documentation that U-Boot adheres to.
There should also be an empty line above the "return 8" below.
> + return 8;
> +}
> +#else
> +#define ngpio(chip) 8
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Modify masked bits in register
> */
> static int pca953x_reg_write(uint8_t chip, uint addr, uint mask, uint data)
> {
> - uint8_t val;
> + uint8_t valb;
> + uint16_t valw;
I'd remove one of the spaces between "valb" above. My understanding is
spaces shouldn't be used for such vertical alignment.
>
> - if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &val, 1))
> - return -1;
> + if (ngpio(chip) <= 8) {
> + if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1))
> + return -1;
> +
> + valb &= ~mask;
> + valb |= data;
> +
> + return i2c_write(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1);
> + } else {
> + if (i2c_read(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2))
> + return -1;
> +
> + valw &= ~mask;
> + valw |= data;
> +
> + return i2c_write(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2);
> + }
> +}
>
> - val &= ~mask;
> - val |= data;
> +static int pca953x_reg_read(uint8_t chip, uint addr, uint *data)
> +{
> + uint8_t valb;
> + uint16_t valw;
>
> - return i2c_write(chip, addr, 1, &val, 1);
> + if (ngpio(chip) <= 8) {
> + if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1))
> + return -1;
> + *data = (int) valb;
The space in "(int) valb" should be removed. Same below.
> + } else {
> + if (i2c_read(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2))
> + return -1;
> + *data = (int) valw;
> + }
> + return 0;
> }
<snip>
> + for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
> + printf("%x",i);
> + printf("\n");
> + if (nr_gpio > 8)
> + printf("--------");
> printf("-------------------\n");
What about changing the printing of '-'s to a for loop like
for (i = 19 + nr_gpio; i >0; i++)
puts("-");
I'll give the next iteration of the patch a shot, it looks like it
should work just fine.
Best,
Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCHv2] pca953x: support 16-pin devices
2010-12-09 0:08 ` Peter Tyser
@ 2010-12-09 4:40 ` Chris Packham
2010-12-09 9:11 ` [U-Boot] [PATCHv3] " Chris Packham
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Packham @ 2010-12-09 4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com> wrote:
> The patch looks good. ?I had a few minor nitpicky style comments below:
>
>> As suggested by Peter I've implemented the 16-pin support in the existing
>> pca953x driver. So this is pretty much a re-write of the v1 patch. Is the commit
>> message sufficient to document CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH or is
>> there something under doc/ that I should be adding to.
>
> You could add a brief description to the top-level README file. ?There
> is currently a bit of info in the "GPIO Support" section that could be
> added to.
>
>> ?#include <common.h>
>> @@ -38,22 +38,78 @@ enum {
>> ? ? ? PCA953X_CMD_INVERT,
>> ?};
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH
>> +struct chip_ngpio {
>> + ? ? uint8_t chip;
>> + ? ? uint8_t ngpio;
>> +};
>
> Since this structure is 953x-specific I'd rename chip_ngpio
> pca953x_chip_ngpio to clarify its a driver-specific structure and to
> prevent the (unlikely) name collision down the road.
>
> The same comment applies to ngpio()->pca953x_ngpio(),
> chip_ngpios[]->pca953x_chip_ngpios[].
>
>> +static struct chip_ngpio chip_ngpios[] = CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH;
>> +#define NUM_CHIP_GPIOS (sizeof(chip_ngpios) / sizeof(struct chip_ngpio))
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Determine the number of GPIO pins supported. If we don't know we assume
>> + * 8 pins.
>> + */
>> +static int ngpio(uint8_t chip)
>> +{
>> + ? ? int i;
>> +
>> + ? ? for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHIP_GPIOS; i++) {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (chip_ngpios[i].chip == chip)
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return chip_ngpios[i].ngpio;
>> + ? ? }
>
> I'd remove the for loop braces above per the Linux CodingStyle
> documentation that U-Boot adheres to.
>
> There should also be an empty line above the "return 8" below.
>
>> + ? ? return 8;
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +#define ngpio(chip) ?8
>> +#endif
>> +
>> ?/*
>> ? * Modify masked bits in register
>> ? */
>> ?static int pca953x_reg_write(uint8_t chip, uint addr, uint mask, uint data)
>> ?{
>> - ? ? uint8_t val;
>> + ? ? uint8_t ?valb;
>> + ? ? uint16_t valw;
>
> I'd remove one of the spaces between "valb" above. ?My understanding is
> spaces shouldn't be used for such vertical alignment.
>
>>
>> - ? ? if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &val, 1))
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? return -1;
>> + ? ? if (ngpio(chip) <= 8) {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1))
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -1;
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? valb &= ~mask;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? valb |= data;
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? return i2c_write(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1);
>> + ? ? } else {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (i2c_read(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2))
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -1;
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? valw &= ~mask;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? valw |= data;
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? return i2c_write(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2);
>> + ? ? }
>> +}
>>
>> - ? ? val &= ~mask;
>> - ? ? val |= data;
>> +static int pca953x_reg_read(uint8_t chip, uint addr, uint *data)
>> +{
>> + ? ? uint8_t ?valb;
>> + ? ? uint16_t valw;
>>
>> - ? ? return i2c_write(chip, addr, 1, &val, 1);
>> + ? ? if (ngpio(chip) <= 8) {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1))
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -1;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? *data = (int) valb;
>
> The space in "(int) valb" should be removed. ?Same below.
>
>> + ? ? } else {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (i2c_read(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2))
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -1;
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? *data = (int) valw;
>> + ? ? }
>> + ? ? return 0;
>> ?}
>
> <snip>
>
>> + ? ? for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? printf("%x",i);
>> + ? ? printf("\n");
>> + ? ? if (nr_gpio > 8)
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? printf("--------");
>> ? ? ? printf("-------------------\n");
>
> What about changing the printing of '-'s to a for loop like
> for (i = 19 + nr_gpio; i >0; i++)
> ? ? ? ?puts("-");
>
> I'll give the next iteration of the patch a shot, it looks like it
> should work just fine.
>
> Best,
> Peter
>
Hi Peter,
I'll try and get an updated patch through as soon as I can. I'm on a
training course today and tomorrow but it won't take me long to make
the changes you've suggested once I find some time.
Thanks,
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCHv3] pca953x: support 16-pin devices
2010-12-09 4:40 ` Chris Packham
@ 2010-12-09 9:11 ` Chris Packham
2010-12-09 17:08 ` Peter Tyser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Packham @ 2010-12-09 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
This adds support for for the PCA9535/PCA9539 family of gpio devices which
have 16 output pins.
To let the driver know which devices are 16-pin it is necessary to define
CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH in your board config file. This is used to
create an array of {chip, ngpio} tuples that are used to determine the
width of a particular chip. For backwards compatibility it is assumed that
any chip not defined in CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH has 8 pins.
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
---
Changes since v2:
- I've addressed Peters style comments.
- I've added a blurb to README describing the new config option
README | 4 ++
drivers/gpio/pca953x.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README b/README
index 68f5fb0..831c5af 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -746,6 +746,10 @@ The following options need to be configured:
CONFIG_PCA953X - use NXP's PCA953X series I2C GPIO
CONFIG_PCA953X_INFO - enable pca953x info command
+ The CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH option specifies a list of
+ chip-ngpio pairs that tell the PCA953X driver the number of
+ pins supported by a particular chip.
+
Note that if the GPIO device uses I2C, then the I2C interface
must also be configured. See I2C Support, below.
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c
index 6e82bd6..c8f5403 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@
*/
/*
- * Driver for NXP's 4 and 8 bit I2C gpio expanders (eg pca9537, pca9557, etc)
- * TODO: support additional devices with more than 8-bits GPIO
+ * Driver for NXP's 4, 8 and 16 bit I2C gpio expanders (eg pca9537, pca9557,
+ * pca9539, etc)
*/
#include <common.h>
@@ -38,20 +38,78 @@ enum {
PCA953X_CMD_INVERT,
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH
+struct pca953x_chip_ngpio {
+ uint8_t chip;
+ uint8_t ngpio;
+};
+
+static struct pca953x_chip_ngpio pca953x_chip_ngpios[] =
+ CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH;
+
+#define NUM_CHIP_GPIOS (sizeof(pca953x_chip_ngpios) / \
+ sizeof(struct pca953x_chip_ngpio))
+
+/*
+ * Determine the number of GPIO pins supported. If we don't know we assume
+ * 8 pins.
+ */
+static int pca953x_ngpio(uint8_t chip)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHIP_GPIOS; i++)
+ if (pca953x_chip_ngpios[i].chip == chip)
+ return pca953x_chip_ngpios[i].ngpio;
+
+ return 8;
+}
+#else
+#define pca953x_ngpio(chip) 8
+#endif
+
/*
* Modify masked bits in register
*/
static int pca953x_reg_write(uint8_t chip, uint addr, uint mask, uint data)
{
- uint8_t val;
+ uint8_t valb;
+ uint16_t valw;
- if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &val, 1))
- return -1;
+ if (pca953x_ngpio(chip) <= 8) {
+ if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1))
+ return -1;
+
+ valb &= ~mask;
+ valb |= data;
+
+ return i2c_write(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1);
+ } else {
+ if (i2c_read(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2))
+ return -1;
+
+ valw &= ~mask;
+ valw |= data;
+
+ return i2c_write(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2);
+ }
+}
- val &= ~mask;
- val |= data;
+static int pca953x_reg_read(uint8_t chip, uint addr, uint *data)
+{
+ uint8_t valb;
+ uint16_t valw;
- return i2c_write(chip, addr, 1, &val, 1);
+ if (pca953x_ngpio(chip) <= 8) {
+ if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1))
+ return -1;
+ *data = (int)valb;
+ } else {
+ if (i2c_read(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2))
+ return -1;
+ *data = (int)valw;
+ }
+ return 0;
}
/*
@@ -86,9 +144,9 @@ int pca953x_set_dir(uint8_t chip, uint mask, uint data)
*/
int pca953x_get_val(uint8_t chip)
{
- uint8_t val;
+ uint val;
- if (i2c_read(chip, 0, 1, &val, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_IN, &val) < 0)
return -1;
return (int)val;
@@ -102,37 +160,44 @@ int pca953x_get_val(uint8_t chip)
static int pca953x_info(uint8_t chip)
{
int i;
- uint8_t data;
+ uint data;
+ int nr_gpio = pca953x_ngpio(chip);
+ int msb = nr_gpio - 1;
- printf("pca953x@ 0x%x:\n\n", chip);
- printf("gpio pins: 76543210\n");
- printf("-------------------\n");
+ printf("pca953x@ 0x%x (%d pins):\n\n", chip, nr_gpio);
+ printf("gpio pins: ");
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
+ printf("%x", i);
+ printf("\n");
+ for (i = 11 + nr_gpio; i > 0; i--)
+ printf("-");
+ printf("\n");
- if (i2c_read(chip, PCA953X_CONF, 1, &data, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_CONF, &data) < 0)
return -1;
printf("conf: ");
- for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--)
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
printf("%c", data & (1 << i) ? 'i' : 'o');
printf("\n");
- if (i2c_read(chip, PCA953X_POL, 1, &data, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_POL, &data) < 0)
return -1;
printf("invert: ");
- for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--)
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
printf("%c", data & (1 << i) ? '1' : '0');
printf("\n");
- if (i2c_read(chip, PCA953X_IN, 1, &data, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_IN, &data) < 0)
return -1;
printf("input: ");
- for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--)
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
printf("%c", data & (1 << i) ? '1' : '0');
printf("\n");
- if (i2c_read(chip, PCA953X_OUT, 1, &data, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_OUT, &data) < 0)
return -1;
printf("output: ");
- for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--)
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
printf("%c", data & (1 << i) ? '1' : '0');
printf("\n");
--
1.7.3.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCHv3] pca953x: support 16-pin devices
2010-12-09 9:11 ` [U-Boot] [PATCHv3] " Chris Packham
@ 2010-12-09 17:08 ` Peter Tyser
2010-12-15 2:49 ` Chris Packham
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Peter Tyser @ 2010-12-09 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 22:11 +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> This adds support for for the PCA9535/PCA9539 family of gpio devices which
> have 16 output pins.
>
> To let the driver know which devices are 16-pin it is necessary to define
> CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH in your board config file. This is used to
> create an array of {chip, ngpio} tuples that are used to determine the
> width of a particular chip. For backwards compatibility it is assumed that
> any chip not defined in CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH has 8 pins.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Looks good to me and works as advertised.
Acked-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
Tested-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCHv3] pca953x: support 16-pin devices
2010-12-09 17:08 ` Peter Tyser
@ 2010-12-15 2:49 ` Chris Packham
2010-12-18 23:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Packham @ 2010-12-15 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 22:11 +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
>> This adds support for for the PCA9535/PCA9539 family of gpio devices which
>> have 16 output pins.
>>
>> To let the driver know which devices are 16-pin it is necessary to define
>> CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH in your board config file. This is used to
>> create an array of {chip, ngpio} tuples that are used to determine the
>> width of a particular chip. For backwards compatibility it is assumed that
>> any chip not defined in CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH has 8 pins.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
>
> Looks good to me and works as advertised.
>
> Acked-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
> Tested-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
>
There is one minor fixup we might want to squash into v3 (or if
someone wants me to submit a v4 I can). It makes sense to have
pca953x_ngpio as a function in both cases. The compiler will
auto-inline the function so we won't see a increase in size and having
a function instead of a macro allows the compiler to do proper type
checking.
---8<---
From: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:44:17 +1300
Subject: [PATCH] fixup! pca953x: support 16-pin devices
---
drivers/gpio/pca953x.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c
index c8f5403..359fdee 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c
@@ -65,7 +65,10 @@ static int pca953x_ngpio(uint8_t chip)
return 8;
}
#else
-#define pca953x_ngpio(chip) 8
+static int pca953x_ngpio(uint8_t chip)
+{
+ return 8;
+}
#endif
/*
--
1.7.3.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCHv3] pca953x: support 16-pin devices
2010-12-15 2:49 ` Chris Packham
@ 2010-12-18 23:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-19 20:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCHv4] " Chris Packham
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2010-12-18 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Chris Packham,
In message <AANLkTi=UrUVinO-Px-yc+7OfskODJADD_QpgRYDRHYxm@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> There is one minor fixup we might want to squash into v3 (or if
> someone wants me to submit a v4 I can). It makes sense to have
> pca953x_ngpio as a function in both cases. The compiler will
> auto-inline the function so we won't see a increase in size and having
> a function instead of a macro allows the compiler to do proper type
> checking.
Please send a v4. Thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"I've seen it. It's rubbish." - Marvin the Paranoid Android
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCHv4] pca953x: support 16-pin devices
2010-12-18 23:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2010-12-19 20:12 ` Chris Packham
2011-01-10 7:02 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot,PATCHv4] " Heiko Schocher
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Packham @ 2010-12-19 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
This adds support for for the PCA9535/PCA9539 family of gpio devices which
have 16 output pins.
To let the driver know which devices are 16-pin it is necessary to define
CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH in your board config file. This is used to
create an array of {chip, ngpio} tuples that are used to determine the
width of a particular chip. For backwards compatibility it is assumed that
any chip not defined in CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH has 8 pins.
Acked-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
Tested-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
---
Changes since v3:
- pca953x_ngpio is now a function in all cases.
- Added Peter's ACK to the commit message.
README | 4 ++
drivers/gpio/pca953x.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README b/README
index 68f5fb0..831c5af 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -746,6 +746,10 @@ The following options need to be configured:
CONFIG_PCA953X - use NXP's PCA953X series I2C GPIO
CONFIG_PCA953X_INFO - enable pca953x info command
+ The CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH option specifies a list of
+ chip-ngpio pairs that tell the PCA953X driver the number of
+ pins supported by a particular chip.
+
Note that if the GPIO device uses I2C, then the I2C interface
must also be configured. See I2C Support, below.
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c
index 6e82bd6..359fdee 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/pca953x.c
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@
*/
/*
- * Driver for NXP's 4 and 8 bit I2C gpio expanders (eg pca9537, pca9557, etc)
- * TODO: support additional devices with more than 8-bits GPIO
+ * Driver for NXP's 4, 8 and 16 bit I2C gpio expanders (eg pca9537, pca9557,
+ * pca9539, etc)
*/
#include <common.h>
@@ -38,20 +38,81 @@ enum {
PCA953X_CMD_INVERT,
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH
+struct pca953x_chip_ngpio {
+ uint8_t chip;
+ uint8_t ngpio;
+};
+
+static struct pca953x_chip_ngpio pca953x_chip_ngpios[] =
+ CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH;
+
+#define NUM_CHIP_GPIOS (sizeof(pca953x_chip_ngpios) / \
+ sizeof(struct pca953x_chip_ngpio))
+
+/*
+ * Determine the number of GPIO pins supported. If we don't know we assume
+ * 8 pins.
+ */
+static int pca953x_ngpio(uint8_t chip)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHIP_GPIOS; i++)
+ if (pca953x_chip_ngpios[i].chip == chip)
+ return pca953x_chip_ngpios[i].ngpio;
+
+ return 8;
+}
+#else
+static int pca953x_ngpio(uint8_t chip)
+{
+ return 8;
+}
+#endif
+
/*
* Modify masked bits in register
*/
static int pca953x_reg_write(uint8_t chip, uint addr, uint mask, uint data)
{
- uint8_t val;
+ uint8_t valb;
+ uint16_t valw;
- if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &val, 1))
- return -1;
+ if (pca953x_ngpio(chip) <= 8) {
+ if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1))
+ return -1;
+
+ valb &= ~mask;
+ valb |= data;
+
+ return i2c_write(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1);
+ } else {
+ if (i2c_read(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2))
+ return -1;
- val &= ~mask;
- val |= data;
+ valw &= ~mask;
+ valw |= data;
- return i2c_write(chip, addr, 1, &val, 1);
+ return i2c_write(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2);
+ }
+}
+
+static int pca953x_reg_read(uint8_t chip, uint addr, uint *data)
+{
+ uint8_t valb;
+ uint16_t valw;
+
+ if (pca953x_ngpio(chip) <= 8) {
+ if (i2c_read(chip, addr, 1, &valb, 1))
+ return -1;
+ *data = (int)valb;
+ } else {
+ if (i2c_read(chip, addr << 1, 1, (u8*)&valw, 2))
+ return -1;
+ *data = (int)valw;
+ }
+ return 0;
}
/*
@@ -86,9 +147,9 @@ int pca953x_set_dir(uint8_t chip, uint mask, uint data)
*/
int pca953x_get_val(uint8_t chip)
{
- uint8_t val;
+ uint val;
- if (i2c_read(chip, 0, 1, &val, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_IN, &val) < 0)
return -1;
return (int)val;
@@ -102,37 +163,44 @@ int pca953x_get_val(uint8_t chip)
static int pca953x_info(uint8_t chip)
{
int i;
- uint8_t data;
+ uint data;
+ int nr_gpio = pca953x_ngpio(chip);
+ int msb = nr_gpio - 1;
- printf("pca953x@ 0x%x:\n\n", chip);
- printf("gpio pins: 76543210\n");
- printf("-------------------\n");
+ printf("pca953x@ 0x%x (%d pins):\n\n", chip, nr_gpio);
+ printf("gpio pins: ");
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
+ printf("%x", i);
+ printf("\n");
+ for (i = 11 + nr_gpio; i > 0; i--)
+ printf("-");
+ printf("\n");
- if (i2c_read(chip, PCA953X_CONF, 1, &data, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_CONF, &data) < 0)
return -1;
printf("conf: ");
- for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--)
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
printf("%c", data & (1 << i) ? 'i' : 'o');
printf("\n");
- if (i2c_read(chip, PCA953X_POL, 1, &data, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_POL, &data) < 0)
return -1;
printf("invert: ");
- for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--)
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
printf("%c", data & (1 << i) ? '1' : '0');
printf("\n");
- if (i2c_read(chip, PCA953X_IN, 1, &data, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_IN, &data) < 0)
return -1;
printf("input: ");
- for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--)
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
printf("%c", data & (1 << i) ? '1' : '0');
printf("\n");
- if (i2c_read(chip, PCA953X_OUT, 1, &data, 1))
+ if (pca953x_reg_read(chip, PCA953X_OUT, &data) < 0)
return -1;
printf("output: ");
- for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--)
+ for (i = msb; i >= 0; i--)
printf("%c", data & (1 << i) ? '1' : '0');
printf("\n");
--
1.7.3.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [U-Boot,PATCHv4] pca953x: support 16-pin devices
2010-12-19 20:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCHv4] " Chris Packham
@ 2011-01-10 7:02 ` Heiko Schocher
2011-01-13 4:02 ` Chris Packham
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Schocher @ 2011-01-10 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hello Chris,
Sorry for the late reply, but just looked in patchwork and found that
I am responsible for your patch, so ...
Chris Packham wrote:
> This adds support for for the PCA9535/PCA9539 family of gpio devices which
> have 16 output pins.
>
> To let the driver know which devices are 16-pin it is necessary to define
> CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH in your board config file. This is used to
> create an array of {chip, ngpio} tuples that are used to determine the
> width of a particular chip. For backwards compatibility it is assumed that
> any chip not defined in CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH has 8 pins.
>
> Acked-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
> Tested-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> - pca953x_ngpio is now a function in all cases.
> - Added Peter's ACK to the commit message.
>
> README | 4 ++
> drivers/gpio/pca953x.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Compiles with actual u-boot the xpedite* boards, so added to
u-boot-i2c.git
Thanks!
bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [U-Boot,PATCHv4] pca953x: support 16-pin devices
2011-01-10 7:02 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot,PATCHv4] " Heiko Schocher
@ 2011-01-13 4:02 ` Chris Packham
2011-01-13 6:08 ` Peter Tyser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Packham @ 2011-01-13 4:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Sorry for the late reply, but just looked in patchwork and found that
> I am responsible for your patch, so ...
>
> Chris Packham wrote:
>> This adds support for for the PCA9535/PCA9539 family of gpio devices which
>> have 16 output pins.
>>
>> To let the driver know which devices are 16-pin it is necessary to define
>> CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH in your board config file. This is used to
>> create an array of {chip, ngpio} tuples that are used to determine the
>> width of a particular chip. For backwards compatibility it is assumed that
>> any chip not defined in CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH has 8 pins.
>>
>> Acked-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
>> Tested-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
>>
>> ---
>> Changes since v3:
>> - pca953x_ngpio is now a function in all cases.
>> - Added Peter's ACK to the commit message.
>>
>> ?README ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?4 ++
>> ?drivers/gpio/pca953x.c | ?114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> ?2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> Compiles with actual u-boot the xpedite* boards, so added to
> u-boot-i2c.git
>
> Thanks!
>
> bye,
> Heiko
Thanks I was about to poke the mailing list to find out where things
had got to. Did I miss something on
http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Patches that says look <here> list for
a custodian and CC them?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [U-Boot,PATCHv4] pca953x: support 16-pin devices
2011-01-13 4:02 ` Chris Packham
@ 2011-01-13 6:08 ` Peter Tyser
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Peter Tyser @ 2011-01-13 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 17:02 +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> wrote:
> > Hello Chris,
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply, but just looked in patchwork and found that
> > I am responsible for your patch, so ...
> >
> > Chris Packham wrote:
> >> This adds support for for the PCA9535/PCA9539 family of gpio devices which
> >> have 16 output pins.
> >>
> >> To let the driver know which devices are 16-pin it is necessary to define
> >> CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH in your board config file. This is used to
> >> create an array of {chip, ngpio} tuples that are used to determine the
> >> width of a particular chip. For backwards compatibility it is assumed that
> >> any chip not defined in CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH has 8 pins.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
> >> Tested-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Changes since v3:
> >> - pca953x_ngpio is now a function in all cases.
> >> - Added Peter's ACK to the commit message.
> >>
> >> README | 4 ++
> >> drivers/gpio/pca953x.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >> 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > Compiles with actual u-boot the xpedite* boards, so added to
> > u-boot-i2c.git
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > bye,
> > Heiko
>
> Thanks I was about to poke the mailing list to find out where things
> had got to. Did I miss something on
> http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Patches that says look <here> list for
> a custodian and CC them?
There's a list of custodians at
http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Custodians , but your GPIO driver doesn't
really fall neatly into any one of their areas of responsibility, so
it'd be tough to know who to CC. I added a comment to
http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Patches to mention that appropriate
maintainers should be CC-ed, as well as people who might be familiar
with the change based on past commits for what its worth.
Best,
Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-13 6:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-07 22:00 [U-Boot] [PATCHv2] pca953x: support 16-pin devices Chris Packham
2010-12-09 0:08 ` Peter Tyser
2010-12-09 4:40 ` Chris Packham
2010-12-09 9:11 ` [U-Boot] [PATCHv3] " Chris Packham
2010-12-09 17:08 ` Peter Tyser
2010-12-15 2:49 ` Chris Packham
2010-12-18 23:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-12-19 20:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCHv4] " Chris Packham
2011-01-10 7:02 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot,PATCHv4] " Heiko Schocher
2011-01-13 4:02 ` Chris Packham
2011-01-13 6:08 ` Peter Tyser
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.